Home

21219977A

Contents

1. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference ug m Figure 68 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM all test sites 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 174 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM2 5 Cologne Winter Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 69 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM s Cologne winter Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM2 5 Cologne Winter Raw data 100 _ gt _ ses 90 J 80 z 70 60 50 40 Candidate ug m 30 20 10 4 dt ft 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 70 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM s Cologne winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the A
2. Ratio PM2 5 PM10 Remark Zero point SN4 no data recording cause unknown Test site Cologne summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 228 of 300 Annex 5 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 Page 18 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m STD Serial No SN3 SN4 No Date Ratio SN3 SN 4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 PM10 PM10 g Nm Nm 181 6 15 2013 13 5 13 8 7 4 8 8 Cologne summer 182 6 16 2013 19 6 18 8 10 1 11 6 183 6 17 2013 25 5 24 2 16 4 18 4 184 6 18 2013 29 9 28 8 24 0 27 0 185 6 19 2013 51 9 49 8 45 5 51 1 Ref PM2 5 stability criteria 186 6 20 2013 15 4 14 3 16 2 18 2 EN 14907 not met 187 6 21 2013 9 0 8 9 7 2 8 0 188 6 22 2013 5 7 5 5 4 6 5 2 189 6 23 2013 8 2 8 1 5 9 6 8 190 6 24 2013 17 0 16 5 12 7 14 0 191 6 25 2013 11 6 12 8 8 6 9 8 192 6 26 2013 15 0 14 4 11 4 12 2 193 6 27 2013 15 1 14 3 12 1 13 4 194 6 28 20
3. 008 142 Results of flow rate CHECKS cccceeeeeccccceeeeeeeeeeeceeeeeceessaeeeseeeeesseaeeaeseeeeeess 145 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 9 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 35 Parameters for total flow measurement 24 h mean SN3 amp SN4 005 145 Table 36 Results from leakage testing ccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeenaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeteees 148 Table 37 Uncertainty between candidates ups for the devices SN3 and SN4 measured component PMa5 cccccceseccccceeecceeceeeceeseeeeceeseeaseeeseueesseeaesesseaaes 152 Table 38 Uncertainty between candidates u for the devices SN3 and SN4 measured component PM ccccceseecccceeeeseeeceeeeceeseeeeceeseseeeeseeeeessuaeeeeseaees 153 Table 39 Overview of equivalence test of APM 2 for PMo5 sssscccceeeeeeeaseeseeeeeeeess 165 Table 40 Overview of equivalence test of APM 2 for PM4o 0 sescccceeeeeeeesseeeeeeeeees 168 Table 41 Uncertainty between reference devices Uret for PMos5 ccccccceceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 172 Table 42 Uncertainty between reference devices Uret for PMj0 cccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 172 Table 43
4. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 73 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM s Cologne summer Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM2 5 Cologne Summer Raw data 100 a 90 nas 80 lt 70 60 ae 50 42 40 a Candidate yg m 4 dt ft 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 74 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM s Cologne summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 177 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM2 5 Rodenkirchen Summer Raw 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate ug m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 75 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM s5 Rodenkirchen summer Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM2 5 Rodenkirchen Summer Raw 100 s 90 a 80 Pead 70 te E 60 mea gt y ES a o 50 a se kej p Z 40 1
5. Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 83 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 2 6 Switch over Switch over between measurement and functional check and or calibration shall be possi ble telemetrically by computer contro or manual intervention 6 2 Equipment Not required here 6 3 Method The operator can monitor the AMS directly or via remote control A telemetric control is not yet implemented 6 4 Evaluation All operating procedures that do not require practical work on site can be monitored by the user directly or via telemetric remote control A telemetric control is not yet implemented 6 5 Assessment The measuring system can be monitored by the user directly or via remote control A tele metric control is not yet implemented but already planned for the future Performance criterion met no 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 84 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 2 7 Maintenance interval
6. 151 5 16 2013 Zero point Cologne summer 152 5 17 2013 i R 84 1 13 3 14 1 17 0 17 7 153 5 18 2013 13 0 13 7 15 2 16 6 154 5 19 2013 15 7 16 6 19 7 21 1 155 5 20 2013 79 2 8 6 9 0 11 1 11 7 156 5 21 2013 3 A i 72 0 6 0 6 4 7 6 8 0 157 5 22 2013 k i 51 3 6 4 7 1 9 8 10 6 158 5 23 2013 y 73 8 8 1 8 8 10 3 11 1 159 5 24 2013 4 k 66 8 8 5 10 1 SN4 no data recording 160 5 25 2013 9 8 12 4 cause 161 5 26 2013 i 50 8 9 1 13 1 unknown 162 5 27 2013 P 69 9 16 1 17 6 19 7 20 9 163 5 28 2013 5 E f 3 66 5 8 5 8 8 10 1 10 7 164 5 29 2013 7 4 7 7 9 2 9 7 165 5 30 2013 13 5 14 3 16 4 17 3 166 5 31 2013 13 5 14 3 16 9 18 5 167 6 1 2013 11 7 12 4 15 6 17 1 168 6 2 2013 A 45 0 6 1 6 4 8 3 9 1 169 6 3 2013 z 5 i A 50 9 7 8 8 4 10 5 11 8 170 6 4 2013 f k 53 0 10 4 10 6 13 5 14 5 171 6 5 2013 p 60 1 8 7 9 0 10 8 11 6 172 6 6 2013 64 1 9 8 9 9 12 0 12 7 173 6 7 2013 66 1 13 9 14 0 171 18 1 174 6 8 2013 13 6 14 4 17 4 19 0 175 6 9 2013 63 0 12 9 13 5 15 9 17 2 176 6 10 2013 55 0 16 7 17 9 22 2 24 6 177 6 11 2013 56 8 15 9 16 7 20 1 22 2 178 6 12 2013 A s 42 5 6 3 6 8 10 7 10 7 179 6 13 2013 i 45 5 4 4 4 9 6 8 Td 180 6 14 2013 5 55 0 5 7 6 3 7 5 8 8 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing
7. 3 1 1 Control Unit All the system settings are entered at the APM 2 control unit Fig 3 The unit has the following ele ments and functions e Main switch used to switch the unit on and off e Jog dial to select functions and to enter or change parameters e An illuminated graphic display showing system functions parameters data and alarms e SD memory card slot for automatic storage of sampling data and parameters and for updating the equipment firmware also for the filter changer unit APM 2 11 COMDE DERENDA Graphic display Slot for SD memory card 12 10 00 Friday 06 12 2013 Memory card status Serial Software Version 3 0 1 A COMDE interface DERENDA APM 2 Jog dial Manual Mode Measurement Mi SIM card i status Programming interface Slot for SIM card Power switch Fig 3 Control unit e Programming interface exclusively for programming purposes can not be used for data trans mission e Serial interface RS 232 for data transfer as per the Bayern Hessen Protokoll Bavaria Hesse protocol e Status indicator for the SD memory card Green Memory card is on standby Red Reading from or writing to the memory card Orange Firmware update being transferred to in ternal flash memory Dark No memory card installed e GSM GPRS module with SIM card slot for online data transmission via mobile phone network optional e Status indicator for the GSM GPRS module slow bli
8. For the zero point test particle free sampling air was applied to both measuring systems SN3 and SN4 by means of zero filters installed at the instrument inlets For the reference point test a measured signal was created and evaluated by offering pro pane to the photometer cell in order to test the stability of the sensitivity of both candidates SN3 and SN4 test gas method 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH P Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 99 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A The ambient temperature within the climatic chamber was altered in the sequence 20 C 20 C 20 C 50 C 20 C The measured values at zero point 3 x 24 h per temperature level and the measured values at reference point 3 x per temperature level were recorded after an equilibration period of 24 h per temperature level 6 4 Evaluation Zero point The measured concentration values obtained in the individual 24 hour measurements were collected and evaluated The absolute deviation in g m per temperature level in relation to the default temperature of 20 C is considered Reference value Bo 2 g m Reference point The measured value s change in percentage for each tem
9. Regression line 80 y x 70 60 50 Candidate 2 yg m 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 60 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM all test sites 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 159 of 300 Candidate 2 ug m 130 120 110 100 APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 Cologne Winter Raw data o Measured values Regression line o y x 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 61 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM o test site Cologne winter Candidate 2 ug m 130 120 110 100 a on oOo oOo O O OQ 40 APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 Bonn Winter Raw data Measured values Regression line y x 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9
10. 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 81 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM o Cologne winter Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM10 Cologne Winter Raw data 100 gt J Candidate yg m 50 60 70 80 90 Reference ug m Figure 82 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM1o Cologne winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 181 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM10 Bonn Winter Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 83 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM1o Bonn winter Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM10 Bonn Winter Raw data 100 gt J Candidate yg m 40 50 60 70 80 90 Reference ug m Figure 84 Reference dev
11. 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 10 of 300 Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Figure 21 Figure 22 Figure 23 Figure 24 Figure 25 Figure 26 Figure 27 Figure 28 Figure 29 Figure 30 Figure 31 Figure 32 Figure 33 Figure 34 Figure 35 Figure 36 Figure 37 Figure 38 Figure 39 Figure 40 Figure 41 Figure 42 Figure 43 Figure 44 Figure 45 Figure 46 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Operating principle of photometer unit cceeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeessesseeseeeeeeeeees 32 Operating principle of the virtual impactor eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeseeseeeeeeeees 33 Overview schematic Of APM 2 sssssesseseesseeeseseseessesesesseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 34 Overview on complete system APM 2 c cccccceeeeeeeeeenneeeeeeeeeeeeeenneeeeeeeeeeees 35 PM o sampling inlet for APM 2 cccccccccccceecceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeneees 36 Virtual impactor for APM 2 iic
12. Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 for suspended particulate matter PM1 gt and PM2 5 Manufacturer Comde Derenda GmbH Stahnsdorf Field of application Continuous and parallel measurement of the PMio and PM2 gt 5 fractions in ambient air station ary operation Measuring ranges during performance testing Component Certification range Unit PM PM25 0 1 000 0 1 000 g m g m Software version 3 0 1 Restriction None 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 20 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Notes qs The requirements according to the guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods are met for the measured components PMi und PM2 5 after applica tion of the determined correction factors terms The requirements on the equivalence test according to Standard EN 12341 1998 for PM have not been met by the candidates The long term drift of the sensitivity of the particle sensor could not be determined during the field test 4 The measuring system can be telemetrically monitored but not operated 5 The measuring system determines the PM 9 and the P
13. For PMio the maximum deviation at zero point was 1 5 yg m for in rela tion to the previous value and 2 7 yg m in relation to the start value and thus related to the start value outside of the permissible limit of Bo 2 yg m This deviation only occurred one time during the entire field test campaign a cause could not be de termined There was no externally triggered adjustment of the measuring device A regular external check of the sensi tivity over the field test period could not be carried out as suitable test equipment was not available before December 2013 As the devices have shown no drift effects during the per manent comparison with the standard reference method this circumstance should not be relevant for the as sessment of the measuring system especially as it is intended to com pletely abstain from this test point in future for type approval testing ac cording to EN TS 16450 9 Not applicable Not applicable T ii TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 27 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A Specification Test result Fulfilled 5 3 15 Difference be tween sample and calibration port 5 3 16 Converter effi ciency 5 3 17 Increase
14. N mM oO N oO q Figure 23 Course of PM concentrations reference at test site Cologne summer 100 90 E 80 E gt 70 T 60 50 e 40 a o 30 c e Oo 20 10 al mM m o mM lae mM lap lap gt gt z Q Q A S S S iN Q foe foe foe o gt o gt o gt Q S S Q Q S g Q lo Ko at O N oO N M oO N N a Figure 24 Course of PM concentrations reference at test site Rodenkirchen summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 57 of 300 Conc PM10 Ref in g m 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 13 01 2014 20 01 2014 27 01 2014 03 02 2014 10 02 2014 17 02 2014 24 02 2014 03 03 2014 Figure 25 Course of PM concentrations reference at test site Cologne winter 2014 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 58 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matt
15. Summary of the results of the equivalence test SN3 amp SN4 measured component PM 5 after correction Of SIOPE ccccsseeeseeseeeeeeeees 189 Table 44 Summary of the results of the equivalence test SN3 amp SN4 measured component PM after correction of slope intercept 191 Table 45 Results of equivalence test at test site Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PMoy 5 raw data cc ceceeeeeeeetteeeeeees 195 Table 46 Results of equivalence test at test site Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PMio raw data cccceseeeeeeeeceeeeeeeees 195 Table 47 Results of equivalence test at test site Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM2 5 slope corrected with 0 919 196 Table 48 Results of equivalence test at test site Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM slope corrected with 0 977 intercept corrected With 3 758 cccccccecceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaeeaeeeeeeeeeeeaaaeeeeeeeeeeaaas 196 Table 49 Results of equivalence test Type approval Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM 5 slope corrected with 0 919 197 Table 50 Results of equivalence test Type approval Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM slope corrected with 0 977 intercept corrected With 3 758 ccccccccceceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaeeeeeseeeeaaas 199
16. cc eeeeeeccceeeeeeeeaeeeeees 111 Zero point drift SN3 amp SN4 PMs with Zero filter 112 Results of the linear regression analysis of measurements with both candidates SN3 and SN4 at all four sites raw data sseeseeeeeeeeeeeeees 124 Results of the linear regression analysis of measurements with both candidates SN3 and SN4 total raw data 0 cece ceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetneeeeeees 124 Two sided 95 confidence interval Clos for the tested devices SN3 and SING reen a A sauces EEE E eoa Ea EE SELNES 132 Results of the calibration function and analytical function measured component PM josss ai ea an ana a ei ATENE nan ENa ANa 137 Results of the calibration function and analytical function measured component PMa 5 cccccseeccecceeeccecceeeeceecueeeceeeeaeeceseeaeeeseueaeeeeeeeeneeasauneeseeaesess 137 Deviation between reference measurement and candidate on days with a relative humidity of gt 70 measured component PM2s5 ccceeeeeeeeeeeeeees 140 Deviation between reference measurement and candidate on days with a relative humidity of gt 70 measured Component PM o cccceeeeeeeeeeeeees 141 Comparison of the candidates SN3 SN4 with the reference device rel humidity gt 70 all test sites measured component PM2s5 0006 141 Comparison of the candidates SN3 SN4 with the reference device rel humidity gt 70 all test sites measured component PM o
17. 8 2 Suitability test of EN TS 16450 9 The results of the additional tests can be found in chapter 7 Investigations for the validation of the instrument software 3 0 1 An overview on the implemented modifications since start of the test work can be found in chapter 4 1 General The reliability of operation of the measuring system is increased continuously by the modifi cations No significant impact on the instrument performance is to be expected for the changes up to version 3 0 0 6 The implemented modification in the calculation algorithm since version 3 0 0 5 has been validated through an extensive test program refer to chapter 7 starting with page 194 in this report 6 5 Assessment The version of the instrument software is shown in the display The test institute is informed on any changes in the instrument software Performance criterion met yes 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH g Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 89 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Figure 31 Display of software version 3 0 1 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precis
18. Ambient air quality Standard gravimetric measurement meth od for the determination of the PM25 mass fraction of suspended particulate matter German version EN 14907 2005 e Guidance document Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Meth ods English version of January 2010 The measuring system Air Pollution Monitor APM 2 operates according to the principle of scattered light measurement By means of a pump ambient air is sucked in via a PMy impactor inlet 3 3 l min and splitted into two partial streams by a virtual impactor Via mag netic valves either the aerosol out of the axial flow enrichment mode for determination of PMjo concentration or the aerosol out of the side flow normal mode for determination of PM 5 concentration is lead to the measurement sensor At this point the PM o respectively PM2 5 concentration is measured in switch over mode by means of scattered light measure ment technique 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 17 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A The tests were performed in the laboratory and during a field test that lasted several months The field test which lasted several months was
19. Candidate 2 ug m 130 120 110 100 APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 All comparisons 218 ug m Raw data Candidate 1 ug m 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 o Measured values Regression line R y x Figure 58 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM 5 all test sites values 2 18 ug m Candidate 2 ug m 130 120 110 100 a on O OO O O O O OQ 40 APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 All comparisons lt 18 g m Raw data O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m o Measured values Regression line Saecsce y x Figure 59 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM s all test sites values lt 18 tg m 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 158 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 All comparisons Raw data 130 120 110 100 o Measured values 90
20. Uncertainty between Candidates 1 13 ug m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 49 Slope b 0 967 Uncertainty of b 0 033 Ordinate intercept a 1 292 Uncertainty of a 1 019 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 18 46 All comparisons lt 18 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 53 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 46 ug m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 143 Slope b 1 137 Uncertainty of b 0 032 Ordinate intercept a 1 073 Uncertainty of a 0 355 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 22 20 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 190 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Candidate J APM 2 i o SN SN3 amp SN4 Limit value 30 Status of measured values Slope corrected _Allowed uncertainty 25 Cologne Winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 54 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 71 ug m SN 3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 52 52 Slope b 0 931 0 962 Uncertainty of b 0 019 0 019 Ordinate intercept a 1 148 1 495 Uncertainty of a 0 424 0 435 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 13 83 12 92 Bonn Winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 62 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 96 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 51 51 Slope b 1 037
21. Uncertainty between Reference 0 55 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 99 yg m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 160 Slope b 0 998 Uncertainty of b 0 041 Ordinate intercept a 0 114 Uncertainty of a 0 768 Expanded measured uncertainty WCM 12 39 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 192 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Candidate APM 2 SN SN3 amp SN4 Limit value 50 Status of measured values__Slope and Offset corrected Allowed uncertainty 25 Cologne Winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 54 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 41 ug m SN 3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 52 52 Slope b 0 953 1 006 Uncertainty of b 0 023 0 022 Ordinate intercept a 1 785 2 520 Uncertainty of a 0 625 0 596 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 10 65 15 00 Bonn Winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 38 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 76 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 51 51 Slope b 0 967 1 069 Uncertainty of b 0 051 0 055 Ordinate intercept a 0 523 1 146 Uncertainty of a 1 511 1 641 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 19 25 20 76 Cologne Summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 60 ug m Uncertainty be
22. as suitable test equipment was not available before December 2013 As the devices have shown no drift effects during the permanent comparison with the standard reference method this circumstance should not be relevant for the assessment of the measuring system espe cially as it is intended to completely abstain from this test point in future for type approval testing according to EN TS 16450 9 6 5 Assessment For PM25 the maximum deviation at zero point was 1 4 g m in relation to the previous val ue and 2 4 ug m in relation to the start value Thus it lies within the permissible limits of Bo 2 ug m For PMyo the maximum deviation at zero point was 1 5 ug m for in relation to the previous value and 2 7 g m in relation to the start value and thus related to the start value outside of the permissible limit of Bo 2 ug m This deviation only occurred one time during the entire field test campaign a cause could not be determined There was no externally triggered ad justment of the measuring device A regular external check of the sensitivity over the field test period could not be carried out as suitable test equipment was not available before December 2013 As the devices have shown no drift effects during the permanent comparison with the standard reference method this circumstance should not be relevant for the assessment of the measuring system espe cially as it is intended to completely abstain from this test point in fut
23. 60 ug are not considered for evaluation after post weighing as conforming to standards 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 245 of 300 Weighed filters are packed in separate polystyrene jars for transport and storage These jars remain closed until the filter is inserted Virgin filters can be stored in the weighing room for up to 28 days before sampling Another pre weighing is carried out if this period is exceeded Sampled filters can be stored for up to 15 days at a temperature of 23 C or less The filters are stored at 7 C in a refrigerator A2 Filter evaluation The filters are evaluated with the help of a corrective term in order to minimize relative mass changes caused by the weighing room conditions Equation Dust MF post Mrara X MKOnpost MKONn pre F1 MKon e mean mass of the 3 control filters after 48 h and 72 h pre weighing MKonyost mean mass of the 3 control filters after 48 h and 72 h post weighing Mrara Mean mass of the filter after 48 h and 72 h pre weighing MF post Mean mass of the loaded filter after 48 h and 72 h post weighing Dust corrected dust mass of the filter
24. 7 9 2013 23 4 60 3 11 2 12 1 14 9 16 8 7 10 2013 17 8 54 4 8 5 8 7 11 5 12 5 7 11 2013 17 2 18 6 22 1 24 5 Outlier Ref PM10 7 12 2013 7 13 2013 7 14 2013 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 218 of 300 Annex 5 Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 8 of 22 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in ug m AMB Serial No SN 3 SN4 Ref 1 Ref 2 Ratio SN3 SN 4 SN3 SN 4 Remark Test site PM10 PM10 PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 yg m yg m ug m yg m yg m yg m 7 30 2013 13 7 13 1 49 0 4 9 4 7 7 6 7 7 Rodenkirchen summer 7 31 2013 12 0 12 3 54 1 6 0 5 4 8 0 7 7 8 1 2013 14 4 15 2 57 7 7 5 6 8 9 6 9 4 8 2 2013 20 8 22 9 56 9 10 3 9 9 13 4 13 4 8 3 2013 7 9 7 4 9 9 9 8 8 4 2013 14 1 15 0 55 7 7 1 6 6 9 0 8 8 8 5 2013 20 2 22 3 48 6 8 8 7 9 12 1 11 6 8 6 2013
25. APM 2 measur Page 34 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 3 2 Principle of operation The sample passes the PM o sampling inlet with a flow rate of 3 3 I min and the sampling tube which connects the sampling inlet with the virtual impactor Inside of the virtual im pactor the sampled air is divided in two partial streams Via magnetic valves either the aer osol out of the axial flow enrichment mode or out of the side flow normal mode enters the scattered light sensor where the measurement itself happens During the type approval test the measuring system was operated in switch mode between PMi and PM2 gt 5 with a respec tive interval time of 2 min Furthermore once per hour zero air purging for approx 2 min is performed for zero point adjustment this is indicated in the display with Flush The deter mined measured data are stored in the instrument memory as well as if installed on a SD card Figure 3 shows the overview schematic of APM 2 lt Protective roof Insect screen peat Impactor inlet for 3 3 I min PM Housing a Baffle plate Impactor jets lt Condensate drain Antenna conirahtuhe Radiation protection Air pressure Temperature 7 _ Rel humidity B SD slot 3 PM 5 29 g m SIM slot C Ns Dial Q2 Protective filter Capillary pm Phot
26. M int enance intervalais isnin naa a ae Ear ea ea n Eas 84 5 2 0 AVaila Blit seinna E E e EEA EE E E 85 5 2 9 Instrument software cs cccccccczcrtensssectedecdentaectasuotiedsetendbaaseiatscsteeteeteazautenacdentesauian 87 S9 Generalki a a a a ee eee eer ec ee ere 90 5 3 2 Repeatability standard deviation at Zero POINt ccccecceceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeneees 92 5 3 3 Repeatability standard deviation at reference POiNt ccccccccceceeeeeeeeeeeeeees 94 5 3 4 Linearity lack Of Tit ass ccncceticesscaseisacdesnenesvasedanddensosceatonasuseascasucaniversdarecasedenieanauas 95 5 3 5 Sensitivity coefficient of Sample gas pressure cccccccccceeeeceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 96 5 3 6 Sensitivity coefficient of sample gas temperature ccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 97 5 3 7 Sensitivity coefficient of surrounding temperature cccccccceceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 98 5 3 8 Sensitivity coefficient of supply Voltage cccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeteeeeeeeeeeteeeeeeeteaaees 102 5 3 9 Cross sensitivity lt i c 4ccascceaccanatedatausdhadededtaddcadedeatedacdeacesdededtedacdcscssandtecedaceencnadts 104 5 3 10 Averaging effect xcs vissccasiwentcaseiansceniestncerdcassantuasadenncackuatanasdsenteatauathuasydanddentds 105 5 3 11 Standard deviation from paired measurements ssseseseseeeeeeeeeeeereeereeree ee 106 5 3 12 Long term OMIM cccazsczicececcessteteacssasacneescaceecengazseeeadtcenceteaz ueesaieeeecedesdnteadssasec
27. Reference equivalence function SN4 test site Rodenkirchen summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 129 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs SN 3 All test sites 100 Measured values 90 80 Regression line 70 zo a a Acceptance range 60 according to EN 12341 00 y x T 3 40 o S 30 oO ete 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 44 Reference equivalence function SN3 all sites Reference vs SN 4 All test sites 100 Measured values 90 Regression line 80 70 4 4 de ee nee Acceptance range im according to EN 12341 E 60 o 50 T 3 40 S 30 S nega 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 45 Reference equivalence function SN4 all sites 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 130 of 300
28. SUMMET ccccceeeeeeeeees 156 Figure 57 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM25 test site Rodenkirchen Summer 000008 156 Figure 58 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMgs all test sites values 2 18 g m ee 157 Figure 59 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMgs all test sites values lt 18 Ug M cceee 157 Figure 60 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM p all test sites ee eeeccecceeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeaeeeeeeees 158 Figure 61 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMio test site Cologne winter cccccccccceeeeeeeees 159 Figure 62 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMip test site Bonn WintEr ccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 159 Figure 63 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMip test site Cologne SUMMET ccceceeeeeeeeeees 160 Figure 64 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM p test site Rodenkirchen SUMMET 00 c0000 160 Figure 65 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM all test sites values 2
29. TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH 6 Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 37 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Figure 7 View on APM 2 front door open Figure 8 View on APM 2 rear door open 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 38 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Figure 9 Measuring systems APM 2 on measurement cabinet The system is controlled and operated directly via the control unit with a Jog Dial on the front of the device Measured data are stored in the internal memory or on a SD card data transmission via RS232 interface is also possible serial or Bayern Hessen Protocol The operator can request measured data and system information change parameters as well as perform tests for checking the correct operation of the measuring system Graphic display Slot for SD memory card 2 40 00 Gana Sacial card status eria interface COMDE DERENDA Jog dial APM 2 Manual Mode Measurement SIM card status Progra
30. TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH P Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 139 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 5 Cross sensitivity The interference caused by moisture in the sample may not exceed 10 of the limit value in the range of the limit value 6 2 Equipment Not required here 6 3 Method The interference caused by moisture in the sample was determined under field conditions Using the data from field test days with a relative humidity of gt 70 the difference between the obtained reference value nominal value and the measured values of each candidate was calculated and the mean difference was applied as a conservative estimate for the inter ference caused by moisture in the sample In addition to that reference equivalence functions were determined for both devices using the data from field test days with a relative humidity of gt 70 6 4 Evaluation Using the data from field test days with a relative humidity of gt 70 the mean difference be tween the calculated reference value nominal value and the measured value of the re spective candidate was calculated and the relative deviation from the mean concentration was determined Annual limit value PM25 25 ug m 10 of the an
31. Table 2 Description of test site validation campaign 2014 Cologne parking lot winter Period 01 2014 03 2014 No of paired values candidates 53 Characteristics Urban background Level of ambient air pollution Average to high 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 18 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A The minimum requirements were fulfilled during performance testing TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH therefore suggests its approval as a perfor mance tested measuring system for continuous monitoring of ambient air pollution by sus pended particulate matter PM1 and PM 3 5 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 1 2 Certification proposal A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 19 of 300 Due to the positive results achieved the following recommendation is put forward for the no tification of the AMS as a performance tested measuring system AMS designation
32. Test CO2 pre measurement only 20 s in Field test stead of 40s campaign 2 2 4 0 e GPRS Modem can be used internally Not installed e Last concentration before purging is kept dur ing purging in the BH protocol e Flagging of purge step by 5 in the BH operational status 2 5 0 e New test gas measurement without bag Not installed 3times exchange with zero air propane in stead of CO e Test gas timeline 50 s zero air 20 s propane with pump 50 s propane without pump e Test gas display in mV with 2 decimals 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 48 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 2 5 1 e Test gas measurement Standard deviation Not installed implemented e Test gas measurement Repeating through Start in the same menu 2 5 2 e Test gas timeline now 60 10 50 s Field test e Test gas display in mV with 1 decimal Campalgise aness 2 5 3 e Graphical improvements in test gas menu Not installed e Stop button in test gas menu 2 5 5 e In the test gas menu the magnetic valve is Not installed switched to zero air so that no propane can outpour provided that the bypass is closed 3 0 0 b e Calibrat
33. The ambient air Q1 sucked in with 3 3 l min using the integral pump is divided into two partial streams by the virtual impactor The division occurs in the area of two nozzles which are arranged oppositely The side flow Q2 3 1 l min is hereby sucked between both nozzles perpendicular to the entering air stream Particles which do not follow the side flow due to their mass inertia keep their path and thus get into the lower axial flow Q3 0 2 l min Thus there is the separation into the side flow with only smaller and lighter particles of the fraction and the axial flow with the particle size und PMj9 Via low loss switch ing appliances pinch valves with straight passage either the aerosol out of the axial flow enrichment mode or out of the side flow normal mode enters the scattered light sensor During the enrichment mode the APM 2 determines the PM concentration during the nor mal mode it determines the PM 5 concentration For zero point adjustment filtered air is lead to the scattered light sensor in periodic intervals via a switching appliance Incoming flow C Virtual impactor lt 2 5 2 5 10 pm Axial flow Valves Scattered light sensor l lt 2 5 2 5 10 um Figure 2 Operating principle of the virtual impactor 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc ra TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUV Rheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2
34. The vacuum pump is powered by a brushless motor and requires no maintenance The normal service life of the pump when in continuous operation is about two years This period of time may vary de pending on the use The pump will have to be replaced once it has reached the end of its service life Should the pump fail the device will automatically issue the appropriate warning 10 5 Impactor Inlet The impactor inlet should be cleaned according to the specific load but every 28 days at the latest To do so pull the inlet off the intake tube and open it The lubricated baffle plate and the impactor section are inside The baffle plate can be cleaned with spirit and then recoated with Vaseline or high vacuum grease medium The use of high vacuum grease medium is especially recommended at low ambient temperatures You can either blow out the impactor section with compressed air or clean it in an ultrasonic bath 10 6 Virtual Impactor The virtual impactor shall be cleaned after 90 days at the latest with the exact value depending on the amount of loading For cleaning purposes you need to take off the connecting hoses to the virtual impactor inside the device Then you can blow out the virtual impactor with compressed air Once a year you should clean the virtual impactor with spirit or highly volatile alcohol to remove deposits 10 7 Spare Parts Item Type Part Number Zero Air Filter Parker Balston D100010 Photometer O
35. measur Page 238 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites Page 6 of 11 No Test site Ambient temperature AVG Ambient pressure Rel humidity Wind velocity Wind direction Precipitation C hPa m s mm 5 16 2013 Cologne summer No weather data available 5 17 2013 86 2 5 18 2013 74 2 5 19 2013 64 4 5 20 2013 83 5 5 21 2013 78 2 5 22 2013 79 4 5 23 2013 80 7 5 24 2013 67 0 5 25 2013 71 3 5 26 2013 79 2 5 27 2013 61 6 5 28 2013 58 8 5 29 2013 k 89 4 5 30 2013 68 4 5 31 2013 70 0 6 1 2013 76 2 6 2 2013 54 1 6 3 2013 58 9 6 4 2013 63 2 6 5 2013 53 6 6 6 2013 51 4 6 7 2013 51 4 6 8 2013 60 2 6 9 2013 71 7 6 10 2013 70 0 6 11 2013 57 4 6 12 2013 66 3 6 13 2013 77 3 6 14 2013 65 6 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVR heinland Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 239 of 300 Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites Page 7 of 11 hPa m s A mm 181 6 15 2013 Cologne summer 16 8 1006 60 6 1 1 172 0 0 182 6 16 2013 18 1 1007 61 0 0 3 159 0 0 183 6 17 2013 23 6 1005 64 7
36. out application of correction factors The correction of slope nevertheless leads to an improvement of the ex panded measurement uncertainties of the full data comparison Upon assessing the minimum re quirements the measured values for both components were available at the same time alternating every two minutes between the measurement channels PM10 and PM25 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 31 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 2 Task definition 2 1 Nature of test Comde Derenda GmbH has commissioned TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH to carry out the type approval test of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measuring The test was performed as a complete type approval test 2 2 Objective The measuring system shall determine the concentrations of suspended particulate matter PM and PM within a concentration range of 0 to 1 000 ug m The performance test was carried out in accordance with the current standards for perfor mance tests and with regard to the most recent developments The testing was performed with respect to the following standards e VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 Performance criteria for performance tests of automat ed ambient air measurin
37. 1 097 Uncertainty of b 0 031 0 032 Ordinate intercept a 0 948 0 964 Uncertainty of a 0 706 0 725 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 15 33 20 40 Cologne Summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 53 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 62 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 46 44 Slope b 1 054 1 113 Uncertainty of b 0 044 0 049 Ordinate intercept a 0 279 0 232 Uncertainty of a 0 493 0 553 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 11 76 22 72 Rodenkirchen Summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 52 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 36 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 45 45 Slope b 1 150 1 133 Uncertainty of b 0 050 0 051 Ordinate intercept a 1 383 1 482 Uncertainty of a 0 565 0 567 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 22 45 18 78 All comparisons 218 pg m Uncertainty between Reference 0 63 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 13 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 49 49 Slope b 0 949 0 986 Uncertainty of b 0 032 0 034 Ordinate intercept a 1 074 1 497 Uncertainty of a 1 002 1 05 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 18 25 20 15 All comparisons lt 18 g m Uncertainty between Reference 0 53 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 46 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 145 143 Slope b 1 114 1 165 Uncertainty of b 0 031 0 034 Ordinate intercept a 1 015 1 179 Uncertainty of a 0 345 0 375 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 18 31 26 94 All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0
38. 18 5 19 0 47 6 8 5 7 9 11 2 10 9 8 7 2013 15 0 15 1 59 0 9 1 8 7 11 5 11 3 8 8 2013 18 8 18 5 58 1 10 4 10 5 12 8 13 1 8 9 2013 18 7 19 1 56 3 10 1 10 1 12 9 13 0 8 10 2013 8 1 8 2 10 8 11 1 8 11 2013 12 6 12 3 39 5 5 7 5 7 7 7 7 7 8 12 2013 18 6 17 6 43 4 7 1 7 3 9 8 10 0 8 13 2013 16 5 17 1 41 7 6 9 6 7 9 7 9 8 8 14 2013 23 1 24 9 38 8 8 2 7 9 12 1 12 4 8 15 2013 19 2 18 6 45 6 8 3 8 2 11 3 11 7 8 16 2013 22 2 22 5 51 4 9 9 9 4 13 2 13 3 8 17 2013 6 6 5 7 8 5 7 9 8 18 2013 10 7 10 1 46 1 4 5 4 4 6 9 6 9 8 19 2013 14 1 14 0 48 3 6 7 6 6 9 0 9 2 8 20 2013 19 5 18 9 57 6 11 0 10 6 13 4 13 5 8 21 2013 18 8 18 0 66 4 13 1 12 6 15 5 15 6 8 22 2013 61 9 16 4 16 0 20 3 20 4 8 23 2013 61 3 15 2 14 8 18 5 18 6 8 24 2013 19 7 19 2 24 9 24 7 8 25 2013 73 6 20 3 20 4 28 6 29 6 8 26 2013 56 4 10 6 10 6 13 4 13 9 8 27 2013 58 8 12 6 12 4 15 7 16 4 8 28 2013 59 5 15 9 15 7 19 9 20 8 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 219 of 300 Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 9 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 M
39. 2013 131 4 18 2013 132 4 19 2013 134 4 20 2013 134 4 21 2013 135 4 22 2013 136 4 23 2013 137 4 24 2013 138 4 25 2013 139 4 26 2013 140 4 27 2013 7 8 141 4 28 2013 9 2 142 4 29 2013 12 0 143 4 30 2013 11 8 144 5 1 2013 14 6 145 5 2 2013 16 5 146 5 3 2013 16 0 147 5 4 2013 15 7 148 5 5 2013 16 4 149 5 6 2013 19 8 5 15 2013 No weather data available Ambient pressure hPa 996 992 996 991 997 1011 1011 1011 1011 1009 1009 1017 1018 1009 1009 1014 1016 1010 1000 1003 1007 1010 1014 1011 1009 1007 1011 1013 1008 63 9 78 0 77 3 69 6 69 0 56 8 57 0 67 0 54 4 54 3 46 2 57 7 51 5 57 4 46 5 63 6 56 5 51 5 77 3 70 3 68 3 56 1 57 9 62 8 60 4 60 0 54 5 55 9 50 0 Rel humidity Wind velocity m s 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 3 11 1 4 1 5 1 5 0 9 0 6 3 1 3 5 3 3 1 1 1 4 1 7 1 0 0 4 2 2 3 2 0 7 1 9 1 0 0 9 1 1 1 5 2 4 1 3 0 6 Wind direction Precipitation 3 mm 0 9 130 133 154 169 154 152 136 214 149 141 210 260 274 253 217 187 167 146 230 293 169 209 214 173 200 253 238 190 192 1 8 6 0 6 0 4 4 0 6 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc a TUVRheinland TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2
40. 21 2013 4 22 2013 4 23 2013 4 24 2013 4 25 2013 4 26 2013 4 27 2013 4 28 2013 4 29 2013 4 30 2013 5 1 2013 5 2 2013 5 3 2013 5 4 2013 5 5 2013 5 6 2013 5 15 2013 Bonn winter Zero point Zero point Zero point Zero point Cologne summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 227 of 300 Page 17 of 22 Serial No Manufacturer Type of instrument Comde Derenda APM 2 SN3 SN4 PM10 and PM2 5 Measured values in g m STD No 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 Date 5 16 2013 5 17 2013 5 18 2013 5 19 2013 5 20 2013 5 21 2013 5 22 2013 5 23 2013 5 24 2013 5 25 2013 5 26 2013 5 27 2013 5 28 2013 5 29 2013 5 30 2013 5 31 2013 6 1 2013 6 2 2013 6 3 2013 6 4 2013 6 5 2013 6 6 2013 6 7 2013 6 8 2013 6 9 2013 6 10 2013 6 11 2013 6 12 2013 6 13 2013 6 14 2013
41. 21219977 A Annex 5 Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 4 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m AMB Serial No SN3 SN4 No Ratio SN3 SN 4 SN3 SN 4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 ug m ug m ug m ug m 91 3 9 2013 9 9 10 7 12 3 13 5 Bonn winter 92 3 10 2013 96 5 25 1 26 1 27 4 29 6 93 3 11 2013 f i 90 6 30 7 32 0 33 5 36 5 94 3 12 2013 87 9 16 1 17 1 18 0 20 0 95 3 13 2013 72 9 31 8 33 5 36 7 40 4 96 3 14 2013 70 3 16 9 18 0 20 4 23 0 97 3 15 2013 68 7 18 8 20 0 22 7 25 0 98 3 16 2013 12 0 12 4 14 6 16 0 99 3 17 2013 f 67 2 9 6 10 1 11 0 12 0 100 3 18 2013 k b 45 9 8 3 8 9 10 5 11 8 101 3 19 2013 E 57 5 10 5 11 0 12 4 13 6 102 3 20 2013 i i 84 7 23 5 24 4 26 5 28 4 103 3 21 2013 R 80 5 35 9 37 7 40 7 44 0 104 3 22 2013 i f 82 2 21 5 22 9 24 2 26 6 105 3 23 2013 23 1 24 4 25 4 27 9 106 3 24 2013 80 6 15 3 16 2 17 1 19 2 107 3 25 2013 78 9 20 8 22 2 23 7 26 7 108 3 26 2013 74 7 14 7 15 7 16 3 19 1 109 3 27 2013 i 79 5 25 1 27 0 28 8 32 4 110 3 28 2013 46 0 49 0 51 4 56 5 111 3 29 2013 i i i 92 2 63 6 67 2 70 5 76 8 112 3 30 2013 Zero point 113 3 31 2013 Zero point 114 4 1 2013 Zero point 115 4 2 2013 81 0 21 4 22 8 23 9 26 5 116 4 3 2013 i i 86 3 28 2 29 8 31 0 34 1 117 4 4 2013 88 0 29 0 30 7 32 4 35 1 118 4 5 2013 84 1 22
42. 264 9 21 2013 Zero point 265 1 13 2014 Cologne winter 2014 266 1 14 2014 validation campaign 267 1 15 2014 268 1 16 2014 269 1 17 2014 270 1 18 2014 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 Manufacturer Comde Derenda Type of instrument APM 2 Serial No SN3 SN4 TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 231 of 300 PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 Page 21 of 22 PM10 and PM2 5 Measured values in g m STD Ref 1 PM2 5 ug m Ref 2 PM2 5 ug m Ref 1 PM10 ug m Ref 2 PM10 ug m Ratio SN3 SN 4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 PM10 PM10 ug Nm ug Nm 1 19 2014 1 20 2014 1 21 2014 1 22 2014 1 23 2014 1 24 2014 1 25 2014 1 26 2014 1 27 2014 1 28 2014 1 29 2014 1 30 2014 1 31 2014 2 1 2014 2 2 2014 2 3 2014 2 4 2014 2 5 2014 2 6 2014 2 7 2014 2 8 2014 2 9 2014 2 10 2014 2 11 2014 2 12 2014 2 13 2014 2 14 2014 2 15 2014 2 16 2014 2 17 2014 Cologne winter 2014 validation campaign Zero point Zero point Zero point 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinl
43. 30 Deviation between reference measurement and candidate on days with a relative humidity of gt 70 measured component PM 5 Field test days with rel humidity gt 70 Mean value Dev to mean value of reference in g m Dev in of mean value reference Deviation in of annual LV 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 141 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 31 Deviation between reference measurement and candidate on days with a relative humidity of gt 70 measured component PM Field test days with rel humidity gt 70 ee Mean value pgm 215 210 22 4 ug m Dev in of mean value reference Deviation in of annual LV Single values are provided in annexes 5 and 6 The measurement uncertainties Wey on days with a relative humidity of gt 70 are present ed in Table 32 and Table 33 Single values are provided in annexes 5 and 6 Table 32 Comparison of the candidates SN3 SN4 with the reference device rel humidity gt 70 all test sites measured component PM 5 Candidate APM 2 SN Limit value __ Status of measured values __ Raw data _ Allowed uncertainty All test sites rH g
