Test Plans PDF
Contents
1. CEFE 114 a ow gt Thts test wa run at a tangential velocity of the bolt head of 2215 ymin Bs fur at targetial velcoty of the bolt gt of 2309 66 inj The average tengential velocity of the brake during the worst case scenario ts 2115 Thir tect ic a cuceece The average groove depth st 12600 cyries was 0 021 in ren is desgned for 15500 cycles S seu cman at 179 ROM w 8200 cycles k MH minwtos dotined as a groove depth of O25 before 12500 OPE TH AJL Tiel 4 Dero at Pai Loe in Tirri e L nan pom int int Loe HOt apl 01 BURS 2080 HATE This Ged wan tun a a laa welissty ol ae Bead j of JLLS kyi This beit hi a deiina The overage prosee depth 1000 epeled was WON ba VI RESULTS Comparison of Groove Test Depths P Test1 Test 2 ATest 3 Average Groove Depth in Time min VII MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED N A VIII CONCLUSION The groove depth at 13 500 cycles 5 sailing seasons was 0 116in This shows the plywood can withstand the braking mechanism for the duration of the device s use2. 17 TP17 Comfort Test Team Test Location Concluded Condition renee Sa a TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number _ Risk Level Marginal Value Target Value ll EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Completed Jib Transfer System Ideally would like the device installed in a Sonar However testing is possible as long as the device is properly secured to allow a user to place their weight on the seat S26 lil DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Specification Number Data Acquisition Strategy This survey of comfort will evaluate whether the device can accommodate multiple users If a wide audience is surveyed and a large percentage find the seat comfortable then the specification has been met IV TESTING FLOWCHART Ask for volunteers to sit in the device and rate their relative comfort on a scale of 1 10 Record the results and analyze the data V RAW DATA ACQUISITION VI RESULTS VII MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED If there are volunteers who do not find the device comfortable the team will solicit their feedback on what would increase their comfort These suggestions will be considered for potential small scale design changes VIII CONCLUSION The seat is installed to the seat plate so the person building the device can pick a seat that best suits their needs Test Plan 18 TP18 Plywood Base Lifetime Back to P14031 Test Plan Summary Test Team Matt Brunelle Mike Kennedy Test Locatio
3. Test Team Test Location Test Date I TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Risk Level Specification Marginal Value Target Value Comments Status Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Specification Number Equipment or Instrumentation required Testing Conditions Jib Transfer System needs to be installed into the Sonar If a Sonar is not available for testing then the device needs to be secured in position so that it is able to ungergo testing Sonar Sailboat Weights up to a combined 265 Ibs Tape Measure S15 IlI DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Determining the weight capacity of the system is a key piece of information that needs to be included in the instructional manual If the specification is met then the S15 device is able to accommodate a wide range of users IV TESTING FLOWCHART Gather the Set the jib transfer Place 50 Ibs onto instrumentation and system up in the the seat s center materials needed Sonar Sailboat wait 2 minutes V RAW DATA ACQUISITION ANSYS simulation shows device will fail at 260 Ibs The team cannot test the device to failure but knows that it can hold at least 215 Ibs VI RESULTS VII MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED VIII CONCLUSION The device is able to accommodate a range of users given that it can hold at least 215 Ibs most likely more given ANSYS analysis measure the deflection Back to P14031 Test Plan Summary Place 50 more Ibs onto the seat
4. chosen with corrosion resistant properties WN e N s3 S5 S6 S12 S16 lt a O gt a 2 V re gt 2 7 2 m m o m o If there are electonic components in the BOM at completion a note needs to be added to the instructional information that the device does not comply with sailing racing regulations The jib transfer system will not be allowed for the user in a race WN w If there are Sonar modifications required during installation a note needs to be added to the instructional information that the device does not comply with sailing racing regulations The jib transfer system will not be allowed for the user in a race If the device is permanently installed into the Sonar and not able to be removed a note needs to be added to the instructional information that the device does not comply with sailing racing regulations The jib transfer system will not be allowed for the user in a race No mitigation action needed All specifications for TP 3 are satisfied op Wn Wn uw S12 S16 lt o e 2 O r 4 ie 2 Test Plan 4 TP 4 Distance between bench and device seat Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number _ Risk Level Marginal Value Target Value ll EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Completed base of system built PVC chair needs to be assembled but NOT glued together Sonar