44. 5 3 Calibrating the Flow Sensor The calibration process is controlled via the control unit 1 Select the Setup menu in the main menu and press the jog dial to confirm 2 Inthe Setup menu select the Measurement parameter item and confirm your choice 3 Inthe APM Parameter menu select the value shown to the right of CalibValue so that it is shown outlined and press the jog dial The value is now shown inverse Fig 22 APM 2 35 COMDE DERENDA 4 Observe the display of the external flow meter and if necessary adjust the pump motor speed by turning the jog dial until the value indicated by the flow meter corresponds exactly to 3 3 min The volume flow correction value also changes accordingly 5 After the correct value is reached press the jog dial 6 Togo back to the main menu select and confirm back 9 5 4 Checking the Accuracy of the Calibration After completion of the calibration procedure start a measurement as a test Please wait until the device automatically changes into the PM25 or PM measurement mode Check the display of the external flow meter for agreement with the set value In the event of deviations repeat the calibration as described 9 6 Inspecting the Photometer In addition to calibrating the photometer at regular intervals see 10 3 it is also possible to use a test gas to verify its functioning and sensitivity You will need optional devices and documentation to carry out the inspection with the
45. 50 mg correspond to approx 200 days with an average concentration of 50 ug m the photometer offset exceeds 2500 mV After the annual maintenance of the photometer the measuring system is to be calibrated at the measurement site with the gravimetric PM reference method according to EN 12341 respectively with the gravimetric PM25 reference method according to EN 14907 Preferably a seasonal calibration rhythm is to follow 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 203 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A e During the annual basic maintenance the cleaning of the sampling tube has also to be considered e The vacuum pump has a life time of approx 2 years after reaching the lifetime the pump must be completely replaced Failure of the pump is displayed on the system with an error message Further details are provided in the user manual Department of Environmental Protection Air Pollution Control foo fido Baim Dipl Ing Karsten Pletscher Dipl Ing Guido Baum Cologne 26th March 2014 936 21219977 A 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Re
46. 51 and Figure 52 present a graphic representation of the flow measurements of the two candidates SN3 and SN4 Table 35 Parameters for total flow measurement 24 h mean SN3 amp SN4 Mean l min Deviation from nominal Std dev l min Max l min Min l min 0 033 0 030 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 146 of 300 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Ambient temperature in C Constancy of sample flow rate SN 3 3 5 20 F 18 3 4 16 F 14 E33 12 gt 8 z F 10 2 g z 3 2 8 t6 3 1 4 r 2 3 0 T T T T 0 3 14 2014 12 00 3 14 2014 18 00 3 15 2014 0 00 3 15 2014 6 00 3 15 2014 12 00 3 15 2014 18 00 Nominal value 3 3 I min Max perm dev Flow rate Ambient temperature C Figure 51 Flow rate of device SN3 field conditions Constancy of sample flow rate SN 4 3 5 16 14 3 4 F 12 10 2 33 4 gt v 5 2 i s 8 z E 2 s 2 J 3 3 2 amp ps 8 4 Si p2 3 0 T T T T 0 3 17 2014 6 00 3 17 2014 12 00 3 17 2014 18 00 3 18 2014 0 00 3 18 2014 6 00 3 18 2014 12 00 Nominal value 3 3 I min Max perm dev
47. 7 2012 12 8 2012 12 9 2012 12 10 2012 12 11 2012 12 12 2012 12 13 2012 12 14 2012 12 15 2012 12 16 2012 12 17 2012 12 18 2012 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 212 of 300 Annex 5 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 2 of 22 Manufacturer Type of instrument Serial No Comde Derenda APM 2 SN3 SN4 PM10 and PM2 5 Measured values in ug m AMB 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc Ref 1 Ref 2 Ratio SN3 SN4 SN3 SN4 Remark Test site PM10 PM10 PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 yg m yg m ug m yg m yg m yg m 12 19 2012 18 3 18 0 73 7 13 1 13 6 14 8 16 4 Cologne winter 12 20 2012 14 1 13 6 83 8 11 7 12 1 13 0 14 0 12 21 2012 18 1 17 8 62 7 13 2 14 2 16 1 18 1 12 22 2012 4 0 4 2 5 3 5 8 12 23 2012 3 5 3 8 4 9 5 7 12 24 2012 6 3 7 1 8 7 10 1 12 25 2012 1 8 2 2 2 8 3 5 12 26 2012 3 2 3 5 5 6 6 5 12 27 2012 8 1 8 8 12 7 14 6 12 28 2012 4 8 5 2 6 1 6 5 12 29 2012 3 6
48. 931 0 982 Uncertainty of b 0 023 0 022 Ordinate intercept a 2 007 1 290 Uncertainty of a 0 611 0 582 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 23 70 12 30 Bonn Winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 38 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 72 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 51 51 Slope b 0 943 1 043 Uncertainty of b 0 049 0 054 Ordinate intercept a 4 224 4 829 Uncertainty of a 1 477 1 604 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 20 66 Cologne Summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 60 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 06 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 47 45 Slope b 0 852 0 954 Uncertainty of b 0 039 0 043 Ordinate intercept a 1 667 2 156 Uncertainty of a 0 733 0 809 Expanded measured uncertainty Wem 19 49 Rodenkirchen Summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 76 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 43 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 45 45 Slope b 0 944 0 983 Uncertainty of b 0 063 0 063 Ordinate intercept a 5 390 5 818 Uncertainty of a 1 252 1 258 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom All comparisons 230 pg m Uncertainty between Reference 0 72 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 2 28 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 33 33 Slope b 1 003 1 068 Uncertainty of b 0 062 0 065 Ordinate intercept a 6 650 6 252 Uncertainty of a 2 639 2 74 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 21 54 All comparisons lt 30 g m Uncertainty between Reference 0 55 ug m Uncertaint
49. 936 21219977 A There have been 47 valid data pairs both for PM1o and PM25 The evaluation of the comparison measurements according to the Guide 5 lead to the fol lowing results Table 45 Results of equivalence test at test site Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM 5 raw data Cologne Winter 2014 Uncertainty between Reference 0 49 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 61 g m SN 3 Number of data pairs 47 Slope b 0 813 Uncertainty of b 0 019 Ordinate intercept a 3 122 Uncertainty of a 0 320 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 18 58 Evaluation for PM 5 1 The in between uncertainty of the candidates is 0 61 ug m and thus smaller than the permissible 2 5 ug m 2 The expanded uncertainty for the raw data is smaller than the permissible 25 for both SN3 and SN4 Table 46 Results of equivalence test at test site Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM19 raw data Cologne winter 2014 Uncertainty between Reference 0 58 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 72 g m SN 3 Number of data pairs 47 Slope b 0 882 Uncertainty of b 0 017 Ordinate intercept a 2 073 Uncertainty of a 0 380 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 16 26 Evaluation for PM o 3 The in between uncertainty of the candidates is 0 72 g m and thus smaller than the permissible 2 5 g m 1 The expanded uncertainty for the raw data is smaller than the permissible 25 for both SN3 and SN
50. DelIVELY vise isccccsescccccsssececdssssccccsssneccesssscceedsssccuedssseeccdasssensaassvecudasstencasiaveosdasnesteassaveses 7 2 Safety Instructions sisscccsesssiscessssccesessssseesteacensessiiecesssaccnsesessseestesssesessiienesssaiensesassseesteatensessiienesseaes 8 3 System OVEIVICW cesisiccsesisiccesiisisesessssscestisscesessscenesdisssesesssssnesdsssansesssssnesdiarsnsedassseesddasansesssesnes ss 10 3 1 F ncti onal CONCEP i since sccsceccvcciccscsteeteedecctedeosecelescscsbeceesccudtesvesccdsarscusousseteoassscuseedscscedeasseubes 10 311 COmtrOl Unii sessao EE NEEESE SEEN EENS 11 e e e E E E E E E EE E E E EA E 13 3 1 3 Virtual IMpactOr coses en senne EENE EESE NS EEES SEEEN ESEESE SENES 13 3 1 4 Scattered Light Photometer Unit sssssssesssessoosssesssessoossessssessoosssssssessoosssesssessoosssesse 14 3 1 5 Impactor Inlet and Intake Tube sseesssosssesseeseosssesssessoosssssssessoosssssssessoosssesssessoesseesse 14 4 Assembly and Commissioning ssssesseessossssesssessoosssssssessoosssssssesscosssesssessoosssssssessoosssssssesseesssesse 15 4 1 Transport cicccssccccacccccsascscsscseccceesesssvessessnascsessessscssisesedeccssstvescsstacsevssessssessesdsssssessabecssacssrssesens 15 4 2 Intake Tube and Impactor Inlet sssnsesssssssssssssssessessossssssssssssssessessssesssessesssssesseseesssssessesse 15 4 3 External Sensor siseicciseseccsscesescsccesscsesceseccsssovssssscsesssacevasssceeanssstoousasssoo
51. Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Filter handling mass determination The following filters were used in the performance test Table 10 Used filter materials Measuring system Filter material type Manufacturer Reference systems Emfab 47 mm Pall LVS3 The filters were handled in compliance with Standard EN 14907 Details on filter handling and weighing processes are describes in annex 2 of this report 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 63 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 5 Reference measurement method In accordance with Standards EN 12341 and EN 14907 the following devices were used in the testing 1 as reference device for PMi Small Filter Device Low Volume Sampler LVS3 Manufacturer Ingenieurb ro Sven Leckel LeberstraRe 63 Berlin Germany Date of construction 2007 PM sampling head 2 as reference device for PM2 Small Filter Device Low Volume Sampler LVS3 Manufacturer Ingenieurb ro Sven Leckel Leberstrake 63 Berlin Deutschland Date of construction 2007 and 2010 PM25 sampling head During the testing two reference systems for
52. Flow rate Ambient temperature C Figure 52 Flow rate of device SN4 field conditions 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 147 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 8 Tightness of the measuring system The complete measuring system shall be checked for tightness Leakage shall not exceed 1 of the sample volume sucked 6 2 Equipment Not required here 6 3 Method The flow meter of the APM 2 measuring system is located directly upstream the pump To determine the leak rate of the AMS a leak test according to chapter 9 7 of the manual is per formed with the help of a test appliance for tightness check provided by the instrument man ufacturer For this a vacuum is created in the device with the help of the instrument s pump and after switching off the pump the rise in pressure over a time period of five minutes is monitored In case of a rise in pressure gt 290 hPa the test on tightness is regarded as failed and the device needs close inspection The system volume is 215 ml Furthermore the in strument offers also the leak rate in ml min as additional information The flow rate is 3 3 l min i e the maximum permissible l
53. Inspecting the Photometer s cccessssscccssssseccsssesssccssssesescessssccssssssoscasssscscaasssessasssscsoasszsosoases 36 9 7 Leak TiGhtneSs TeSt i isscccscdosceccccders cece saseeeodueeeceanGeceencc sees cecedecessecwsvccecdessxseecsussceecessessecusyscvesas 36 9 7 1 Sequence for Leak Tightness TeSting lt c cssssecccssseseceeessecccsiseencsedssensesssenessiensenceeseeeees 36 9 7 2 Leaking Test Ment sic cciiics dostastccediavccdaeaen ce ceaksiccccesiedece ls seecctedenceceussvecseWitencedusbendcudevecss 36 9 7 3 Conducting the Leak Tightness Test ssssscccssssscecsssssceccssssceecsssecessessssessesssesseessseees 37 9 8 Factorand Offset Settings cccisiisecevcecscsesstbecadveecscasedsccessevenccsesdsbocwssdudeosed svceeseveveossesbvecseseevests 39 9 9 Allowing Negative Measured Values ssssssssssessssosssesssessoosssesssessoosssssssessoosssssssessoossssssssss 39 10 Service and Maintenance wisciscccscsssccciscsascceccssssccscsassicscsssdesscoaadsescaastesscoarisecsassdesssoaadseccaatenscoaaiis 41 10 1 Gene a PNE A E ccsvccasscevdceasesvecaessstaceeseswecdssssvdces sesvecensssvsceaseswecaesesvdeeaseswecessesvaceesesues 41 10 2 ea a E E O 41 10 3 Photometer Unit ciscccicces cicccces cceusces csscccassssncctacesnecesseensceasesusvessssnsceasssncdessssnaseoasesussessssneceesstves 41 10 4 VACUUM PUMP witseecccsscsonscctseseccucsvesssbedsescdescussssedave cosscteseshorsucodsccunssssisescsdeccdusdsbereeusdvicessseners
54. No weather data available 3 11 21 2012 4 11 22 2012 8 2 1013 79 5 0 6 150 0 0 5 11 23 2012 8 5 1010 88 3 0 1 147 9 3 6 11 24 2012 11 6 1005 78 5 0 9 156 0 3 7 11 25 2012 8 8 1004 70 3 1 4 161 0 3 8 11 26 2012 8 9 997 83 3 0 3 150 5 9 9 11 27 2012 7 5 998 81 2 0 1 125 0 3 10 11 28 2012 6 0 997 81 3 1 8 84 0 0 11 11 29 2012 4 0 999 81 0 1 0 80 0 0 12 11 30 2012 1 6 1005 83 8 0 1 157 0 0 13 12 1 2012 2 9 1003 83 1 0 7 156 5 1 14 12 2 2012 3 9 1006 82 3 1 3 146 0 3 15 12 3 2012 3 7 997 87 7 0 5 158 7 2 16 12 4 2012 4 5 993 84 3 1 0 114 5 7 17 12 5 2012 2 1 999 85 7 0 8 120 4 2 18 12 6 2012 0 9 1005 79 9 0 7 151 0 0 19 12 7 2012 2 6 1001 89 4 0 0 108 0 0 20 12 8 2012 2 6 1016 86 2 0 0 125 0 9 21 12 9 2012 4 0 1002 87 0 1 8 149 16 1 22 12 10 2012 1 9 1010 81 4 2 6 78 1 8 23 12 11 2012 0 2 1018 74 8 0 8 128 0 0 24 12 12 2012 0 5 1010 71 4 0 5 136 0 0 25 12 13 2012 0 9 1000 75 6 0 5 148 0 0 26 12 14 2012 7 1 988 82 4 1 3 157 4 2 27 12 15 2012 8 7 995 78 6 1 2 173 4 7 28 12 16 2012 7 2 997 85 2 0 4 151 7 4 29 12 17 2012 7 2 999 85 4 0 1 141 3 0 30 12 18 2012 6 2 1011 88 1 0 0 145 0 9 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc T VRh z d T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH U einlan Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 234 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 93
55. Page 72 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A These operations and therefore the setup time for the first time installation require approx 1 2 h If mounted once the measuring system is easy to transport as a whole and can be moved from one measuring test site to another The warm up time is the time between the start of operation of the measuring system and the point when it is ready for measurement Upon power up of the system the measurement can be started directly by selecting the menu point Measurement after the nominal temperature of the photometer has been reached The measurement starts with two minutes of purging the photometer with zero air and following zero point adjustment This zero point purging is carried out automatically for a time period of two minutes during measurement operation The measurement itself starts immediately after the first purging After that the measuring systems carries out dependent on the switching interval during the type approval test every 2 min alternatingly the PM25 respectively PM o measuremements The warm up time is thus in normal case at least 15 30 min depending on the time needed to reach the nominal temperature of the photometer If necessary any changes to basic parameters can quickly be carried out in a few minutes by personnel that are familiar with the AMS However
56. Password screen 5 4 2 Changing the Administrator Password Change the four digit administrator password as follows 1 When inthe Administrator menu go to the line Admin Password Click on the left hand digit turn the jog dial to change it and confirm the change by pressing on the jog dial 3 Proceed for the other three digits as described in step 2 Administrator 12 12 2013 12 10 00 Admin Password 0000 Device Number 00 0 7 8 Server subdom dom de Modem internal external Fig 16 Administrator menu 24 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 5 4 3 Server Settings In preparation for transmitting the data measured by the APM 2 to a web server via the GSM GPRS module available as an option it is necessary for an authorized web administrator to first install the corresponding software package to the target server If you have any questions about this please get in touch with Comde Derenda Then in the Administrator menu enter the server s domain and subdo main names Do so as described below 1 Store on an SD card a text txt file containing as text the designation of the domain subdo main e g apm2 derenda de The file must be named server txt 2 Mount the card in the SD card drive at the APM 2 control unit In the Administrator menu click on Server Answer the query which follows with Yes Rw The name of the server will then appear in the Administrator menu see Fig 16 5 4 4 Selecti
57. Reference 0 58 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 27 pg m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 193 Slope b 0 977 nicht signifikant Uncertainty of b 0 020 Ordinate intercept a 3 758 signifikant Uncertainty of a 0 502 Expanded measured uncertainty WCM 23 25 All comparisons 230 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 72 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 2 28 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 33 Slope b 1 035 Uncertainty of b 0 063 Ordinate intercept a 6 432 Uncertainty of a 2 681 Expanded measured uncertainty WCM All comparisons lt 30 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 55 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 96 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 160 Slope b 0 971 Uncertainty of b 0 040 Ordinate intercept a 3 579 Uncertainty of a 0 751 Expanded measured uncertainty WCM 23 05 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 169 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Candidate APM 2 SN SN3 amp SN4 Limit value 50 Status of measured values _Rawdata ___ Allowed uncertainty 25 Cologne Winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 54 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 38 ug m SN 3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 52 52 Slope b 0
58. Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH einian Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 236 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites Page 4 of 11 i a Ambient temperature AVG ae ial Rel a Wind de Wind direction Precipitation C mm 3 9 2013 Bonn winter 3 10 2013 3 11 2013 3 12 2013 3 13 2013 3 14 2013 3 15 2013 3 16 2013 3 17 2013 3 18 2013 3 19 2013 3 20 2013 3 21 2013 3 22 2013 3 23 2013 3 24 2013 3 25 2013 3 26 2013 3 27 2013 3 28 2013 3 29 2013 3 30 2013 3 31 2013 4 1 2013 4 2 2013 4 3 2013 4 4 2013 4 5 2013 4 6 2013 4 7 2013 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 237 of 300 Page 5 of 11 No Test site Ambient temperature AVG C 7 0 121 4 8 2013 Bonn winter 122 4 9 2013 123 4 10 2013 124 4 11 2013 125 4 12 2013 126 4 13 2013 127 4 14 2013 128 4 15 2013 129 4 16 2013 130 4 17
59. Serial Number 27 120 hhhhhh Not Assigned 28 127 lt ETX gt End of Text 29 128 lt BCC1 gt Low Nibble BCC 30 129 lt BCC2 gt High Nibble BCC Telegram Identification MD Telegram Length Variable Telegram Type Response APM 2 47 COMDE DERENDA 13 Technical Specifications Dimensions and Weight excluding impactor inlet and antenna Width 320 mm Height 560 mm Depth 270 mm Weight approx 15 kg Power Supply Supply Voltage 230 V 50 60 Hz Microfuse T1 25A Power Consumption approx 80 W Electronics Interface RS 232 Transfer Protocol Bayern Hessen Protokoll Additional Data Measurement Range 0 1000 pg m Resolution 1 ug m Flow Rate 3 3 I min controlled Sampling time Continuous IP Classification IP 65 48 COMDE DERENDA 14 Dimensional Drawing 1 Ca Gewicht ca z5 Ma stab 1 Werkstoff COMDE DERENDA APM2 73000_A1 Ma e ohne Toleranzang DIN 2768 mH Werkstiickkanten DIN ISO 13715 APM 2 49 COMDE DERENDA 15 Index Administrator SettingS ccccsccccccecssssseseees 23 ASSOMDIY seccctecsctsesadiettanendin eontcetaaneteaeaeteecieens 15 Basic SCttiNn eS 2isciis eis ew a Mies 20 Baud Rate Settings n dss 23 Bayern Hessen Protokoll ccsscceseesteeeeeeeeees 44 Calibrating the Flow Sensor 34 Connecting the SyStEM c ccccccsssssssssteeeeees 16 Contr
60. Site BONN WINTED cc cece ceccceeseeeseeeeeseeuseueseueeeeaeeaeeeueeeeeaueeaueeaneeaenees 133 Figure 48 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 test site Cologne SUMMED isisisi ie ital al oiran aeaa EENE Eren E E 134 Figure 49 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 test site Rodenkirchen SUMMET 0ccccccccecceeeceeeseeeeeeseueeeeeeeeeeeeeueeeeeneanens 134 Figure 50 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 all test SILOS cece ceccecssceceeeeeceneeteeeeeceseesaneeeceneesaaeeasececeaeesaeeeeeneetsneseneneees 135 Figure 51 Flow rate of device SN3 field conditions eee eee ee eeeetee cette eeeeeetteeeeeeeeeeeeees 146 Figure 52 Flow rate of device SN4 field conditions eee eee eeeteeeeee eee eeeeeetteeeeeeeeteeees 146 Figure 53 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMos all test sites ce cececcecceeeeeeeseaeeeeeseaeeeeeeees 154 Figure 54 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM2 test site Cologne winter ceeeeeeeeeees 155 Figure 55 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMos test site Bonn winter cccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 155 Figure 56 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMos test site Cologne
61. Start of Text Byte 002 nnn lt TEXT gt Message Text max 120 Characters USASCII coded Byte nnn 1 ETX End of Text Byte nnn 2 3 BCC Block Check Character The response from the measurement site is always in the same format as that of the command it re ceived APM 2 45 COMDE DERENDA Data Polling The data registered at the measurement site are transmitted to the MSR in response to a polling re quest A polling data block can be used to query either a single measurement unit or all the measure ment units connected at a measurement site Data Transmission The data registered at the site are transferred by way of a response message Where the measurement site has multiple measurement units the individual values will all be compiled into a single message 12 5 Generation of the Block Check Character The block check character BCC is generated by forming byte by byte the exclusive or sum of all the characters transmitted including STX and ETX starting at 00 The result byte block checksum thus created is transmitted in hexadecimal code wherein the upper nibble of this byte is transmitted as BCC1 and the lower nibble as BCC2 The ASCII value range of from 0 to 9 and from A to F capital letters is permissible for the BCC bytes so that the nibbles can be expressed in hexadecimal notation 12 6 Telegrams Serial Measuring Instruments In the telegrams cited below the required blanks are depicted with a p
62. TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 167 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A The results of the check of the five criteria given in chapter 6 1 Methodology of the equiva lence check modules 5 4 9 5 4 11 are as follows Criterion 1 More than 20 of the data are greater than 17 g m Criterion 2 The uncertainty between the candidates is less than 2 5 ug m Criterion 3 The uncertainty between the reference devices is less than 2 0 ug m Criterion 4 All expanded uncertainties are below 25 Criterion 5 The slopes for evaluation of the complete dataset are significantly greater than the permissible values for both devices Other For both candidates together the slope is 0 919 and the intercept is 0 327 at an expanded overall uncertainty of 17 68 for the full dataset 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 168 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 40 Overview of equivalence test of APM 2 for PM All comparisons Uncertainty between
63. Table 42 present an overview of the uncertainties between the reference de VICES Ue Obtained in the field tests Table 41 Uncertainty between reference devices Ure for PM25 Reference Test site No of Uncertainty Ups a values ee ee ee 1 _e Cologne winter 52 0 54 e p emme f a f oe 1 2 Rodenkirchen sum mer All test sites Table 42 Uncertainty between reference devices Uret for PM10 devices val ues e pt EEN an Pare oe a ae All test sites The uncertainty between the reference devices Ue is lt 2 ug m for all test sites 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 173 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM2 5 All comparisons Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference ug m Figure 67 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PMp lt s all test sites Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM2 5 All comparisons Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate g m 30 20 10
64. The maintenance interval of the measuring system shall be determined during the field test and specified The maintenance interval should be three months if possible but at least two weeks 6 2 Equipment Not required here 6 3 Method The types of maintenance and the maintenance intervals required to ensure proper function ing of the AMS were determined in this performance criterion In order to determine the maintenance interval the results of the determination of the drift at zero point according to chapter 6 1 5 3 12 Long term drift have been taken into account 6 4 Evaluation During the entire field test no impermissible drifts at zero have been observed in the candi dates An external check of the sensitivity of the photometer is possible with the help of the test gas procedure but could not be checked in the field test campaign during the type approval test During an investigation on the repeatability a standard deviation smaller than 1 of the mean of the measured values could be determined in 15 measurements so that the test method itself is to be considered sufficiently stable and reproducible and in general suitable for the stability check of the measuring system As the devices have shown no drift effects during the permanent comparison with the standard reference method this circumstance should not be relevant for the assessment of the measuring system especially as it is in tended to completely abstain from this test po
65. This shows that the method becomes independent from weighing room conditions due to the corrective calculation Influence due to the water content of the filter mass between virgin and loaded filter can be controlled and do not change the dust content of sampled filters Hence point 9 3 2 5 of EN 14907 is fulfilled The example of the standard weight between November 2008 and February 2009 shows that the permissible difference of max 20 ug from the previous measurement is not exceeded 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVR heinland TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Pracienly Riah Air Pollution Control recisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 246 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Stability of standard weight between Nov 08 and Feb 09 0 20010 0 20005 2 aa a 1 a A N Standard weight 5 0 20000 eee 3 2 Mean standard weight 0 19995 0 19990 T T T T l 0 5 10 15 20 25 No of weighing Figure 1 Stability of standard weight 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM
66. Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 135 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A SN 3 vs SN 4 All test sites 100 90 Measured values 80 RRE Regression line 70 2 60 gt a oor Acceptance range according to EN 12341 N 2 Ha 2 40 yox 5 30 20 i oeeo 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Candidate 1 yg m Figure 50 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 all test sites 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 136 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 4 Calibration The systems under test shall be calibrated in the field test by comparison measurements with the reference method according to Standard EN 12341 respectively EN 14907 Here the relationship between the output signal and the gravimetrically determined reference concentration shall be determined as a steady function 6 2 Equipment Refe
67. a 0 453 0 508 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 10 59 7 90 Rodenkirchen Summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 52 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 33 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 45 45 Slope b 1 053 1 037 Uncertainty of b 0 046 0 047 Ordinate intercept a 1 230 1 320 Uncertainty of a 0 519 0 521 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 7 76 7 54 All comparisons 218 g m Uncertainty between Reference 0 63 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 04 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 49 49 Slope b 0 871 0 904 Uncertainty of b 0 030 0 031 Ordinate intercept a 1 046 1 438 Uncertainty of a 0 921 0 96 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 24 98 19 63 All comparisons lt 18 g m Uncertainty between Reference 0 53 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 42 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 145 143 Slope b 1 019 1 065 Uncertainty of b 0 029 0 031 Ordinate intercept a 0 877 1 020 Uncertainty of a 0 317 0 344 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 7 80 10 37 All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 55 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 65 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 194 192 Slope b 0 896 significant 0 943 Uncertainty of b 0 012 0 012 Ordinate intercept a 0 382 not significant 0 267 not significant Uncertainty of a 0 209 0 225 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 21 09 14 84 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A
68. as it is intended to completely abstain from this test point in future for type approval testing according to EN TS 16450 9 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 70 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 4 Evaluation All functions described in the operator s manual are available or can be activated The cur rent instrument status is continuously monitored and different warning messages are dis played in the case of problems External zero point checks by means of a zero filter can be carried out at any time An external check of the sensitivity of the photometer can also be carried out at any time with the help of the test gas check however it could not be verified during the field test campaigns within the context of the type approval test During an investigation on the repeatability a standard deviation smaller than 1 of the mean of the measured values could be deter mined in 15 measurements so that the test method itself is to be considered sufficiently sta ble and reproducible and in general suitable for a stability check of the measuring system 6 5 Assessment All functions described in the operator s manual are available can be activated a
69. campaigns with exception of Cologne winter The demonstra tion of equivalence according to EN 12341 1998 is thus not possible Nevertheless the equivalence test according to the EC guide which is relevant for the end user is passed after application of the necessary cor rection factors for all test sites without restrictions refer to 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms Reproducibility of This shall be demonstrated in The two sided confidence interval the sampling the field test for two identical CI95 of max 3 58 g m is below the systems systems according to permissible limit of 5 g m EN 12341 T2 Calibration The systems under test shall A statistical correlation between the be calibrated in the field test by reference measuring method and the comparison measurements output signal could be demonstrated with the reference method ac cording to EN 12341 and EN 14907 Here the relation ship between the output signal and the gravimetrically deter mined reference concentration shall be determined as a steady function 5 4 5 Cross sensitivity Shall not exceed 10 of the No deviation of the measured signal limit value from the nominal value gt 1 1 g m caused by interference due to mois ture in the sample could be observed for PM2 5 For PMio no deviation of the measured signal from the nominal value gt 0 9 ug m caused by interfer ence due to moisture in the sample could be o
70. devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM2s all test sites 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 155 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 Cologne Winter Raw data 130 ee 120 110 100 o Measured values Regression line o y x Candidate 2 ug m O te O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 54 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM 5 test site Cologne winter APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 Bonn Winter Raw data 130 ca 120 110 100 Measured values Ko Regression line y x NI oO Candidate 2 ug m oa O o O 40 O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 55 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMz2 5 test site Bonn winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc in ra TUV Rheinland Energie und
71. display will show the initialization screen for a short period of time It will be followed by the start screen Fig 8 Shown in addition to the date and time of day is the model designation 3 Read the information in the display at the control unit to determine whether the device has been correctly recognized as APM 2 If the filter changer has not been identified correctly check the cable connection and if necessary get in touch with Comde Derenda GmbH NOTE Whenever the system is moved to a new location observe an acclimatization period of one hour before sampling so that the external sensor can adjust to the ambient conditions 4 5 Storage The following instructions should be followed if the unit is moved or taken out of service for an extend ed period of time e The storage temperature should be in a range of from 10 C to 60 C e Cover the inlet for the virtual impactor e Protect the device s inlets and outlets against grime e Itis necessary to avoid both high relative humidity which could cause condensation in case of a temperature change and any severe vibration of the unit It is advisable to thoroughly clean and maintain the unit before any extended period out of service 16 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 5 Operation and Device Settings After the device is switched on with the main power and control unit power switches the APM 2 main menu is shown in the display at the control unit Fig 8 The ma
72. each PM and PM25 were operated simultane ously with a flow rate of 2 3 m h Under real operating conditions the volume flow control ac curacy is lt 1 of the nominal flow rate The sampling head of the small filter device LVS3 sucks in the sample air via a rotary vane vacuum pump The sample volume flow is then measured by means of a measuring orifice between filter and vacuum pump The suctioned air then streams out of the pump via a sepa rator for the abrasion of the rotary vanes and towards the air outlet As soon as the sampling is complete the electronic measurement equipment displays the sucked in sample air volume in standard or operating m The PM and PM25 concentrations were determined by dividing the amount of suspended particulate matter on each filter that had been determined gravimetrically in the laboratory by the respective sampling volume in operating m 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 64 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 Test results 6 1 4 1 1 Measured value display The AMS shall have a means to display the measured values 6 2 Equipment Additional equipment is not required 6 3 Method It was checked whether the AMS
73. flow sensor e Last Photo Calib Date and time of the most recent service for the photometer e Model Number GPRS modem type e Firmware Rev Firmware version for the GPRS modem e Network Stat Status of the GSM GPRS connection e IP Address IP address of the GPRS connection See section 9 5 3 for details on calibrating the flow sensor System Information 12 10 00 Software Vers Hardware Vers Serial Number Device Number Last Flow Calib 23 10 2013 Last Photo Calib 16 09 2013 Model Number GE864 QUAD Firmware Rev 10 00 014 Network Stat registered IP Address 88 128 226 63 A o Fl Fig 20 System Information screen 9 3 Service Menu The Service menu is used primarily to check the sensors and for adjustment and maintenance work car ried out by service technicians This menu will not usually be used in normal operations You access the Service menu from the main screen by selecting Setup gt Service Shown in the Service menu are all measured values reported by the unit s sensors together with the corresponding correction parameters 9 4 Manual Mode The Manual Mode menu allows you to start individual system functions manually It is primarily de signed for service technicians who want to test individual functions Manual mode is not suitable for regular measurements of the particulate matter mass concentration because there is no automatic flushing during the measurement You can call up the following
74. for the tested devices SN3 and SN4 Candidates Test site Number Standard Student s Confidence of deviation s factor t interval Clos values OS o oe SN3 SN4 Cologne winter 69 144 1 996 2 87 SN3 SN4 Rodenkirchen 53 2 008 1 38 summer SN3 SN4 237 1 35 1 970 2 67 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 133 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A SN 3 vs SN 4 Cologne Winter 2012 2013 100 Measured values 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Regression line Acceptance range according to EN 12341 y x Candidate 2 ug m O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 46 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 test site Co logne winter SN 3 vs SN 4 Bonn Winter 100 7 Sf Measured values 90 P orn 80 7 z Pa Regression line 70 al a E 60 seal Acceptance range e cat according to EN 12341 Ps 50 a g oa y x 5 40 to ao Pa 30 ia 10 gfe o K7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Candid
75. has a means to display the measured values 6 4 Evaluation The measuring system provides a display that shows the measured values During meas urement mode the currently measured PM concentration respectively during the purge mode the measured voltage value in mV is shown at the right hand side of the display On the left hand side the following measured values are shown PM2 5 avg Mean value of the measured mass concentration PM25 moving updated every second PM10 avg Mean value of the measured mass concentration PM moving updated every second Fl Offset Photometer Offset determined during zero air purging Phototemp Photometer temperature Ext temp Ambient temperature Humidity Ambient relative humidity Pressure Ambient pressure 6 5 Assessment The measuring system provides a display that shows the measured values Performance criterion met yes 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH d Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 65 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Figure 29 shows the user interface with the current concentrations Figure 29 Display of measured concentrations here PM25 German language setup 3195669_
76. if deviations of the group averages of measured values about the calibration function meet the requirements of Table 2 in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 in the certification range according to Table 1 in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 For all other certification ranges the group averages of measured values about the calibra tion function shall not exceed 5 of the upper limit of the corresponding certification range Note By resolution of the relevant body in Germany refer to module 5 3 1 this test item is irrele vant to particulate measuring systems Particulate measuring systems for PM shall be test ed according to performance criterion 5 4 2 Equivalency of the sampling system Particulate measuring systems for PM25 shall be tested according to performance criterion 5 4 10 Cal culation of expanded uncertainty between systems under test 6 2 Equipment Refer to modules 5 4 2 PM and 5 4 10 PMz25 6 3 Method Particulate measuring systems for PM19 shall be tested according to performance criterion 5 4 2 Equivalency of the sampling system Particulate measuring systems for PM25 shall be tested according to performance criterion 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between systems under test 6 4 Evaluation Refer to modules 5 4 2 PM and 5 4 10 PMz25 6 5 Assessment Particulate measuring systems for PM19 shall be tested according to performance criterion 5 4 2 Equi
77. individual functions of the device Normal users need it very rarely For operation see 9 4 18 APM 2 Lu m 2 O DERENDA ON 991K0q pomssed upy SPOW OM aey pneg sapoo unod joueds3 yosinaq ysy6ug Weled WIINSLEIN 10 e S1UIU pY juswuysnipy s1naq oju Wa shS ERINES seJ uop Jaysues aul eq s 1 4297 UOHEIGIED enbue7 B N molly Joyoe4 suo dwajoj oud anjeaqied dweay jes jeasaqu uoNoes4 Wd OLWd S eWd ysnis ayepdn aemuli 11g peo GS pied as lt Aiowayy Aiowayy 343120 pesp Aioway Fig 10 APM 2 menu structure 19 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 5 2 Basic Settings Certain basic settings will have to be made at the unit before starting the configuration work proper 5 2 1 Choosing a Language Follow these instructions to select the language for the operator prompts 1 2 3 Select the Setup item in the main screen and confirm by pressing the jog dial When in the Setup menu select the Language item and confirm this Turn the jog dial to select the desired language displayed in the right half of the display English German Spanish Italian and Polish are available at present and confirm your choice Confirm the Back menu item to return to the main menu Setup Menue 11 11 00 Go Back Calibration English Leaking Test Deutsch Date time Espa
78. lists the values obtained in leakage testing Table 36 Results from leakage testing Test SN3 SN4 max Pressure Leak rate in Pressure Leak rate in permissible f leak rate in increase in ml min increase in ml min mimin 5 min in hPa 5 min in hPa 1 108 8 2 151 10 4 33 2 104 8 0 143 10 1 33 102 8 0 139 9 9 33 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 149 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 Methodology of the equivalence check modules 5 4 9 5 4 11 According to the January 2010 version of the Guide 5 the following 5 criteria shall be met in order to prove equivalence 1 At least 20 of the concentration values from the complete dataset determined by means of reference method shall exceed the upper assessment threshold for annual limit values determined in 2008 50 EC 8 i e 28 g m for PMio and 17 ug m for PMy 5 2 The uncertainty between the candidates must be less than 2 5 g m for all data and for two sub datasets corresponding to all the data split greater than or equal to and lower than 30 ug m or 18 g m for PM1o and PM 3 5 respectively The uncertainty between the reference devices must be l
79. not connected correctly Check Temperature sensor at photometer defective Error_PARAMETERCRC Malfunction Can appear following a firmware update be ab solutely sure to load the factory defaults and calibrate the device Before updating the firmware be absolutely sure to copy down the old parameters shown in the menu Error_MENUITEM Please notify the manufacturer APM 2 43 COMDE DERENDA 12 Bayern Hessen Protokoll Bavaria Hesse Protocol 12 1 Interface Definition Serial Measuring Instruments Being used ever more frequently in pollution measurement networks are intelligent microprocessor controlled measurement units fitted as standard equipment with an interface to transfer measurement data operational status information and error status To ensure trouble free attachment of a wide variety of equipment a standard interface is described below similar to the 50 pole data plug described in the Standardization Recommendation for Auto mated Air Quality Control Measurement Networks 12 2 Interface Specification Asynchronous serial Data Transfer Baud Rate 1200 Baud Data Format 1 Start Bit 8 Data Bits 1 Stop Bit Handshake Full duplex Operation Polling Method MSR Master Connector 9 pole SUB D Connector with the PIN configuration PIN 02 TxD Send Data Off PIN 03 RxD Receive Data On PIN 05 GNDGround Voltage Level According to norm V24 not potential free
80. of NO2 concentration due to residence in the AMS 5 3 18 Overall uncer tainty The difference between the Not applicable measured values obtained by feeding gas at the sample and calibration port shall not ex ceed the requirements of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 In the case of measuring sys Not applicable tems with a converter the effi ciency of the converter shall be at least 98 In case of NOx measuring sys Not applicable tems the increase of NO2 con centration due to residence in the measuring system shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 The expanded uncertainty of By resolution of the relevant body in the measuring system shall be Germany see module 5 3 1 this test determined The value deter item is irrelevant to particulate meas mined shall not exceed the cor uring systems Please refer to module responding data quality objec 5 4 10 tives in the applicable EU Di rectives on air quality listed in Annex A Table A1 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 Sep tember 2010 5 4 Requirements on measuring systems for particulate air pollutants 5 4 1 General Test according to the minimum The test was carried out according to requirement stated in Table 5 the minimum requirements set out in of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 Table 5 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet Furthermore the particle mass 1
81. of the pump is displayed on the system with an error message Maintenance work shall be carried out according to the instructions provided in the manual chapter 10 In general all work can be carried out with commonly available tools 6 5 Assessment Maintenance work can be carried out from the outside with commonly available tools and reasonable time and effort The operations described in item 6ff shall only be performed when the device is on standstill These works occur every 3 months cleaning of virtual im pactor every 6 months filter replacement once a year photometer respectively every 2 years pump In the meantime maintenance work is limited to the check of contaminations plausibility and possible status error messages Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results During the testing work on the devices was carried out on the basis of operations and work processes described in the manuals However there was no replacement of the photometer By adhering to the described procedures no difficulties were observed Up to this point all maintenance could be carried out without difficulty and with conventional tools 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 68 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the c
82. performed at the test sites given in Table 1 Table 1 Description of test sites Cologne Bonn Cologne Rodenkirchen parking lot street crossing parking lot motorway A555 winter winter summer summer Period 11 2012 02 2013 02 2013 05 2013 05 2013 07 2013 07 2013 09 2013 No of 69 61 54 53 paired values candidates Characteristics Urban background Influenced by traffic Urban background Rural structure motorway Level of ambient air Average Average Low Low pollution to high to high to average During the performance of the type approval test the calculation algorithm for the measured PM values has been further optimized by the instrument manufacturer For this the instru ment software had to be revised and a new software version Version 3 0 1 was provided during winter 2014 In order to qualify the now implemented modification of the calculation algorithm in the instrument software all measured values of the comparison campaigns ac cording to table 1 have been manually recalculated with the new calculation algorithm and re evaluated Furthermore an additional comparison campaign at the test site Cologne park ing lot with two candidates and the new software version Version 3 0 1 was carried out for further qualification Table 2 gives an overview on the additional campaign The results of these additional investigations are presented in chapter 7 starting with page 194
83. pi 30 A 20 10 0 cl se a a a 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 76 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM s Rodenkirchen summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 178 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM2 5 All comparisons 218 ug m Raw 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 77 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM s values 2 18 ug m Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM2 5 All comparisons 218 yg m Raw 100 gt gt gt 90 Le 80 lt 70 60 50 40 Candidate ug m 30 20 10 SS eae me 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 78 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM s values 2 18 ug m 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performa
84. sensors APM 2 17 COMDE DERENDA e System info Information on the equipment data e Administrator Changing the password and resetting to default settings e Device Adjustment Special settings made by the manufacturer e Measurem Param Setting the particulate fractions to be used for measurement purposes PM25 PMao or alternating mode the target temperature for the heating block the factors and offsets for the measurement and the intervals for alternating mode if selected Setup Menue 11 11 00 Language Calibration Leaking Test Date time Transfer Contrast Service System info Administrator Device Adjustment Measurem Param Fig 9 Setup menu 5 1 2 Data Menu The Data menu Fig 19 contains all the functions related to the data memory overview transmission and deletion of stored data as well as a display of the capacity utilization of the internal data memory In addition this menu provides access to the update functions for the device software For operation see 8 5 1 3 Measurement Clicking on this menu item will start the measurements and will control the volume flow correction For operation see 6 5 1 4 Manual Mode menu The Manual Mode menu Fig 21 makes it possible to directly start the functions PM measurement PM measurement and flushing manually The selected functions run without pauses until they are stopped by the user This menu is primarily designed for service staff to test
85. shall not exceed 5 for ATu of 15 K between 5 C and 20 C or for 20 K between 20 C and 40 C 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc Particulate measuring systems for PMio shall be tested according to per formance criterion 5 4 2 Equivalency of the sampling system Particulate measuring systems for PMz5 shall be tested according to per formance criterion 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between sys tems under test Not applicable Not applicable The ambient temperature range test ed at the AMS installation site was 20 C to 50 C Looking at the val ues that were output by the AMS the maximum dependence of ambient temperature in the range of 20 C to 50 C at zero was 0 1 ug m for PMz2 5 and 0 2 ug m for PM1o At reference point no deviations gt 2 7 in relation to the default tem perature of 20 C were observed TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 25 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Specification Test result Fulfilled 5 3 8 Sensitivity coeffi cient of supply voltage 5 3 9 Cross sensitivity 5 3 10 Averaging effect 5 3 11 Standard devia tion from paired measurements The sensitivity coefficient of th
86. sus Page 75 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 4 1 7 Data output The output signals shall be provided digitally e g RS232 and or as analogue signals e g 4 mA to 20 mA 6 2 Equipment PC with HyperTerminal software 6 3 Method The measuring system has got an internal buffer with 3 5 MB capacity The buffer is de signed as a non volatile ring buffer Additionally the measured data can be saved directly on a SD card During type approval test the measured data have been saved device internally on the SD card and have been readout The measuring system also offers the possibility to output measured signals or communicate via serial interface RS232 serial Bayern Hessen proto col The transfer of measured data via RS 232 to a terminal software is easily possible The AMS does not provide analogue output signals 6 4 Evaluation The measured signals are offered as follows on the front side of the instrument 1x SD card for saving measured values 1x RS232 interface for communication via serial interface Bayern Hessen Protocol 1x RS232 interface as programming interface for service only 6 5 Assessment The measured signals are stored on SD card or offered digitally via RS232 Performance criterion met yes 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance te
87. system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 217 of 300 Annex 5 Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 7 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m AMB Serial No SN3 SN4 Ref 1 Ref 2 Ratio SN3 SN 4 SN3 SN4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 ug m ug m ug m ug m ug m ug m 6 15 2013 45 0 4 9 5 5 6 9 8 2 Cologne summer 6 16 2013 44 9 6 8 7 5 9 3 10 8 6 17 2013 58 4 11 5 12 3 14 8 16 7 6 18 2013 63 5 16 6 17 7 21 4 24 1 6 19 2013 33 0 35 7 40 6 45 6 Ref PM2 5 stability criteria 6 20 2013 58 6 11 5 12 5 14 9 16 7 EN 14907 not met 6 21 2013 57 5 5 3 5 7 6 6 7 4 6 22 2013 83 9 3 3 3 7 4 2 4 8 6 23 2013 68 6 3 9 4 4 5 5 6 4 6 24 2013 65 3 9 4 9 9 12 0 13 3 6 25 2013 60 5 6 1 6 8 8 3 9 4 6 26 2013 69 8 8 9 9 3 10 9 11 6 6 27 2013 69 7 9 3 10 0 11 6 12 7 6 28 2013 79 1 10 6 11 7 13 1 14 2 6 29 2013 Zero point 6 30 2013 Zero point 7 1 2013 16 7 57 8 9 6 10 1 12 0 13 3 7 2 2013 13 1 60 8 8 7 9 0 10 3 11 0 7 3 2013 11 8 53 2 6 0 6 5 8 3 9 3 7 4 2013 14 8 56 1 9 2 9 6 11 1 12 1 7 5 2013 23 1 15 0 16 0 18 6 20 6 Outlier Ref PM2 5 7 6 2013 17 6 77 4 14 0 14 3 16 3 17 3 7 7 2013 16 4 74 2 10 8 11 0 12 3 13 1 7 8 2013 18 2 70 2 10 7 11 5 12 9 14 3
88. test gas These can be obtained on request from Comde Derenda GmbH 9 7 Leak Tightness Test An automatic leak tightness test is provided in the APM 2 to check the tightness of the system this is started via the device firmware This test requires the Comde Derenda leak test instrument Fig 24 available separately 9 7 1 Sequence for Leak Tightness Testing Leak testing is started by using the internal pump to create a vacuum of approx 300 hPa inside the de vice Then observe the system to determine whether and the extent to which this pressure rises within the following 5 minutes The test is considered to have been passed if the pressure rise is less than 290 hPa Otherwise the system is leaking and will have to be inspected The test at the zero air port is optional and intended primarily for use by service technicians 9 7 2 Leaking Test Menu The leak test is conducted using the APM 2 control unit The appropriate menu is called up by selecting Setup gt Leaking Test Shown in the center of the menu window is the name of the function currently being run and the ap propriate progress bar The following values are shown in the lower section of the window 36 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA e PGas Current vacuum in the system in hPa e Zero air Starts the leak test when the leak testing instrument is connected to the zero air port e Inlet Starts the leak test when the leak testing instrument is connected to the virtual impa
89. the settings described below in the APM Parameter menu Fig 17 The password set at the factory is 0000 6 1 Selecting Particulate Matter Fraction First of all you select the particulate matter fraction to be measured Here you have a choice between PM25 PM and alternating measurement of both fractions alternating mode To select the fraction to be measured 1 Inthe Setup menu select Measurem Param and enter your password as described above 2 Inthe APM parameter menu Fig 17 select the desired fraction 2 5 10 or 2 5 10 for alternat ing mode in the top left entry line by turning the jog dial to shift the inversion and press the jog dial to confirm After that the selected value appears outlined and the selection remains active until it is changed 26 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 6 2 Selecting Interval for Alternating Mode and Storage If you have selected alternating mode 2 5 10 as the measurement mode the APM 2 alternately measures the concentration of the particulate matter fractions PM 5 and PM The device automatically carries out the necessary zero air flushing for a period of two minutes on an hourly basis Using the in terval setting you can specify the intervals at which the change between the two fractions should take place In addition this setting specifies at what intervals the measurement data are stored in the inter nal device memory and or if provided on the SD card To carry out the set
90. tightness of the sampling system Dependence of the measured values on sample humidity Maintenance interval Availability Total uncertainty of tested systems Unfortunately the test method was not available before December 2013 so that the nec essary tests at the reference point in the lab climate chamber mains voltage could be carried out but there are no long term drift investigations at the reference point available from the field test As the devices have shown no drift effects during the permanent com parison with the standard reference method this circumstance should not be relevant for the assessment of the measuring system especially as it is intended to completely ab stain from this test point in future for type approval testing according to EN TS 16450 9 The following auxiliary devices were used during the field test e T V Rheinland measuring cabinet air conditioned to approx 20 C e Weather station WS 500 of ELV Elektronik AG for the detection of meteorological parameters such as ambient temperature atmospheric pressure humidity wind ve locity wind direction and amount of precipitation 2 reference measuring systems LVS3 for PM as per item 5 2 reference measuring systems LVS3 for PM25 as per item 5 1 gas meter dry 1 mass flow meter Model 4043 Manufacturer TSI Power consumption measuring device type Metratester 5 manufactured by Gossen Metrawatt e Zero filter for external zero point checks 319566
91. y x T 3 40 S 30 oO ae 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 38 Reference equivalence function SN3 test site Bonn winter Reference vs SN 4 Bonn Winter 100 Measured values 90 80 Regression line 70 om pod fea a E A a SEES Acceptance range 2 according to EN 12341 g 50 ya 40 ke S 30 oO Rete 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 39 Reference equivalence function SN4 test site Bonn winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 127 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs SN 3 Cologne Summer 100 Measured values 90 Regression line 80 AO it Ooo ot ree Acceptance range E according to EN 12341 60 y x 2 50 3 40 ao S 30 is ao 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 40 Reference equivalence function SN3 test site Cologne summer Refe
92. 0 0 265 1 13 2014 Cologne winter 2014 6 8 1002 82 5 0 0 210 0 0 266 1 14 2014 validation campaign 6 3 1001 77 9 0 3 203 0 0 267 1 15 2014 5 3 998 86 2 0 3 205 3 9 268 1 16 2014 7 8 993 80 2 0 2 220 0 0 269 1 17 2014 8 2 994 72 4 0 3 209 0 3 270 1 18 2014 6 5 992 75 3 0 7 202 0 0 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc T VRh z d T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH U einlan Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 242 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites Page 10 of 11 No Test site Ambient temperature AVG Ambient pressure Rel humidity Wind velocity Wind direction Precipitation C hPa m s a mm 5 7 994 0 2 202 0 0 1 19 2014 Cologne winter 2014 1 20 2014 validation campaign 1 21 2014 1 22 2014 1 23 2014 1 24 2014 1 25 2014 1 26 2014 1 27 2014 1 28 2014 1 29 2014 1 30 2014 1 31 2014 2 1 2014 2 2 2014 2 3 2014 2 4 2014 2 5 2014 2 6 2014 2 7 2014 2 8 2014 2 9 2014 2 10 2014 2 11 2014 2 12 2014 2 13 2014 2 14 2014 2 15 2014 2 16 2014 2 17 2014 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Dere
93. 0 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 62 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM test site Bonn winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 160 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 Cologne Summer Raw data 130 ee 120 110 100 o Measured values Regression line y x Candidate 2 ug m O te O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 63 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM o test site Cologne summer APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 Rodenkirchen Summer Raw data 130 E 120 110 100 Measured values Ko Regression line y x NI oO Candidate 2 ug m oa O o O 40 O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 64 Results of the parallel measurements with the d
94. 0 2 186 0 6 184 6 18 2013 28 2 1005 57 4 0 2 181 0 0 185 6 19 2013 27 2 1003 64 4 1 1 190 0 0 186 6 20 2013 19 7 1003 79 5 0 4 187 32 4 187 6 21 2013 17 9 1006 73 8 0 7 155 2 7 188 6 22 2013 18 4 1004 67 4 1 0 172 2 4 189 6 23 2013 16 0 1006 69 7 1 6 176 1 5 190 6 24 2013 13 7 1014 76 2 1 8 163 0 3 191 6 25 2013 13 0 1019 68 8 0 9 232 0 0 192 6 26 2013 13 6 1018 71 0 0 7 197 11 2 193 6 27 2013 12 6 1014 77 9 0 4 191 8 9 194 6 28 2013 13 7 1010 89 5 0 2 173 22 5 195 6 29 2013 13 8 1014 74 0 1 1 222 0 0 196 6 30 2013 17 6 1012 67 3 0 5 163 0 0 197 7 1 2013 19 4 1008 68 3 0 4 189 0 0 198 7 2 2013 21 8 1003 59 2 0 2 179 0 9 199 7 3 2013 16 9 1005 87 7 0 1 179 12 7 200 7 4 2013 20 4 1015 68 6 0 6 187 0 0 201 7 5 2013 19 9 1021 73 4 0 3 186 0 0 202 7 6 2013 22 9 1020 61 9 0 2 147 0 0 203 7 7 2013 23 6 1021 54 0 0 7 174 0 0 204 7 8 2013 24 0 1019 55 0 0 8 156 0 0 205 7 9 2013 23 4 1014 55 6 0 8 207 0 0 206 7 10 2013 19 1 1012 61 2 2 0 191 0 0 207 7 11 2013 14 8 1014 73 1 0 4 174 0 0 208 7 12 2013 16 8 1014 68 2 0 7 184 0 0 209 7 13 2013 18 0 1015 66 5 0 5 196 0 0 210 7 14 2013 No weather data available 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc T VRh z d T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH U einlan Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 240 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2
95. 0 74 ug m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 47 47 Slope b 0 903 0 949 Uncertainty of b 0 018 0 018 Ordinate intercept a 5 965 4 990 Uncertainty of a 0 389 0 385 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 8 39 12 00 All comparisons 230 pg m Uncertainty between Reference 0 68 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 2 17 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 40 40 Slope b 1 024 1 083 Uncertainty of b 0 061 0 061 Ordinate intercept a 2 267 1 935 Uncertainty of a 2 595 2 58 Expanded measured uncertainty Wem 19 05 20 49 All comparisons lt 30 pg m Uncertainty between Reference 0 56 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 93 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 202 200 Slope b 0 900 0 987 Uncertainty of b 0 036 0 037 Ordinate intercept a 2 238 1 597 Uncertainty of a 0 652 0 665 Expanded measured uncertainty Wcm 17 00 13 72 All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 58 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 22 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 242 240 Slope b 0 937 signifikant 1 014 nicht signifikant Uncertainty of b 0 019 0 019 Ordinate intercept a 1 556 signifikant 1 086 signifikant Uncertainty of a 0 455 0 460 Expanded measured uncertainty Wem 15 47 15 91 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components su
96. 1 2013 37 6 63 8 16 9 18 1 23 3 25 6 135 4 22 2013 43 9 68 3 24 1 25 7 30 8 33 9 136 4 23 2013 18 8 57 6 8 5 8 9 11 4 12 1 137 4 24 2013 gt 24 4 55 6 11 0 11 7 15 0 16 3 138 4 25 2013 i 3 23 6 55 3 10 4 10 9 14 5 15 8 139 4 26 2013 Zero point 140 4 27 2013 Zero point 141 4 28 2013 Zero point 142 4 29 2013 5 i 21 4 64 9 10 7 11 1 14 0 15 0 143 4 30 2013 13 0 13 8 17 1 18 5 144 5 1 2013 b 22 2 80 7 15 9 16 9 19 3 20 8 145 5 2 2013 16 0 16 9 20 0 21 7 146 5 3 2013 34 4 68 5 21 4 22 7 27 5 30 1 147 5 4 2013 A y 30 6 65 7 16 8 17 7 21 5 23 3 148 5 5 2013 5 i 14 8 65 4 7 5 8 0 9 6 10 2 149 5 6 2013 i 22 9 63 9 12 9 13 7 16 5 18 1 150 5 15 2013 Zero point Cologne summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc T VRh z T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH U einland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 216 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 6 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m AMB Serial No SN3 SN4 No Ratio SN3 SN 4 SN3 SN 4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 ug m ug m ug m ug m
97. 1 2013 97 2 40 1 41 4 44 1 47 4 65 1 22 2013 90 5 50 6 52 4 56 0 59 4 Outlier Ref PM10 not discarded 66 1 23 2013 90 8 58 3 60 2 64 8 67 7 67 1 24 2013 86 1 20 3 20 9 23 1 23 6 68 1 25 2013 93 3 16 3 16 9 18 4 18 9 69 1 26 2013 92 5 23 3 23 9 26 0 27 0 70 1 27 2013 61 1 8 3 8 4 10 8 12 3 71 1 28 2013 68 6 5 3 5 6 6 7 7 6 72 1 29 2013 72 0 3 6 4 1 4 6 5 1 73 1 30 2013 43 8 3 5 4 1 7 4 8 9 74 1 31 2013 41 6 4 8 5 5 9 8 12 2 75 2 1 2013 81 4 8 8 9 2 10 9 11 9 76 2 2 2013 4 3 4 5 7 8 8 8 77 2 3 2013 7 9 8 1 9 7 10 4 78 2 4 2013 5 4 5 9 9 2 10 8 79 2 5 2013 Zero point 80 2 6 2013 Zero point 81 2 27 2013 Zero point Bonn winter 82 2 28 2013 Zero point 83 3 1 2013 24 9 23 0 36 3 36 7 65 6 20 8 21 8 27 0 30 0 84 3 2 2013 25 1 26 1 31 7 35 4 85 3 3 2013 22 1 23 2 29 3 29 8 76 6 19 1 20 0 22 7 24 9 86 3 4 2013 19 6 20 5 28 2 28 7 70 2 16 3 17 4 20 3 22 9 87 3 5 2013 28 4 27 7 40 2 39 9 70 1 23 9 25 6 29 4 32 7 88 3 6 2013 25 8 24 5 39 3 39 7 63 8 21 1 22 6 26 8 30 3 89 3 7 2013 28 0 28 3 39 5 39 5 71 2 25 6 27 6 31 5 35 1 90 3 8 2013 28 8 27 0 35 4 34 8 79 5 27 0 28 8 32 0 34 8 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc T VRh z T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH U einland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 214 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936
98. 12 16 2012 12 17 2012 12 18 2012 ANOaARWND 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH 7 Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 223 of 300 Annex 5 PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 Page 13 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m STD Serial No SN3 SN4 Ref 1 Ref 2 Ref 1 Ref 2 Ratio SN3 SN 4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 PM10 ug m ug m ug m ug m ug Nm ug Nm 12 19 2012 Cologne winter 12 20 2012 12 21 2012 12 22 2012 12 23 2012 12 24 2012 12 25 2012 12 26 2012 12 27 2012 12 28 2012 12 29 2012 12 30 2012 12 31 2012 Power loss 1 1 2013 Power loss 1 2 2013 1 3 2013 1 4 2013 1 5 2013 1 6 2013 1 7 2013 1 8 2013 1 9 2013 1 10 2013 1 11 2013 Zero point 1 12 2013 Zero point 1 13 2013 Zero point 1 14 2013 1 15 2013 1 16 2013 1 17 2013 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUVRh d T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH einian Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2
99. 13 12 9 14 0 13 8 15 0 195 6 29 2013 Zero point 196 6 30 2013 Zero point 197 7 1 2013 18 4 17 9 13 0 14 4 198 7 2 2013 15 2 14 2 11 4 12 1 199 7 3 2013 12 6 12 6 8 9 10 0 200 7 4 2013 16 7 15 9 12 0 13 1 201 7 5 2013 25 4 24 6 19 9 22 0 Outlier Ref PM2 5 202 7 6 2013 19 4 18 9 17 7 18 8 203 7 7 2013 17 7 17 6 13 4 14 2 204 7 8 2013 19 5 19 6 14 0 15 6 205 7 9 2013 25 5 25 3 16 3 18 3 206 7 10 2013 19 6 19 0 12 4 13 5 207 7 11 2013 23 4 26 0 Outlier Ref PM10 208 7 12 2013 30 6 28 4 21 9 24 4 209 7 13 2013 28 3 26 4 23 0 25 0 210 7 14 2013 21 8 24 3 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 229 of 300 Annex 5 PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 Page 19 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m STD Serial No SN3 SN4 No Date Ref 1 PM2 5 ug m Ref 2 PM2 5 ug m Ref 1 PM10 ug m Ref 2 PM10 ug m Ratio PM2 5 PM10 SN 3 PM10 ug Nm SN4 PM10 ug Nm Remark Test
100. 2 manufacturer s data APM 2 Measuring system 320 x 560 x 270 mm 15 kg Sampling line 0 5m between inlet and virtual impactor customized lengths available on request Sampling inlet PM general shape and manufacture accord ing to DIN EN 12341 downscaled to 3 3 I min Power requirements 230 V 50 60 Hz Power input ca 80 W Ambient conditions Temperature 20 to 50 C Humidity Outdoor assembly protection class IP65 Sample flow rate Inlet 3 3 I min Virtual impactor Side flow 3 1 l min PM25 Axial flow 0 2 l min PMio Aerosol sensor Measuring principle Scattered light One angle 90 Nominal temperature photometer 40 C Measuring range 0 1000 pg m Resolution 1 yg m Operating method During type approval test PM1o and PM2 5 in switch mode with switching interval of 2 min different switching intervals 5 10 and 15 min as well as option to single operation of either PMio or PM2 5 are available Storage capacity data internal 3 5 MB corresponds to 27 000 data sets non volatile ring buffer Device inputs and outputs 1 x SD card for storage of measured values 1 x RS232 interface for communication via se rial interface Bayern Hessen Protocol 1 x RS232 interface as programming interface service only Status signals Error messages Available manual chapter 11 3195669_2014_936_21219977
101. 2 5 Ref in pg m 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 15 05 2013 23 05 2013 31 05 2013 08 06 2013 16 06 2013 24 06 2013 02 07 2013 10 07 2013 Figure 18 Course of PM25 concentrations reference at test site Cologne summer Conc PM2 5 Ref in pg m 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 30 07 2013 06 08 2013 13 08 2013 20 08 2013 27 08 2013 03 09 2013 10 09 2013 17 09 2013 Figure 19 Course of PM25 concentrations reference at test site Rodenkirchen summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 54 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 80 70 E 60 E 50 m we 40 w g 30 g S 20 oO 10 0 l O fo oO oO oO oO A S Q A A A A S se hr N N N N oO S Q 2 S 2 2 2 S mM jo N oO j N T oO N N N Figure 20 Course of PM 5 concentrations reference at test site Cologne winter 2014 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of
102. 2013 1 8 5 15 2013 1 4 5 15 2013 1 7 5 16 2013 1 2 5 16 2013 1 7 6 29 2013 i 1 6 6 29 2013 2 4 6 30 2013 15 j 1 5 2 2 9 21 2013 1 5 0 0 1 5 9 21 2013 1 7 0 5 1 7 2 7 2014 2 8 2014 2 9 2014 Cologne Winter 2014 validation campaign 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 112 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 24 Zero point drift SN3 amp SN4 PM2s with zero filter SN3 SN4 Measured Deviation from Deviation from Measured Deviation from Deviation from Date Value previous value start value Date Value previous value start value g m pg m ug m pg m ug m pg m 11 19 2012 11 19 2012 11 20 2012 11 20 2012 11 21 2012 11 21 2012 1 11 2013 1 11 2013 1 12 2013 1 12 2013 1 13 2013 1 13 2013 2 5 2013 2 5 2013 2 6 2013 2 6 2013 2 27 2013 2 27 2013 2 28 2013 2 28 2013 3 30 2013 3 30 2013 3 31 2013 3 31 2013 4 1 2013 4 1 2013 4 26 2013 4 26 2013 4 27 2013 4 28 2013 4 28 2013 5 15 2013 5 15 2013 5 16 2013 5 16 2013 6 29 2013 9 21 2013 T 1 5 9 21 2013 2 0 0 2 20 2 7 2014 2 8 2014 2 9 2014 Cologne winter 2014 validation campaign 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN do
103. 2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 66 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 4 1 2 Easy maintenance Necessary maintenance of the measuring systems should be possible without larger ef fort if possible from outside 6 2 Equipment Additional equipment is not required 6 3 Method Necessary regular maintenance work was carried out according to the instructions given in the manual 6 4 Evaluation The operator shall carry out the following maintenance work 1 Check of system status The system status can be monitored and controlled directly or online 2 The sampling inlet has to be cleaned in general according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer at which the local PM conditions have to be considered during the type approval test approx every 4 weeks 3 Acheck of the sensors for ambient temperature and ambient pressure should be car ried out every 3 months according to EN TS 16450 9 4 Acheck of the flow rate should be carried out every 3 months according to EN TS 16450 9 5 In the context of the check of the flow rate a check on tightness should also be carried out every 3 months 6 The virtual impactor has to be cleaned latest e
104. 23 of 300 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 24 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Specification Test result Fulfilled 5 3 4 Linearity lack of fit 5 3 5 Sensitivity coeffi cient of sample gas pressure Sensitivity coeffi cient of sample gas temperature Sensitivity coeffi cient of sur rounding tem perature The analytical function describ ing the relationship between the output signal and the value of the air quality characteristic shall be linear The sensitivity coefficient of the sample gas temperature at ref erence point shall not exceed the specifications of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 The sensitivity coefficient of the surrounding temperature at ze ro and reference point shall not exceed the specifications of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 The sensitivity coefficient of the surrounding temperature at ze ro and reference point shall not exceed the specifications of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 For PM Zero point value for ATu of 15 K between 5 C and 20 C or 20 K between 20 C and 40 C shall not exceed Bo The measurement value in the range of B
105. 30 Ug M cc eee 161 Figure 66 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PMio all test sites values lt 30 Ug M ee 161 Figure 67 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM2 5 PITESE Site Senne ecs ce ctceaneetacesce E atenecteatmeapayceteeunadaaeannae 173 Figure 68 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM2 5 e EEEE EO 173 Figure 69 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM 3 s5 Cologne WINIET cceccccccccsceeeeeeeeeecceeaaecaseeeeeeeceeeaaaeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaeeeeeeseeeeaageees 174 Figure 70 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM2 5 Cologne WING Es iccsasec5mcaceeacedecesscecasecs mdatecavada ce ch vacuse texsadeiaeeiadedaieiateisieiarciates 174 Figure 71 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PMg 5 XO 010 FN 110 lt gt nker k erta nanru nunnan nA E RAAR AERREEREE AEREE RA Ennan nnna 175 Figure 72 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM2 5 B n WIM R schoo eae eee Alec et E aa aae aeara inaa 175 Figure 73 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM2 5 Cologne SUMIMNCM niesscendeasiccscuacedaneaesuscsscawk dans iasiays danadanscascanesanidarksavsvareiartcasec 176 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 12 of 300 Figure 74 Figure 75 Figure 76 Figure 77 Figure 78 Fig
106. 4 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 196 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A The correction factors terms determined during the type approval test in chapter 6 1 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between systems under test are applied to the raw data sets Thus the data sets for SN3 and SN4 are corrected with the slope of 0 919 uncertainty of slope 0 012 for PM2 with the following results Table 47 Results of equivalence test at test site Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM2 5 slope corrected with 0 919 Cologne Winter 2014 Uncertainty between Reference 0 49 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 66 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 47 47 Slope b 0 886 0 922 Uncertainty of b 0 021 0 020 Ordinate intercept a 3 385 2 225 Uncertainty of a 0 348 0 341 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 9 66 9 47 Evaluation 1 The expanded uncertainty for the data corrected with the slope of 0 919 is smaller than the permissible 25 For PM the data sets for SN3 and SN4 are corrected with the slope of 0 977 uncertainty of slope 0 020 and with the intercept of 3 758 uncertainty of intercept 0 502 with
107. 4 0 4 8 5 3 12 30 2012 3 3 3 6 5 9 6 5 12 31 2012 Power loss 1 1 2013 Power loss 1 2 2013 60 9 9 6 10 1 11 9 13 1 1 3 2013 65 6 12 1 12 8 15 9 17 2 1 4 2013 72 5 9 5 9 9 11 6 12 2 1 5 2013 14 3 15 2 17 4 19 0 1 6 2013 71 3 23 4 25 2 28 9 31 9 1 7 2013 74 5 15 8 16 8 18 7 20 5 1 8 2013 71 4 13 2 13 9 15 5 17 1 1 9 2013 64 5 11 8 12 3 14 6 16 5 1 10 2013 65 1 12 8 13 6 15 8 17 9 1 11 2013 Zero point 1 12 2013 Zero point 1 13 2013 Zero point 1 14 2013 86 0 22 7 23 8 25 5 27 9 1 15 2013 91 5 31 2 32 6 34 7 37 9 1 16 2013 92 0 44 8 46 8 52 4 57 1 1 17 2013 93 0 43 3 45 1 49 9 54 1 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 213 of 300 Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 3 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m AMB Serial No SN 3 SN4 No Ratio SN3 SN 4 SN3 SN4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 ug m ug m ug m ug m 61 1 18 2013 92 7 15 7 16 2 17 2 18 7 Cologne winter 62 1 19 2013 92 4 20 0 20 7 22 1 24 2 63 1 20 2013 96 2 28 4 29 3 31 9 34 5 64 1 2
108. 4 10 6 2 Equipment By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 this test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems Please refer to module 5 4 10 6 3 Method By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 this test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems Please refer to module 5 4 10 6 4 Evaluation By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 this test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems Please refer to module 5 4 10 6 5 Assessment By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 this test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems Please refer to module 5 4 10 Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 this test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems Please refer to module 5 4 10 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH P Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 121 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 1 General The testing of particulate measuring systems shall be carried out according to the mini mum requirements set out in Table 5 of V
109. 42 10 5 Impactor Inlet ciccsesssisccesssiscesssscceessssiecsesasisesesssiecessssiseessssieesesssiseeosssiacesssssivessssiaesesasisosessrics 42 10 6 Virtual IMpPaCtOl ss esccicscesssiscssssscccessssiacsesssisesesssiscessssiseessssiessesssisesesssiacesssssseessssiaessasiseoessaien 42 ao y 2S Pare Parts EEE E T T a 42 11 Error Messages isisccccisssesecssescscccscecvesscssieesissnesecsssnescasesuseassesececessvesvonsseesesescntccudssesceecdsescsecsaesseesss 43 4 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 12 Bayern Hessen Protokoll Bavaria Hesse Protocol s sssssssssessssssssssscesesssesessceoesesssesscsoesssssesse 44 12 1 Interface Definition Serial Measuring Instruments sssssssssesssseesosssssesscesesssssesecseesssssesse 44 12 2 Interface SPECITICATION sisesessssctsessesscsssssececsssccanens sacecescccasensssasecsscscasensssasacessseasessosasexsssseaeensos 44 12 3 Data ThaAnSfeh sccssscccsescsisssesssscesnsseusessssvececsscctanensdsasesvecccasssssvasecsscseasessdsasacesseeasessovasessssscacensos 44 12 4 Transfer Protocol cccccccscceissceccecisecaceausveccevecetscesuverecevecetscuswssecsevccvcceustessedevavnsestaussersevedeecacauees 45 12 5 Generation of the Block Check Character sssscccssssssssssssceesccscacsssseseeeseceeasansssseessesseaeanees 46 12 6 Telegrams Serial Measuring InstruMents cccccccsssssssssessececcscacsssssseecsecseanansssseeseessessanens 46 12 6 1 Data Polling of the Measuring Station c
110. 4o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 1 Date 12 11 2008 13 11 2008 10 12 2008 11 12 2008 17 12 2008 18 12 2008 07 01 2009 08 01 2009 14 01 2009 15 01 2009 21 01 2009 22 01 2009 29 01 2009 30 01 2009 04 02 2008 05 02 2009 11 02 2009 12 02 2009 18 02 2009 19 02 2009 26 02 2009 27 02 2009 Weighing No Marked in yellow average value Marked in green lowest value Marked in blue highest value Stability of standard weight OANDOOARWDND Standard weight g 0 20002 0 20002 0 20002 0 20003 0 20002 0 20000 0 20000 0 20000 0 20000 0 19999 Difference to the previous weighing Hg 10 10 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 247 of 300 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUVRheinland TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH 7 Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 248 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Stability control filter Emfab 0 09280 0 09260 Sees ssazgassator Peetos 0 09240 TM 3 0 09220 A TM2 0 09200 TM3 0 09180 x Mean TM1 0 09160 ae ee ee soe Se se o Mean TM2 0 09140 e Mean TM3 0 09120 id 0 09100 0 5 10 15 20 25 No of weighing Figure 2 Stability of the
111. 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Candidate APM 2 _ Status of measured values _ Cologne winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 54 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 71 ug m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 52 52 Slope b 0 931 0 962 Uncertainty of b 0 019 0 019 Ordinate intercept a 1 148 1 495 Uncertainty of a 0 424 0 435 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 13 83 12 92 Bonn winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 62 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 96 pg m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 51 51 Slope b 1 037 1 097 Uncertainty of b 0 031 0 032 Ordinate intercept a 0 948 0 964 Uncertainty of a 0 706 0 725 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 15 33 20 40 Cologne summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 53 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 62 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 46 44 Slope b 1 054 1 113 Uncertainty of b 0 044 0 049 Ordinate intercept a 0 279 0 232 Uncertainty of a 0 493 0 553 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 11 76 22 72 Rodenkirchen summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 52 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 36 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 45 45 Slope b 1 150 1 133 Uncertainty of b 0 050 0 051 Ordinate intercept a 1 383 1 482 Uncertainty of a 0 565 0 567 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 22 45 18 78 Cologne Winter 2014 Uncertainty between Reference 0 49 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 66 ug m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 47 4
112. 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites Page 8 of 11 No Date Test site Ambient temperature AVG Ambient pressure Rel humidity Wind velocity Wind direction Precipitation C hPa m s c mm 211 7 30 2013 Rodenkirchen summer 18 2 1006 80 0 2 4 201 7 3 212 7 31 2013 20 1 1006 75 8 3 4 233 0 0 213 8 1 2013 24 0 1004 62 5 2 9 117 0 0 214 8 2 2013 27 8 1000 48 6 3 4 128 2 7 215 8 3 2013 23 1 1006 64 3 3 3 230 0 0 216 8 4 2013 20 5 1009 64 3 1 6 122 0 0 217 8 5 2013 22 8 1004 62 3 2 6 128 0 1 218 8 6 2013 21 6 1003 62 9 2 7 213 0 0 219 8 7 2013 19 5 999 80 7 2 9 175 1 2 220 8 8 2013 16 8 1006 82 9 2 4 233 0 7 221 8 9 2013 17 9 1008 73 5 1 8 174 0 0 222 8 10 2013 17 3 1008 71 8 3 0 241 0 0 223 8 11 2013 17 0 1007 62 9 2 5 199 0 0 224 8 12 2013 16 9 1004 75 3 2 3 202 0 4 225 8 13 2013 15 5 1007 73 7 2 9 217 0 0 226 8 14 2013 14 5 1011 75 3 1 8 161 0 0 227 8 15 2013 17 2 1010 73 1 2 0 151 0 0 228 8 16 2013 20 9 1005 59 1 2 4 167 0 0 229 8 17 2013 21 4 1003 65 8 2 1 226 0 0 230 8 18 2013 19 6 1001 81 0 3 2 174 7 8 231 8 19 2013 16 9 1005 83 0 3 2 263 0 5 232 8 20 2013 14 3 1016 78 9 1 6 154 0 0 234 8 21 2013 15 5 1013 70 6 LT 141 0 0 234 8 22 2013 18 2 1008 65 3 1 8 154 0 0 235 8 23 2013 20 3 1005 62 3 2 4 128 0 0 236 8 24 2013 17 8 1000 80 0 2 7 135 5 9 237 8 25 2013 16 2 1000 96 4 1 6 224 2 5 238 8 26 2013 16 1 1003 81 8 1 7 141 0 0 239 8 27 2013 17 1 1003 69 7 1 7 142 0 0 240 8 28 2013 15
113. 5 3 3 Setting the Baud Rate The baud rate used for data transmission can be set optionally for 1200 2400 4800 or 9600 Make this setting as follows 1 When in the Transmission menu select Baudrate and confirm your choice 2 Turn the jog dial to change the value displayed inverse for the baud rate press the jog dial to confirm the new value 5 4 Administrator Settings In order to access the Administrator settings it is necessary first to select Administrator in the Setup menu and then to enter the administrator password digit by digit and to confirm the entry by selecting OK and pressing on the jog dial Fig 15 Then you can make the settings described below in the admin istrator menu Fig 16 The password set at the factory is 0000 5 4 1 Editing the Device Number In addition to the serial number assigned by the manufacturer you may assign a five digit device num ber to the instrument To set or edit the device number 1 Inthe Setup menu select Administrator enter your password as described above and go to the Device Number line 2 Click on the left hand digit and change it by turning the jog dial apply and confirm the change by pressing the jog dial 3 Edit the other four digits as described in step 2 above APM 2 23 COMDE DERENDA The device will then automatically store the change The new device number will be used when using the Bavaria Hesse protocol Enter Password 12 10 00 Fig 15
114. 5 4 6 Averaging effect The measuring system shall allow the formation of 24 h mean values The time of the sum of all filter changes within 24 h shall not exceed 1 of this averaging time 6 2 Equipment Additionally a timer was used 6 3 Method It was tested whether the AMS allows the formation of daily mean values 6 4 Evaluation The APM 2 measuring system switches alternatingly every two minutes between the meas uring channels for PM1o and PM2 5 Additionally once per hour the photometer unit is purged with zero air for two minutes Thus the available acquisition per PM fraction is 6Omin 2min 2 29 min per hour and thus at 48 3 of the total time The results from the field investigations according to chapter 6 1 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between systems under test and chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms in the report at hand nevertheless show that the comparability of the candidate systems with the reference method has been demonstrated in the tested candidate configuration and that the formation of valid daily mean values is possible this is also valid for the strongly traffic influenced test site at the crossroads in Bonn Thus the formation of daily mean values can be guaranteed 6 5 Assessment The measuring system allows the formation of valid daily mean values Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014
115. 55 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 71 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 194 192 Slope b 0 976 not significant 1 027 significant Uncertainty of b 0 013 0 013 Ordinate intercept a 0 396 not significant 0 269 not significant Uncertainty of a 0 228 0 245 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 11 97 14 57 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 191 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 44 Summary of the results of the equivalence test SN3 amp SN4 measured component PM after correction of slope intercept All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 58 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 30 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 193 Slope b 1 001 nicht signifikant Uncertainty of b 0 021 Ordinate intercept a 0 023 nicht signifikant Uncertainty of a 0 514 Expanded measured uncertainty WCM 13 55 All comparisons 230 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 72 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 2 33 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 33 Slope b 1 061 Uncertainty of b 0 065 Ordinate intercept a 2 800 Uncertainty of a 2 744 Expanded measured uncertainty WCM 18 84 All comparisons lt 30 ug m
116. 6 21219977 A Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites Page 2 of 11 Test site Ambient temperature AVG Ampe Ce Rel P i Wind ea Wind direction Precipitation C mm 4 2 12 19 2012 Cologne winter 12 20 2012 12 21 2012 12 22 2012 12 23 2012 12 24 2012 12 25 2012 12 26 2012 12 27 2012 12 28 2012 12 29 2012 12 30 2012 12 31 2012 1 1 2013 1 2 2013 1 3 2013 1 4 2013 1 5 2013 1 6 2013 1 7 2013 1 8 2013 1 9 2013 1 10 2013 1 11 2013 1 12 2013 1 13 2013 1 14 2013 1 15 2013 1 16 2013 1 17 2013 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 235 of 300 Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites Page 3 of 11 AE a Ambient temperature AVG dia aad Rel o Wind as Wind direction Precipitation C mm 1 18 2013 Cologne winter 1 19 2013 1 20 2013 1 21 2013 1 22 2013 1 23 2013 1 24 2013 1 25 2013 1 26 2013 1 27 2013 1 28 2013 1 29 2013 1 30 2013 1 31 2013 2 1 2013 2 2 2013 2 3 2013 2 4 2013 2 5 2013 2 6 2013 2 27 2013 Bonn winter 2 28 2013 3 1 2013 3 2 2013 3 3 2013 3 4 2013 3 5 2013 3 6 2013 3 7 2013 3 8 2013 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUVRh z d T V
117. 7 Slope b 0 886 0 922 Uncertainty of b 0 021 0 020 Ordinate intercept a 3 385 2 225 Uncertainty of a 0 348 0 341 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 9 66 9 47 All comparisons 218 g m Uncertainty between Reference 0 64 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 03 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 61 61 Slope b 0 935 0 972 Uncertainty of b 0 030 0 032 Ordinate intercept a 1 602 1 688 Uncertainty of a 0 919 0 97 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 17 91 19 54 All comparisons lt 18 pg m Uncertainty between Reference 0 51 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 52 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 180 178 Slope b 1 048 1 099 Uncertainty of b 0 031 0 028 Ordinate intercept a 0 133 0 242 Uncertainty of a 0 329 0 301 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 14 77 20 44 All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 54 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 70 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 241 239 Slope b 0 956 significant 1 006 not significant Uncertainty of b 0 012 0 012 Ordinate intercept a 1 030 significant 0 693 significant Uncertainty of a 0 212 0 212 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 12 62 13 71 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control T V Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 199 of 300 pended pa
118. 7 1007 78 3 1 6 166 0 0 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 241 of 300 Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites Page 9 of 11 C hPa ml Fi ar 8 29 2013 Rodenkirchen summer 17 0 1010 72 2 146 a 8 30 2013 17 1 1008 72 8 r 189 243 8 31 2013 16 4 1009 81 1 2 7 244 2 0 244 9 1 2013 13 9 1015 70 5 2 9 256 0 0 245 9 2 2013 17 1 1013 70 7 3 5 269 0 0 246 9 3 2013 17 2 1015 82 2 1 6 145 0 0 247 9 4 2013 20 5 1010 70 6 2 0 112 0 0 248 9 5 2013 23 6 1002 61 5 3 6 126 0 0 249 9 6 2013 23 7 998 60 2 3 6 166 0 0 250 9 7 2013 17 9 1005 88 0 2 2 225 21 3 251 9 8 2013 14 0 1007 94 6 2 5 244 2 1 252 9 9 2013 14 0 1005 80 5 2 8 186 27 253 9 10 2013 12 8 1001 81 3 5 0 255 9 2 254 9 11 2013 12 8 1001 91 5 3 2 270 5 8 255 9 12 2013 13 5 1004 92 0 2 5 277 7 2 256 9 13 2013 15 2 1008 84 4 2 0 194 1 0 257 9 14 2013 15 3 1001 91 0 3 1 214 3 8 258 9 15 2013 13 7 999 79 4 2 3 280 8 1 259 9 16 2013 12 8 990 72 3 4 3 238 0 0 260 9 17 2013 9 9 991 81 7 3 8 184 5 8 261 9 18 2013 11 7 988 92 8 2 7 270 1 2 262 9 19 2013 12 3 1000 79 4 2 7 225 1 8 263 9 20 2013 13 8 1004 83 7 2 9 248 0 0 264 9 21 2013 12 9 1014 83 8 1 2 165
119. 7 2 Mean value 81 2 63 2 68 4 75 6 74 4 Wind velocity m s Range 0 0 3 3 0 4 4 2 0 1 2 7 1 2 5 0 0 0 3 0 Mean value 0 9 1 6 0 8 2 6 0 0 Amount of precipitation mm d Range 0 0 25 7 0 0 13 2 0 0 32 4 0 0 21 3 0 0 18 9 Mean value 2 9 0 9 3 7 1 9 1 7 Validation campaign for software 3 0 1 refer to chapter 7 Investigations for the validation of the instrument soft ware 3 0 1 on page 194 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 61 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A Sampling duration According to Standard EN 12341 the sampling time shall be 24 h However for low concen trations longer sampling times are permissible while for high concentrations shorter sampling times are allowed as well According to Standard EN 14907 the sampling time shall be 24 h 1 h During the field test a sampling time of 24 h was set for all devices 10 00 10 00 Cologne and 7 00 7 00 Bonn and 9 00 9 00 Rodenkirchen Data handling Before the respective analyses for each test site were carried out the paired reference val ues determined during the field test were subject to a statistical outlier test a
120. 7 24 1 26 0 28 4 119 4 6 2013 23 0 24 3 25 9 28 3 120 4 7 2013 i 74 9 21 4 23 2 24 6 27 7 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 215 of 300 Annex 5 Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 5 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m AMB Serial No SN3 SN4 No Ratio SN3 i SN 4 SN3 SN 4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 ug m ug m ug m ug m 121 4 8 2013 31 7 81 0 21 8 23 4 25 7 28 7 Bonn winter 122 4 9 2013 f F 21 0 77 4 14 6 15 5 17 0 18 6 123 4 10 2013 k 17 8 68 4 10 6 11 3 12 8 13 9 124 4 11 2013 3 i 15 7 57 4 Fel 7 6 9 4 9 8 125 4 12 2013 i k K 10 4 60 4 4 6 4 9 6 6 7 1 126 4 13 2013 5 6 5 9 7 8 8 2 127 4 14 2013 i gt 11 1 61 4 5 0 5 4 7 0 7 6 128 4 15 2013 F i 30 2 57 3 14 3 15 2 20 6 22 3 129 4 16 2013 20 7 57 2 10 1 10 5 13 6 14 4 130 4 17 2013 i 5 19 7 50 2 6 6 6 8 10 1 10 8 131 4 18 2013 F b 21 5 42 2 5 6 5 9 9 9 10 8 132 4 19 2013 i 20 8 49 4 8 4 8 8 12 0 12 9 133 4 20 2013 9 6 10 1 12 7 13 8 134 4 2
121. 7 8 17 4 310 2 27 2014 70 3 8 6 8 1 11 9 12 1 311 2 28 2014 74 3 8 3 7 7 10 5 10 4 312 3 1 2014 83 5 13 2 12 5 15 7 15 8 313 3 2 2014 88 6 16 0 16 1 18 7 19 5 314 3 3 2014 63 0 9 1 8 5 11 2 11 3 315 3 4 2014 74 4 19 3 18 8 24 8 25 2 316 3 5 2014 71 0 28 2 27 7 41 4 42 0 317 3 6 2014 82 2 29 4 29 5 38 1 39 7 318 3 7 2014 78 0 37 1 38 4 48 9 50 9 319 3 8 2014 84 4 34 1 33 8 42 7 44 1 320 3 9 2014 80 7 19 2 18 7 26 4 26 4 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUVRh d T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH einian Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 222 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 Page 12 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in pg m STD Serial No SN3 SN4 Ratio Test site PM2 5 PM10 11 19 2012 Zero point Cologne winter 11 20 2012 Zero point 11 21 2012 Zero point 11 22 2012 Audits 11 23 2012 11 24 2012 11 25 2012 11 26 2012 11 27 2012 11 28 2012 11 29 2012 11 30 2012 12 1 2012 12 2 2012 12 3 2012 12 4 2012 12 5 2012 12 6 2012 12 7 2012 12 8 2012 12 9 2012 12 10 2012 12 11 2012 12 12 2012 12 13 2012 12 14 2012 12 15 2012
122. 80 of the upper limit of the certification range shall be used at refer ence point Note In relation to particulate measuring systems this test item cannot be evaluated according to the current versions of VDI Standards 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 and 4203 Sheet 3 September 2010 because the minimum requirements are not defined By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 reference is made to the following require ments stated in the earlier version of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 June 2002 If the surrounding temperature changes by 15 K in the range 5 C to 20 C or by 20 K in the range 20 C to 40 C the temperature dependence of the measured value at zero point shall not exceed the reference value Bo The temperature dependence of the measured value in the range of the reference value B shall not be greater than 5 of the measured value when a change in temperature by 15 K in the range of 5 C to 20 C or 20 C to 40 C occurs 6 2 Equipment Climatic chamber for a temperature range of 20 to 50 C zero filter for testing the zero point test gas method with propane for testing the reference point 6 3 Method According to the manufacturer the permissible ambient temperature range amounts to 20 C to 50 C In order to test the dependence of zero point and measured values on the surrounding tem perature the complete measuring systems were operated within a climatic chamber