5. OLLECTION STRATEGY The distance that the user is able to move to from the centerline is important because the user needs to be able to maintain the appropriate weight distribution Jib S19 Trimmers who do not need assistive devices are able to place themselves past the bench seats seating themselves on the edge of the Sonar If the specification is met then the jim trimmer in the device will be able to provide sufficient weight distribution IV TESTING FLOWCHART subtract 1 2 the Place a piece of Position the jib Place a piece of measure the depth of the Gather required masking tape at transfer system masking tape on horizontal device seat to instrumentation the centerline of position over the bench at the distance between obtain the for testing the sonar as a bench in locked back of the device these two pieces distance in reference position seat of tape relation to the center of the seat Repeat with the device over the other Sonar bench V RAW DATA ACQUISITION VI RESULTS 23 distance between centerline and back of seat when positioned over the bench VII MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED N A VIII CONCLUSION The jib trimmer can provide sufficient weight distribution while using the device Test Plan 13 TP13 Degrees of Rotation from Centerline Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition Test Date 4 23 14 TESTING SPECIFICATION Specificat
6. S3 LIZ olulnfululw n n SIS ClolN a a as Nie WN WN NIV e e e he oO oa PIW WN me N WN me o0 VNV Ne O O NIVU NIN NTR S23 Nn N g Nn N Sg NJU NIN NIO Metric Specification User reach distance to jib lines Does design only contain mechanical parts Distance between existing bench and seat Is fixture permanently fastened to boat y m P14031 Test Plan Summary Sonar Sailing Test Plan Concluded Condition TP1 po Bee No Number of potential pinch points count User s unobstructed field of view compared to no device use 8 53 100 Does the user have the option to secure their limbs Does design require boat modification Time to get into seat Time to get out of seat Weight capacity sec in i m Device displacement from secured position i in in m m Are all components chosen for corrosion resistant properties yes no Time to install device in Sonar m Number of installation steps 45 Vertical distance between seat and boom Number of parts requiring specialized equipment to manufacture TEE m Max horizontal distance from boat centerline Degrees of rotation degrees m Number of custom parts used in design custom parts cannot be purchased off the shelf in a store or online Time to remove device from Sonar Number of steps to uninstall device of users who find seat comfortable Depth of plywood groove after 13500 rotations 5
7. Sailboat Tape Measure S4 lil DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Specification Number Data Acquisition Strategy The jib transfer system will comply with ISAF IFDS Regulations if the vertical distance between the existign Sonar bench seat and the jib transfer system seat is less than a 200mm Complying with these regulations allows for the device to be used in competitive sailing This test determines compliance with the ISAF IFDS Regulations IV TESTING FLOWCHART Measure the distance between the top of the Sonar bench and the bottom of the jib transfer chair Position the jib transfer system position over bench in locked position Gather required i Record the distance in mm instrumentation for testing To verify the measurement also complete the following Place the jib transfer system MHGRELITE Une neat Men Record the measurement in Subtract the height of the the flat surface to the on a flat surface n E SiGe oes mm bench mm V RESULTS Measurement from Sonar s existing bench seat to the top of the device s seat where the user is seated is 6 VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED If the height between the existing bench and the device seat is gt 200mm then the team will not glue the PVC chair together The team will re evaluate the design to modify the height of the PVC chair If this is not possible the device will still function but will not comply with the ISAF IFDS Racing Regulations If the dev
8. device use II EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Equipment or Instrumentation required Testing Conditions 510 Complete jib transfer system Ideally want to test under sailing conditions but it is possible to test with device Sonar Sailboat in a secure position lll DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY IV TESTING PROCEDURE Data Acquisition Strategy By obtaining the user s estimated unobstructed field of view the team will be able to determine if the device inhibts the user s ability to see their surroundings The jib trimmer is often the eyes of the boat and needs to be able to see as much as possible of their field of view 7 Have user sit on the Position the jib transfer Have the user sit in the Estimate the of field of system position over device seat and note what bench in locked position is in their field of vision Gather required instrumentation and materials for testing view that is unobstructed while in the jib transfer system seat existing bench of the Sonar and note what is in their field of view This is a subjective test and needs to be brainstormed further to see if another test is more suitable or if the metric for the function needs to be changed V RESULTS 100 field of view is unobstructed the user can see the same field of view they would have without the device VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED N A VII CONCLUSION The user has the same field of view they would have without t