123. 9_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 51 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A The recording of measurement values was performed by device internal recording on the SD card During the field test two APM 2 systems and two reference systems for PM25 and PM 9 were operated simultaneously for a period of 24 hours The reference system operates discontinu ously that is to say the filter needs to be changed manually after sampling During the testing the impaction plates of the PM and PM25 sampling heads of the refer ence systems were cleaned and lubricated with silicone grease approx every 2 weeks in or der to ensure a safe separation and deposition of particulates The sampling inlets of the candidates were cleaned approx every 4 weeks according to manufacturer s information The sampling head shall always be cleaned in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer Local concentrations of suspended particulate matter shall also be consid ered in this procedure Before and after each change of test site the flow rate was tested on each candidate as well as on each reference system with a dry gas meter and a mass flow meter which connects to th
124. APM 2 measur Page 224 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 Page 14 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in pg m STD Serial No SN3 SN4 Ratio Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 1 18 2013 Cologne winter 1 19 2013 1 20 2013 1 21 2013 1 22 2013 Outlier Ref PM10 not discarded 1 23 2013 1 24 2013 1 25 2013 1 26 2013 1 27 2013 1 28 2013 1 29 2013 1 30 2013 1 31 2013 2 1 2013 2 2 2013 2 3 2013 2 4 2013 2 5 2013 Zero point 2 6 2013 Zero point 2 27 2013 Zero point Bonn winter 2 28 2013 Zero point 3 1 2013 3 2 2013 3 3 2013 3 4 2013 3 5 2013 3 6 2013 3 7 2013 3 8 2013 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 225 of 300 Annex 5 PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 Page 15 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 an
125. A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 46 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 4 Test programme 4 1 General The performance test was carried out with two identical devices with the serial numbers SN3 and SN4 The test was started in the year 2012 with software version 1 3 During the test work the software was constantly developed and optimized especially for the implementation of the test gas measurement With start of the field test in November 2012 the software version 2 1 0 was installed updat ed to version 2 3 1 in February 2013 before the campaign Bonn winter and updated again to version 2 5 2 in June 2013 before the campaign Cologne summer This version was kept over the complete remaining field test Cologne summer and Rodenkirchen All implemented modification until version 2 5 2 are related in first line to the implementation of the test gas measurement and have no impact on the performance of the measuring sys tem refer to Table 5 For the outstanding lab investigations at the reference point the software version 3 0 0 d re spectively 3 0 1 was finally made available in December 2013 respectively January 2014 These software versions contain a
126. Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Specification Test result Fulfilled The long term drift at zero point and reference point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 in the field test of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 Sep tember 2010 in the field test For PM Zero point within 24 h and within the maintenance interval a maximum of BO As reference point within 24 h and within the maintenance in terval a maximum 5 of B1 The short term drift at zero point and reference point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 within 12 h for benzene 24 h in the laboratory test and within 24 h in the field test The response time rise of the measuring systems shall not exceed 180s The response time fall of the measuring systems shall not exceed 180s The difference between the re sponse time rise and re sponse time fall of the meas uring system shall not exceed 10 of response time rise or 10 s whatever value is larger 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc For PM2 5 the maximum deviation at zero point was 1 4 g m in relation to the previous value and 2 4 g m in relation to the start value Thus it lies within the permissible limits of BO 2 ug m
127. Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 210 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 4 Dependence of measured value on mains voltage Page 1 of 1 Manufacturer Comde Derenda Standards Propane test gas Type APM 2 Serial No SN3 SN4 Mains voltage poet value Se value oie value V a a a 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 211 of 300 Annex 5 Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 1 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m AMB Serial No SN 3 SN4 Ratio SN3 SN4 SN3 SN4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 ug m ug m ug m ug m 11 19 2012 Zero point Cologne winter 11 20 2012 Zero point 11 21 2012 Zero point 11 22 2012 Audits 11 23 2012 11 24 2012 11 25 2012 11 26 2012 11 27 2012 11 28 2012 11 29 2012 11 30 2012 12 1 2012 12 2 2012 12 3 2012 12 4 2012 12 5 2012 12 6 2012 12
128. DI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 Particle mass concentrations shall be related to a defined volume The relation to volume with respect to pressure and temperature shall be comprehensively described 6 2 Equipment No equipment is necessary to test this performance criterion 6 3 Method The test was carried out according to the minimum requirements set out in Table 5 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 To determine whether the measured particle mass concentrations are related to a defined volume was the objective of the test 6 4 Evaluation The test was carried out according to the minimum requirements set out in Table 5 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 The APM 2 measuring system is an optical measuring system which first determines the scattered light signal induced by particles in a defined measured volume and then converts the available information into concentration values by means of an algorithm The measured signal for the particles is therefore related to a defined volume measured volume 6 5 Assessment The test was carried out according to the minimum requirements set out in Table 5 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 The APM 2 measuring system is an optical measuring system which first determines the scattered light signal induced by particles in a defined measured volume and then converts the available information into concentration values by means of an algorithm The me
129. Date starting time and duration of measurement e Unit model and serial number e Mean mass concentration of the measured particulate matter fraction in pg m e of the maximum pump motor speed e Outside air pressure e Outside air temperature e Photometer temperature e Relative humidity e Any reportable events and errors A data record that comprises the information listed above will require 128 bytes As a consequence about 27 000 data records can be placed in storage The system uses a non volatile ring memory The data are retained even if the device is switched off Once the memory is full the oldest data is overwrit ten with the new data Since overwriting works reliably only for a limited number of cycles the memory should be erased at regular intervals If an SD memory card is present in the device then the data will also be automatically written as a text file CSV file format on the SD memory card 30 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 8 1 Storing Data on an SD Memory Card Manually In additional to ongoing automatic storage all the data can also be transferred manually from the de vice memory to an SD memory card Transfer is in the serial mode corresponding to normal data output see 5 3 2 To start data transfer to an SD card select and confirm menu item Memory gt SD Card in the Data menu This function is useful if for instance no SD memory card had been mounted in the device during measurement operations 8 2 Erasi
130. E DERENDA Standards Zero filter Type APM 2 Serial No SN3 SN4 o a vom ug m ug m g m7 bam 0 0 0 0 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUVRh z d T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH einian Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 208 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 2 Dependence of zero point on ambient temperature Page 2 of 2 Manufacturer COMDE DERENDA Standards Zero filter Type APM 2 Serial No SN3 SN4 Lel gmi vot ug m ug m g m7 vain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g m ug m g m bam 0 0 0 0 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH 7 Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 209 of 300 Annex 3 Dependence of measured value on ambient temperature Page 1 of 1 Manufacturer Comde Derenda Standards Propane test gas Type APM 2 Serial No SN3 SN4 Temperature sia value Se value Tio value K A a ae 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution
131. For Data Lines RxD TxD 15 to 3V for logical HIGH 3 to 15V for logical LOW 12 3 Data Transfer Data transmission MSR lt gt measurement unit is effected using standardized blocks each secured with a block check character BCC The characters transmitted here are taken from the USASCII standard character set 0 9 A Z check characters are added to the block to facilitate error detection Maximum block length at present is 256 characters including control characters and protocol frame 44 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA Polling Instrument Control Handshake not Response Telegram necessary MD113 ST max 2300 ms 1200 ms lt A Oe Entire Polling Cycle 12 4 Transfer Protocol Data transmission between the measurement point and the MSR takes place in accordance with a strict master slave procedure The measurement site itself never initiates contact with the MSR The MSR transmits commands to the measurement site which then responds with an answer block All the commands contain an address i e the measurement unit identifier The addresses can be used to address either the entire measurement site or individual measurement units at the measurement site Response blocks also contain from one to four measurement device identifiers for the purposes of iden tification and allocation See section 12 6 for the definitions of the individual telegrams message blocks Data Protocol Structure Byte 001 STX
132. M1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Candidate APM2 Status of measured values __ _Slope and Offset corrected _ Cologne winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 54 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 41 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 52 52 Slope b 0 953 1 006 Uncertainty of b 0 023 0 022 Ordinate intercept a 1 785 2 520 Uncertainty of a 0 625 0 596 Expanded measured uncertainty Wem 10 65 15 00 Bonn winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 38 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 76 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 51 51 Slope b 0 967 1 069 Uncertainty of b 0 051 0 055 Ordinate intercept a 0 523 1 146 Uncertainty of a 1 511 1 641 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 19 25 20 76 Cologne summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 60 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 09 ug m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 47 45 Slope b 0 873 0 978 Uncertainty of b 0 040 0 044 Ordinate intercept a 2 123 1 622 Uncertainty of a 0 750 0 828 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 18 93 9 59 Rodenkirchen summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 76 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 44 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 45 45 Slope b 0 969 1 008 Uncertainty of b 0 065 0 065 Ordinate intercept a 1 719 2 154 Uncertainty of a 1 281 1 287 Expanded measured uncertainty Wem 16 42 12 16 Cologne winter 2014 Uncertainty between Reference 0 58 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates
133. M25 fraction of suspended particu late matter in an alternating way within the scope of the type approval test the switch over between the two fractions has been carried out every two minutes The measuring system shall be calibrated on site with the gravimetric PM reference method as per EN 12341 on a regular basis Preferably a seasonal calibration rhythm is to follow The measuring system shall be calibrated on site with the gravimetric PM2 5 reference method as per EN 14907 on a regular basis Preferably a seasonal calibration rhythm is to follow This report on the performance testing can be viewed on the internet at www qal1 de Test report TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Cologne Report no 936 21219977 A of 26th March 2014 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 21 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 1 3 Summary of test results filled Requirements on instrument design 4 1 General requirements aE 4 1 1 Measured value display Shall be available The measuring system provides a display that shows the measured val ues 4 1 2 Easy maintenance 4 1 3 Functional check Shall be specified in the in The instrument design sp
134. Marked in yellow average value Marked in green lowest value Marked in blue highest value 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 250 of 300 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Appendix 3 Manual DERENDA Instruction Manual Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 Comde Derenda GmbH Tel 49 3329 69027 10 info derenda de Kieler Strasse 9 14532 Stahnsdorf Germany Fax 49 3329 69027 19 www derenda de COMDE DERENDA Important Information This instruction manual and the software are protected by copyright All rights are reserved including those ensuing from the awarding of patents or registration of a utility model or registration of an engi neering design No part of this instruction manual may be translated copied otherwise reproduced or circulated without the express written consent of Comde Derenda GmbH Contraventions of these re strictions will be prosecuted and damages recovered The Comde Derenda GmbH assumes no guarantee for the completeness and or correctness of the con tents of this instruction manual Liability for consequential damages resulting from using products man ufactured by Comd
135. Mio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 12 Long term drift The long term drift at zero point and reference point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 in the field test A value c at 70 to 80 of the upper limit of the certification range shall be used as reference point Note In relation to particulate measuring systems this test item cannot be evaluated according to the current versions of VDI Standards 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 and 4203 Sheet 3 September 2010 because the minimum requirements are not defined By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 reference is made to the following require ments stated in the earlier version of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 June 2002 The temporal change in the measured value at zero concentration shall not exceed the reference value Bg in 24 h and in the maintenance interval The temporal change in the measured value in the range of the reference value B shall not be greater than 5 of B in 24 h and in the maintenance interval 6 2 Equipment Zero filter for testing the zero point 6 3 Method The test was carried out as part of the field test over a period of about 10 months altogether comparison campaigns 1 4 respectively approx 15 months if considering the validation campaign during winter 2014 In the context of the regular checks approximately once a month including those at the be ginni
136. Pa as well In the following report the performance criteria according to the considered Standards 1 2 3 4 5 are stated in the caption of each test item with number and wording 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 49 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 4 2 Laboratory test The laboratory test was carried out with two identical devices of the type APM 2 with the se rial numbers SN3 and SN4 In conformity with the applicable standards 1 2 the following performance criteria were tested in the laboratory e Description of device functions e Determination of detection limit e Dependence of zero point sensitivity on ambient temperature e Dependence of sensitivity on mains voltage In the laboratory test the following devices were used for the determination of performance characteristics e climatic chamber temperature range from 20 C to 50 C accuracy better than 1 C Isolation transformer 1 mass flow meter Model 4043 Manufacturer TSI Zero filter for external zero point check Test gas box propane Test appliance for tightness check The recording of measurement values at zero point was performed by device internal record ing on the
137. Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 13 Short term drift TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 115 of 300 The short term drift at zero point and reference point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 within 12 h for benzene 24 h in the laboratory test and within 24 h in the field test A value c at 70 to 80 of the upper limit of the certification range shall be used as reference point Note By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 this test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applicable 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVR hein land 7 Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 116 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 14 Response time The response time rise of the measuring system s
138. SD card For external check of the sensitivity of the photometer the instrument s manufacturer has developed the following optional test method By offering propane to the photometer a scattered light signal in the range of 300 400 mV corresponds to an aerosol concentration of approx 70 g m is induced The stability of that signal is taken as a measure for the stability of the sensitivity The results of the laboratory tests are summarized in chapter 6 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 50 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 4 3 Field test The field test was carried out with two identical measuring systems System 1 SN3 System 2 SN4 The following performance criteria were tested in the field e Comparability of the systems under test according to the Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods e Comparability of the systems under test with the reference method according to the Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods Check of constancy of the volume flow rate Calibration capability analytical function Reproducibility Zero drift and sensitivity drift Leak
139. SN3 SN4_ Rodenkirchen sum mer Classification over reference value 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 153 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 38 Uncertainty between candidates u for the devices SN3 and SN4 measured com ponent PM Device Test site No of Uncertainty Ups values a o oo L SNo7Sm opore summer 6 18 Classification over reference values 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 154 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 All comparisons Raw data 130 120 110 100 o Measured values 90 Regression line 80 o y x 70 60 50 Candidate 2 yg m 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 53 Results of the parallel measurements with the
140. September 2010 concentration shall be related The APM 2 measuring system is an to a defined volume optical measuring system which first determines the scattered light signal induced by particles in a defined measured volume and then converts the available information into concen tration values by means of an algo rithm The measured signal for the particles is therefore related to a de fined volume measured volume 117 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 28 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Specification Test result Fulfilled 5 4 2 Equivalency of The equivalency to the refer For SN3 the reference equivalence the sampling ence method according to functions for the uncorrected da system EN 12341 T2 shall be tasets lie outside the limits of the re demonstrated spective acceptance envelope for all test sites with exception of Cologne winter for SN4 only the reference equivalence function for the field campaign Rodenkirchen is outside of the respective acceptance envelope Moreover the variation coefficient R of the calculated reference equiva lence function in the concentration range concerned is lt 0 95 for all comparison
141. TUV RHEINLAND ENERGIE UND UMWELT GMBH DAkks Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle D PL 11120 02 00 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measuring system manufac tured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the compo nents suspended particulate matter PM and PM25 TUV report 936 21219977 A Cologne 26 March 2014 www umwelt tuv de teu service de tuv com The department of Environmental Protection of TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH is accredited for the following work areas Determination of air quality and emissions of air pollution and odour substances Inspection of correct installation function and calibration of continuously operating emission measuring instru ments including data evaluation and remote emission monitoring systems Combustion chamber measurements Performance testing of measuring systems for continuous monitoring of emissions and ambient air and of elec tronic data evaluation and remote emission monitoring systems Determination of stack height and air quality projections for hazardous and odour substances Determination of noise and vibration emissions and pollution determination of sound power levels and execu tion of sound measurements at wind energy plants according to EN ISO IEC 17025 The accreditation is valid up to 22 01 2018 DAkkS register number D PL 11120 02 00 Reproduction of extracts from this test report is subject to written consent TUV Rheinland En
142. Table 18 Table 19 Table 20 Table 21 Table 22 Table 23 Table 24 Table 25 Table 26 Table 27 Table 28 Table 29 Table 30 Table 31 Table 32 Table 33 Table 34 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Description of test sites cccccccccccscseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeesessesseseseees 17 Description of test site validation Campaign 2014 cccceeeeeeeeteeeeeeeeeeeeees 17 Test on repeatability with test gas DOX cccccesedneseeetnenetinentneneeeee 42 Device related data of the APM 2 manufacturer s data eeeeeeeeeeees 45 Overview of software releases during the type approval teSt eeeeee 47 Field test SeS arcs entvcten eine aie Hides pe NPN AN AI 51 Ambient conditions at the field test sites daily mean values eeee 60 Results of the Grubbs outlier test reference PMjo ccceecceeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 61 Results of the Grubbs outliner test reference PMo5 cccccceececeeeeeceeeeeeees 61 Used filter materials ccccccccsssssseccceceeeeeesseeecceeeeceeaaeceeeeesseesaeeaaeeeeeeseesaaes 62 Test on repeatability with test gas DOK siscssc cccccccadssitveessncediessesevendineesieeeeeeeeneees 69 Certification ranges oie cccecesican
143. Test gas box for checking the sensitivity Figure 14 Test set up APM 2 test gas box 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 44 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A For checking the tightness of the measuring device a test appliance for tightness check is available A vacuum is created in the device with the help of the instrument s pump and after switching off the pump the rise in pressure over a time period of five minutes is monitored In case of a rise in pressure gt 290 hPa the test on tightness is regarded as failed Figure 15 Test appliance for tightness check 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 45 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 4 contains a list of important device related characteristics of the APM 2 measuring system for suspended particulate matter in the ambient air Table 4 Dimensions Weight Device related data of the APM
144. Umwelt GmbH TU V R hei n a nd big Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 156 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 Cologne Summer Raw data o Measured values Regression line o y x Candidate 2 ug m 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m Figure 56 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM 5s test site Cologne summer APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 Rodenkirchen Summer Raw data Candidate 2 pg n tt tT Wi Tt tt tt wm i i tt tt 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 pg m Figure 57 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM test site Rodenkirchen summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 157 of 300
145. _936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 144 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 7 Constancy of sample volumetric flow The sample volumetric flow averaged over the sampling time shall be constant within 3 of the rated value All instantaneous values of the sample volumetric flow shall be within a range of 5 of the rated value during sampling 6 2 Equipment As indicated in chapter 4 a flow meter was used in the testing of this performance criterion 6 3 Method The sample volumetric flow was calibrated before testing at the first field test site Before testing at the other field test sites it was checked for correctness with a mass flow meter and readjusted if necessary The APM 2 measuring system operates with a flow rate of 3 3 l min In order to determine the constancy of sample volumetric flow the flow rate was recorded over 24 h SN4 respectively 21 h SN3 by means of a mass flow meter and evaluated ac cording to the relevant upcoming test item 7 4 5 Constancy of sample flow rate of Technical Specification EN TS 16450 May 2013 9 6 4 Evaluation The obtained measured values for the flow rate were used to calculate mean value standar
146. able 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 118 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 16 Converter efficiency In case of measuring systems with a converter the converter efficiency shall be at least 98 Note This test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applicable 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 119 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 17 Increase of NO concentration due to residence in the AMS In case of NO measuring systems the increase of NO due to residence in the measuring system shall not
147. ains voltage returns the AMS returns to failure free operation mode and automatically resumes measuring after re stabilization of the photometer temperature and two minutes zero air purging Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 82 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 2 5 Operating states The measuring system shall allow control of important operating states by telemetrically transmitted status signals 6 2 Equipment PC for data acquisition 6 3 Method A PC was connected locally via RS232 to the measuring system to check data transfer and instrument status The use of corresponding routers or modems enables tele monitoring 6 4 Evaluation The AMS allows telemetric monitoring and control via various ports Ethernet RS232 6 5 Assessment The measuring systems can be monitored and operated extensively from an external PC via modem or router Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland
148. al mode to the scattered light sensor via low loss switching devices pinch valves with straight passage In the enrichment mode the APM 2 thus records the PM concentration in normal mode the PM 5 concentration For zero point adjustment filtered light is fed to the scattered light sensor via the switching device at periodic intervals Incoming flow Virtual impactor lt 2 5 2 5 10 pm Axial flow Valves Scattered light sensor lt 2 5 2 5 10 pm J Fig 5 Functional principle of the virtual impactor APM 2 13 COMDE DERENDA 3 1 4 Scattered Light Photometer Unit The photometer unit consists of an intensity Light trap stabilized laser diode and a semiconductor 4 photodetector The two components are mounted ey at an angle of 90 to each other the unit is thus a s single angle sensor The light reflected by the par ticles in a precisely defined measurement volume is recorded by the detector as described in 0 The photodetector then generates a corresponding voltage signal 0 5 V which is subsequently ampli fied in a low noise process O Measurement volume To rule out temperature dependence of the pho tometer signal the photometer is installed in a Light source Light detector thermally insulated housing heated with a heating block and temperature controlled to 40 C Fig 6 Functional principle of the photometer unit 3 1 5 Impactor Inlet and Intake Tube Particles larger th
149. an 10 um are separated by the PM impactor inlet Fig 7 during intake In terms of its de sign it corresponds to the certified Derenda PM sam pling inlet in accordance with DIN EN 12541 It was scaled down from 38 3 l min to the smaller intake volume flow of 3 3 l min for application in the APM 2 The impactor inlet is mounted on the intake tube that leads to the vir tual impactor on the device roof The impactor inlet and the APM 2 are connected to each other via an intake tube made of sturdy stainless steel The standard length of the tube is 500 mm on request special lengths are also available The outside diameter is 12 mm Fig 7 APM 2 impactor inlet 14 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 4 Assembly and Commissioning 4 1 Transport The system and its components should be well packed and protected against shipping damage when moving the system to a new location All the openings have to be closed during transportation in order to protect the device from dirt and grime The device should be kept in an upright position during transport 4 2 Intake Tube and Impactor Inlet The device must be installed at a suitable level installation site The components required are the intake tube provided with a diameter of 12 mm and a length of 500 mm and the impactor inlet which is not included in the scope of supply To install the components mentioned proceed as follows 1 Remove the device and corresponding parts from the transport b
150. and Precisely Right Page 232 of 300 Annex 5 Manufacturer Type of instrument APM 2 Comde Derenda Serial No SN3 SN4 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 PM10 and PM2 5 Measured values in g m STD suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 22 of 22 Ratio PM2 5 PM10 SN 3 SN 4 Remark Test site 2 18 2014 2 19 2014 2 20 2014 2 21 2014 2 22 2014 2 23 2014 2 24 2014 2 25 2014 2 26 2014 2 27 2014 2 28 2014 3 1 2014 3 2 2014 3 3 2014 3 4 2014 3 5 2014 3 6 2014 3 7 2014 3 8 2014 3 9 2014 Cologne winter 2014 validation campaign 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVR heinland Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 233 of 300 Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites Page 1 of 11 C hPa m s mm 1 11 19 2012 Cologne winter 2 11 20 2012
151. and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM10 Rodenkirchen Summer Raw 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 87 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM o Rodenkirchen summer Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM10 Rodenkirchen Summer Raw data 100 LLII TTT 90 reall 80 70 60 at 50 zee 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 SS EE ee EEE 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference ug m Figure 88 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM o Rodenkirchen summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 184 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM10 All comparisons 230 g m Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 89 Reference device vs candidat
152. aset and 12 36 dataset after slope correction which would require an annual test at 4 measurement sites uncorrected or 3 measurement sites corrected for PM 9 23 25 uncorrected dataset and 13 55 dataset after slope offset correction which would require an annual test at 5 measurement sites uncorrected or 3 measurement sites corrected 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 189 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 43 and Table 44 present the results of the evaluations of the equivalence test after ap plication of the correction factors for slope and intercept on the complete dataset Table 43 Summary of the results of the equivalence test SN3 amp SN4 measured component PM 25 after correction of slope All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 55 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 71 pg m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 192 Slope b 1 001 not significant Uncertainty of b 0 013 Ordinate intercept a 0 335 not significant Uncertainty of a 0 235 Expanded meas uncertainty Wem 12 36 All comparisons 218 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 63 ug m
153. asssssconsssseocanssssoousassoons 15 4 4 Connecting and Powering Up the System ssseesssssssesseessoosssesssessoosssssssessoosssssssessoesssssssesso 16 A RRE ol T 1 T E E E E EE TTE 16 5 Operation and Device Settings s csis ccccsessececsseccedsssececcbverccedusececceusiecssduercescebverccstusbecscesebecsstubes 17 Bills E A e E E O E E E E EE E 17 5 1 1 Setup MOM sis fied cceecccsccecssecceseccausveddeesceesccavveoscebessuccusbonssscceeecosssdes seacesoceusscocsesseeensesvers 17 si e E Data MOM ss stcssicceeccsiscccesscccesccostceasceceossccessdeas suscseccassconsctesasecostecasdssessaceesccoascsoveonsaesecs 18 5 1 3 IMCASULEINENE svi ccsscesestecitescoseceeses easicontecesesdcedeccaseecesssaavexdeuscecasesdeets cousssassiseas csceussecuseues 18 5 1 4 Manual Mode Menu visccissscccccssissccscssscisssssiaceisssssasscssesasissasaiscanasaasssossaasiassaavses sossaacsesseays 18 5 2 Basic Settings ciccsiscscsccsssvctccescsccccsdeviccecdssicccssseidea sdsaccccssavsccacdsvicecassecdcaed sascccsdsscccesdsstcadeeseecins 20 5 2 1 Choosing a Language viccissicccccssescscccssscscecsessassceosssccceessacscassascecsessacsassaccssosaves sossancsieesses 20 5 2 2 Setting Time of Day and Date sseesssosssessssssoosssssssessoossssossesscosssssseessoossssossessoessesese 20 5 2 3 Adjusting the Display s Contrast sssssesesssssssssseesssssesesecesesssesasscsoesssssesseeeesesssesseseee 21 5 3 Data Transmission Settings sisiscisssscccisc
154. ast Control Unit Display ceee 21 Control UNE earainn nE 11 Data Manageme n cccsccceeseeeeeseseeeeeseeeeeees 30 Displaying SD Memory Card Data 31 Erasing M MOTy cccccceeeeeesenteeeeeeeeeeee 31 Storing Data on SD Memory Card 6 31 Data Transmission Input Output Mode cccccseeceesseeesseeeees 21 Parameter Identifier Codes ccceeee 22 SOINE S ei ssdeccercctawkencienentissesleessudaedevectaeaeosiesa 21 Device Adjustment M nu cccssccecsssteeeeeeees 25 Device Number editing ccccsscecsssteeeeeeees 23 Dimensional Drawing ccccccseessssseeeeeeeeeees 49 Electromagnetic Compatibility cceeeee 7 Error Messages ccccccccccecececececececececeseeeeeeeeess 43 External SQNSOP cccccececececececeeeeeeeeeseeeeens 13 15 Factor S ttingS cccccccccccccececececeeeceeeeeeeeeeess 39 Filters Internal cccccccccsssececsssseseessseeeeseees 41 Firmware Update ccscccccccscessesssseeeeeeseesees 32 Flushing Manually cc cccccccccssssssssseeeeeeeeeees 34 Flushing with Zero Ail cccccccccssesssssseeeeeeeeeees 28 Functional COnCept ccssccccccccsssesssteeeeeseesees 10 GPRS Module Type Selection cccccssssccccecessesssteseeeeseesees 25 impactor HEA ceeeeeesessceceeecessessceeeeeeseesees 15 IM PaCtOF INET seo scceacesseeveecacensecsadendeccctaedersteens 14 Maintenance c
155. asured signal for the particles is therefore related to a defined volume measured volume Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results No equipment is necessary to test this performance criterion 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 122 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 2 Equivalency of the sampling system The equivalency between the PM sampling system and the reference method according to Standard EN 12341 T5 shall be demonstrated Not applicable to PM25 sampling systems Please refer to module 5 4 10 in this report 6 2 Equipment The performance criterion was tested with the additional equipment described in chapter 5 of this report 6 3 Method As described in chapter 4 of this report the test was carried out at various sites during the field test Different seasons as well as different PM concentrations were taken into account At least 15 valid data pairs were obtained at each test site 6 4 Evaluation Requirement according to Standard EN 12341 The calculated functional correlation y f x between the candidate y and the concentration values measured by the reference device x shall be limit
156. ataradtiecesainiaieatnienens 184 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 13 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 1 General and certification proposal 1 1 General According to Directive 2008 50 EC dated 21 May 2008 replaces air quality framework di rective 96 62 EC dated 27 September 1996 including the related daughter directives 1999 30 EC 2000 69 EC 2002 3 EC as well as the Council decision 97 101 EC on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe the reference method for measuring the PM concen tration as per Air quality Determination of the PM fraction of suspended particulate mat ter Reference method and field test procedure to demonstrate reference equivalence of measurement methods of equality given in EN 12341 and the reference method for measur ing the PM concentration as per Ambient air quality Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM2 5 mass fraction of suspended particulate matter giv en in EN 14907 shall be used A Member State can in the case of particulate matter use any other method which the Member State concerned can demonstrate displays a consistent relationship to the r
157. ate 1 yg m Figure 47 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 test site Bonn winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 134 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A SN 3 vs SN 4 Cologne Summer 100 Measured values 90 80 Regression line 70 D 60 _ __ _ 4 4 _ _J OS Acceptance range 2 according to EN 12341 P 50 a2 y x 3 40 ae 5 30 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Candidate 1 yg m Figure 48 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 test site Co logne summer SN 3 vs SN 4 Rodenkirchen Summer 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Measured values Regression line Acceptance range according to EN 12341 y x Candidate 2 ug m O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Candidate 1 yg m Figure 49 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 test site Ro denkirchen summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und
158. ation values meas ured simultaneously by both candidates Then the concentration mean values Y are split into two separate datasets a Dataset with Y lt 100 g m with number of data pairs n lt and b Dataset with Y gt 100 g m with number of data pairs n gt With respect to a The data pairs of the dataset with Y lt 100 ug m are used to calculate the absolute standard deviation s Sq a gt D 2n The Student s factor t 9975 which is defined as the 0 975 quantile of the two sided 95 confidence interval of the Student s t distribution with f lt n lt 2 degrees of freedom is ap plied 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 131 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A The two sided 95 confidence interval Clos for concentration mean values lt 100 ug m is calculated as follows Clos Sa ti 0 975 With respect to b The relative standard deviation s is calculated from the data pairs of the dataset with Y gt 100 ug m s X D Y 2n Again the Student s factor t 975 defined as 0 975 quantile of the two sided 95 confi dence interval of the Student s t distribution with f gt n gt 2 degr
159. bration function It is x 1 m y b m The slope m of the regression line describes the sensitivity of the measuring system the y intercept b describes the zero point 6 4 Evaluation The resulting quantities for PM are given in Table 28 Table 28 Results of the calibration function and analytical function measured component PM Device no Calibration function Analytical function On f gt m m ug m ug m g m g m g m System 1 SN3 0 894 2 590 System 2 SN4 0 972 3 010 The resulting quantities for PM2 5 are given in Table 29 Table 29 Results of the calibration function and analytical function measured component PM25 Device no Calibration function Analytical function pom mm System 1 SN3 0 896 0 382 1 116 0 426 System 2 SN4 0 943 0 267 1 060 0 283 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc P T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUV Rheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 138 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 5 Assessment A statistical correlation between the reference measuring method and the output signal could be demonstrated Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Refer to modules 5 4 2 and 5 4 10 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc
160. bserved The comparability of the candidates with the reference method according to the Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods 5 is ensured even for days with a rela tive humidity of gt 70 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur A TUVRheinland Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Specification Test result Fulfilled 5 4 6 Averaging effect 5 4 7 Constancy of sample volumet ric flow Tightness of the measuring sys tem Determination of uncertainty be tween systems under test ubs 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncer tainty between systems under test The measuring system shall al low the formation of 24 h mean values The time of the sum of all filter changes within 24h shall not exceed 1 of this averaging time 3 of the rated value during sampling instantaneous values 5 of the rated value during sampling Leakage shall not exceed 1 of the sample volume sucked Shall be determined according to chapter 9 5 3 1 of the Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods in the field test for at two identical systems Determination of the expanded uncertainty of the
161. c TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control T V Rheinl and Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 113 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Zero point drift PM2 5 SN3 NOU A ooo O o o om gt ooo Measured value yg m b O Figure 32 Zero point drift SN3 measured component PM 5 Zero point drift PM10 SN3 Measured value ug m Figure 33 Zero point drift SN3 measured component PM 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 114 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Zero point drift PM2 5 SN4 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 Measured value yg m N2 Nv n gt nN ND x n gt n gt No ne Na nN S o S T T D A N D o Figure 34 Zero point drift SN4 measured component PM 5 Zero point drift PM10 SN4 Measured value yg m Figure 35 Zero point drift SN4 measured component PM 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air
162. candidates according to chapters 9 5 3 2ff of the Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods The measuring system allows the formation of valid daily mean values All determined daily mean values de viate less than 3 from the rated value and all instantaneous values deviate less than 5 The criterion for passing the leakage test which has been specified by the manufacturer maximum pressure in crease of 290 hPa in 5 min proved to be an appropriate parameter for moni toring instrument tightness The de tected maximum leak rate of 10 4 ml min is less than 1 of the nominal flow rate which is 3 3 I min The uncertainty between the candi dates Ups with a maximum of 1 04 yg m for PM25 and a maximum of 2 28 g m for PM10 does not ex ceed the required value of 2 5 yg m Without application of correction fac tors the determined uncertainties Wem for PM25 for all datasets under consideration lie below the defined expanded relative uncertainty Wago of 25 for suspended particulate mat ter Without application of correction fac tors the determined uncertainties Wem for PMio for SN3 are for all da tasets above the defined expanded relative uncertainty Waqo of 25 with exception of Cologne Winter for SN4 the data set Rodenkirchen Summer and for both candidates together the data set 2 30 ug m are also above the defined expanded relative uncer tainty Waqo of 25 for suspen
163. cation of correction factors and terms The revised January 2010 version of the Guide requires that in order to monitor the processes in compliance with the guidelines random checks shall be performed on a number of systems within a measuring network and that the number of measuring sites shall depend on the expanded uncertainty of the system Either the network operator or the responsible authority of the member state is responsible for the appropriate realization of the requirement mentioned above However TUV Rheinland recommends that the expanded uncertainty for the full dataset here uncorrected raw data shall be referred to i e 17 68 for PM25 which would require annual checks at 4 sites and 23 25 for PMy9 which would require annual checks a 5 sites Guide 5 Chapter 9 9 2 Table 6 Due to the necessary application of the corresponding calibration factors this assessment should be made on the basis of the evaluation of the corrected datasets refer to chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 172 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 41 and
164. ccccccsssssssssssseccecssnssssesseeseescanssssesseesseseanees 46 12 6 2 Measuring Station Data in Reply to Data Polling cccssssccccsssscccccsssceccecsseeceecsseseeees 47 13 Technical Sp cificati ons wiiascciidscisccstiseiscccccdcacssdosaedissavcece cise casecdcdcessansedesesscesetsossedcesaded cosseseotesesne 48 14 Dimensional Drawing voissisesccssssesesctscevedssceesessscoosessssonsesssecevedsscecandsseoouessssoosnastscevassssoeanssssoonsesssoes 49 TS INA OX EE T E TEE E A E O O E E E I A E ET 50 APM 2 5 COMDE DERENDA 1 Introduction This instruction manual is intended to provide a systematic and comprehensive introduction to the fea tures functions and operation of the sampling system This manual also contains a number of important safety warnings Please read this manual completely and carefully so that you will be able to make use of the system s many functions and do so both safely and efficiently Please note that details in the de scription of the device and in the illustrations may deviate from the properties found in your own unit 1 1 Symbols and Typography In the interest of making the text clearer and more understandable the following symbols and typo graphic conventions are used The following apply to sections that deal with the parameterization and control of the device by way of the control unit e Elements that can be clicked or selected e g menu items are highlighted in blue e Other word