9. e video s frames Gather required Set up the video transfer system Record the a Apply a force to to determine instrumentation camera for data position over h h distance in i collection bench in locked euer a ee inches for testing e displacement of position the seat Testing procedure for displacement of the device base Observce the position Position the jib a of the jib transfer Gather required transfer system Note Lye paion eh Have the user swing system s base after Record the distance instrumentation for position over bench i VTS eh to the other side the swing and any in inches testing in locked position SVGGS MS DEBE displacement from sliding V RESULTS The device displaces 0 50 0 75 from it s initial secured position VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED If the device moves gt 2 inches then the team will re evaluate the design of the securing mechanism finding a way to secure the device to the Sonar more effectively VII CONCLUSION The device is secure in the Sonar and is safe for use Test Plan 7 TP 7 Pinch Points Back to P14031 Test Plan Summary Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition Test Date 4 23 14 I TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Risk Level Specification Marginal Value Target Value Comments Status II EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Specification Number Equipment or Instrumentation required Testing Conditio
10. e and in the instruction manual In addition the team will evaluate any minor design changes that could reduce this hazard VII CONCLUSION Most users should not have to worry about the hitting their head on the boom as they transfer The user should still be aware of what is going on around them to ensure they are not injured while swinging between port and starboard Test Plan 15 TP15 Custom Parts Manufacturing Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition I TESTING acceso Lic Specification Value EE Value Comments Status Number of parts requiring specialized equipment to oon a p q amp sP ee Testing will occur periodically throughout the build manufacture l phase As parts are built notes will be taken on the Number of custom parts used in design custom parts en number of manufacturing processes and equipment cannot be purchased off the shelf in a store or online used Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Equipment Instrumentation Material required Testing Conditions Completed Jib Transfer System None S24 None None ltl DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Data Acquisition Strategy The number of parts requiring specilized equipment to manufacture will relate to the ease of assembly repdroduction and cost As the number increases these customer S23 needs are less likely to be satisfied S24 Count number of parts that requ
11. ed in the boat By proving that the jib transfer system is removable from the Sonar the design will comply with this regulation Complying with these regulations allows for the device to be used in competitive sailing This test determines compliance with the ISAF IFDS Regulations oa The purpose of this test is to confirm the device allows the user to secure their lower limbs which they may not have full control of If the user has the option to secure their legs to the base then the specification is met S16 IV TESTING PROCEDURE s3 When the device is complete check the BOM for electronic components If there are none the specification has been met S5 When the device is installed into the Sonar verify the installation process does not require any modifications to the Sonar If there a no modifications the specification has been met S6 At the completion of TP16 the jib transfer system will be removed from the Sonar The specification has been met when the device is removed from the Sonar 512 After the device is installed in the Sonar have a user sit in the seat and place their legs on the base between the 2 PVC legs Using an Ace Bandage see if the users legs are able to be secured between the PVC leg supports Record the result S16 When the components are purchased ensure only the corrosion resitant material components are bought If these materials are used the specification has been met V RESULTS All hardware components
12. em user will swing to the Record the time in position over bench other side time this seconds in locked position motion Repeat the time measurement 10 times total Gather required instrumentation for testing V RESULTS The device was tested at a 15 degree heel angle and the results show approximately 3 second transfer time VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED N A VII CONCLUSION The user will be able to transfer between port and starboard in an appropriate amount of time in order to maintain weight distribution Test Plan 2 TP2 Reach Distance to Jib Lines Back to P14031 Test Plan Summary Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Risk Level Marginal Value _ Target Value User reach distance to jib lines Cannot complete test until device is fully built Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Completed Jib Transfer System None Test can be completed while Sonar is out of water Sonar Sailboat Tape Measure Ill DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Measuring the maximum distance from the seat to the jib lines will allow the team to conclude that the jib system allows the user to reach the existing jib lines We want the distance the user has to reach in order to hold the jib lines to be comfortable and not cause an excessive strain on their body IV TESTING FLOWCHART ae N Unlock the seat Position t
13. he jib Measure the Again measure and swing to the Gather required transfer system distance from the aN the distance to l i Record the starboard side she instrumentation position over edge of the seat the jib lines and ki it a for testing port side bench in to the jib lines on elenae Un Tans Pattee record the locked position the bulkhead distance in inches bench V RAW DATA ACQUISITION Port side locked position Starboard locked position VI RESULTS The distance for the user to access the jib lines is the same from both port and starboard locked positions at 19 VII MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED If the jib lines are not accessible by the user then the team can consider two options 1 Moving the device more forward in the boat if possible 2 bringing the jib lines to the user by building another subsystem into the jib transfer system that feeds the existing jib lines within the user s reach VIII CONCLUSION No mitigation action needed The user is able to reach the jib lines from both port and starboard locked positions Test Plan 3 TP3 Yes No Questions Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition Test Date 4 23 14 C ee I TESTING SPECIFICATION Spec Risk Level Specification Marginal Value Target Value Comments Status 3 LOW __ Does design only contain mechanical parts O Able to prove concurrently with TP16 when the system i
14. he use of the device gt 100 of the user s field of view is unobstructed The user may actually have an advantage because they are positioned 6 higher than if no device was used Test Plan 9 TP9 Getting into out of the device Concluded Condition Back to P14031 Test Plan Summary Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Test Date 4 23 14 I TESTING SPECIFICATION S13 low Timetogetintoseat min S Psi4 LOW Time to get out ofseat min SS Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Equipment Instrumentation Material required Testing Conditions Completed Jib Transfer System S13 Sonar Sailboat Stopwatch Completed Jib Transfer System S14 Sonar Sailboat Stopwatch lil DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Spec Data Acquisition Strategy S13 Test under real sailing conditions while on the water in order to obtain most accurate measurements If these conditions are not available then it is possible to complete the test while stationary test will not consider the reduce stability of the Sonar while it is in the water or in a hoist device A lengthy process to set the user up in the seat may be discourgaing and take away the freedom associated with sailing S14 stop using the device A lengthy process to get the user out of the seat may be discourgaing IV TESTING FLOWCHART Gather required S13 instrumentation for testing Gather required S14 instrume
15. ice does not comply with the racing regulations a note needs to be added to the instructional information VII CONCLUSION The device complies with the ISAF IFDS Regulations of being lt 200mm 7 87 inches Complying with this regulation allows the assistive device to be used in competitive sailing Test Plan 5 TP 5 Weight of Jib Transfer System Back to P14031 Test Plan Summary Test Team M Brunelle K Wurman Test Location College of Engineering Machine Shop Concluded Condition Test Date 4 28 14 I TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Risk Level Marginal Value Target Value Comments Status Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Specification Number Equipment or Instrumentation required Testing Conditions Completed System Assembled N A 37 Scale Ig enough to place system on IlI DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Specification Number Data Acquisition Strategy Weighing the device will ensure that the customer requirement of lightweight has been met Since the volunteers at Piers Park are responsible for installing un installing the assitive devices the weight is an important factor If a device is too heavy then more volunteers are needed IV TESTING PROCEDURE When the device is completed bring it to the KGCOE Machine Shop Place the device on the scale and record weight to the nearest pound If the device is too large to place on the scale the base and seat will be weighed separately The indiidual components
16. ion Number _ Risk Level Marginal Value Target Value Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Completed Jib Transfer System Device needs to be installed in the Sonar however the Sonar does not need to Sonar Sailboat be in the water If a Sonar is not available for testing then the test can be Tape Measure conducted knowing the internal dimensions of the Sonar 45 cannot test until device is built S20 IlI DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY 20 Determining the degrees of rotation will allow the team to conclude that there is a large range of movement for the jib trimmer while using the assistive device IV TESTING FLOWCHART Repeat the measurement with the seat secured on the other side of the Sonar Position the jib measure the transfer system maximum angle of Record the angle in position over bench rotation from the degrees in locked position initial seat centerline Gather required instrumentation for testing VI RESULTS Device can swing 90 degrees from the centerline of the boat VII MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED N A VIII CONCLUSION There is a large range of motion for the jib trimmer while using the assistive device Test Plan 14 TP14 Boom and Head Collision Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition Test Date 4 23 14 TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Risk Level Specification Marginal Value Target Value C