165. ccording to Grubbs 99 in order to prevent any effects of evidently implausible data on the test re sults Value pairs identified as significant outliers may be discarded from the pool of values as long as the critical value of test statistic does not fall below the target According to the Guide 5 of January 2010 not more than 2 5 of data pairs shall be determined as outliers and discarded As far as candidates are concerned the measured values are usually not discarded unless there are proven technical reasons for implausible values Throughout the testing no values measured by the candidates were discarded Table 8 and Table 9 provide an overview of the number of value pairs that were identified as significant outliners and therefore removed at each site reference The following value pairs were discarded Table 8 Results of the Grubbs outlier test reference PM Test site Date Reference 1 ug m Reference 2 ug m Cologne summer 11 07 2013 31 0 28 1 Table 9 Results of the Grubbs outliner test reference PM35 Test site Date Reference 1 ug m Reference 2 ug m Cologne summer 05 07 2013 14 6 17 4 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc P T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUV Rheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 62 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde
166. ccssssccessssecceessssccecssssceecssesseoess 26 6 2 Selecting Interval for Alternating Mode and Storage scccssssssccsssssecccesssecceessssceeesseseeeees 27 6 3 Selecting the Set Temperature for the Photometer ssssccsssssscccssssececesssscceessssceeessesseeens 27 6 4 Starting the MeaSUrEMENt si cicccscsiccccsssscecccsssccccssssssccssssssccssssssccsssscacesssasscdsessssscessssasisassaassiss 27 7 Measurement Procedure iissicscccssscscsicssssscccsessacscssssacsccsssesicesssscccsessasscosssasssesssasiessssasccsessaaicssssasees 28 7 1 Flushing With Zero Alls sscesesssscicesssececsescsvccesssaveceassscdensassveceaasedeccssssecsesesteonsesateceaceadeobassaceseus 28 7 2 Start of the Measurement and the Measurement MeNu sssscccsssssecccssseccceessescceessseceeees 28 7 3 Aborting the Measurement ciccsssececessssceccsssescncesssv cnsassveceasssdecesassesceassssecusassieccaasaseossasaceuess 29 8 Data Management ini cccsiiictececssstcesivcdsssscssstessdivesceccdecteustdecsxenoues cessdcueteccverscewsdoscstecssaceueeccuusceesdeces 30 8 1 Storing Data on an SD Memory Card Manually ssccccssssccccsssscccccssseccecssseccecssssccensseeeeeess 31 8 2 Erasing Data Memory siciciscsccstececcdevectavcctistuevieeasadcdiecededveuecavsdeeecwssveteesdsdbecesesveuecsecstuecwiveetesss 31 8 3 Displaying Data Content of an SD Memory Card ssscccssssccccssssccccesssceccecssseccecsssseeensseseeeess 31 9 Special FUNCTIONS iiic
167. ce device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM o Cologne WINER fscecscdscaneceeutees oc ceteiis cedanbas eechavacds aes ea ea er E EES EEn 180 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM o Cologne WIM sad ecasestecdies ict eeeasucnaeiecs xasusieatutaindiasicdas daviasasavecaxkianidaxeiansianeianiiaceis 180 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM 4o BOM Mig WILE oead i AANEEN O IELU ENET 181 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM 4o BOM fie WIM err E AE 181 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PMio Cologne SUMMED cccccccccseeeeeeeeeeeeceeaaeaaceeeeeeeeeeaaaaaeeeeeeeeaaaaageeeeeeeeeeeaaaaneees 182 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM o CODE SUITINIS Eo vesctcentctacetent indents as inneni atetea aa iE iais 182 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PMio Rodenkirchen SUMMED 0 cccccccsceeseeseeeseueseueseuceeueeeueseuuseeueaueeeueeaeeeauseaeauees 183 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM 4o Rodenkirchen SUMMED 0 ccccccesceeceeeseeeeeeceeeeseueeeuueeeuseueseuueeueeueeeeeeeaeseaeeuaes 183 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM 4o values gt 30 UJM sa asshesadsisahatsa ds satcagasae raga sil aaa anitir SEa EEEIEE ENESEST EERE 184 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM o values 2 30 YOUN sisvncisniasscatiinnecatidesecaadintecaninra adeno scatdi
168. contribution to the measured signal For the utilized wavelength of approx 650 nm the maximum of sensitivity is in the particle size range between 0 5 and 1 um Be cause of that characteristic the use of simple scattered light photometry for the measure ment of PM 9 concentration is limited as the measured signal is mainly dominated by the PM lt fraction 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 33 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A For the measurement of the fraction PM o the complementary coarse fraction PM2 5 19 con tributes significantly less to the scattered light signal in relation to the mass thus being un derrepresented during the measurement The sensitivity deficit for the coarse fraction is compensated in the device by a simple method by selective enrichment of the concentra tion PM25 10 by the factor 3 3 0 2 16 5 using a virtual impactor which is arranged up stream of the scattered light sensor The enrichment of concentration is equivalent to an in creasement of sensitivity of the photometry for the PM 5 10 fraction The virtual impactor is located on the top of the case and is connected to the impactor inlet via the sampling tube
169. control filters 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVBheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 249 of 300 Table 2 Stability of the control filters Control filter no Weighing no TM1 TM2 TM3 1 0 09257 0 09155 0 09110 2 0 09258 0 09155 0 09113 3 0 09260 0 09155 0 09115 4 0 09260 0 09157 0 09116 5 0 09262 0 09156 0 09117 6 0 09264 0 09157 0 09116 T 0 09262 0 09154 0 09114 8 0 09260 0 09156 0 09116 9 0 09262 0 09156 0 09113 10 0 09263 0 09160 0 09117 11 0 09263 0 09158 0 09118 12 0 09263 0 09158 0 09117 13 0 09267 0 09160 0 09118 14 0 09265 0 09157 0 09116 15 0 09266 0 09159 0 09119 16 0 09269 0 09162 0 09122 17 0 09268 0 09162 0 09121 18 0 09267 0 09161 0 09121 19 0 09266 0 09161 0 09118 20 0 09268 0 09160 0 09120 21 0 09264 0 09161 0 09117 22 0 09264 0 09159 0 09116 Mean value 0 09264 0 09158 0 09117 Standard de viation 3 2911E 05 2 4937E 05 2 8558E 05 Rel standard de viation 0 036 0 027 0 031 Median 0 09264 0 09158 0 09117 Lowest value 0 09257 0 09154 0 09110 Highest value 0 09269 0 09162 0 09122
170. cor rection factors and terms Performance criterion met no 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 165 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 39 and Table 40 provide an overview of all results from the equivalence test of the APM 2 for PM25 and PMipo In the event that a criterion has not been met the respective cell is marked in yellow Table 39 Overview of equivalence test of APM 2 for PM25 All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 55 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 65 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 192 Slope b 0 919 significant Uncertainty of b 0 012 Ordinate intercept a 0 327 not significant Uncertainty of a 0 216 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 17 68 All comparisons 218 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 63 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 04 pg m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 49 Slope b 0 887 Uncertainty of b 0 030 Ordinate intercept a 1 248 Uncertainty of a 0 937 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 21 92 All comparisons lt 18 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 53 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 42 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 143 S
171. criteria stated in VDI Stand ard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 However the test items 5 3 2 5 3 7 5 3 8 5 3 11 and 5 3 12 were evaluated on the basis of the performance criteria stated in the 2002 version of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 i e applying the reference values Bo B4 and B2 The test items 5 3 3 5 3 4 5 3 13 and 5 3 18 were omitted as they are irrelevant to particulate meas uring devices Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 92 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 2 Repeatability standard deviation at zero point The repeatability standard deviation at zero point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 in the certification range ac cording to Table 1 in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 In case of deviating certification ranges the repeatability standard deviation at zero point shall not exceed 2 of the upper limit of this certification range Note With regard to dust measuring devices this test item cannot be evaluated on the basis of the current version of VDI Standar
172. csiiieitiaassettiatiswisrarsiansiacsivnnaraietiiadsieiagepiataawitasaatecs 36 View on APM 2 front door Open c cccceeeeeeeesceeeeeeeeeeeeessaeeeeeeeeeeeeneeeeeeaaeees 37 View on APM 2 rear door Open sssssssesssessssseerrrrtssssrrrrrnntrssertnrrrrnrrnnnrsent 37 Measuring systems APM 2 on measurement cabinet ccseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 38 Control GIT escremar casadasd canada pteexerncevicedeia ixeresiundavaiatinataseis 38 Structure Of menu APM 2 ccsseeeeseesessseseessseeeesseseseeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeneeeess 40 TM cerea E 41 Test gas box for checking the Sensitivity 0 00 0 cee eeeeeceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeneeeeeeees 43 Test set up APM 2 test gas DOK 2ttonc eerie Orie etedeniacetueincee 43 Test appliance for tightness CHECK ccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseneeeeeeees 44 Course of PM 5 concentrations reference at test site Cologne winter 52 Course of PM25 concentrations reference at test site Bonn winter 52 Course of PM25 concentrations reference at test site Cologne summer 53 Course of PM2 5 concentrations reference at test site Rodenkirchen SUMMED cccccccccecceeceeeeeeeeeecseeeeeeueeeueeeueeaueeeueeueeeceeueueeueueeeuaes 53 Course of PM 5 concentrations reference at test site Cologne winter 2014 oo cccceeccccececceceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaeaaneeeeeeesaaaaeeeeeeseeseeaaaaaeees 54 Course of PM concentrat
173. cssiisccs occccccscciecdsssssicdessssccdsssscacdssdciaddssssticdesadined ssssancdessaasddessstacdessssncdesessecd s 32 9 1 Updating the Firmware iicsssicccccsicsccctscssccccsdcsccccsdivccccssssccctscaweccsedssscassdsssssvadssscctadsxesonadesscoeasss 32 9 2 System IMPOFMAtiON 0ciceccsssscccceveseacsucsescssvaseaccoueccacsovaseetecuadescesvadesccouaveacoevadescsduadescesvaasacsoues 32 9 3 Service MON isicccteccciscesccsvcceecccsescacssccceaccavsctescsvecasccoveseesesvcsesccvsses scsvostaccoveceaseanegeaccevecoesesves 33 94 MANU al Mod i isvsiccccsesecccsveseacscvsseacciucsaacssvaseaccoueseacssvaseacstuaveaceotasescoovarescoovadeatscuddeaceovadesscoues 33 e E Ma E PIUSMING O EE A E O E E E O E E A E 34 9 4 2 Measuring PMa5 oder PMi sscossssasssccsosscnssssavescceesvonssscuveeccoosvenssssnsescctessensssonsescovesvensesens 34 9 5 Calibrating the Flow Sensor sccissicccssssissccsssssccssasssccssessaccssasasssssassacsssassiesssasaaccosabassssssssscsssaees 34 9 5 1 Preparing for the Calibration ississcestissccsessssccesssaccesessisscesseassnsessssscesssascnsesnssssesssassnsessszen 35 9 5 2 Connecting the external flow Meter ccccsssscecsssssceccsssscsccesssceccassssseceasessscassssssaasseees 35 9 5 3 Calibrating the Flow Sensor o ccesssscssesssssccesssssceensssssoesssssceenssssseessssscnensssssnesssassnensasacs 35 9 5 4 Checking the Accuracy of the Calibration sssssscssssscsccssssceccssssceccesssssccacsssseceesseees 36 9 6
174. ctor e Stop Terminates a leak test currently being conducted e Back Leaves the Leaking Test menu Leaking Test 12 12 2013 12 10 00 CPU 87 Prepare test for intake OG PGas 377 mV PGas 83 hPa Zero air Inlet Fig 23 Leaking Test menu 9 7 3 Conducting the Leak Tightness Test Follow the instructions below to conduct a leak test 1 Ensure that the APM 2 is switched off 2 Remove the impactor head from the APM 2 by pulling it upward and off of the inlet tube above the virtual impactor Fig 24 Leak testing instrument APM 2 37 oO 12 DERENDA 3 Lift the inlet tube off the virtual impactor 4 Connect the leak testing instrument Fig 24 with the control cable socket on the APM 2 The 7 pole socket is lo cated on the front panel of the APM 2 control unit 5 Power up the APM 2 by turning on the main switch on the front panel and the switch on the front of the control unit 6 Disconnect the coarse filter with tube from the zero air port on the left hand side of the unit 7 Insert the closure plug into the socket at the zero air port 8 Join the leak testing instrument with the APM 2 by inserting the hose fitting into the virtual impactor inlet port Fig 25 Fig 25 Connecting the leak testing instrument 9 At the APM 2 control unit call up the Leaking Test menu with menu items Setup gt Leaking Test 10 Click on menu item Inlet to start the automatic testing proces
175. current software version is displayed in the main menu as well as under menu point Setup System info The test was started in the year 2012 with software version 1 3 During the test work the software was constantly developed and optimized especially for the implementation of the test gas measurement With start of the field test in November 2012 the software version 2 1 0 was installed updat ed to version 2 3 1 in February 2013 before the campaign Bonn winter and updated again to version 2 5 2 in June 2013 before the campaign Cologne summer This version was kept over the complete remaining field test Cologne summer and Rodenkirchen All implemented modification until version 2 5 2 are related in first line to the implementation of the test gas measurement and have no impact on the performance of the measuring sys tem refer to Table 5 For the outstanding lab investigations at the reference point the software version 3 0 0 d re spectively 3 0 1 was finally made available in December 2013 respectively January 2014 These software versions contain an optimization of the calculation algorithm by introducing a linearity correction for the measured PM values As this modification has an impact on the formation of measured values the following measures for qualification of the new software in addition to the outstanding lab investigations have been agreed upon All available measured values of the four past c
176. d datasets lie outside the limits of the respective acceptance envelope for all test sites with exception of Cologne win ter for SN4 only the reference equivalence function for the field campaign Rodenkirchen is outside of the respective acceptance envelope Moreover the variation coefficient R of the calculated reference equivalence function in the concentration range concerned is lt 0 95 for all comparison campaigns with exception of Cologne winter The demonstration of equiva lence according to EN 12341 1998 is thus not possible Nevertheless the equivalence test according to the EC guide which is relevant for the end user is passed after application of the necessary correction factors for all test sites without restrictions refer to 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms Performance criterion met no 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 25 and Table 26 present a summary of the results of the regression analyses Figure 36 to Figure 45 provide graphical representations which illustrate these findings In addition to the regression lines of both candidates the diagrams show the curve y x which is con sidered ideal and the two sided acceptance envelope All individual values for the candidates as well as for the reference devices are listed separately for each test site in annex 5 of the appendix 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Co
177. d deviation as well as maximum and minimum value 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 145 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 5 Assessment The results of the flow rate checks carried out at each field test site are given in Table 34 Table 34 Results of flow rate checks Flow rate check before SN3 SN4 testing at l min Deviation l min Deviation Test site from nominal from nominal value value Cologne winter 3 31 0 3 3 30 0 Bonn winter 3 32 0 6 3 28 0 6 Cologne summer 3 33 0 9 3 29 0 3 Rodenkirchen summer 3 36 1 8 3 33 0 9 The graphical representations of flow rate constancy show that none of the values obtained during sampling deviates from the respective nominal value by more than 5 The 24h mean values for the total flow rate of 3 3 I min also deviate significantly less than the permis sible 3 from the nominal value All determined daily mean values deviate less than 3 from the rated value and all instan taneous values deviate less than 5 Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 35 shows the parameters determined for the flow Figure
178. d PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m STD Serial No SN3 SN4 No Date Ratio Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 91 3 9 2013 Bonn winter 92 3 10 2013 93 3 11 2013 94 3 12 2013 95 3 13 2013 96 3 14 2013 97 3 15 2013 98 3 16 2013 99 3 17 2013 100 3 18 2013 101 3 19 2013 102 3 20 2013 103 3 21 2013 104 3 22 2013 105 3 23 2013 106 3 24 2013 107 3 25 2013 108 3 26 2013 109 3 27 2013 110 3 28 2013 111 3 29 2013 112 3 30 2013 Zero point 113 3 31 2013 Zero point 114 4 1 2013 Zero point 115 4 2 2013 116 4 3 2013 117 4 4 2013 118 4 5 2013 119 4 6 2013 4 7 2013 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc T VRh T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH U einland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 226 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 Page 16 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in pg m STD Serial No SN3 SN4 Ratio SN3 SN 4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 4 8 2013 4 9 2013 4 10 2013 4 11 2013 4 12 2013 4 13 2013 4 14 2013 4 15 2013 4 16 2013 4 17 2013 4 18 2013 4 19 2013 4 20 2013 4
179. d on any changes the measuring system The test institute shall be informed on changes in the instrument software which have influence on the performance of the measuring system Minimum requirement accord ing to VDI 4202 Sheet 1 The repeatability standard de viation at zero point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 in the certification range according to Table 1 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 For PM Max Bo The repeatability standard de viation at reference point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 in the certification range according to Table 1 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 in the instrument software Requirements on measuring systems for gaseous air pollutants The test was carried out on the basis of the performance criteria stated in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet1 Sep tember 2010 However the test items 5 3 2 5 3 7 5 3 8 5 3 11 and 5 3 12 were evaluated on the basis of the performance criteria stated in the 2002 version of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 i e applying the reference values Bo Bi and B2 The test items 5 3 3 5 3 4 5 3 13 and 5 3 18 were omitted as they are irrelevant to par ticulate measuring devices The tests resulted in detection limits of 0 03 g m PM10 and lt 0 01 g m PM2s5 for System 1 SN3 and 0 09 ug m PMio and 0 10 ug m PM2 5 for System 2 SN4 Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc Page
180. ded particulate matter Correction factors shall be applied according to chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc Page 29 of 300 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 30 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Specification Test result Fulfilled 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms Requirements on multiple component measuring sys tems If the maximum expanded un certainty of the systems under test exceeds the data quality objectives according to the Eu ropean Directive on ambient air quality 8 the application of correction factors and terms is allowed Values corrected shall meet the requirements of chap ter 9 5 3 2 ff of the Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods Shall comply with the require ments set for each component also in the case of simultane ous operation of all measuring channels 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc Due to application of the correction factors the candidates meet the re quirements on data quality of ambient air quality measurements for all da tasets for PM2 5 and PMio For PM25 the requirements are met even with
181. dial The value is now shown inverse 4 Adjust the value according to the previously calculated values by turning the jog dial and press the jog dial to confirm The change is thus saved 9 9 Allowing Negative Measured Values This function is relevant only for service technicians and is not required in standard operation The value should in the normal case be left at 0 Change the setting for negative measured values as follows The change is thus stored 1 Select the Setup menu in the main menu and press the jog dial to confirm 2 Inthe Setup menu select the Measurement parameter item and confirm your choice 3 Click on the value displayed next to Allow Neg and modify as desired 0 negative values not permitted 1 negative values permitted APM 2 39 COMDE DERENDA 4 Press the jog dial to confirm The change is thus saved 40 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 10 Service and Maintenance 10 1 General The device requires little service The photometer chamber is cleaned automatically by the device dur ing the measurement operation and should not be opened 10 2 Internal Filters The replacement intervals for the filters vary widely depending on the level of air pollution In general the filters should be replaced after six months at the latest For the zero air filter the change in the photometer offset value may be used as an indicator of the loading level Minor fluctuations in the off set by a few t
182. ds 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 and 4203 Sheet 3 Sep tember 2010 By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 reference is made to the following minimum requirement in the previous version of this guideline VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 June 2002 The detection limit of the measuring system shall not exceed the reference value Bo The detection limit shall be determined during the field test 6 2 Equipment Zero filter for testing the zero point 6 3 Method The detection limits of the candidates SN3 and SN4 were determined by means of zero fil ters which were installed at the inlets of instruments Over a period of 15 days and 24 h day particulate free sample air was fed into the systems The detection limit was determined in the laboratory test because long term provision of particulate free air proved impossible un der field conditions 6 4 Evaluation The detection limit X is calculated from the standard deviation So from the measured values when particulate free sample air is sucked in by the two candidates It corresponds to the standard deviation from the mean value S of the measured values Xo for each candidate multiplied by the Student s factor X tht 0 95 Sxo with Spo fro X i 1 n Reference value Bo 2 ug m 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUV R hei n a nd Report on performance testing of the Air Pol
183. e SN3 measured component PM1o values 2 30 g m Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM10 All comparisons 230 pg m Raw data 100 90 a 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate ug m 30 20 10 40 50 60 70 80 90 Reference ug m Figure 90 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM10 values 2 30 g m 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH P Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 185 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms If the maximum expanded uncertainty of the systems under test exceeds the data quality objectives according to Annex B of Standard VDI 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 for the test of PM25 measuring systems the application of factors and terms is allowed Values corrected shall meet the requirements of chapter 9 5 3 2ff of the Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods The tests were also carried out for the component PM30 6 2 Equipment No equipment is necessary to test this performance criterion 6 3 Method Refer to module 5 4 10 6 4 Evaluation If evaluation of the raw data acc
184. e electric voltage at reference point shall not exceed the specifications made in Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 For PM Change in measured value at B maximum Bo within the volt age interval 230 15 20 V The change in the measured value caused by interfering components in the sample gas shall not exceed the require ments of Table 2 of VDI Stand ard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 at zero and reference point For gaseous components the measuring system shall allow the formation of hourly averag es The averaging effect shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 The standard deviation from paired measurements under field conditions shall be deter mined with two identical meas uring systems by paired meas urements in the field test It shall not exceed the specifica tions stated in Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 Sep tember 2010 For PM RD gt 10 related to B4 No deviations gt 1 3 in relation to yes 102 the default value of 230V due to changes in supply voltage were de tected Not applicable T Not applicable In the field test the reproducibility for the full dataset was 20 for PM2 5 and 16 for PM o 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 26 of 300 5 3 12 Long term drift 5 3 13 Short term drift 5 3 14 Response time TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH
185. e 250 Manual of 50 Total 300 Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 pages pp pp Pages Pages 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc e T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 4 of 300 Blank page 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 5 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Contents 1 GENERAL AND CERTIFICATION PROPOSAL ccccecccceceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 13 Hel General seiere iere E EE e a a e e E E E S 13 1 2 C rtification Proposal eiieeii aE EEEE aE S EE a a Ee a ETS 19 1 3 Summary of test results scsi ccpacnssdesceesiceecceradessuenkcabstenaceysuasscebanuianiealddasaseedmasceyaeeaaise 21 25 TASK DEFINITION csccesttesctastsasatavecesciasieniasasadesdiasbsntasatsiabenecencedeedtecs conde dadentuesbusaceesbdeee 31 2 1 Nat re of teStrercicniranaran aa a a a E a ae ea adaa 31 De OSC ale EE A ES 31 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE AMS TESTED sisiiiastiisassenticariin
186. e Derenda GmbH is excluded Authority to adopt changes to this instruction manual and the system software as well as modifications to the technology equipment and form of the device in comparison with the statements and illustra tions in this manual is reserved by the Comde Derenda GmbH such changes may be implemented with out prior notification Comde Derenda GmbH 2010 2014 Comde Derenda GmbH Kieler Strasse 9 14532 Stahnsdorf Germany Tel 49 3329 69027 10 Fax 49 3329 69027 19 E Mail info derenda de www derenda de 2 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA Table of Contents important INFOMATION sie seciisscscdsiscoendsss sosecdiecostscbisossdateceendssscoseascceesvscbe cosedade coendsse SrO EEAS n Ssa 2 Table of Contents ccissccccscsssscctcsscsccscesseencceesscctcssssestsesssccdsessesndsessacctdsssesetsasssscaceasssnssaasesescaasessdoasezssdeass 3 1 nroddu ON sasssa EEEE SEESE ESE E SEES 6 1 1 Symbols and Typography ssiiccisticcccsscccccssasiccccssscccccsstecaccsssscecesastesccsssssaccssseseccassssdessas ssceasseseces 6 1 2 Intended USC siisiiccisscccccissccaccseiics ccsssscace sesicacossstceccssssceccassesactdes eacesssssaccsssssaccassssses do SESS ENSS 6 1 3 Operating ENVirOnMent isccciccssscccccsscccccssessccccssscceccssssceccsssscscedesteacesssssnccsssssaccsssssecs co s ascssssssnass 7 1 4 Electromagnetic Compatibility csscccsssssccsssssscecssssscecsssssccesessscescessssessesssssssessssssnesssesons 7 1 5 Scope Of
187. e for the stability of the sensitivity During an investigation on the repeatability a standard deviation smaller than 1 of the mean of the measured values could be determined in 15 measurements refer to Table 3 so that the test method itself is to be considered sufficiently stable and reproducible Table 3 Test on repeatability with test gas box Pot Tt 363 2 8 54 366 Oa ee l a P09 370 Detection limit X of mean value 1900 Unfortunately the test method was not available before December 2013 so that the neces sary tests at the reference point in the lab climate chamber mains voltage could be carried out but there are no long term drift investigations at the reference point available from the field test As the devices have shown no drift effects during the permanent comparison with the standard reference method this circumstance should not be relevant for the assessment of the measuring system especially as it is intended to completely abstain from this test point in future for type approval testing according to EN TS 16450 9 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH 6 Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 43 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Figure 13
188. e slope for the full dataset is 0 977 The intercept for the full dataset 3 758 refer to Table 40 For PM25 a slope correction and for PM 9 a slope due to SN3 and intercept correction for the complete dataset was applied and all datasets were then re evaluated using the correct ed values After correction all datasets fulfil the requirements on data quality and the measurement un certainties improve significantly at some sites The January 2010 version of the Guide requires that the systems are tested annually at a number of sites corresponding to the highest expanded uncertainty found during equivalence testing if the AMS is operated within a network The corresponding criterion for determining the number of test sites is divided into 5 steps Guide 4 chapter 9 9 2 Table 6 It should be noted that the highest expanded uncertainty determined for PM25 lies in the range of 10 to 15 after correction while it has been in the range of 15 to 20 before correction For PM the highest expanded uncertainty determined lies in the range of 10 to 15 after correction while it has been in the range of 20 to 25 before correction The network operator or the responsible authority of the member state is responsible for the appropriate realization of the required regular checks in networks mentioned above Howev er TUV Rheinland recommends to use the expanded uncertainty for the full dataset i e for PM 5 17 68 uncorrected dat
189. e system inlet via hose line Test sites and AMS placement For the field test at the test sites Cologne and Bonn the measuring systems were installed completely outside on the roof of the measuring cabinet At these sites the entire reference equipment LVS3 was installed outdoors on the roof of the cabinet as well The installation of the candidates and the reference devices at test site Rodenkirchen was carried out on platforms with approx 0 5 m height The field test was carried out at the following test sites Table 6 Field test sites No Test site Period Characterization 1 Cologne winter 11 2012 02 2013 Urban background 2 Bonn road junc 02 2013 05 2013 Influence of traffic tion winter Cologne summer 05 2013 07 2013 Urban background Rodenkirchen 07 2013 09 2013 Rural structure influ summer ence of traffic 5 Cologne winter 01 2014 03 2014 Urban background Validation campaign for software 3 0 1 refer to chapter 7 Investigations for the validation of the instrument software 3 0 1Investigations for the validation of the instrument software 3 0 1 at page 194 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 52 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particu
190. eak rate is 0 033 l min or 33 ml min This procedure was finally implemented in the software not before January 2014 and was tested afterwards in the lab It is recommended to check the tightness of the measuring system by means of the afore mentioned procedure every three months 6 4 Evaluation Leakage testing was performed in the laboratory The criterion for passing the leakage test which has been proposed by the manufacturer maximum pressure increase of 290 hPa in 5 min proved to be an appropriate parameter for monitoring instrument tightness The detected maximum leak rate of 10 4 ml min is less than 1 of the nominal flow rate which is 3 3 I min 6 5 Assessment The criterion for passing the leakage test which has been specified by the manufacturer maximum pressure increase of 290 hPa in 5 min proved to be an appropriate parameter for monitoring instrument tightness The detected maximum leak rate of 10 4 ml min is less than 1 of the nominal flow rate which is 3 3 l min Performance criterion met yes 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 148 of 300 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 36
191. easured values in g m AMB Serial No SN 3 SN4 No Ratio SN3 SN 4 SN3 SN 4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 ug m ug m ug m ug m 241 8 29 2013 61 9 18 9 18 4 23 3 23 8 Rodenkirchen summer 242 8 30 2013 57 7 17 8 17 4 21 9 22 6 243 8 31 2013 7 9 8 0 11 5 12 5 244 9 1 2013 44 5 6 1 6 2 9 0 10 0 245 9 2 2013 44 3 8 4 8 4 11 6 13 0 246 9 3 2013 55 0 12 4 12 2 15 7 16 6 247 9 4 2013 58 2 9 6 9 2 11 2 11 3 248 9 5 2013 60 8 9 5 8 6 11 4 1424 249 9 6 2013 59 1 17 7 16 9 22 0 22 6 250 9 7 2013 65 6 14 5 14 3 18 4 19 2 251 9 8 2013 12 1 13 5 14 6 16 7 252 9 9 2013 59 3 5 7 6 7 7 3 8 4 253 9 10 2013 58 3 6 1 6 4 7 5 7 8 254 9 11 2013 10 0 10 0 12 1 12 7 255 9 12 2013 60 9 11 8 11 7 14 3 15 3 256 9 13 2013 57 6 7 9 7 5 9 4 9 5 257 9 14 2013 4 1 4 0 5 9 6 3 258 9 15 2013 45 5 5 4 5 0 7 3 7 4 259 9 16 2013 45 4 4 5 4 3 6 8 7 0 260 9 17 2013 48 8 4 6 4 4 6 7 7 0 261 9 18 2013 58 4 10 3 10 0 12 8 13 3 262 9 19 2013 50 0 6 9 6 6 9 1 9 3 263 9 20 2013 45 9 8 2 8 1 10 6 11 3 264 9 21 2013 Zero point 265 1 13 2014 71 5 13 3 12 6 17 2 15 7 Cologne winter 2014 266 1 14 2014 72 3 12 5 11 8 15 0 14 1 validation campaign 267 1 15 2014 66 9 9 1 7 9 10 4 9 0 268 1 16 2014 50 0 6 8 5 5 9 6 7 8 269 1 17 2014 56 0 7 3 5 8 9 4 8 2 270 1 18 2014 12 3 11 5 13 8 12 9 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 220 of 300 Annex 5 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air P
192. eaualcao eles 139 6 1 5 4 6 Averaging effect ee ccccccceeeeeeeceneceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaeeeaeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeeenenaaaaes 143 6 1 5 4 7 Constancy of sample volumetric flOW cccceeeeeeeeeeeeneeeeeeeeeeeteeeesaeeaaeees 144 6 1 5 4 8 Tightness of the measuring SYStOM eeeeeeeeeeee eee e eee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeneeeaaaees 147 6 1 Methodology of the equivalence check modules 5 4 9 5 4 11 cesseeeeeeeeeteees 149 6 1 5 4 9 Determination of uncertainty between systems under test Upg eeeeeeees 150 6 1 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between systems under test 162 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terMs cccccccceeceececeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 185 6 1 5 5 Requirements on multiple component measuring SySteMS ccccceeeeeeeeeeees 193 7 INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE VALIDATION OF THE INSTRUMENT SOFTWARE 02001 coctintatabmntainaniecbeveuntd a e a Ea A aa 194 8 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICAL USE seseseiesereiirserirrrerrirrserrrnrserrrnese 202 Se EMERA TURE oisein a a a 204 TOs ANNEX eas ia a i a 205 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Page 8 of 300 Tables Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 Table 10 Table 11 Table 12 Table 13 Table 14 Table 15 Table 16 Table 17
193. eceeeesseeeeeees 7 S TUN GS seis ccsescsedssedsshesdaveseeessorsteasaaietseeeshdtet 17 Software Data M Nu ccscseccceccecececceeceeeeeeeeaeeeeeaeees 18 DOSIB E E T E 17 Leaking Test Menu ccccssscecesssrteeeeseeeees 36 Manual Mode Menu csscccessssteceeeeeeees 18 Measurement Menu sesser 18 Service MeNu ccsccececeeeeeeseeeeaeceeeeeeeeeees 33 Setup M NU cccceeeseseseseesseeeseeeesseeeeeees 17 Spare Paltser nenien eegee eaaet aE 42 Special FUNCtIONS ccccccccsessssssceeeeeeessessnaeees 32 SPECIFICATIONS ccscsccceceseesssteceeeeecessesseaeees 48 SEO SC eere einna enters aeaa saie ans areare ideae 16 Symbols and Typography c sccccccssssssssseees 6 System Information cccccccsssscceessseeeesseeees 32 System OVErVIEW ccceceeeeeseseeeseseseseeeseeeeeees 10 Time and Date ceccsccccessseeecessueeeeeeseeeeseaaes 20 TANS POLE a T A S 15 Vacuum Pump Maintenance 42 Virtual IMpactor ccccecscccecsssssssssaeeeeeeesessees 13 Maintenance ssssessssssssssssssssssrrssssssrrrsrresssrens 42 Ed 03 2014 APM 2
194. ecifications struction manual listed in the operator s manual are complete and correct the adjustment of the measur against illicit or unintentional adjust ing system against illicit or un ments of instrument parameters Ad intended adjustment during ditional protection against unauthor operation ized access is provided by the locka ble door of the weatherproof housing 4 1 7 Data output The output signals shall be The measured signals are stored on provided digitally and or as an SD card or offered digitally via alogue signals RS232 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 22 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Performance criteria 5 1 General 5 2 5 2 1 Certification rang es 5 2 2 Measuring range 5 2 3 Negative output signals 5 2 4 Failure in the mains voltage 5 2 5 Operating states 5 2 6 Switch over 5 2 7 Maintenance in terval The manufacturer s specifica tions in the instruction manual shall not contradict the results of the performance test General requirements Shall comply with the require ments of Table 1 of VDI Stand ard 4202 Sheet 1 The upper limit of measure ment of the measur
195. ed and assessed with the requirements on data quality of ambient air measurements according to EU Standard 8 Two results are possible 1 Wem S Waqo Candidate method is accepted as equivalent to the standard method 2 Wem gt Waqo Candidate method is not accepted as equivalent to the standard method The specified expanded relative uncertainty Waqo for particulate matter is 25 8 6 5 Assessment Due to application of the correction factors the candidates meet the requirements on data quality of ambient air quality measurements for all datasets for PM25 and PM For PM25 the requirements are met even without application of correction factors The correction of slope nevertheless leads to an improvement of the expanded measurement uncertainties of the full data comparison Performance criterion met yes 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 188 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A The evaluation of the full dataset for both candidates shows a significant slope for PM25 and a significant intercept for PM For PM SN3 also the slope has been significant For PM 5 The slope for the full dataset is 0 919 refer to Table 39 For PMyo Th
196. ed by a two sided acceptance en velope This acceptance envelope is defined by y x 10 ug m for concentration mean values lt 100 g m and y 0 9x g m or 1 1x g m for concentration mean values gt 100 g m Furthermore the variation coefficient R of the calculated reference equivalence function shall not fall below the value of 0 95 The test is directed towards the functional correlation between the concentration values ob tained from paired determinations between the candidate and the reference device Ideally both systems measure the same mass fraction of suspended particulate matter so that y x The evaluation procedure is as follows A linear regression analysis was carried out for the measured values obtained at all four test sites individually and as a whole A reference equivalence function corresponding to the equation below is determined for each measured value y of the respective candidate and of the reference device x both in g m y m x b with i candidate APM 2 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 123 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 5 Assessment For SN3 the reference equivalence functions for the uncorrecte
197. eeeceessecececeeeeeeseeaeeeeeeeeeeee 42 INtAKE TUB Ge ocecccecnecesseanseesedcanesaaiceseracteege 14 15 Intended USC cceceeseeceesseeeceeseeecesseeeeeeesenaees 6 INtrOCUCTION sesira anaran ATEO 6 Language Settings cccccccccccccccceceeeeeeeeeeeeees 20 Leak Tightness TeSt cccssccessssteceeseneeeeeenes 36 Conducting the Test cscssccccceeeesseserees 37 Maintenance ceecseseccececeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeneees 41 Manual Measurement ccccccceesseceesesteeeeeeaes 34 50 Manual Mod e ccccssccccsessececessteeeessseeeeseaaes 33 Measurement AD Ort AEE A EE PI E E S 29 Alternating Mode Interval c scccceeees 27 Parameterizing oren steve eencecees 26 Particulate Fraction ccccsscccessssseceseeteees 26 Procedure rrisin rosnie Ah 28 Set Temperature for Photometer 27 Starting a Measurement s es 27 Measurement Menu During Operation 28 Negative Measured Values cccceesseeeeeenees 39 Offset Settings si cciiscccsveiceied dies denetheseoviesseetees 39 Operating Environment 0 0s0seseseeeeeeeees 7 Operations ciieitvan hin She a 17 Password Change siinne a 24 Photometer Inspection ccccccceseesssteeeeeeens 36 Photometer Unit essnicsssisesinsusinranisis 14 Maintenant 0 ccc eceeseeeecececeseeneeneeeeeeeeees 41 Safety INStrUCTIONS ccccccecsseceseesteeeeeesteeeeeees 8 Scope Of DeliVery cccccccccecsseccceess
198. ees of freedom is applied The two sided 95 confidence interval Clos for concentration mean values gt 100 ug m is calculated as follows Clos S tf 0 975 During the field tests no concentration values gt 100 pg m were observed For that reason a statistical evaluation is not possible Hence consideration according to b is not required 6 5 Assessment The following is applicable to all field test sites The two sided confidence interval Clos of max 3 58 g m is below the permissible limit of 5 g m Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 27 lists the calculated values of the standard deviation sa and the two sided confidence interval Clos Figure 46 to Figure 50 provide the graphical representation Aside from the re gression line of both candidates calculated by means of linear regression analysis the dia gram shows the y x curve which is considered ideal and the two sided acceptance enve lope All single values for the candidates are provided in annex 5 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc P T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 132 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 27 Two sided 95 confidence interval Clos
199. eference method In that event the results achieved by that method must be corrected to produce results equivalent to those that would have been achieved by using the reference method 2008 50 EC Annex VI B The Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods 5 which was developed by an ad hoc EC working group in January 2010 Source http ec europa eu environment air quality legislation pdf equivalence pdf describes a method for testing for equivalence of non standardized measurement methods The requirements set out in the Guide for equivalence testing have been included in the last revision of the VDI Standards 4202 Sheet 1 and VDI 4203 Sheet 3 In this performance testing the following limit values were applied PM25 PMio Daily limit DL 24 h Not defined 50 yg m Annual limit AL 1 a 25 yg m 40 g m as well as for the calculations according to the Guide 5 PM25 PMio Limit value 30 g m 50 g m 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 14 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A The 2002 VDI guideline 4202 Sheet 1 describes the Minimum requirements for suitability tests
200. einland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 162 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between systems under test For the test of PM25 measuring systems the equivalency with reference method shall be demonstrated according to chapter 9 5 3 2 to 9 6 of the Guide Demonstration of Equiva lence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods in the field test at least at four sampling sites representative of the future application The maximum expanded uncertainty of the sys tems under test shall be compared with data quality objectives to Annex A of VDI Stand ard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 The tests were also carried out for the component PM 0 6 2 Equipment Additional instruments according to item 5 of this report were used in the testing of this per formance criterion 6 3 Method The test was carried out at four different comparisons during the field test Different seasons and varying concentrations for PM25 and PM were taken into consideration At least 20 of the concentration values from the complete dataset determined with the ref erence method shall exceed the upper assessment threshold according to 2008 50 EC 8 The upper assessment threshold is 17 g
201. elt GmbH g P Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 81 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 2 4 Failure in the mains voltage In case of malfunction of the measuring system or failure in the mains voltage for a period of up to 72 h uncontrolled emission of operation and calibration gas shall be avoided The instrument parameters shall be secured by buffering against loss caused by failure in the mains voltage When mains voltage returns the instrument shall automatically reach the operation mode and start the measurement according to the operating instructions 6 2 Equipment Not required here 6 3 Method A failure in the mains voltage was simulated and it was tested whether the AMS remains undamaged and is ready for measurement after the restart of power supply 6 4 Evaluation The measuring systems do not require operation gas or calibration gas therefore uncon trolled emission of gases is not possible When mains voltage returns after a power failure the AMS automatically returns to the measuring mode after re stabilization of the photometer temperature and two minutes zero air purging see also item 6 1 4 1 4 Setup times and warm up times 6 5 Assessment All parameters are secured against loss by buffering When m
202. ely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 90 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 1 General The testing is performed on the basis of the minimum requirements stated in VDI Stand ard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 6 2 Equipment Not required here 6 3 Method The testing is performed on the basis of the minimum requirements stated in VDI Stand ard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 6 4 Evaluation After extensive revision the VDI Standards 4202 Sheet 1 and 4203 Sheet 3 has been new ly published in September 2010 Unfortunately after this revision there are several ambigui ties and inconsistencies in relation to concrete minimum requirements and the general signif icance of particular test items as far as the testing of particulate measuring systems is con cerned The following test items are in need of clarification 6 1 5 3 2 Repeatability standard deviation at zero point no performance criterion defined 6 1 5 3 3 Repeatability standard deviation at reference point not applicable to particulate measuring devices 6 1 5 3 4 Linearity lack of fit not applicable to particulate measuring devices 6 1 5 3 7 Sensitivity coefficient of surrounding temperature no performance criterion defined 6 1 5 3 8 Sensitivity coefficient of supply voltage no perf
203. ement operation the volume flow of the drawn in air has to be 3 3 l min during the measurement When in continuous operation the flow sensor shall be calibrated once a month Calibra tion will require an external flow meter which is not included in the standard scope of delivery 34 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 9 5 1 Preparing for the Calibration Prior to calibration of the flow sensor the APM 2 should be run for a period of 15 minutes so it warms up For this purpose parameterize and start a measurement Additionally check the values for outside air temperature Ext Temp and air pressure Pressure indicated on the left side of the APM Measurement menu Fig 18 If they should deviate from the values of calibrated reference instruments by more than 2 K and 4 mbar respectively temperature and or pressure sensors first have to be cali brated adjusted see 9 3 9 5 2 Connecting the external flow meter 1 Remove the impactor inlet by pulling it off the intake tube in an upward direction 2 Shift the calibration adapter to the upper end of the intake tube and ensure that the adapt er is firmly seated 3 Connect the calibration adapter and the external flow meter using the corresponding hose APM Parameter 12 12 2013 12 20 00 PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 10 Offset2 5 Save file Factor2 5 2 S 40 min Offset 10 Set Temp 40 0 C Factor 10 CalibValue Allow Neg Phototemp 39 0 C Fig 22 Adjusting the pump s power setting 9
204. ended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 11 Standard deviation from paired measurements The standard deviation from paired measurements under field conditions shall be deter mined with two identical measuring systems by paired measurements in the field test It shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 Note In relation to particulate measuring systems this test item cannot be evaluated according to the current versions of VDI Standards 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 and 4203 Sheet 3 September 2010 because the minimum requirements are not defined By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 reference is made to the following require ments stated in the earlier version of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 June 2002 The Reproduzierbarkeit reproducibility Rp of the measuring system shall be determined by parallel measurements with two identical measuring systems and shall be at least equal to 10 B shall be used as reference value 6 2 Equipment For the determination of reproducibility the additional measuring systems described in chap ter 5 were used 6 3 Method Reproducibility is defined as the maximum difference between two randomly chosen single values that have been obtained under equal conditions Reproducibility was determined us ing two identical measuring systems that were operated simultaneously during the field
205. ens of a mV are normal If the offset should however rise by several hundred mV then this is evidence of a clogged or damaged zero air filter The condition of the filter shall be inspected at regular intervals To change the internal filters switch off the device and disconnect it from the power supply The existing filters 1 zero air filter type Parker Balston 1 photometer outlet filter type Parker Balston 1 bypass filter type WIX 1 pump outlet filter type WIX can simply be pulled off the silicone hoses and replaced see 10 7 10 3 Photometer Unit The photometer in the APM 2 shall be calibrated once a year Do this by sending the photometer in its casing to Comde Derenda GmbH and by contacting our customer service department It will be necessary to replace the photometer after a certain period in service The photometer is to be changed if either of the following criteria is fulfilled e f the total amount of particulate matter collected exceeds 50 mg This corresponds to a throughput of about 100 ug m continuously over 100 days or 50 ug m3 continuously over 200 days or 10 ug m continuously over 1 000 days e Ifthe photometer offset value has risen to more than 2 500 mV If one of these events occurs then please contact Comde Derenda GmbH The replacement of the pho tometer which may then be necessary will be carried out by Comde Derenda GmbH APM 2 41 COMDE DERENDA 10 4 Vacuum Pump
206. ents PM25 SN3 amp SN4 Ambient temperature Deviation Start temperature End temperature 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 101 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 19 Dependence of sensitivity test gas values on ambient temperature deviation in mean value of three measurements SN3 amp SN4 lO m m Ca o a Ca s rv e For the respective results of the 3 individual measurements refer to annex 2 and annex 3 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 102 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 8 Sensitivity coefficient of supply voltage The sensitivity coefficient of supply voltage shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 A value c at 70 to 80 of the upper limit of the certification range shall be used as reference point Note In relation to particulate measuring systems this test
207. er PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A The following figures show the measuring cabinet at the field test sites Cologne Bonn and Rodenkirchen Figure 26 Field test site Cologne summer amp winter Figure 27 Field test site Bonn winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH 6 Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 59 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Figure 28 Field test site Rodenkirchen summer In addition to the measuring systems for the measurement of ambient air pollution through suspended particulate matter a data acquisition system for meteorological parameters was installed on the cabinet at the test site where the measurement was carried out Ambient temperature ambient pressure humidity wind velocity wind direction and the amount of precipitation were monitored continuously 30 minutes mean values were stored The cabinet setup and the arrangement of the sample probes had the following dimensions e Height of cabinet roof 2 50 m e Sampling height for tested system 0 96 m 0 51 m above cabinet roof e Sampling height for reference system 3 46 3 01 m above ground e Height of wind vane 4 5 m above ground The following Table 7 therefore contains an over
208. er assessment threshold of 17 ug m for PM25 and a total of 20 7 of the measured values exceed the upper assessment threshold of 28 ug m for PMio The meas ured concentrations were brought into relation with ambient conditions 6 4 Evaluation According to chapter 9 5 3 1 of the Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods the following applies The uncertainty between the candidates ups shall be lt 2 5 g m If the uncertainty between the candidates exceeds 2 5 ug m one or both systems might not be working properly In such a case equivalence cannot be declared Uncertainty is determined for e All test sites comparisons together full dataset e 1 dataset with measured values 2 18 g m for PM25 basis mean values of refer ence measurement e 1 dataset with measured values 2 30 g m for PM basis mean values of reference measurement 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 151 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A In addition to that this report provides an evaluation of the following datasets e Each test site comparison separately e 1 dataset with measured values lt 18 g m for PM25 basis mean values of refer e
209. ergie und Umwelt GmbH D 51105 Cologne Am Grauen Stein Tel 49 221 806 5200 Fax 49 221 806 1349 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc i T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUV Rheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 2 of 300 Blank page 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A DAkks Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle D PL 11120 02 00 A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 3 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measuring system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the com ponents suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Instrument tested Manufacturer Comde Derenda GmbH Kieler Stra e 9 14532 Stahnsdorf Germany Test period April 2012 until March 2014 Date of report 26th March 2014 Report number 936 21219977 A Editor Dipl Ing Karsten Pletscher Tel 49 221 806 2592 karsten pletscher de tuv com Scope of report Report 205 Annex Page 206 Manual Pag
210. es are required to be carried out at regular intervals e Check of instrument status The instrument status may be controlled directly at the instrument or monitored on line e The sampling inlet has to be cleaned in general according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer at which the local PM conditions have to be considered during the type approval test approx every 4 weeks As for the rest the instructions and recommendations provided by the manufacturer shall be followed 8 2 Further maintenance work In addition to the regular maintenance work in the maintenance interval the following proce dures are necessary e A check of the sensors for ambient temperature and ambient pressure should be carried out every 3 months according to EN TS 16450 9 e Acheck of the flow rate should be carried out every 3 months according to EN TS 16450 9 e Inthe context of the check of the flow rate a check on tightness should also be carried out every 3 months e The virtual impactor has to be cleaned latest every 3 months According to the manufacturer the internal filters in the device zero air filter outlet filter for photometer bypass filter and pump outlet filter shall be exchanged latest every 6 months e The photometer should be sent to the manufacturer for re calibration at least once a year According to the manufacturer the photometer has to be completely replaced if the completely collected PM mass exceeds
211. ess than 2 0 ug m The expanded uncertainty Wcwm is calculated at 50 ug m for PM and 30 wg m for PM 5 for each candidate against the mean value of the reference method In each of the following cases the expanded uncertainty shall not exceed 25 e Full dataset e Dataset with PM concentrations greater equal 30 g m for PM4o or greater equal 18 g m for PM25 provided that the dataset contains 40 or more valid data pairs e Datasets for each field test site 5 For the complete dataset to be accepted it is required that the slope b differs insignifi cantly from 1 b i lt 2 u b and that the intercept a differs insignificantly from 0 a lt 2 u a Should these requirements not be met the candidates may be cali brated using the values for slope and or intercept from the complete dataset In the following 5 chapters compliance with the 5 criteria is tested In chapter 6 1 5 4 9 Determination of uncertainty between systems under test Ups criteria 1 and 2 will be checked In chapter 6 1 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between systems under test criteria 3 4 and 5 will be checked In chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms there is an exemplary evaluation for the event that criterion 5 cannot be met without application of correction factors or terms 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Rep
212. evices SN3 SN4 measured component PM o test site Rodenkirchen summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 161 of 300 Candidate 2 ug m 130 120 110 100 APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 All comparisons 230 pg m Raw data 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m o Measured values Regression line Tasia y x Figure 65 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM all test sites values 2 30 ug m Candidate 2 ug m 130 120 110 100 a on oOo oOo O O OQ 40 APM 2 SN 3 amp SN 4 All comparisons lt 30 g m Raw data 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Candidate 1 ug m o Measured values Regression line Eapen y x Figure 66 Results of the parallel measurements with the devices SN3 SN4 measured component PM o all test sites values lt 30 g m 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rh
213. exceed the requirements of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 Sep tember 2010 The requirements of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 apply to certification ranges according to Table 1 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 For deviating cer tification ranges the requirements shall be proportionally converted Note This test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applicable 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 120 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 18 Overall uncertainty The expanded uncertainty of the measuring system shall be determined The value de termined shall not exceed the corresponding data quality objectives in the applicable EU Directives on air quality listed in Annex A Table A 1 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 Sep tember 2010 Note By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 this test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems Please refer to module 5
214. for ambient air quality systems General parameters for the related tests are set out in VDI Standard 4203 Sheet 1 Testing of automated measuring systems General concepts of October 2001 and further specified in VDI 4203 Sheet 3 Testing of automated measuring systems Test procedures for point related ambient air measuring systems for gaseous and particulate air pollutants of August 2004 VDI Standards 4202 Sheet 1 and 4203 Sheet 3 underwent extensive revision and were newly published in September 2010 Unfortunately after this revision there are some ambi guities and contradictions in relation to the performance testing of particulate measuring sys tems as far as minimum requirements on the hand and the general relevance of test items on the other hand are concerned The following test items require clarification 6 1 5 3 2 Repeatability standard deviation at zero point no minimum requirement defined 6 1 5 3 3 Repeatability standard deviation at reference point not relevant to particulate measuring systems 6 1 5 3 4 Linearity lack of fit not relevant to particulate measuring systems 6 1 5 3 7 Sensitivity coefficient of surrounding temperature no minimum requirement defined 6 1 5 3 8 Sensitivity coefficient of supply voltage no minimum requirement defined 6 1 5 3 11 Standard deviation from paired measurements no minimum requirement defined 6 1 5 3 12 Long term drift no minimum re
215. functions via the Manual Mode menu APM 2 33 COMDE DERENDA 9 4 1 Flushing Carry out manual activation of zero air flushing of the photometer unit as follows 1 Select the Manual Mode menu in the main menu and press the jog dial to confirm 2 Select the item Flush in the Manual Mode menu and confirm Flushing starts immediately During flushing you see the current value of the voltage signal at the pho tometer on the right side of the display and left of that the offset voltage value of the photometer de termined during flushing To stop flushing select and confirm the menu item Stop 9 4 2 Measuring PM2 5 oder PM10 Start a manually activated measurement of PM 5 or PM particulate matter as follows 1 Select the Manual Mode menu in the main menu and press the jog dial to confirm 2 Select the item PM2 5 or PM10 in the Manual Mode menu and confirm Manual Mode 12 12 2013 12 10 00 PM 2 5 avg 28 ug m3 PM 10 avg 32 ug m3 FI Offset 369 mV Gas Offset 32 mV Phototemp 18 6 C PGas 557 hPa Flush PM 10 RefGas Stop Fig 21 Manual Mode menu The measurement starts immediately The current value of the mass concentration is shown on the right side of the display during the measurement On the left you see the corresponding mean value for the measurement which is updated once every second To stop the measurement select and confirm the menu item Stop 9 5 Calibrating the Flow Sensor For correct measur
216. g systems Point related measurement methods for gase ous and particulate air pollutants September 2010 June 2002 1 e VDI Standard 4203 Sheet 3 Testing of automated measuring systems Test pro cedures for point related ambient air measuring systems for gaseous and particulate air pollutants September 2010 August 2004 2 e European Standard EN 12341 Air quality Determination of the PM fraction of suspended particulate matter Reference method and field test procedure to demon strate reference equivalence of measurement methods of equality German version EN 12341 1998 3 e European Standard EN 14907 Ambient air quality Standard gravimetric measure ment method for the determination of the PM25 mass fraction of suspended particu late matter German version EN 14907 2005 4 e Guidance document Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Meth ods English Version January 2010 5 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 32 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 3 Description of the AMS tested 3 1 Measuring principle The measuring system Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 determines the concentra
217. gne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM2 5 slope corrected with 0 919 Candidate APM 2 SN SN3 amp SN4 Limit value 30 Status of measured values Slope corrected Allowed uncertainty 25 All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 54 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 70 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 239 Slope b 0 981 not significant Uncertainty of b 0 012 Ordinate intercept a 0 872 significant Uncertainty of a 0 209 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 12 39 All comparisons 218 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 64 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 03 ug m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 61 Slope b 0 953 Uncertainty of b 0 030 Ordinate intercept a 1 663 Uncertainty of a 0 932 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 18 09 All comparisons lt 18 g m Uncertainty between Reference 0 51 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 52 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 178 Slope b 1 069 Uncertainty of b 0 029 Ordinate intercept a 0 010 Uncertainty of a 0 308 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 16 79 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 198 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz
218. hall not exceed 180 s The response time fall of the measuring system shall not exceed 180 s The difference between the response time rise and the response time fall of the meas uring system shall not exceed 10 of response time rise or 10 s whatever value is larger Note This test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applicable 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 117 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 15 Difference between sample and calibration port The difference between the measured values obtained by feeding gas at the sample and calibration port shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 A value c at 70 to 80 of the upper limit of the certification range shall be used as reference point Note This test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applic
219. he certifica tion range Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 80 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 2 3 Negative output signals Negative output signals or measured values may not be suppresses life zero 6 2 Equipment No additional tools are required here 6 3 Method In the field test and during laboratory testing it was examined whether the AMS has a means to output negative measured values as well 6 4 Evaluation The measuring system can output negative values both via the display and via the data out puts though no negative output signals occurred during performance testing Due to measur ing principle and instrument design negative output signals are not to be expected 6 5 Assessment Negative output signals are directly displayed by the AMS and can be output via correspond ing data outputs Yet they are not to be expected due to measuring principle and instrument design Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umw
220. he front of the de vice The menu levels which are not protected by password mostly allow reviewing measure ments parameters etc respectively carrying out functional checks The adjustment of parameters for the measurement is password protected Menu Set up Measurement Parameter Instrument parameters which are implemented in the system can only be accessed by specifically authorized personnel via the menu Setup Device Ad justment which is protected by the factory password Moreover the door of the weatherproof housing is protected by two locks which prevent un authorized access to the measuring system 6 4 Evaluation Unintended adjustment of instrument parameters can be avoided by password protection Moreover additional protection against unauthorized intervention is given by the weather proof housing with lockable door 6 5 Assessment The measuring system is secured against illicit or unintentional adjustments of instrument pa rameters Additional protection against unauthorized access is provided by the lockable door of the weatherproof housing Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components
221. ice vs candidate SN4 measured component PM1o Bonn winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 182 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM10 Cologne Summer Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 85 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM1o Cologne summer Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM10 Cologne Summer Raw data 100 LT TTT 90 lt 80 ae 70 A 60 t Candidate ug m EE EEE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference ug m Figure 86 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM1o Cologne summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 183 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o
222. in Ug m Ambient temperature temperature of the outside air Relative humidity humidity of the outside air Ambient pressure pressure of the outside air Photo temperature temperature of the photometer Error warning message if temperature and or volume flow is outside of the tolerance range Individual identifier codes can be assigned to each of these parameters in preparation for data transmis sion in accordance with the Bavaria Hesse protocol The code for each parameter comprises three digits To set the individual codes 22 E a a a When in the Transfer menu turn the jog dial until the numerical code next to the desired pa rameter e g Air Flush mV is shown outlined in the display and confirm by pressing the jog di al Turn the dial to change the code and press it again once the desired value has been reached Repeat steps 1 and 2 for all the other parameters Go to Set and press the jog dial to store the modified codes Go to Back and press the jog dial to leave the Transfer menu APM 2 COMDE DERENDA NOTE Parameters with code 000 will not be transmitted in BH Bavaria Hesse protocol mode In Serial mode all 8 parameters are generally transmitted Parameter ID BH 12 12 2013 11 11 00 Air Flush mV Concent PM2 5 ug m3 Concent PM10 ug m3 Ambient temperature Relative humidity Ambient pressure Photo Temperature Error Baudrate Serial I O Mode serial Fig 14 Tranfer menu
223. in menu enables access to all system settings and functions The jog dial on the control unit see Fig 3 is used for navigation within the individual menus Turn the jog dial to change from one menu item to the next and to change the param eter selected The menu item selected at any given moment is shown inverse or outlined Press the jog dial to confirm the selection of a menu item or to confirm a modified value 12 10 00 Friday 06 12 2013 Software Version 3 0 1 fe N12 DERENDA APM 2 Manual Mode Measurement Fig 8 Start screen with main menu 5 1 Software Design The software makes possible convenient adaptation of all system settings and exact parameterization for the measurement being planned See Fig 10 for a survey of the menu structure implemented in the software The main menu which is always shown whenever the unit is switched on provides access to the submenus described below 5 1 1 Setup Menu The Setup menu Fig 9 is used to specify numerous settings at the unit It contains the following menu items and functions e Language Selecting the language for the equipment software e Calibration Verifying the sensitivity of the photometer e Leaking Test Leak testing e Date time Setting the date and time of day e Transfer Selection and configuration for data transmission e Contrast Setting the contrast level for the display screen e Service Displaying and adjusting the measured values output by the
224. in the range of 300 400 mV corresponds to an aerosol concentration of approx 70 g m is induced The stability of that signal is taken as a measure for the stability of the sensitivity During an investigation on the repeatability a standard deviation smaller than 1 of the mean of the measured values could be determined in 15 measurements refer to Table 11 so that the test method itself is to be considered sufficiently stable and reproducible 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUV R hei n a nd Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 69 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 11 Test on repeatability with test gas box Measured value mV 8 54 Standard deviation s xo Detection limit X of mean value Unfortunately the test method was not available before December 2013 so that the neces sary tests at the reference point in the lab climate chamber mains voltage could be carried out but there are no long term drift investigations at the reference point available from the field test As the devices have shown no drift effects during the permanent comparison with the standard reference method this circumstance should not be relevant for the assessment of the measuring system especially
225. ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 3 Reproducibility of the sampling systems The PM sampling systems of two identical systems under test shall be reproducible among themselves according to Standard EN 12341 T5 This shall be demonstrated in the field test Not applicable to PM25 sampling systems Please refer to module 5 4 10 in this report 6 2 Equipment No equipment is necessary to test this performance criterion 6 3 Method The test was carried out at various test sites according to item 4 in this report Different sea sons as well as different PM concentrations were taken into account At least 15 valid data pairs were obtained per site 6 4 Evaluation The two sided confidence interval Clos calculated from the concentration mean values meas ured by the candidates shall not exceed 5 yg m if the average concentration is lt 100 ug m If the average concentration is gt 100 g m the confidence interval shall not exceed 0 05 The demonstration of the reproducibility of the candidates focuses on the differences D be tween the concentration values Y measured by the candidates Ideally both candidates are identical and therefore measure the same mass fraction of suspended particulate matter so that D 0 The evaluation procedure is as follows First the concentration mean values Y are calculated from the concentr
226. ing systems shall be greater or equal to the upper limit of the certification range Negative output signals or measured values may not be suppressed life zero Uncontrolled emission of oper ation and calibration gas shall be avoided The instrument pa rameters shall be secured by buffering against loss caused by failure in the mains voltage When mains voltage returns the instrument shall automati cally reach the operation mode and start the measurement ac cording to the operating in structions The measuring system shall al low the control of important op erating states by telemetrically transmitted status signals Switch over between meas urement and functional check and or calibration shall be pos sible telemetrically by computer control or manual intervention If possible 3 months minimum 2 weeks 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc No differences between the instru ment design and the descriptions giv en in the manuals were found Assessment of AMS in the range of the relevant limit values is possible The upper limit of measurement is greater than the corresponding upper limit of the certification range Negative output signals are directly displayed by the AMS and can be output via corresponding data out puts Yet they are not to be expected due to measuring principle and in strument design All parameters are secured against loss by buffering When mains voltage returns the AMS retur
227. inland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 78 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 2 1 Certification ranges The certification range over which the AMS will be tested shall be determined 6 2 Equipment No additional tools are required here 6 3 Method The certification range over which the AMS will be tested shall be determined 6 4 Evaluation VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 lists the following minimum requirements for the certification ranges of measuring systems intended for the measurement ambient air pollution through suspended particulate matter Table 12 Certification ranges Component Minimum Maximum Limit value Assessment period value cr value cr in ug m in ug m in ug m PMio 0 100 50 24h PM2 5 0 50 25 Calendar year Certification ranges are related to the limit value with the shortest assessment period and used for the assessment period of the measuring system in the range of the limit value This assessment of the measuring system in the range of the limit value is performed as part of the determination of the expanded uncertainty of the candidates according to the guide 5 For this purpose the following values are used as reference values in accordance w
228. int 2 8 2014 Zero point 2 9 2014 Zero point 2 10 2014 71 4 10 9 10 2 13 6 13 6 2 11 2014 47 6 6 1 5 0 8 3 7 9 2 12 2014 51 3 5 7 4 3 9 0 8 1 2 13 2014 44 8 5 7 4 9 9 4 9 2 2 14 2014 4 8 4 5 7 3 7 5 2 15 2014 4 9 3 4 7 5 6 9 2 16 2014 56 2 6 5 5 7 9 3 9 1 2 17 2014 59 7 9 1 8 6 12 5 12 3 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 221 of 300 Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 11 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m AMB Serial No SN3 SN4 No Ratio SN3 SN4 SN3 SN4 Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 ug m ug m ug m ug m 301 2 18 2014 71 7 14 9 14 0 19 9 19 7 Cologne winter 2014 302 2 19 2014 67 4 11 1 10 6 13 6 13 7 validation campaign 303 2 20 2014 67 5 6 7 6 4 8 0 8 1 304 2 21 2014 63 2 7 3 6 6 9 7 9 1 305 2 22 2014 90 9 7 0 5 8 7 8 6 9 306 2 23 2014 87 0 7 7 7 4 8 5 8 6 307 2 24 2014 70 6 9 5 8 7 12 6 12 5 308 2 25 2014 70 5 9 1 8 9 11 6 12 0 309 2 26 2014 61 7 12 0 11 0 1
229. int in future for type approval testing according to EN TS 16450 9 Thus the maintenance interval is determined by regularly necessary maintenance work see also module 4 1 2 During operating time maintenance may be limited to contamination checks plausibility checks and possible status and error messages 6 5 Assessment The maintenance interval of 4 weeks has been determined by regular maintenance work Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of results For necessary maintenance work refer to item module 4 1 2 in this report or chapter 10 in the operator s manual 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 85 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 2 8 Availability The availability of the measuring system shall be determined during the field test and shall be at least 95 6 2 Equipment Not required here 6 3 Method The start and end point of the availability checks are determined by the start and end point at each of the field test sites For this purpose all interruptions for instance those caused by malfunctioning or maintenance work are recorded as well 6 4 Evaluation Table 13 and Table 14 provide lists of o
230. intended adjustment aictatctancscreiasciahemredane dare nitananiaisdhenedlbinnmiamitbenenehiathatoncbec 74 6 1 4 1 7 Data output 2 2 eeeee cece eee ecaaa aaa eeeeeeeeeeaaaeeeeeeeeesaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeseaaaneeeeeeeees 75 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 6 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Bi TIN srecne a patente na gata tara AE E EE ENEA 77 5 2 1 Certification ranges aisle edeasth ye cence tucnanctie ranted acerasturiuavavasthenenbecaetvadeecnceivansee 78 5 2 2 Me asunng rang sere ace atte tes rete a inni eeann ataei ARN 79 5 2 3 Negative output signals 0 ccccciccintntcascetantadietadeandanandaddesadenncendenedesedetenbeddnsedenedetes 80 5 2 4 Failure in the mains voltage axcccseiscsase occa sctecadiaee eee arsed aeeeee eee eee 81 5 2 5 Operating SUAISS ah cieasi settee deacnanssetcineedennasasahcceacerdias sdepadyaceaneelhadeandeidienotaiaaatehs 82 5 2 6 Switch OVer iinciccccastidsscctcsancdastesasscntiesesentudnninscbsacccnseetaaseseatecondeateseedestaanccenteateans 83 5 2
231. into two partial flows The aerosol now optionally goes from the axial flow enrichment mode for recording PM concentration or from the side flow normal mode for recording PM concentration to the scattered light sensor system via solenoid valves a lt Protective roof Insect screen ee Impactor inlet for 3 3 min PM Housing Baffle plate i Impactor jets a a lt Condensate drain Antenna Kt Central tube Qi Radiation protection Air pressure AN AEN PE i Temperature ZN Rel humidity Virtual impactor Z 2s ur Q3 SD slot Magnetic valve 3 Q2 PM 29 g m SIM slot Z DOC Magnetic valve Zero air filter J ll Z 0 Magnetic valve E Protective filter D ga 5 a oO lt D lt o P S ll Capillary PM 5 3 G Photometer 25 os 2 ae S P EF O Mass flow meter Pump Fig 1 Overview diagram 10 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA The light of a laser diode illuminates there a measurement volume defined by the optical beam path The light reflected by the aerosol particles within this measurement volume is recorded by the detector positioned at an angle of 90 The voltage signal generated and then amplified by the detector repre sents a direct measure for the mass concentration of the aerosol in the measurement volume 0 1000ug m For the zero point adjustment filtered air is fed to the scattered light sensor via the sw
232. ion function for barometer developed Not installed e Linearity correction implemented e Error display as superposed window e Calibration factor for photometer implemented e Factory calibration of ADC input now possible e Display of negative measured values can be switched on off as an option e Leak test implemented 3 0 0 d e Optional inversion of valve PM2 5 PM10 during Test gas measure test gas measurements ments for lab test 3 0 1 e Leak test shows leak rate Campaign 5 f lidati 0 1 e Leak test Vacuum pressure is determined a ar validan aA couple of seconds after switching off the pump e Communication via serial interface stabilized The reliability of operation of the measuring system is increased continuously by the modifi cations No significant impact on the instrument performance is to be expected for the changes up to version 3 0 0 b The implemented modification in the calculation algorithm since version 3 0 0 b has been validated through an extensive test program refer to chapter 7 starting with page 194 in this report The test comprised of a laboratory test for the assessment of performance characteristics as well as a field test conducted over several months and at various field sites All obtained concentrations are given in pg m operating conditions Additionally the PM concentrations for evaluation according to Standard EN 12341 for standard conditions are given in pg m 273 K 101 3 k
233. ions reference at test site Cologne winter 55 Course of PM concentrations reference at test site Bonn winter 55 Course of PM19 concentrations reference at test site Cologne summer 56 Course of PM concentrations reference at test site Rodenkirchen SUMMED cccc cece ceecceeececeeeeseeeeeeuseeueeuueeuueeuueuceeuceeueeeueeuaeeuaes 56 Course of PM 9 concentrations reference at test site Cologne Winter 2014 oo cccccecccececceceeaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaeeaeeeeeeesaaaaaeeeeeeseeeseaaeaaeees 57 Field test site Cologne summer amp Winter ccccccccccccceccecceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeess 58 Field test site Bonn Winter cece ceccceccceccueceueseueseueseueeeueseuaeuaeeueeeneveneeenanes 58 Field test site Rodenkirchen SUMMET c ccccceecccecseeceueceueceuuseuueeueeeueeeueeaaees 59 Display of measured concentrations here PM25 German language setup 65 Front side of the APM 2 top right side SD card slot left side RS232 76 Display Of software version 3 0 1 eenen ennnen 89 Zero point drift SN3 measured Component PMo 5 ccccccseeeeeeeeeseeeeseaeeees 113 Zero point drift SN3 measured Component PMyo cccccceeeeeceeeeeeeeeeeeueeeees 113 Zero point drift SN4 measured Component PMo5 ccceceeeeeeeeeeesseeeeeeeeeeens 114 Zero point drift SN4 measured component PM4o ccccceeeseessecceeeeeeeeeaeeeeees 114 Refe
234. ir Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 175 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM2 5 Bonn Winter Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 71 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM s Bonn winter Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM2 5 Bonn Winter Raw data 100 J 90 Le 80 70 l 60 50 40 Candidate ug m 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 72 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM s Bonn winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc ra TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 176 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM2 5 Cologne Summer Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10
235. itching device at periodic intervals The data determined are stored in the device memory as well as if provided onan SD memory card The physics of the light scattering on particulates causes aerosol particles with a diameter on the order of the light wavelength used based on their mass to scatter the light the most efficiently That means they supply the greatest contribution to the signal The maximum sensitivity for the wavelength of 650 nm used in the device is in a particle size range from 0 5 to 1 um Because of this characteristic there are limits to application of simple scattered light photom etry for measurement of the PM concentration The measurement signal of a scattered light sensor used in outside air is primarily dominated by the PM fraction Fig 2 Front side of APM 2 Based on mass the complementary coarse fraction PM3 5 10 contributes significantly less to the scat tered light signal and is therefore underrepresented in the measurement The sensitivity deficit in the coarse fraction is thus compensated for in the device by a simple process via selective enrichment of the concentration of the PM 5 19 fraction by a factor of 3 3 0 2 16 5 by means of a virtual impactor see 3 1 3 which is connected upstream from the scattered light sensor Concentration enrichment is equivalent to an increase in sensitivity of the photometry for the PM 5 10 fraction The system consists of the following components
236. item cannot be evaluated according to the current versions of VDI Standards 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 and 4203 Sheet 3 September 2010 because the minimum requirements are not defined By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 reference is made to the following require ments stated in the earlier version of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 June 2002 Change in the measured value at reference value B caused by the common changes in the mains voltage in the interval 230 15 20 V shall not exceed Bo 6 2 Equipment Isolation transformer test gas method with propane for testing the reference point 6 3 Method In order to examine the dependence of measured signal on supply voltage the latter was re duced from 230 V to 210 V and then increased over an intermediate stage of 230 V to 245 V For the reference point test a measured signal was created and evaluated by offering pro pane to the photometer cell in order to test the stability of the sensitivity of both candidates SN3 and SN4 test gas method As the AMS is not designed for mobile use separate testing of the dependence of measure ment signal on mains frequency was abstained from 6 4 Evaluation At reference point the changes in percentage of the determined measured values were ex amined for each voltage step in relation to the default voltage of 230 V 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Cont
237. ith the specifications of the Guide PMio 50 g m PM25 30 ug m Refer to test item 6 1 under test in this report 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between systems 6 5 Assessment Assessment of AMS in the range of the relevant limit values is possible Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Refer to test item 6 1 under test in this report 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between systems 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 79 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 2 2 Measuring range The upper limit of measurement of the measuring system shall be greater or equal to the upper limit of the certification range 6 2 Equipment No additional tools are required 6 3 Method It was examined whether the upper limit of measurement is greater or equal to the upper limit of the certification range 6 4 Evaluation The measuring system has a default measuring range of 0 1 000 ug m Measuring range 0 1 000 g m Upper limit of certification range PMio 100 g m PM25 50 g m 6 5 Assessment The upper limit of measurement is greater than the corresponding upper limit of t
238. k test data transmission system information instrument settings for service only protected with factory password and meas urement parameters PM25 PMio or switch mode nominal tem perature for heater block interval for switch mode Figure 11 gives an overview on the structure of the menu for APM 2 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc P T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 40 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A a 2 7 E P 2 l S E slisala 3 2 2 SIENE 2 Ri 3 E a S Q e 6 2 39 8 s o i ln s ela a S 5 2 E j wild Go Z s v 5 s 85 la 12 lal lgi lel lf z S T E T E lt E ra a E3 fu c 5 3 E D E 5 2 2 oc J T 8 w e E fos z j oO oa a z g ao 5 allg i e 5g MEIE 5 2 IES EJZ 8 2 8 lle 8l s O 8 c i Mes aj j lt n 5 u v 3 4 8 amp N a 2 3 a p p t o a Oo S 3 E 8 Aa 5 Figure 11 Structure of menu APM 2 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH y Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured b
239. late matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Figure 16 to Figure 25 show the course of PM concentrations at the measuring locations in the field as recorded by the reference measuring systems 80 70 60 50 3 amp 40 te S 30 g S 20 oO 10 0 N N N N N N N oe oO oD mM M gt gt gt gt gt gt gt gt gt gt gt gt N N N N N N N N N N N N A A N N A Se se ja lt fo fo fo fo fo gt S S Ss N F rz F BS h N N oO oO N N Figure 16 Course of PM25 concentrations reference at test site Cologne winter 80 70 60 50 3 40 w S 30 g 3 E i T I oO gt CANETTI TTT TATE a TT 0 mM mM lap mM mM mM mM lapl mM mM gt gt gt gt gt gt gt gt gt gt N N N N N N N N N N A ra ra oo sr T i t re oO oO oO oO oO Oo oO oO oO oO N S S N 3 S gt N m N N T T N Figure 17 Course of PM2 5 concentrations reference at test site Bonn winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 53 of 300 Conc PM
240. level of y 50 g m for PM4o Item 9 5 5 The expanded relative uncertainty of the results of the candidates is calculated for each dataset by multiplying w cy with a coverage factor k according to the following equa tion Wom k Woy In praxis k 2 for large n Item 9 6 The highest resulting uncertainty Wey is compared with the requirements on data quality of ambient air measurements according to EU Standard 8 and assessed There are two possible results 1 Wem S Wago Candidate method is considered equivalent to the reference method 2 Wem gt Waqo Candidate method is considered not equivalent to the reference method The specified expanded relative uncertainty Wago for particulate matter is 25 8 6 5 Assessment Without application of correction factors the determined uncertainties Wey for PM2 5 for all datasets under consideration lie below the defined expanded relative uncertainty Wago of 25 for suspended particulate matter Without application of correction factors the determined uncertainties Wey for PM for SN3 are for all datasets above the defined expanded relative uncertainty Waqo of 25 with excep tion of Cologne Winter for SN4 the data set Rodenkirchen Summer and for both candidates together the data set 2 30 ug m are also above the defined expanded relative uncertainty Wago Of 25 for suspended particulate matter Correction factors shall be applied according to chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Application of
241. lope b 1 040 Uncertainty of b 0 030 Ordinate intercept a 0 928 Uncertainty of a 0 327 Expanded meas uncertainty Wcm 7 98 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 166 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Candidate J APM 2 i SN SN3 amp SN4 Limit value 30 Status of measured values Raw data_ Allowed uncertainty 25 Cologne Winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 54 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 65 ug m SN 3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 52 52 Slope b 0 855 0 883 Uncertainty of b 0 017 0 018 Ordinate intercept a 1 068 1 387 Uncertainty of a 0 389 0 400 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 24 56 18 11 Bonn Winter Uncertainty between Reference 0 62 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 88 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 51 51 Slope b 0 952 1 007 Uncertainty of b 0 029 0 029 Ordinate intercept a 0 834 0 849 Uncertainty of a 0 649 0 666 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 20 54 14 80 Cologne Summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 53 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 57 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 46 44 Slope b 0 966 1 019 Uncertainty of b 0 041 0 045 Ordinate intercept a 0 221 0 174 Uncertainty of
242. lues standard deviation uncertainty range and reproducibil ity in the field measured component PM iy fm ft SN4 Se T om om o e caooo winer Rodenkirchen 53 12 9 12 8 0 426 2 006 summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 108 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 22 Concentration mean values standard deviation uncertainty range and reproducibil ity in the field measured component PM25 Site Number c c C ges t U SN3 SN4 coore mner 6 2 wo 145 os 100 127 20 E O SRE E N a Cole summer summer 10 9 9 11 11 6 11 2 2 0 508 508 2 2 005 1 1 02 summer c SN3 Mean value of concentrations System SN3 e c SN4 Mean value of concentrations System SN4 Cae Mean value of concentrations Systems SN3 amp SN4 For individual values refer to annex 5 of the appendix 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 109 of 300 pended particulate matter P
243. lution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 93 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 5 Assessment The tests resulted in detection limits of 0 03 g m PM10 and lt 0 01 g m PM2 5 for System 1 SN3 and 0 09 ug m PM and 0 10 g m PM25 for System 2 SN4 Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 15 Detection limit PM19 po NSN Nowofvaluesn J J 15 fJ 15 Te e Standard deviation of values eea a h oe Detection imix pgm 003 00 Table 16 Detection limit PMz 5 po NSN Noofvaluesn 135 J 15 T mazos a oo oes Standard deviation of values aime ooo oos Detectionimitx pgm o0 om The single measured values used in the determination of the detection limit are given in An nex 1 of this report 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 94 of 300 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 3 Repeatability standard deviation at reference point The repeatability standard deviation at reference point shall not exceed the req