17. ire more than 4 processes to manufacture IV TESTING PROCEDURE Count the numer of parts that require specialized equipment to manufacture specialized equipment is considered to be tools machinery that the average person would not S23 have in their posession S24 Count the number of parts that require more than 4 processes to manufacture V RESULTS S23 1 part S24 1 part VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED N A VII CONCLUSION The device only has one custom part that will need to be taken to a local machine shop for manufacturing The specifications for TP15 are met Test Plan 16 TP16 Un installation Back to P14031 Test Plan Summary Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition I TESTING SPECICATION Value m Low Time to remove Time to remove device from Sonar from Sonar Testing Testing should occur after TP11 is complete occur after TP11 is Testing should occur after TP11 is complete Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Equipment Instrumentation Material required Testing Conditions Completed Jib Transfer System Testing should occur while the Sonar is docked on the water or in a hoist in order to Sonar Sailboat represent real installation conditions The volunteers used for testing will have limited to Volunteers no knowledge of the device to represent the volunteers at Piers Park who may have no existing knowledge N
18. n ME Machine Shop Test Outcome Test Date 2 11 14 oO I TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Risk Level Specification Units Marginal Value Target Value Comments Status Testing will be done by applying a constant load to the plywood S27 MED Depth of plywood groove after 13500 rotations 5 years in 0 23 0 10 test sample with the lathe running to estimate lifetime of the plywood under braking Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Specification Number Equipment or Instrumentation required Testing Conditions Plywood test sample Plywood sample must be secured in chuck so it will not move relative to the S27 Lathe with with four jaw chuck chuck during the test lli DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Specification Number _ Data Acquisition Strategy 27 Time and lathe speed will be measured to estimate usage lifetime IV TESTING FLOWCHART Apply load to cross slide handle to provide a constant pressure to the test sample and begin recording time Secure test sample in chuck Stop lathe and time measurment when a 1 4 inch groove has been cut into the plywwod sample Prepare lathe and chuck V RAW DATA ACQUISITION TEST 2 lest 2 Text i Depth at Peruri lei Tierer min F r MAG Danion Cite 0 Die EEE Looe ois oo a LEED fii oF mo Dae Pint Lore ned Ert oe Ta era foe fi hes p 0 M7 toe idi waai ii u Bir 118 pea 15 J DIW
19. ns Completed Jib Transfer System Device should be installed in the Sonar to accurately estimate pinch points in S9 Sonar Sailboat the real use environment IlI DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Specification Number Data Acquisition Strategy This ergonomic analysis will determine the relative safety of the device for the user and others in the boat based on the number of pinch points IV TESTING PROCEDURE After the jib transfer system is installed in the Sonar count the number of pinch points that pose a safety hazard to the user Develop countermeasures to reduce the severity or likeliood of injury from these pinch points Publish this information in the instruction manual V RESULTS Analysis shows no pinch points because the spring and all moving components are covered by the bases The addition of handles to the bottom base did create one trip hazard hazard for the user and the other people in the Sonar VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED N A VII CONCLUSION There is limited safety hazards for the user while using the device The one trip hazard created by the handles on the bottom base will be outlined as a warning in the user manual Test Plan 8 TP 8 Unobstructed View Back to P14031 Test Plan Summary Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition I TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Risk Level Marginal Value Target Value Comments Status I fi f no