244. m for PM25 and 28 yg m for PM At least 40 valid data pairs were determined per comparison Out of the complete dataset 4 test sites PM 9 195 valid data pairs for SN3 and 193 valid data pairs for SN4 PM25 194 val id data pairs for SN3 and 192 valid data pairs for SN4 28 6 of the measured values ex ceed the upper assessment threshold of 17 ug m for PM25 and a total of 20 7 of the measured values exceed the upper assessment threshold of 28 g m for PMio The meas ured concentrations were brought into relation with ambient conditions 6 4 Evaluation Item 9 5 3 2 The calculation of expanded uncertainty is preceded by an uncertainty check between the two simultaneously operated reference devices Urer The uncertainty between the simultaneously operated reference devices is determined anal ogous to the uncertainty between the candidates and shall be lt 2 ug m The evaluated results are given in 7 6 of this test item In order to evaluate the comparability between the candidates y and the reference method x a linear correlation y a bx between the measured results obtained from both methods is assumed The correlation between the mean values of the reference devices and the candi dates which shall be assessed individually is established by means of orthogonal regres sion 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH n Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Report on performance te
245. m to save your settings Date Motor rel Flush PM2 5 PM10 speed Photometer POutside TOutside Humidity Time Type S N mv ug m3 ug m3 Temp C hPa C 3 Event Error 08 LA 2013 12 02 APM 2 3081 0 0 43 8 1010 4 20 50 Start ext Sensor 08 11 2013 12 02 26 APM 2 3039 0 0 100 43 7 1010 7 20 50 Stop ext Sensor 08 aE 2013 123 33 327 APM 2 0 0 40 1010 9 20 50 Start ext Sensor 08 11 2013 12 35 00 APM 2 3005 0 0 100 40 1010 4 20 50 PFlush ext Sensor 08 11 2013 12 36 00 APM 2 3001 0 0 100 40 1010 9 20 50 Flush ext Sensor 08 AA 2013 12 s 38 00 APM 2 3001 28 0 67 40 1010 7 20 50 PM2 5 ext Sensor Fig 13 Example for the way the measured data are output in serial mode at the interface corresponds to the log file on the SD card 5 3 2 Setting Identifier Codes for Individual Parameters The following 8 measurement parameters can be transferred by the system oN OW PWN P Air Flush mV voltage at photometer during zero air flushing Concent PM2 5 Ug m PM concentration in ug m Concent PM10 ug m PMio concentration
246. ment is necessary to test this performance criterion 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 194 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 7 Investigations for the validation of the instrument software 3 0 1 The instrument manufacturer has developed a new instrument software 3 0 1 for the measur ing system APM 2 for winter 2013 2014 This software version contains an optimization of the calculation algorithm by introducing a linearity correction for the measured PM values an overview on the modifications can be found in Table 5 on page 47 As this modification has an impact on the formation of measured values and thus also on the already obtained measured values from the comparison campaigns during type approval test the following measures for qualification of the new software have been agreed upon All available measured values of the four past comparison campaigns have been re calculated manually with the new calculation algorithm and evaluated again The results of these investigations can be found in chapter 6 1 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncer tainty between systems under test Furthermore an additional comparison campaign at the test site Cologne parki
247. mming interface Slot for SIM card Power switch Figure 10 Control unit 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 39 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A On top level one can find the main window of the operator display starting from here one can navigate into the respective submenus via Jog Dial Furthermore current date and time and the installed software version are displayed Menu Data In this menu one finds all functionalities with respect to data storage internally or SD card Furthermore one can access the software update functionalities via this menu Menu Manual Mode Here one can find the possibility to manually start the function alities PM25 measurement PM1o measurement and Purging The chosen options will operate as long until they are interrupt ed again by the operator This menu is mainly dedicated to ser vice technicians for functional checks Menu Measurement A measurement is initiated by clicking on Menu Setup Via the menu Setup the instrument parameters are set or tests for the correct operation are performed e g language date time check of sensitivity of photometer test gas box lea
248. must be disconnected from all sources of electrical power pri WARNING or to starting maintenance or repairs or replacing parts e Whenever it is unavoidable to carry out maintenance or repair work on devices that are opened and connected to the power supply then such work may be carried out only by a qualified employee who is familiar with all the associated hazards e Any interruption in the protective ground wire either inside or outside the unit or disconnection of the ground wire may result in the unit becom ing dangerous Any intentional interruption of the ground wire circuit is prohibited 8 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA e The line plug may be connected only to a socket with a protective ground contact This safety feature may not be counteracted by using an extension cord that does not incorporate a protective ground wire APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 3 System Overview The APM 2 is a measuring device for direct and continuous determination of the suspended particulate matter of the fractions PM and PM in outside air The heart of the device is a highly sensitive scat tered light photometer The measuring method applied makes use of the specific physical features of light scattering in microparticles 3 1 Functional Concept Outside air is drawn in via a PMyo impactor inlet at a volume flow of 3 3 min Particles larger than 10 um are separated in this impactor inlet In a virtual impactor the air drawn in is then divided
249. n a scale of from 0 bright to 63 dark and confirm your selection Confirm at the Back button to return to the main menu 5 3 Data Transmission Settings All the settings affecting data transmission are made in the Transfer menu Fig 14 Data transmission is effected through the RS 232 serial interface at the control unit 5 3 1 Choosing the Input Output Mode You may choose from two different input out modes for the serial interface 1 APM 2 BH Bayern Hessen Protokoll Bavaria Hesse protocol All measured values with a measured value identifier not equal to 000 will upon request be transmitted as per the Bavaria Hesse protocol The measured value transmission sequence is sorted in accordance with the measured value identifiers see 5 3 2 Serial serial mode All eight of the recorded measured values see 5 3 2 and the following ad ditional information will be forwarded via the RS 232 interface to a PC equipped with a terminal emulation program date time of day device type and serial number event error using semi colon as the separator 21 COMDE DERENDA Specify the I O mode as follows In the main screen select Setup and press the jog dial to confirm In the Setup menu select Transfer and confirm your choice In the Transfer menu Fig 14 turn the jog dial until the desired mode BH or Serial is shown in verse Press the jog dial to confirm your mode selection Select Set and confir
250. n dealings with electrical and electronic equipment carrying line voltage Although the device was manufactured in accordance with recognized safety regulations hazards or adverse effects for the unit or other property could arise during use Only suitably qualified personnel may work on this unit This personnel shall be thoroughly familiar with all the safety notes and with the installation operation and maintenance procedures contained in this instruction manual Safe and fault free operation of the unit presumes proper handling and correct in stallation operation and maintenance This device may be used only for the purpose intended by Comde Derenda GmbH see 1 2 Unauthor ized modifications and the use of accessories and spare parts not supplied or recommended by Comde Derenda GmbH can result in property damage and personal injury If it is to be expected that hazard free operation is no longer possible then A WARNING the device shall be taken out of service and secured against unintentional restarting It is to be presumed that non hazardous operation is no long possible e ifthe electronics unit exhibits visible damage e ifthe unit no longer operates or shows obvious deviations from normal operations e if an electrical connector has been damaged As long as the unit is connected to the line power supply components carrying electrical voltage may become accessible when covers are opened or other parts are removed A e The unit
251. n optimization of the calculation algorithm by introducing a linearity correction for the measured PM values As this modification has an impact on the formation of measured values the following measures for qualification of the new software in addition to the outstanding lab investigations have been agreed upon All available measured values of the four past comparison campaigns have been re calculated manually with the new calculation algorithm and evaluated again The results of these investigations can be found in chapter 6 1 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncer tainty between systems under test Furthermore an additional comparison campaign at the test site Cologne parking lot has been conducted with two candidates and the new software version for qualification For this the following test program was carried out in detail e Performance of a comparison campaign with at minimum 40 valid data pairs refer ence vs candidate e Determination of the in between uncertainty for the candidates u according to the Guide e Calculation of the expanded uncertainty of the candidates according to the Guide e Application of the correction factors and terms determined in chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms e Re calculation of the equivalence for the 4 data sets of the type approval at hand additional data set from the validation campaign Cologne winter 2014 according to the approach of chapter 8 2 Sui
252. n value of the measured mass concentration for PM if active e FI Offset Photometer offset determined during zero air flushing e Phototemp Temperature at photometer e Ext Temp Temperature determined by external sensor e Humidity Humidity determined by external sensor e Pressure Air pressure determined by external sensor APM Measurement 12 12 2013 12 10 00 Measured Values PM2 5 avg 37 ug m3 PM 10 avg 0 ug m3 Fl Offset 284 mV Physical Data Phototemp 40 0 C Ext Temp ZIG Humidity 53 0 rH Pressure 1003 hPa Fig 18 APM Measurement menu 28 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 7 3 Aborting the Measurement To abort an ongoing measurement select the menu item Stop in the APM Measurement menu and press the jog dial to confirm The measurement is then stopped and the main menu screen is displayed APM 2 29 COMDE DERENDA 8 Data Management The Data menu Fig 19 serves to manage the measurement data in internal storage and or on the SD memory card You access this menu via the Data menu item in the main screen BEIE 12 12 2013 11 10 00 Memory used 27136 Byte Delete Memory Memory gt SD Card SD Card Dir Firmware Update Fig 19 Data menu Shown at the right in the screen is the memory usage in bytes The total free capacity of the data memory is 3 5 MB The following data and parameters for sampling are automatically stored in the unit s memory individually for each sampling filter e
253. nce measurement e 1 dataset with measured values lt 30 yg m for PM basis mean values of reference measurement The uncertainty between the candidates ups is calculated from the differences of all daily mean values 24 h values of the simultaneously operated candidates by means of the fol lowing equation Yi Yi2 Vi u2 i 1 bs an with Yi1 and yi2 results of the parallel measurements of individual 24 h values i n number of 24 h values 6 5 Assessment The uncertainty between the candidates ups with a maximum of 1 04 g m for PMz5 and a maximum of 2 28 g m for PM10 does not exceed the required value of 2 5 yg m Performance criterion met yes 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 152 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 37 and Table 38 list the calculated values for the uncertainty between candidates Ups Graphical representations of the results are provided in Figure 53 to Figure 66 Table 37 Uncertainty between candidates ups for the devices SN3 and SN4 measured com ponent PM25 Device Test site No of Uncertainty Ups values E a a T Single test sites C summer eo 065 53
254. nce testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 179 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM10 All comparisons Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference ug m Figure 79 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PM10 all test sites Reference vs APM 2 SN 4 PM10 All comparisons Raw data 100 _ 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate yg m 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference ug m Figure 80 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM1o all test sites 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVR hein land i Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 180 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs APM 2 SN 3 PM10 Cologne Winter Raw data 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Candidate ug m
255. nd work properly The current instrument status is continuously monitored and different warning mes sages are displayed in the case of problems The results of the external zero point checks by means of zero filter that were carried out dur ing the field tests are described in Chapter 6 1 5 3 12 Long term drift in this report An external check of the sensitivity of the photometer can also be carried out at any time with the help of the test gas check however it could not be verified during the field test campaigns within the context of the type approval test During an investigation on the repeatability a standard deviation smaller than 1 of the mean of the measured values could be deter mined in 15 measurements so that the test method itself is to be considered sufficiently sta ble and reproducible and in general suitable for a stability check of the measuring system Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results See chapter 6 1 5 3 12 Long term drift 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 71 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 4 1 4 Setup times and warm up times The AMS setup and warm up times shall be stated in the ma
256. nda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 6 Ambient conditions at the field test sites A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 243 of 300 Page 11 of 11 Test site Ambient temperature AVG Ambient pressure C hPa 2 18 2014 Cologne winter 2014 2 19 2014 validation campaign 2 20 2014 2 21 2014 2 22 2014 2 23 2014 2 24 2014 2 25 2014 2 26 2014 2 27 2014 2 28 2014 3 1 2014 3 2 2014 3 3 2014 3 4 2014 3 5 2014 3 6 2014 3 7 2014 3 8 2014 3 9 2014 Rel humidity 76 0 77 5 78 3 77 2 76 2 70 4 53 2 No weather data available 75 3 78 1 69 9 71 5 70 6 81 8 67 2 63 3 56 2 46 8 Wind velocity Wind direction Precipitation m s mm 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc 7 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH boat Nika land Air Pollution Control recisely nIg S Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 244 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Appendix 2 Filter weighing procedure A 1 Carrying out the weighing All weighings are done in an air conditioned weighing room Ambient conditions are 20 C 1 C and 50 5 relative humidity which conforms to the requirements of Standard EN 14907 The filters used in the field test are weighed manually In order to conditi
257. ndard operation during the field test 6 4 Evaluation The measuring system APM 2 is equipped with weatherproof housing and thus designed for outdoor installation The AMS shall be installed in horizontal position Dimensions and weight of the AMS match the information given in the operator s manual According to the manufacturer the power consumption of the AMS with the used pump is about 80 W at maximum for the complete system During a 24 h test the total power demand of the AMS was determined During this test the stated value was not exceeded at any time 6 5 Assessment The instrument design specifications listed in the operator s manual are complete and cor rect Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 74 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 4 1 6 Unintended adjustment It shall be possible to secure the adjustment of the measuring system against illicit or un intended adjustment during operation 6 2 Technical equipment No additional tools are required here 6 3 Method The measuring system is operated via the control unit with a Jog Dial on t
258. nded measured uncertainty Wom 15 03 16 38 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 193 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 5 Requirements on multiple component measuring systems Multiple component measuring systems shall comply with the requirements set for each component also in the case of simultaneous operation of all measuring channels 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method The APM 2 is an automated measuring system based on the measurement technology of light scattering The output of measurements of PM fractions is continuous and alternating every two minutes between the measurement channels PM and PM25 The test was carried out in compliance with the requirements on testing the different PM frac tions 6 4 Evaluation The evaluation of the individual performance criteria was made with regard to the respective measurement components 6 5 Assessment Upon assessing the minimum requirements the measured values for both components were available at the same time alternating every two minutes between the measurement chan nels PM and PM25 Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results No equip
259. nents suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 1 Detection limit Page 1 of 1 Manufacturer Comde Derenda Type of instrument APM 2 Standards ZP Zero point with absolute filter Serial No SN3 SN4 No Date Measured values PM 5 ug m Measured values PM yg m Measured values PM 5 ug m Measured values PM 9 ug m SN3 SN3 SN4 SN4 1 4 18 2012 0 00 0 06 0 00 0 04 2 4 19 2012 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 03 3 4 20 2012 0 00 0 00 0 01 0 03 4 4 21 2012 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 06 5 4 22 2012 0 00 0 00 0 04 0 08 g 4 23 2012 2 09 0 00 0 01 0 01 7 4 24 2012 0 00 0 00 0 04 0 10 8 4 25 2012 0 00 0 00 0 04 0 10 9 4 26 2012 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 03 10 4 27 2012 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 11 4 28 2012 0 00 0 00 0 08 0 06 12 4 29 2012 0 00 0 00 0 17 0 13 13 4 30 2012 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 14 5 1 2012 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 15 5 2 2012 0 00 0 00 0 00 Number of values 7 Mean So f P Xo Xo Standard deviation Sxo n i 1 n Detection limit X 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH 7 Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Page 207 of 300 Annex 2 Dependence of zero point on ambient temperature Page 1 of 1 Manufacturer COMD
260. ng Data Memory It is recommended that the device memory be erased at regular intervals e g whenever the SD card is replaced To do so select and confirm the Erase memory menu item in the Data menu and affirm the following confirmation prompt 8 3 Displaying Data Content of an SD Memory Card Use the SD card dir command in the Data menu to display the data stored on the SD memory card The csv files present on the SD card containing the data for the measurement can be opened with any PC and can be viewed and edited with a suitable program such as Microsoft Excel NOTE See 9 1 for information on updating the firmware APM 2 31 COMDE DERENDA 9 Special Functions Described below are some of the device s functions that are irrelevant to normal operations but which nonetheless may occasionally be required 9 1 Updating the Firmware It may occasionally be necessary to update the equipment s operating program An SD memory card with the software to be installed is required for this purpose Please apply to Comde Derenda GmbH to receive the latest version CAUTION Pay attention to compatibility issues If the parameter records in the old and new versions of the firmware are not identical then settings may be lost and the proper functioning of the device may be endangered Please contact Comde Derenda GmbH prior to updating in order to clarify compatibility questions Proceed as follows to update the firmware 1 Moun
261. ng and end of tests at each field test site both measuring systems were operated with zero filters applied to their inlets for at least 24 h The measured zero values were then eval uated For external check of the sensitivity of the photometer the instrument s manufacturer has developed the following optional test method By offering propane to the photometer a scattered light signal in the range of 300 400 mV corresponds to an aerosol concentration of approx 70 g m is induced The stability of that signal is taken as a measure for the stability of the sensitivity Unfortunately the test method was not available before December 2013 so that the neces sary tests at the reference point in the lab climate chamber mains voltage could be carried out but there are no long term drift investigations at the reference point available from the field test As the devices have shown no drift effects during the permanent comparison with the standard reference method this circumstance should not be relevant for the assessment of the measuring system especially as it is intended to completely abstain from this test point in future for type approval testing according to EN TS 16450 9 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 110 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde De
262. ng lot has been conducted with two candidates and the new software version Version 3 0 1 for qualifi cation For this the following test program was carried out in detail e Performance of a comparison campaign with at minimum 40 valid data pairs refer ence vs candidate e Determination of the in between uncertainty for the candidates ups according to the Guide e Calculation of the expanded uncertainty of the candidates according to the Guide e Application of the correction factors and terms determined in chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms e Re calculation of the equivalence for the 4 data sets of the type approval at hand additional data set from the validation campaign Cologne winter 2014 according to the approach of chapter 8 2 Suitability test of EN TS 16450 9 The additional comparison campaign was carried out at the test site Cologne parking lot be tween 13 January 2014 and 09 March 2014 Ambient conditions during that campaign are presented in Table 7 All single values can be found in Annex 5 PM measured values and 6 ambient conditions 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 195 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no
263. ng the Modem Type To select an internal or external modem for data transmission 1 Inthe Administrator menu go to the Modem line 2 Turn the jog dial to select either internal or external and confirm by pressing the jog dial 5 5 Device Adjustment Menu The Device Adjustment menu enables authorized service technicians to make changes to specific system settings This menu is protected by a special password APM 2 25 COMDE DERENDA 6 Parameterizing and Starting a Measurement After you have carried out the system settings described under 5 2 to 5 4 you can then parameterize and activate the planned measurement After selecting the desired particulate matter fraction PM3s5 PM or alternating mode and if applicable the desired interval for alternating mode and the set tem perature of the heating block you can start the measurement Various data on the measurement are shown in the display during operation APM Parameter 12 12 2013 12 20 00 PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 10 Offset2 5 Save file Factor2 5 Se he 40 min Offset 10 Set Temp 40 0 C Factor 10 CalibValue 90 0 Allow Neg Phototemp 39 0 C Fig 17 Measurement parameters in the APM parameter menu In order to access the measurement parameter settings it is necessary first to select Measurem Param in the Setup menu and then to enter the password digit by digit and to confirm the entry by selecting OK and pressing on the jog dial Fig 15 Then you can make
264. nk rapid blink steady light Fig 4 External sensor 12 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 3 1 2 External Sensor The unit s external sensor Fig 4 is used for continuous registration of temperature and relative humidi ty The ambient temperature is measured at an accuracy of 0 5 K in a range of from 40 to 80 C rela tive humidity at an accuracy of 3 in a range of from 0 to 100 The sensor is bolted to the unit by way of a mounting bracket for assembly instruction see 4 3 A shield protects the sensor from direct sunlight and precipitation 3 1 3 Virtual Impactor The virtual impactor is located on the top side of housing and is connected to the impactor inlet via the intake tube The outside air drawn in by means of an integrated pump at 3 3 l min is divided into two partial flows by the virtual impactor This division takes place in the area around two jets mounted op posite each other In this process the side flow 3 1 I min is drawn off between the two jets perpendicu lar to the incoming air flow Particles that cannot follow the side flow because of their mass inertia ex tensively maintain their direction of motion and thus enter the smaller axial flow 0 2 I min This results in the division into the side flow with exclusively smaller and lighter particles of the PM fraction and the axial flow with a particle size of PM The aerosol now goes optionally from the axial flow enrich ment mode or from the side flow norm
265. normal measuring operation is interrupt ed for this 6 5 Assessment Setup and warm up times were determined The measuring system can easily be operated at various measuring sites The setup time amounts to approximately 1 2 h at first time installation The warm up time amounts to 15 30 min depending on the necessary stabilization time Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not required here 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 73 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 4 1 5 Instrument design The instruction manual shall include specifications of the manufacturer regarding the de sign of the measuring system These elements are Instrument shape e g bench mounting rack mounting free mounting mounting position e g horizontal or vertical mounting safety requirements dimensions weight power consumption 6 2 Equipment Additionally a measuring device for recording the power consumption and a balance were used to test this performance criterion 6 3 Method The supplied instruments were compared to the descriptions in the manuals The specified power consumption is determined over a 24 h sta
266. ns to failure free operation mode and automatically re sumes measuring after re stabilization of the photometer temperature and two minutes zero air purging The measuring systems can be moni tored and operated extensively from an external PC via modem or router The measuring system can be moni tored by the user directly or via re mote control A telemetric control is not yet implemented but already planned for the future The maintenance interval of 4 weeks has been determined by regular maintenance work TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur A TUVRheinland Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Specification Test result Fulfilled 5 2 8 Availability 5 2 9 Instrument soft ware 5 3 5 3 1 General 5 3 2 Repeatability standard devia tion at zero point 5 3 3 Repeatability standard devia tion at reference point Minimum 95 The version of the instrument software to be tested shall be The availability was 100 for SN3 and 98 9 for SN4 without test related downtimes Including test related downtimes it was 91 6 for SN3 and 90 5 for SN4 The version of the instrument soft ware is shown in the display The test displayed during switch on of institute is informe
267. nscs 109 5 3 13 Short term drift eeeeoooeeenneneeesoeeeeertntrrnrrtserrterrrnnrtserrrrtttnnntseerrrttennnreeeenene 115 5 3 14 Response time 2 2 0 ccc cece cc ceeeeeeeeeeee eee eceeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaeaaaeeeeeeeeesaaeaadeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaneees 116 5 3 15 Difference between sample and calibration Port ccccccceccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeees 117 5 3 16 Converter efficiency 0 2 2 2 ceeeeccecenee eter eeeeeeeaeeaaaeeeeeeeeeeesaaaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeneesaaaaes 118 5 3 17 Increase of NO concentration due to residence in the AMS 000 119 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 7 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 18 Overall uncertainty si pas ceanincctsteasiansaaransdieanacanadananatinanadannncuaasadendeacmeahiaaseaanduanids 120 6 1 WN eM eateererd ease a a a e eaa aae aaea ea tees 121 6 1 5 4 2 Equivalency of the sampling system c ccceeeeeeeeeeeeeneeeeeeeeeeeteeeeeneeaaaees 122 6 1 5 4 3 Reproducibility of the sampling systems cccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeteeeeeteeeeeees 130 6 1 544 Calibration d rp arr iE eee ee ee 136 6 1 5 4 5 Cross sensitivity tai ccasdestcieakdaeanasisehatentendianiceha teak deids eceandendianisctceaedesa
268. ntrol Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 124 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 25 Results of the linear regression analysis of measurements with both candidates SN3 and SN4 at all four sites raw data SN3 Number of Slope m Intercept b R paired values N Cologne winter 52 0 922 1 779 0 968 Bonn winter 51 0 876 2 419 0 861 Cologne summer 47 0 830 1 253 0 911 Rodenkirchen 45 0 880 3 745 0 804 summer SN4 Number of Slope m Intercept b R paired values N Cologne winter 52 0 976 1 068 0 974 Bonn winter 51 0 964 2 705 0 863 Cologne summer 45 0 927 1 669 0 917 Rodenkirchen 45 0 893 4 320 0 822 summer Table 26 Results of the linear regression analysis of measurements with both candidates SN3 and SN4 total raw data Candidate Number of Slope m Intercept b R paired values N SN3 195 0 894 2 590 0 914 SN4 193 0 972 3 010 0 907 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 125 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Re
269. nual 6 2 Equipment A timer was provided additionally 6 3 Method The measuring systems were activated according to the manufacturer s specifications The amounts of time required for setup and warm up were recorded separately Structural measures taken before installation like for instance the set up of the power supply line or necessary measures for protection of the measuring system have not been assessed here 6 4 Evaluation The setup time comprises the time needed for all necessary works from system installation to start up The APM 2 measuring system is equipped with weatherproof housing and thus designed for outdoor installation As a result all that is needed at the installation site is a 220V power connection The following steps are required for the initial installation of the measuring system Unpacking and Installation of the AMS Installation of sampling tube impactor inlet and ambient sensor Power connection Power up of AMS After a warm up period of at least 1 h photometer temperature has to be at 40 C Test on tightness Check of ambient sensor Check of volume flow optional Check with test gas e Optional connection of peripheral logging systems RS232 to the corresponding port 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur
270. nual limit value 2 5 g m Annual limit value PM 40 g m 10 of the annual limit value 4 ug m It was also examined whether the reproducibility of the measuring systems under test using the reference method according to Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods 5 can be ensured even if the measured values were obtained on days with a relative humidity of gt 70 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc P T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUV Rheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 140 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 5 Assessment No deviation of the measured signal from the nominal value gt 1 1 ug m caused by interfer ence due to moisture in the sample could be observed for PM25 For PMio no deviation of the measured signal from the nominal value gt 0 9 g m caused by interference due to moisture in the sample could be observed The comparability of the candidates with the reference method according to the Guide Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods 5 is ensured even for days with a relative humidity of gt 70 Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 30 and Table 31 provide summaries of the results Table
271. o 2 yg m 2 yg m B 25 yg m 40 g m Bo 200 yg m 200 yg m B shall merely be adjusted to the level of the limit value for the annual mean 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 16 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Comde Derenda GmbH has commissioned TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH to carry out a performance test of the Air Pollution Monitor APM 2 measuring system for the components suspended particulate matter PM and PM25 e VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 Performance criteria for performance tests of automat ed ambient air measuring systems Point related measurement methods for gase ous and particulate air pollutants September 2010 June 2002 e VDI Standard 4203 Sheet 3 Testing of automated measuring systems Test pro cedures for point related ambient air measuring systems for gaseous and particulate air pollutants September 2010 August 2004 e Standard EN 12341 Air quality Determination of the PM fraction of suspended particulate matter Reference method and field test procedure to demonstrate refer ence equivalence of measurement methods of equality German version EN 12341 1998 e Standard EN 14907
272. of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe Technical Specification CEN TS 16450 Ambient air Automated measuring systems for the measurement of the concentration of particulate matter PM10 PM2 5 Ger man version August 2013 Report UK Equivalence Programme for Monitoring of Particulate Matter Report No BV AQ AD202209 DH 2396 of 5 June 2006 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 10 Annex Appendix 1 Annex 1 Annex 2 Annex 3 Annex 4 Annex 5 Annex 6 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Measured and calculated values Detection limit Temperature dependence of zero point Temperature dependence of the sensitivity Dependence on supply voltage Measured values at the field test sites Ambient conditions at the field test sites Filter weighing procedure Manual A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 205 of 300 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 206 of 300 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the compo
273. ol Transfer Pyccknit Contrast Service System info Administrator Device Adjustment Measurem Param Fig 11 Language selection 5 2 2 Setting Time of Day and Date To set the current date and time of day 1 2 3 oN AM 20 Select the Setup item in the main screen and confirm by pressing the jog dial Select Date time in the Setup menu and confirm Turn the jog dial in order to select the desired value day month year hour minute second in the Date Time screen Fig 12 the selected value will be outlined in each case To change the selected value press the jog dial the value is now shown inverse and turn the dial in the appropriate direction until the desired value is reached Press the jog dial to confirm the entry Repeat steps 3 to 5 for all the values to be changed Select and confirm Set to store the values shown Select and then confirm Back twice to return to the main menu APM 2 5 2 35 COMDE DERENDA Date Time 12 12 2013 11 10 05 Thursday 12 12 2013 11 12 00 Set Back Fig 12 Setting time and date Adjusting the Display s Contrast In order to adjust the contrast in the display 1 2 3 In the main screen select the Setup item and confirm this by pressing the jog dial In the Setup menu select Contrast and confirm your choice The current contrast value is shown in the right half of the display turn the jog dial to adjust the contrast as desired o
274. ollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Measured values from the field test sites related to ambient conditions Page 10 of 22 Manufacturer Type of instrument Serial No Comde Derenda APM 2 SN3 SN4 PM10 and PM2 5 Measured values in ug m AMB Ref 1 Ref 2 Ratio SN3 SN 4 SN3 SN4 Remark Test site PM10 PM10 PM2 5 PM10 PM2 5 PM2 5 PM10 PM10 yg m yg m ug m yg m yg m yg m 1 19 2014 16 8 17 3 84 2 17 3 15 7 19 6 17 7 Cologne winter 2014 1 20 2014 18 9 19 9 79 7 18 4 16 9 22 9 20 4 validation campaign 1 21 2014 30 8 31 1 78 7 22 9 22 5 30 1 27 8 1 22 2014 23 0 23 5 80 0 19 6 18 8 24 5 22 2 1 23 2014 15 2 16 3 70 9 12 1 11 8 15 7 16 3 1 24 2014 28 1 28 9 66 6 19 7 19 7 27 5 28 9 1 25 2014 11 2 10 3 15 1 15 1 1 26 2014 11 4 12 0 37 8 6 0 5 5 11 5 11 6 1 27 2014 6 7 7 1 46 7 5 8 4 3 8 1 7 3 1 28 2014 10 9 10 6 60 4 8 3 TL 10 6 10 6 1 29 2014 19 2 19 7 83 8 16 3 16 2 19 3 20 1 1 30 2014 41 6 42 3 85 4 36 7 36 9 43 3 45 1 1 31 2014 84 1 29 4 29 5 35 0 36 5 2 1 2014 8 5 7 0 9 7 8 7 2 2 2014 46 3 9 6 9 1 17 6 18 0 2 3 2014 84 5 18 7 18 7 22 2 23 2 2 4 2014 13 8 13 3 17 3 17 3 2 5 2014 48 6 6 5 5 8 8 9 8 7 2 6 2014 32 0 5 6 3 8 9 0 8 1 2 7 2014 Zero po
275. ometer Protective Capillary PM SEA Mass flow meter Pump Figure 3 Overview schematic of APM 2 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH s Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 35 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 3 3 AMS scope and setup The APM 2 measuring system for the measurement of ambient air pollution through sus pended particulate matter is based upon the measurement principle of scattered light The tested measuring system consists of a PM10 sampling inlet the sampling tube the vir tual impactor the measuring device with control unit and scattered light photometer unit the ambient and manual in German respectively English language Figure 4 Overview on complete system APM 2 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 36 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Figure 5 PM o sampling inlet for APM 2 Figure 6 Virtual impactor for APM 2 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc
276. omparison campaigns have been re calculated manually with the new calculation algorithm and evaluated again The results of these investigations can be found in chapter 6 1 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncer tainty between systems under test Furthermore an additional comparison campaign at the test site Cologne parking lot has been conducted with two candidates and the new software version Version 3 0 1 for qualifi cation For this the following test program was carried out in detail e Performance of a comparison campaign with at minimum 40 valid data pairs refer ence vs candidate e Determination of the in between uncertainty for the candidates Ups according to the Guide e Calculation of the expanded uncertainty of the candidates according to the Guide 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 88 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A e Application of the correction factors and terms determined in chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms e Re calculation of the equivalence for the 4 data sets of the type approval at hand additional data set from the validation campaign Cologne winter 2014 according to the approach of chapter
277. omponents suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 4 1 3 Functional check If the operation or the functional check of the measuring system requires particular in struments they shall be considered as part of the measuring system and be applied in the corresponding sub tests and included in the assessment Test gas units included in the measuring system shall indicate their operational readiness to the measuring system by a status signal and shall provide direct as well as remote con trol via the measuring system 6 2 Technical equipment Operator s manual zero filter test gas box optional 6 3 Method The system status is monitored continuously and problems are indicated by a series of dif ferent status messages The current status of the monitored parameters can be viewed di rectly on the instrument display or they can be taken from the data record If there is an error message the message is shown in the display permanently The zero point of the measuring system can also be checked externally by applying a zero filter to the instrument s inlet The use of this filter allows the provision of particulate free air During the testing the zero point was determined using a zero filter approx every 4 weeks For external check of the sensitivity of the photometer the instrument manufacturer has de veloped the following test method By offering propane to the photometer a scattered light signal
278. on separately e 1 dataset with measured values 2 18 ug m for PM25 basis mean values of refer ence measurement e 1 dataset with measured values 2 30 g m for PM basis mean values of reference measurement According to the Guide preconditions for acceptance of the full dataset are that e the slope b differs insignificantly from 1 b 1 lt 2 u b and that e the intercept a differs insignificantly from 0 a lt 2 u a 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 164 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A with u b and u a being the standard uncertainties of slope and intercept each calculated as the square root of their variances If these preconditions are not met the candidates may be calibrated according to item 9 7 of the guideline refer to 6 1 5 4 11 Application of cor rection factors and terms The calibration shall only be applied to the full dataset Item 9 5 4 The combined uncertainty of the candidates w cu is calculated for each dataset by combining the contributions from 9 5 3 1 and 9 5 3 2 according to the following equation For each dataset the uncertainty W cm is calculated at the level of y 30 ug m for PM2 5 and at the
279. on the filters includ ing control filters they are placed on sieves to avoid overlap The specifications for pre and post weighing are specified beforehand and conform to the Standard Before sampling pre weighing After sampling post weighing Conditioning 48 h 2h Conditioning 48 h 2h Filter weighing Filter weighing Re conditioning 24 h 2 h Re conditioning 24 h 2 h Filter weighing and immediate packaging Filter weighing The balance is always ready for use An internal calibration process is started prior to each weighing series The standard weight of 200 mg is weighed as reference and the boundary conditions are noted down if nothing out of the ordinary results from the calibration process Deviations of prior weighings conform to the Standard and do not exceed 20 ug refer to Fig ure 1 All six control filters are weighed afterwards and a warning is displayed for control fil ters with deviations gt 40 pug during evaluation These control filters are not used for post weighing Instead the first three acceptable control filters are used while the others remain in the protective jar in order to replace a defective or deviating filter if necessary Figure 2 shows an exemplary process over a period of more than four months All filters which display a difference of more than 40 ug between the first and second weigh ing are excluded from the pre weighing process Filters exhibiting deviations of more than
280. ording to module 5 4 10 leads to a case where Wem gt Wago which means that the candidate systems is not regarded equivalent to the reference method it is permitted to apply a correction factor or term resulting from the regression equation ob tained from the full dataset The corrected values shall satisfy the requirements for all da tasets or subsets refer to module 5 4 10 Moreover a correction factor may be applied even for Wem S Wago in order to improve the accuracy of the candidate systems Three different cases may occur a Slope b not significantly different from 1 b 1 lt 2u b intercept a significantly different from 0 la gt 2u a b Slope b significantly different from 1 b 1 gt 2u b intercept a not significantly different from 0 a lt 2u a c Slope b significantly different from 1 lb 1 gt 2u b intercept a significantly different from 0 la gt 2u a With respect to a The value of the intercept a may be used as a correction term to correct all input values y according to the following equation Y corr yi a 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 186 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A The res
281. ormance criterion defined 6 1 5 3 11 Standard deviation from paired measurements no performance criterion defined 6 1 5 3 12 Long term drift no performance criterion defined 6 1 5 3 13 Short term drift not applicable to particulate measuring devices 6 1 5 3 18 Overall uncertainty not applicable to particulate measuring devices For this reason an official enquiry was made to the relevant body in Germany to define a coordinated procedure for dealing with the inconsistencies in the guideline 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 91 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A The following procedure was suggested The test items 5 3 2 5 3 7 5 3 8 5 3 11 and 5 3 12 are evaluated as before on the basis of the minimum requirements stated in the 2002 version of VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 i e applying the reference values Bo B4 and Bz The test items 5 3 3 5 3 4 5 3 13 and 5 3 18 are omitted as they are irrelevant to particulate measuring devices The relevant body in Germany agreed with the suggested procedure by decisions of 27 June 2011 and 07 October 2011 6 5 Assessment The test was carried out on the basis of the performance
282. ort on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 150 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 4 9 Determination of uncertainty between systems under test Ups For the test of PM25 measuring systems the uncertainty between the systems under test shall be determined according to chapter 9 5 3 1 of the Guide Demonstration of equiva lence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods in the field test at least at four sampling sites representative of the future application The tests were also carried out for the component PM o 6 2 Equipment No equipment is necessary to test this performance criterion 6 3 Method The test was carried out at four different comparisons during the field test Different seasons and varying concentrations for PMz5 and PM were taken into consideration At least 20 of the concentration values from the complete dataset determined with the ref erence method shall exceed the upper assessment threshold according to 2008 50 EC 8 The upper assessment threshold is 17 ug m for PM25 and 28 g m for PMio At least 40 valid data pairs were determined per comparison Out of the complete dataset 4 test sites PM 9 195 valid data pairs for SN3 and 193 valid data pairs for SN4 PM25 194 val id data pairs for SN3 and 192 valid data pairs for SN4 28 6 of the measured values ex ceed the upp