20. ntation for testing V RESULTS Cannot complete test Position the jib transfer system position over bench in locked position Position user into the jib transfer system position over bench in locked position Have the user stand on the dock and board the Sonar Record the time in seconds it takes the user to get out of the seat and unboard the Sonar to the dock Record the time in seconds it takes for the user to board the Sonar and correctly position themselves in the device Repeat the time measurement 10 times total Conducting a time study will allow us to determine the time it takes to position a user into the seat The entry time is important because the user wants to be able to easily begin using the Conducting a time study will allow us to determine the time it takes to position a release themselves from the seat The exit time is important because the user wants to be able to easily Repeat the time measurement 10 times total VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED N A VII CONCLUSION The time it takes for the user to get in and out of the seat is fully dependent on the user s disabilities The test team is able to get in and out of the seat in lt lt 1 minute which meets the specification No testing was complete with disabled users however the team is confident that the user will be able to position themselves in the seat in the 2 Smin range Test Plan 10 TP 10 Weight Capacity
21. o evaluate the ease of installation IV TESTING FLOWCHART Repeat the time measurement 5 total times ideally using different volunteers for each test to elimintae learning curve effect Time how long it takes for the 2 volunteers to follow the instruction Record the time in in manual to properly minutes install the device in the Sonar Gather required Place all system S17 instrumentation for components on the testing dock next to the Sonar Count the number of steps in the completed installation manual and record the number V RESULTS VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED sia va VII CONCLUSION The device is easy to install requiring lt 5 minutes for 2 people to complete the installation process It is not possible to install the device with less than 2 people due to the size The instruction manual clearly states in 6 steps how to properly install the system into the Sonar Test Plan 12 TP 12 Max User Distance from Centerline Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition Test Date 4 23 14 TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Risk Level Marginal Value Target Value Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Completed Jib Transfer System The device needs to be properly installed in the Sonar but the Sonar does not Sonar Sailboat need to be on the water Masking Tape Measuring Tape S19 Ill DATA C
22. omments Status Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Specification Number Equipment or Instrumentation required Testing Conditions Completed Jib Transfer System Device needs to be installed in the Sonar and the boom needs to be positioned S21 Sonar Sailboat at its lowest point directly down the centerline of the sailboat Measuring Tape lil DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Specification Number Data Acquisition Strategy Determining the vertical distance between the device seat and boom will determine the likelihood that the user s head will come in contact with the boom If the specification is met then the user should not have to worry about the boom hitting their head S21 IV TESTING PROCEDURE Position the jib Gather required transfer system at the instrumentation for centerline of the testing Sonar this is not a locked position Position the boom to Measure the distance the minimum height from the top of the Record this distance at the centerline of device seat to the in inches the Sonar bottom of the boom V RESULTS Height between the seat top where the user sits and the boom is 34 5 VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED If there is not enough distance between the boom and the device seat there is a high probability that the boom will hit the user in the head This is a big safety concern In order to reduce the likelihood or severity of this hazard the team will need to incorporate warning labels on the devic
23. one a e ee Ill DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Data Acquisition Strategy Spec S24 Spec Conducting a time study with multiple users to obtain the average time it takes for two individuals to properly uninstall the device in the Sonar will allow the team to evaulate the ease of un installation a Determining the number of steps in the installation manual will allow the team to evaluate the ease of un installation IV TESTING FLOWCHART Position the jib Time how long it takes for the 2 transfer volunteers to follow the Repeat the time measurement 5 system instruction manual to properly un Record the total times position over install the device in the Sonar time in in ideally using different volunteers bench in completely removing the minutes for each test to elimintae learning locked components from the Sonar and curve effect position placing them on the dock Gather 524 required instrumentatio n for testing Count the number of steps in the completed installation manual for the process of removing the device from the Sonar and record the number V RESULTS VI MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED Vil CONCLUSION NTU The device is easy to un install requiring lt 5 minutes for 2 people to complete the process It is not possible to un install the device with less than 2 people due to the size The instruction manual clearly states in 6 steps how to properly remove the system from the Sonar Test Plan
24. s center wait 2 minutes Record the total weight on the system and the total deflection measure the deflection keep loading the seat every 2 minutes until the 220 265 range is met Test Plan 11 TP11 Installation of Jib Transfer System Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition l TESTING SERR EES anes Value as Value Low Time to Time to install device in Sonar device in Sonar es assumption is a device with a fewer number of steps will be easier for LOW Number of installation steps count the user to install in the sailboat Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Equipment Instrumentation Material required Testing Conditions Completed Jib Transfer System Testing should occur while the Sonar is docked on the water or in a hoist in order to Sonar Sailboat represent real installation conditions The volunteers used for testing will have limited to no S17 S Volunteers knowledge of the device to represent the volunteers at Piers Park who may have no existing knowledge None None S18 lll DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Data Acquisition Strategy S7 Conducting a time study with multiple users to obtain the average time it takes for two individuals to properly install the device in the Sonar will allow the team to evaulate the ease of installation S18 Determining the number of steps in the installation manual will allow the team t
25. s uninstalled from S6 LOW Is fixture permanently fastened to boat yes no No No P y y the Sonar Able to test concurrently with TP1 when the system is installed in the Sonar 516 LOW Are all coropunents chosen for corrosion resistant jasia properties Corrosion testing on components not needed because using SS aluminum and plastic These materials are known to be corrosion resistant ll EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Spec Equipment Instrumentation Material required Testing Conditions 3 Completed BOM N A None N A 6 None N A Completed Jib Transfer System Device needs to be stable to that the user can sit in the seat for testing 12 Ace Bandage S16 Completed BOM N A Ill DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Spec Data Acquisition Strategy 17a Wn S The jib transfer system will comply with ISAF IFDS Regulations if there are no electronic components Complying with these regulations allows for the device to be used in competitive sailing This test determines compliance with the ISAF IFDS Regulations 17a w The jib transfer system will comply with ISAF IFDS Regulations if the device does not require modification of the Sonar drilling into the boat cutting into the boat etc Complying with these regulations allows for the device to be used in competitive sailing This test determines compliance with the ISAF IFDS Regulations The jib transfer system will comply with ISAF IFDS Regulations if the device is not permanently install
26. will then be summed to obtain the overall system weight VI RESULTS Whole device fits on scale for measurement Total system weight is 51 Ibs VII MITIGATION PLAN IF NEEDED N A VIII CONCLUSION The device weight of 51 Ibs is significanly less than the previous project iteration With a total system weight of 51 Ibs two volunteers are needed to safely install and uninstall the device from the Sonar Test Plan 6 TP 6 Secure Device Fit in Sonar Test Team All Test Location Rochester Yacht Club device installed in Sonar Concluded Condition Test Date 4 23 14 TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Risk Level oN Marginal Value Target Value Comments Status Il EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS ss Specification Number Equipment or Instrumentation required Completed System Assembled Device needs to be secured in a Sonar The user will have a force applied to them in Sonar Sailboat order to measure the displacement of the system Tape Measure Video Camera lil DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Specification Number Data Acquisition Strategy S8 Testing Conditions S8 The purpose of the test is determine how secure the jib transfer system fits in the Sonar If the specification is met then the jib transfer systems was designed to the appropriate Sonar dimensions and fits securely in the sailboat IV TESTING FLOWCHART Testing procedure for displacement of user and seat Position the jib Fean th
27. years KEY TEST RESULTS Does not meet expectation Caution Undetermined if specification is met Meets specification in X X X X X X X X 3 sec 6 152 4 mm 1 Yes E O O a O i a a 215 Ibs ANSYS simulation shows failure at 300 Ibs but team could not test to device failure a Co steps a ee C ee ee pO tart ae 5 mi O O i T 025 i x Test Plan 1 TP1 Transfer time between port and starboard Test Team Test Location Test Date TESTING SPECIFICATION Specification Number Marginal Value Target Value ll EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS REQURIED Completed Jib Transfer System Sonar Sailboat Stopwatch Test under real sailing conditions while on the water in order to obtain most accurate measurements S1 on oe If these conditions are not available then it is possible to complete the test while stationary test will show device does rotate however will provide unreliable results for transfer time conclusion Ili DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY Specification Number Data Acquisition Strategy Conducting a time study will allow us to determine the time it takes to move the user between port and starboard The transfer time is important because the user needs to be able to switch sides relatively quickly to maintain the appropriate weight distribution S1 IV TESTING FLOWCHART Position user into the Before the tack the jib transfer syst
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search