283. ound sign The block control characters and the BCC characters are enclosed in lt gt for emphasis 12 6 1 Data Polling of the Measuring Station Block Identifier DA Telegram Length Variable Telegram Type Command Field No Start Byte Data Format Description 1 1 lt STX gt Start of Text 2 2 DA Block Identifier 3 4 lt ETX gt End of Text 4 5 lt BCC1 gt Low Nibble BCC 5 6 lt BCC2 gt High Nibble BCC 46 APM 2 12 6 2 Measuring Station Data in Reply to Data Polling COMDE DERENDA Field No Start Byte Data Format Field Description 1 1 lt STX gt Start of Text 2 2 MD Block Identifier 3 4 nn Number of Measuring Units 4 7 nnn Measuring Unit ID 5 11 nnnntee Measured Value 6 20 hh Operating Status 7 23 hh Error Status 8 26 nnn Serial Number 9 30 hhhhhh Not Assigned 10 37 nnn Measuring Unit 2 ID optional 11 41 nnnntee Measured Value 12 50 hh Operation Status 13 53 hh Error Status 14 56 nnn Serial Number 15 60 hhhhhh Not Assigned 16 67 nnn Measuring Unit 3 ID optional 17 71 nnnntee Measured Value 18 80 hh Operating Status 19 83 hh Error Status 20 86 nnn Serial Number 21 90 hhhhhh Not Assigned 22 97 nnn Measuring Unit 4 ID optional 23 101 nnnntee Measured Value 24 110 hh Operation Status 25 113 hh Error Status 26 116 nnn
284. ox and check that the contents are complete see 1 5 2 Slowly and carefully place the intake tube into the intake flange of the virtual impactor from above and check to ensure that the tube is firmly seated 3 Slowly and carefully place the impactor inlet on the upper end of the intake tube and check to ensure that the inlet is firmly seated before starting a measurement lubricate the impact plate of the impactor inlet Ensure that the upper and lower parts of the impactor inlet are firmly attached to the housing section 4 3 External Sensor The sensor is already screwed to a mounting bracket on delivery To mount the sensor on the device proceed as follows 1 Place the entire unit protective shield facing up with the holes of the mounting bracket over the corresponding thread on the housing side 2 Screw the unit firmly in place using the two knurled nuts provided 3 Connect the cable of the sensor to the appropriate socket next to the threaded connection using the installed cable plug connector NOTE If the system is used in a measurement container the external sensor has to be mounted outside the container APM 2 15 COMDE DERENDA 4 4 Connecting and Powering Up the System 1 Connect the power plug to the local power supply 2 To activate the system turn on the main power switch located in the bottom right hand corner and the line switch at the control unit After the unit has been switched on the
285. peration times time used for maintenance and mal function times The measuring systems were operated over a period of 264 days in total dur ing the field test 4 comparison campaigns This period includes 22 days of zero filter opera tion respectively device audits during the type approval test see also annex 5 Downtimes caused by external influences which the instrument cannot be blamed for have been recorded on 31 December 2012 and 01 January 2013 failure in the mains voltage As a consequence of these external influences the total operation time has been reduced to 262 days The following instrument malfunctions have been recorded SN3 There have been none instrument malfunctions SN4 Between 24 May 2013 and 26 May 2013 there has been no data recording due to unknown reasons for SN4 thus there have been three days of downtime Apart from that no further instrument malfunctions were recorded Downtimes caused by maintenance of the sampling heads regular checks of flow rates re spectively tightness amount to 0 5 to 1h per system Daily mean values affected by this have not been discarded 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 86 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM
286. perature level in relation to the ini tial temperature of 20 C is checked 6 5 Assessment The ambient temperature range tested at the AMS installation site was 20 C to 50 C Looking at the values that were output by the AMS the maximum dependence of ambient temperature in the range of 20 C to 50 C at zero was 0 1 ug m for PM25 and 0 2 yg m for PM o At reference point no deviations gt 2 7 in relation to the default temperature of 20 C were observed In case of permanent exposition of the device to direct sun radiation combined with very high ambient temperatures gt 35 C the instrument manufacturer recommends a sun protected installation of the device Performance criterion met yes 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc P T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUV Rheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 100 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 17 Dependence of zero point on ambient temperature deviations in ug m mean value of three measurements PMi SN3 amp SN4 Ambient temperature Deviation Start temperature End temperature eee Table 18 Dependence of zero point on ambient temperature deviations in ug m mean value of three measurem
287. port no 936 21219977 A Reference vs SN 3 Cologne Winter 100 Measured values 90 Regression line 80 70 _ aS co Or Acceptance range E according to EN 12341 60 y x g 50 40 S 30 i Pee 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 36 Reference equivalence function SN3 test site Cologne winter Reference vs SN 4 Cologne Winter 100 90 Measured values 80 Regression line 70 sol y ayz rf wrereee Acceptance range D according to EN 12341 g 50 y x 3 40 ao S 30 i RS 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 37 Reference equivalence function SN4 test site Cologne winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 126 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs SN 3 Bonn Winter 100 Measured values 90 80 Regression line 70 E Acceptance range 5 60 according to EN 12341 00
288. port on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 204 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Literature VDI Standard 4202 Part 1 Performance criteria for performance tests of automated ambient air measuring systems Point related measurement methods for gaseous and particulate air pollutants June 2002 amp September 2010 VDI Standard 4203 Part 3 Testing of automated measuring systems Test proce dures for point related ambient air measuring systems for gaseous and particulate air pollutants August 2004 amp September 2010 Standard EN 12341 Air quality Determination of the PM10 fraction of suspended particulate matter Reference method and field test procedure to demonstrate refer ence equivalence of measurement methods German version EN 12341 1998 Standard EN 14907 Ambient air quality Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM25 mass fraction of suspended particulate matter Ger man version EN 14907 2005 Guidance document Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Meth ods English version of January 2010 Operator s manual APM 2 Version 03 2014 Operator s manual LVS3 Stand 2000 Directive 2008 50 EC of the European Parliament and
289. pragmatic approach is taken here that was previously undertaken in earlier studies Therefore according to Table 39 the slope must be corrected for PM25 due to the deter mined significance For PMyo the slope and intercept must be corrected due to exceedance of the permissible expanded uncertainty for several comparison campaigns and due to the determined significance according to Table 40 Nonetheless it should be noted that even without application of correction factors the determined uncertainties Wey for PM25 lie below the specified expanded relative uncertainty Waqo of 25 for particulate matter for all datasets considered 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 171 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A For PM2 5 The slope for the complete dataset is 0 919 Thus an additional evaluation applying the re spective calibration factors to the datasets is made in chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Application of correction factors and terms For PMyo The slope for the complete dataset is 0 977 The intercept for the complete dataset is 3 758 An additional evaluation where the respective calibration factors are applied to the datasets is made in chapter 6 1 5 4 11 Appli
290. quirement defined 6 1 5 3 13 Short term drift not relevant to particulate measuring systems 6 1 5 3 18 Overall uncertainty not relevant to particulate measuring systems covered by 5 4 10 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 15 of 300 Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A In order to determine a concerted procedure for dealing with the inconsistencies in the guide lines an official enquiry was directed to the relevant body in Germany The following procedure was suggested As before the test items 5 3 2 5 3 7 5 3 8 5 3 11 and 5 3 12 are evaluated based on the minimum requirements set out in VDI 4202 Sheet 1 of 2002 i e using the reference values Bo B4 and Bo The test items 5 3 3 5 3 4 5 3 13 and 5 3 18 are omitted as they are not relevant to particu late measuring systems The relevant body in Germany approved of the suggested procedure by decisions of 27 June 2011 and 7 October 2011 The reference values which shall be used according to the applied guidelines explicitly refer to the measured component PM Therefore the following reference values are suggested for the measured component PM s5 PM25 PM B
291. r to module 5 4 2 or module 5 4 10 6 3 Method For PMyo The reproducibility of the measuring systems was proven during testing refer to module 5 4 2 In order to determine the calibration function and the analytical function the complete da taset was used 195 valid data pairs SN3 and 193 valid data pairs SN4 The quantities of the calibration function y m x b were determined by means of linear regression The analytical function is the inverse of the calibration function It is x 1 m y b m The slope m of the regression line describes the sensitivity of the measuring system the y intercept b describes the zero point 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUV R hei n a nd Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 137 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A For PM 5 The reproducibility of the measuring systems as per module 5 4 10 was proven during test ing In order to determine the calibration function and the analytical function the complete da taset was used 194 valid data pairs SN3 and 192 valid data pairs SN4 The quantities of the calibration function y m x b were determined by means of orthogonal regression The analytical function is the inverse of the cali
292. raw data is smaller than the permissible 25 for both SN3 and SN4 3 The expanded uncertainty for the data corrected with the slope of 0 977 and the in tercept of 3 758 determined in type approval test is smaller than the permissible 25 for both SN3 and SN4 4 The combined evaluation of the four original data sets during type approval manually re calculated with the new calculation algorithm and evaluated with the additional fifth data set of Cologne winter 2014 software version 3 0 1 installed leads also to fulfillment of the equivalence criteria according to the Guide 5 Thus it has to be noted that the demonstration of equivalence of the data from the type ap proval test comparison campaigns 1 4 manually calculated with the modified calculation algorithm of software 3 0 1 with data obtained with software 3 0 1 under practical conditions could be shown and thus the validation of the current software version 3 0 1 could be final ized in a positive way 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 202 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PMio and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 8 Recommendations for practical use 8 1 Works in the maintenance interval 4 weeks The following procedur
293. rence equivalence function SN3 test site Cologne winter 006 125 Reference equivalence function SN4 test site Cologne winter 005 125 Reference equivalence function SN3 test site Bonn winter ccce 126 Reference equivalence function SN4 test site Bonn winter ccce 126 Reference equivalence function SN3 test site Cologne summer 05 127 Reference equivalence function SN4 test site Cologne summer 5 127 Reference equivalence function SN3 test site Rodenkirchen summer 128 Reference equivalence function SN4 test site Rodenkirchen summet 128 Reference equivalence function SN3 all sites 2 0 0 0 ceccccceceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 129 Reference equivalence function SN4 all sites 2 0 0 0 cece cceeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 129 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 test site Cologne WiINTET ccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeneeees 133 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 11 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Figure 47 Results of parallel measurements with the tested devices SN3 SN4 test
294. rence vs SN 4 Cologne Summer 100 90 Measured values 80 Regression line 70 go J Ke rrr Acceptance range 2 according to EN 12341 o 50 TEx 3 40 ge S 30 i Redon 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 41 Reference equivalence function SN4 test site Cologne summer 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 128 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference vs SN 3 Rodenkirchen Summer 100 Measured values 90 Regression line 80 19 oS et et PS asses Acceptance range E according to EN 12341 60 y x 00 T 3 40 o S 30 oO 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 42 Reference equivalence function SN3 test site Rodenkirchen summer Reference vs SN 4 Rodenkirchen Summer 100 e Measured values 90 80 Regression line 70 a e dh e ee e a as Acceptance range ey according to EN 12341 g 50 JEX 3 40 ke S 30 S 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reference yg m Figure 43
295. renda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A For quality assurance according to the manufacturer the photometer has to be sent once a year to the manufacturer for check and re calibration By this also the requirements on ongo ing quality assurance according to chapter 8 4 10 of EN TS 16450 9 can be accommodat ed 6 4 Evaluation While it is possible to assess zero point drift and drift of the measured value within a 24 h pe riod it is not useful for particulate measuring systems The measuring system carries out a zero point check adjustment with zero air at the start of a measurement as well as at each hour during operation The evaluation at zero point is made on the basis of the measurement results of the regular external zero point measurement by comparing the respective values with the corresponding measured values of the previous test and the measured value of the first test On 31 March 2013 a zero value of 2 7 g m for PM1o was measured for SN 4 this value deviates from the start value with 2 7 g m and is outside of the permissible range of 2 ug m A cause for this outlier could not be determined and all corresponding evaluations did not show any exceedance of the permissible limits There was no externally triggered ad justment of the measuring device A regular external check of the sensitivity over the field test period could not be carried out
296. rol A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 103 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 5 Assessment No deviations gt 1 3 in relation to the default value of 230 V due to changes in supply volt age were detected Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 20 presents a summary of test results Table 20 Dependence of measured value on supply voltage deviation in SN3 amp SN4 Mains voltage Deviation Oa m f e f Ca a oe o For the individual results refer to annex 4 in this report 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 104 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 9 Cross sensitivity The change in the measured value caused by interfering components in the sample gas shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 at zero and reference point Note This test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems As minimum requirement 5 4 5 applies in this case the tes
297. rticulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 50 Results of equivalence test Type approval Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM o slope corrected with 0 977 intercept cor rected with 3 758 All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 58 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 22 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 240 Slope b 0 975 nicht signifikant Uncertainty of b 0 019 Ordinate intercept a 1 346 signifikant Uncertainty of a 0 454 Expanded measured uncertainty WCM 14 03 All comparisons 230 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 68 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 2 17 pg m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 40 Slope b 1 052 Uncertainty of b 0 060 Ordinate intercept a 2 041 Uncertainty of a 2 563 Expanded measured uncertainty WCM 18 48 All comparisons lt 30 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 56 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 93 g m SN3 amp SN4 Number of data pairs 200 Slope b 0 941 Uncertainty of b 0 036 Ordinate intercept a 1 975 Uncertainty of a 0 653 Expanded measured uncertainty WCM 13 56 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 200 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter P
298. s NOTE If there is any vacuum in the device at the beginning of the test then the testing cycle cannot be started The appropriate message will appear in the display requesting that the device first be vented To do so briefly detach the fitting on the gas hose from the adaptor at the virtual impactor and then reconnect the hose To begin the test cycle select and confirm the Start menu item The leak test is not available in all versions of the device The steps in the testing process follow this sequence 1 Generating a vacuum The message Leak test starting will appear briefly in the display The internal pump will generate a vacuum in the APM 2 to a pressure level of approx 300 hPa 2 Testing phase The testing phase will commence once the vacuum has been generated Dur ing this period the vacuum in the system will be monitored continuously by the sensors in the device and shown as the PGas value in the display 38 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 3 Displaying the results A tolerance of 290 hPa applies to the rise in pressure If the pressure during the test phase remains the same or has risen by no more than 290 hPa then the test is deemed to have been passed If the pressure has risen by more than 290 hPa then the test has been failed The results will be shown accordingly in the display This concludes the leak test To leave the menu after the test select the Finished menu item and respond to the following confirma
299. s Page 201 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Summary of evaluation In order to demonstrate equivalence of the data from the type approval test comparison campaigns 1 4 manually calculated with the modified calculation algorithm of software 3 0 1 with data obtained with software 3 0 1 under practical conditions an additional com parison campaign Cologne winter 2014 was carried out with both candidates with software 3 0 1 and the obtained data were equivalence checked The evaluation leads to the follow ing results For PM 5 1 The in between uncertainty of the candidates is 0 61 g m and thus smaller than the permissible 2 5 g m 2 The expanded uncertainty for the raw data is smaller than the permissible 25 for both SN3 and SN4 3 The expanded uncertainty for the data corrected with the slope of 0 919 determined in type approval test is smaller than the permissible 25 for both SN3 and SN4 4 The combined evaluation of the four original data sets during type approval manually re calculated with the new calculation algorithm and evaluated with the additional fifth data set of Cologne winter 2014 software version 3 0 1 installed leads also to fulfillment of the equivalence criteria according to the Guide 5 For PM 1 The in between uncertainty of the candidates is 0 72 g m and thus smaller than the permissible 2 5 ug m 2 The expanded uncertainty for the
300. s appearing in software screens are boldfaced e Instructions regarding elements to be selected in sequence sometimes use arrows in the inter est of brevity e g Settings gt Language gt English The following apply to safety information This symbol indicates risk to life serious injury and or considerable proper DANGER ty damage if the appropriate safety measures are not taken A This symbol indicates risk of lesser injury and property damage if the ap WARNING propriate safety measures are not taken without a warning triangle indicates a risk to property if the appropriate WARNING safety measures are not taken CAUTION indicates that undesirable results or states could occur if the appropriate notes are not observed NOTE indicates important information or emphasizes a part of the documentation to which particular attention must be paid 1 2 Intended Use The sampling system may be used only for the purposes specified in this manual and only in conjunction with devices and components recommended and approved by the Comde Derenda GmbH 6 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA 1 3 Operating Environment The device is designed for operation at temperatures of from 20 C to 50 C In the case of extended exposure to strong sunlight in conjunction with very high air temperatures upwards of about 35 C the system is to be set up beneath a self supporting roof with an opening through which the air intake tube passes The APM 2 i
301. s designed for outdoor use and may be operated without rain protection or the like 1 4 Electromagnetic Compatibility This is a Class A unit and may cause radio interference in residential areas In this event the operator may be required to implement and pay for appropriate abatement measures The device satisfies the requirements of the Electromagnetic Compatibility EMC Directive and harmonized European stand ards Every modification to the system may have an effect on EMC characteristics 1 5 Scope of Delivery Included in the delivery are e leach Basic device APM 2 e leach Air intake tube length 500 mm diameter 12 mm e teach Impactor inlet PM e leach Serial cable for connection to a PC e 2each SD memory card e leach USB card reader e leach Instruction manual e leach Calibration record e leach Set of keys for the equipment APM 2 7 COMDE DERENDA 2 Safety Instructions This unit was engineered and tested in accordance with DIN EN 61010 1 2002 08 Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement control and laboratory use It left the factory in perfect working condition In order to maintain this condition and to ensure hazard free operation please be absolutely sure to observe the following safety notes Disregarding these warnings or noncompliance with these notes could results in fatalities severe bodily injury and or significant property damage Also observe local safety requirements that gover
302. scasxcasceetncarsvaseaanseeniesevxesesandcesiaateeenssasvaveuas derseasbuays 78 Determination of availability without test related downtimes ccceee 86 Determination of availability incl test related downtimes ccceceeeeeeeees 86 Detection limit PM cccececseccecescececeeeeeeeceneetanececeeetaeeeaneeeeeneetsneseageeeneneetans 93 Detection limit PMo5 cccccccseecccseeeceneeeeeececeneetanececeucecseetaneeeeeeeetsnenteeeeneneatans 93 Dependence of zero point on ambient temperature deviations in ug m mean value of three measurements PM19 SN3 amp SN4 cc ccceeeeeeeeeeeees 100 Dependence of zero point on ambient temperature deviations in ug m mean value of three measurements PMo5 SN3 amp SN4 eee eceeeeeeeeeeees 100 Dependence of sensitivity test gas values on ambient temperature deviation in mean value of three measurements SN3 amp SN4 006 101 Dependence of measured value on supply voltage deviation in TONG amp SING pesicccdvccedasinntenebedeseuesadescaasudsistasadses EE E E EE ieis 103 Concentration mean values standard deviation uncertainty range and reproducibility in the field measured component PM o 0000eseeeeeees 107 Concentration mean values standard deviation uncertainty range and reproducibility in the field measured component PMo5 eeeeeeeeee 108 Zero point drift SN3 amp SN4 PMyjo with zero filter
303. site 7 30 2013 Rodenkirchen summer 7 31 2013 8 1 2013 8 2 2013 8 3 2013 8 4 2013 8 5 2013 8 6 2013 8 7 2013 8 8 2013 8 9 2013 8 10 2013 8 11 2013 8 12 2013 8 13 2013 8 14 2013 8 15 2013 8 16 2013 8 17 2013 8 18 2013 8 19 2013 8 20 2013 8 21 2013 8 22 2013 8 23 2013 8 24 2013 8 25 2013 8 26 2013 8 27 2013 8 28 2013 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc T VRh T V Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH U einland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 230 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM10 and PM2 5 Report no 936 21219977 A Annex 5 PM10 Measured values from the field test sites related to standard conditions EN 12431 Page 20 of 22 Manufacturer Comde Derenda PM10 and PM2 5 Type of instrument APM 2 Measured values in g m STD Serial No SN3 SN4 No Date Ratio Remark Test site PM2 5 PM10 241 8 29 2013 Rodenkirchen summer 242 8 30 2013 243 8 31 2013 244 9 1 2013 245 9 2 2013 246 9 3 2013 247 9 4 2013 248 9 5 2013 249 9 6 2013 250 9 7 2013 251 9 8 2013 252 9 9 2013 253 9 10 2013 254 9 11 2013 255 9 12 2013 256 9 13 2013 257 9 14 2013 258 9 15 2013 259 9 16 2013 260 9 17 2013 261 9 18 2013 262 9 19 2013 263 9 20 2013
304. sscecccscecseces sosacicssssssccscasecccasesssccecosaccessossecsacsacctesessssses 21 5 3 1 Choosing the Input Output Mode cccccccccccccccccccccccsceececcccceceeecececeeceesesesesenesesenenenens 21 5 3 2 Setting Identifier Codes for Individual Parameters sssscscssssscecsssssceccssssseccessseseeeeees 22 5 3 3 Setting the Baud Rate x iccisce siccsces cccteces ccavecesssenscosseseesenssevecte scavesessiavssoasesvesenseevectoseawsctedin 23 5 4 Administrator Settings c cccccsseccsccsciccesssseccsuesseccesseneccacesscccedessaccacesteccasssescoavesstccasssesccavssiees 23 54 1 Editing the Device Number isisiics cccticsesscessendssesscosscesced decessonsscessondesesscossccsses doseescoveressee sen 23 5 4 2 Changing the Administrator Password cccssssscccssssceccnssceccasseeccecssesccacssssceacssesceeeens 24 5 4 3 Server Settings siiiscessisisesesssssvessssscesesssssvessisccnsesssssnesdssssnsessssanessisscnbeassssnestsssanseasseanensss 25 5 4 4 Selecting the Modem Type isisssesssisscssssiscessssisessssssecsnsssicassssssacessssssnsnssssccsnsssicasasssacesass 25 APM 2 3 COMDE DERENDA 5 5 Device Adjustment Menu ccisisciccssssccccesecccsesteccavestesscveasaccsveseass svessaccduessascoveasaccosessaseovadsessoeds 25 6 Parameterizing and Starting a Measurement cccssssccccssssceccsssscsccnssceccasscseceasessecaassssssaasssees 26 6 1 Selecting Particulate Matter Fraction cccssssssccsssssscccssssscc
305. sting of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 76 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Figure 30 shows the instrument s front side with the various data outputs GERAT 003 Figure 30 Front side of the APM 2 top right side SD card slot left side RS232 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 77 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 1 General The manufacturer s information provided in the operator s manual shall not contradict the findings of the performance test 6 2 Equipment Not required here 6 3 Method The test results are compared with the information given in the manual 6 4 Evaluation Instances where the first draft of the manual deviated from the actual design of the instru ment have been corrected 6 5 Assessment No differences between the instrument design and the descriptions given in the manuals were found Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test result For this module refer to item 6 4 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rhe
306. sting of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 163 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A Regression is calculated for e All test sites comparisons together e Each test site comparison separately e 1 dataset with measured values 2 18 ug m for PM25 basis mean values of refer ence measurement e 1 dataset with measured values 2 30 g m for PM basis mean values of reference measurement For further evaluation the results of the uncertainty u s of the candidates compared with the reference method is described in the following equation which describes Ucr as a function of the OM concentration x 5 _RSS_ ae WER Yi aay Wi fa O Oi With RSS Sum of the relative residuals from orthogonal regression u x random uncertainty of the reference procedure if the value Ups which is calculat ed for using the candidates can be used in this test refer to item 6 1 5 4 9 De termination of uncertainty between systems under test ubs Algorithms for the calculation of intercept a as well as slope b and its variances by means of orthogonal regression are specified in Annex B of 5 The sum of the relative residuals RSS is calculated using the following equation RSS y a bx i 1 Uncertainty ucr is calculated for e All test sites comparisons together e Each test site comparis
307. t 70 Uncertainty between Reference 0 53 yg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 63 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 116 116 Slope b 0 885 0 927 Uncertainty of b 0 013 0 014 Ordinate intercept a 0 729 0 671 Uncertainty of a 0 263 0 280 Expanded meas uncertainty Wom 21 29 15 71 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 142 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 33 Comparison of the candidates SN3 SN4 with the reference device rel humidity gt 70 all test sites measured component PM 19 All test sites rH gt 70 Uncertainty between Reference 0 56 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 29 g m SN3 Number of data pairs 116 Slope b 0 947 Uncertainty of b 0 022 Ordinate intercept a 0 635 Uncertainty of a 0 557 Expanded measured uncertainty Wcm 14 55 14 64 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH P Air Pollution Control TUV Rheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 143 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1
308. t results are stated in module 5 4 5 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applicable 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 10 Averaging effect A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 105 of 300 For gaseous components the measuring system shall allow the formation of hourly aver ages The averaging effect shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 Note This test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applicable 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 106 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components susp
309. t the SD memory card with the update file in the SD card slot at the upper right hand cor ner of the control unit 2 Inthe main menu select the Data menu item and confirm by pressing the jog dial 3 Inthe Data menu select the Firmware Update item and confirm your choice 4 Confirm with Yes the query as to whether you want to proceed with the update The update will now be installed A bar appears showing the progress of the copying procedure Once the update has run successfully to completion the display will show OK The unit will then automatically be reset and restarted WARNING The unit must not be switched off while the software is being upgraded This would cause data loss the device could no longer be used and it would have to be returned to the factory for repairs before it could be returned to service 9 2 System Information Proceed as follows to call up the system information 1 Select the Setup menu item in the main screen and confirm your choice by pressing the jog dial 2 When in the Setup menu select the System info item and confirm your choice You will see the following information in the System information screen e Software Vers Software release version number e Hardware Vers Hardware version number e Series Number Device serial number 32 APM 2 COMDE DERENDA e Device Number Device number assigned by the user see 5 4 1 e Last Flow Calib Date and time of the most recent calibration of the
310. tability test of EN TS 16450 9 The results of the additional tests can be found in chapter 7 Investigations for the validation of the instrument software 3 0 1 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 47 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 5 gives an overview on the software releases during the type approval test and the changes between the different versions Table 5 Overview of software releases during the type approval test Version Description of changes Status during type approval test 1 3 Start version Lab test 2 0 0 e Process control optimized as crashes during Not installed active heating were possible e Bug fix for volume flow calibration e Data transmission either on request BH or on regular base e Internal storage which can later be transferred to the SD card 2 1 0 e Implementation test gas measurement with Field test CO2 campaign 1 2 2 2 e Decimal place added for Sp lOffset Gas Not installed Offset ugM _PM2 5 and ugM3_PM10 e CO Test 2 seconds break between evacua tion and filling 2 3 0 e CO Test Pre measurement with 67 in Not installed stead of 100 pump voltage 2 3 1 e CO
311. ter it has started you will see the APM Measurement menu Fig 18 in the display APM 2 27 COMDE DERENDA 7 Measurement Procedure The measurement will not start until the photometer has reached its target temperature When the measurement starts first the pump runs up and all device components are activated The selected measurement program begins after that 7 1 Flushing with Zero Air First the photometer unit is flushed with air that has previously flowed through a zero air filter for a period of two minutes This is necessary for zero point adjustment of the photometer This zero air flushing is carried out automatically by the device for two minutes in each case at hourly intervals also in the further course of the measurement During flushing the word Flush will be displayed on the right hand side of the display 7 2 Start of the Measurement and the Measurement Menu The actual measurement starts immediately after the first flushing You see the APM Measurement menu in the display In addition to date and time it indicates on the right side the currently measured mass concentration of the selected particulate matter fraction in ug m or during a flushing operation the measured voltage value in mV On the left side of the screen the following values are shown in the two window sections Measured Values and Physical Data e PM 2 5 avg Mean value of the measured mass concentration for PM if active e PM 10 avg Mea
312. test For this purpose all measurement data obtained during the entire field test was evaluated 6 4 Evaluation The reproducibility is calculated as follows 1 n gt a xa B R 21 gt 10 with U s tin and sp U D n 0 95 D mn 4 1 R Reproducibility at B4 U Uncertainty B 40 ug m for PMio and 25 g m for PM25 Sp Standard deviation from paired measurements n No of paired measurements t n 0 95 Student s factor at confidence level of 95 X Measured signal of system 1 e g SN3 at i concentration Xa Measured signal of system 2 e g SN4 at i concentration 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 107 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 5 Assessment In the field test the reproducibility for the full dataset was 20 for PM2 5 and 16 for PM4o Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results The test results are summarized in Table 21 and Table 22 The graphical representation for PMjois given in Figure 60 to Figure 64 and for PM25 in Figure 53 to Figure 57 Note The determined uncertainties are related to reference value B for each site Table 21 Concentration mean va
313. the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 55 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A Conc PM10 Ref in g m a oO 10 a hi g o x g g x 2 2 2 2 2 Figure 21 Course of PM concentrations reference at test site Cologne winter 100 90 E g D g s50 o 3 30 oo I a L I ad D a N IR 10 o UME WW A WANNAN WAIN tH oe oO oe oO ise oO oe oe oO mM o amp amp aon os amp Ss 8 gs 8 8 8 8 amp 8 8S 8 8 5 2 amp 28 2 ss Figure 22 Course of PM concentrations reference at test site Bonn winter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 56 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 100 90 80 70 T 60 50 e 40 a o 30 c e Oo 20 10 0 oD mM m lap mM mM mM lap gt gt gt gt gt gt gt gt N N N N N N N N D D al 3S S 5 5 e e oO Oo oO E3 e 5 S D A S
314. the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 97 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 6 Sensitivity coefficient of sample gas temperature The sensitivity coefficient of sample gas temperature at reference point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 A value c at 70 to 80 of the upper limit of the certification range shall be used as reference point Note This test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applicable 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 98 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 7 Sensitivity coefficient of surrounding temperature The sensitivity coefficient of surrounding temperature at zero and reference point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 A value c at 70 to
315. the follow ing results Table 48 Results of equivalence test at test site Cologne winter 2014 SN 3 amp SN 4 measured component PM19 slope corrected with 0 977 intercept cor rected with 3 758 Cologne winter 2014 Uncertainty between Reference 0 58 pg m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 74 g m SN 3 SN4 Number of data pairs 47 47 Slope b 0 903 0 949 Uncertainty of b 0 018 0 018 Ordinate intercept a 5 965 4 990 Uncertainty of a 0 389 0 385 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 8 39 12 00 Evaluation 1 The expanded uncertainty for the data corrected with the slope of 0 977 and the in tercept of 3 758 is smaller than the permissible 25 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 197 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A According to the approach of chapter 8 2 Suitability test of EN TS 16450 9 the corrected data set for Cologne winter 2014 was finally added as a fifth data set to the original equiva lence test during type approval refer to Table 43 for PM2 and Table 44 for PM 9 and it was checked if the criteria of the equivalence test are still fulfilled Table 49 Results of equivalence test Type approval Colo
316. ting 1 Inthe Setup menu select Measurem Param and enter your password as described above 2 Inthe APM parameter menu select the desired interval 2 5 10 or 15 minutes in the entry line under Save file by turning the jog dial to shift the inversion and pressing the jog dial to confirm The selected value then appears outlined and the selection remains active until it is changed 6 3 Selecting the Set Temperature for the Photometer The photometer unit has to be heated in order to rule out measurement errors see 3 1 4 In normal cases the target temperature should be set to 40 C because this setting has proven to be appropriate in practice To modify the value 1 Inthe Setup menu select Measurem Param and enter your password as described above 2 In the APM parameter menu turn the jog dial until the value to the right of Set temp is out lined and press the jog dial 3 Turn the jog dial to change the value Press the jog dial again to save the changed value The selected value remains active until it is changed NOTE The parameterization options in the APM parameter menu regarding volume flow calibration as well as the factor and offset settings are described in sections 9 5 and 9 8 6 4 Starting the Measurement After completing parameterization start the measurement by calling up the APM 2 main menu select the Measurement menu item and confirm by pressing on the jog dial Measurement will commence immediately Af
317. tion question with Yes While the test is running the sequence may be aborted by selecting the Stop menu item it may be recommenced with Start If the test is not successful first attempt to locate and correct the reason for the leak e g a hose that is connected loosely If this cannot be done then the device will have to be inspected at the factory In this case please contact Comde Derenda GmbH 9 8 Factor and Offset Settings In the device the values determined during a measurement are in the form of voltage in mV The meas ured value is then converted to ug m by means of correction factors multiplication Depending on the measurement situation it may be necessary to adjust these factors for PM and PM separately in each case For this purpose the measurement results are compared to those of a reference device in a measurement series and on this basis the necessary correction factors are calculated mathematically The values determined by the device regarding offset values can also be adjusted again separately for PM 5 and PM To enter the factor and offset settings proceed as follows 1 Select the Setup menu in the main menu and press the jog dial to confirm 2 Inthe Setup menu select the Measurement parameter item and confirm your choice 3 Select the value next to the desired variable Factor 2 5 Factor 10 Offset 2 5 or Offset 10 in the right hand section of the menu so that this value is shown outlined and press the jog
318. tions of suspended particulate matter PM and PM25 according to the measuring principle of scat tered light measurement The implemented measuring method utilizes the physical characteristics of light scattering at micro particles The used scattered light photometer unit consists of an intensity stabilized laser diode and a semiconductor photo detector Both components are arranged to each other in an angle of 90 thus it is a mono angle scattered light sensor The light reflected by particles in an exactly defined measuring volume is measured by the detector The photo detector generates a corresponding voltage signal 0 5 V which is then low noise amplified and is a direct measure for the mass concentration of the aerosol in the measured volume For zero point adjustment filtered air is lead to the scattered light sensor in periodic intervals via a switching appliance Light trap YY n Bey Soy 90 Measurement 7 volume Light source Light detector Figure 1 Operating principle of photometer unit In order to exclude temperature dependency of the photometer signal the photometer is in stalled in a case which is thermally isolated and heated with a heating block controlled on a temperature of 40 C The physics of light scattering at particles causes that aerosols with a diameter in the range of the used light wave length scatter the light in most efficient way related to their mass i e deliver the biggest
319. tusdtinanagaeidindeasiittdaseedtseacaedeionte 32 3 1 Measuring principle cccccccceeeeceeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeaaaeaaaeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaneeeeeeseeeeaaaa 32 3 2 Principle of operation xi inc catxiatncataiasncatniatncatadniacatniatniatadaiastesadedeietabelabesndeleteeabelaleiadilenncers 34 3 3 AMS SCOP and SetUPsiprirerrir i pirn An EE EREA A reaa TERE AN EA ENAERE Ea as 35 Ay TESTPROGRAMME vinsicccsvinaconarseiventinsuninistiniciatinaelsaia ar pra ei e i pripra ED iot 46 4 14 General ss cccnciiccieetvictieciviccietindacdenirancies tuanbinmesitedanianiadaeiaeteamiianinaiedeitidmndastraaelasthaahiasteecuand 46 4 2 Laboratory ESti a anara AAEN 49 43 FieldigS hereren o 50 5 REFERENCE MEASUREMENT METHOD cccccccccccccceececeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseneees 63 6 TESTRESULTS ctssomimasnutatatsiganrasioniatanoanaidiemlauagiapielatateanidietelatanemaniiiamlataiemabineas 64 6 1 4 1 1 Measured value display i2cs c cisastatsQeatsantsadentzegentengsfaaanananetedeoedsatenteacetentesdaees 64 6 1 4 1 2 Easy MAMENANG Oraria aapna aaa ATEA AAE aR AA ENAA AAE AA 66 6 1 4 1 3 Functional check ccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeneeeeeeeeeeeaaaeaaaeeeeeeaaeeaageeeeeeeeesaaanseeeeeeees 68 6 1 4 1 4 Setup times and warm up tiMES cccccccceeceeceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeees 71 6 1 4 1 5 Instrument design ecsicidccetics entered Aieetinainn deneelnieetnenns detaulnebbedesededddesedlecdesudsSdeesadens 73 6 1 4 1 6 Un
320. tween Candidates 1 09 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 47 45 Slope b 0 873 0 978 Uncertainty of b 0 040 0 044 Ordinate intercept a 2 123 1 622 Uncertainty of a 0 750 0 828 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 18 93 9 59 Rodenkirchen Summer Uncertainty between Reference 0 76 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 44 g m SN3 SN4 Number of data pairs 45 45 Slope b 0 969 1 008 Uncertainty of b 0 065 0 065 Ordinate intercept a 1 719 2 154 Uncertainty of a 1 281 1 287 Expanded measured uncertainty Wcm 16 42 12 16 All comparisons 230 ug m Uncertainty between Reference 0 72 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 2 33 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 33 33 Slope b 1 028 1 095 Uncertainty of b 0 064 0 066 Ordinate intercept a 3 024 2 618 Uncertainty of a 2 701 2 81 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 19 65 21 03 All comparisons lt 30 g m Uncertainty between Reference 0 55 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 0 99 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 162 160 Slope b 0 946 1 053 Uncertainty of b 0 038 0 044 Ordinate intercept a 0 486 0 325 Uncertainty of a 0 714 0 826 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 14 64 16 26 All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 58 ug m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 30 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 195 193 Slope b 0 958 signifikant 1 045 signifikant Uncertainty of b 0 020 0 022 Ordinate intercept a 0 190 nicht signifikant 0 253 nicht signifikant Uncertainty of a 0 485 0 543 Expa
321. uirements of Table 2 in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 in the certification range ac cording to Table 1 in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 The limit value or the alert threshold shall be used as reference point In case of deviating certification ranges the repeatability standard deviation at reference point shall not exceed 2 of the upper limit of this certification range In this case a value c at 70 to 80 of the upper limit of this certification range shall be used as reference point Note By resolution of the relevant body in Germany see module 5 3 1 this test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applicable 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 95 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz25 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 4 Linearity lack of fit The analytical function describing the relationship between the output signal and the value of the air quality characteristic shall be linear Reliable linearity is given
322. ulting values of Yicorr may then be used to calculate the following new terms by linear regression Y corr C dx and 2 RSS U Yin 7a x e d 1 x u a with u a uncertainty of the original intercept a the value of which has been used to obtain Yi corr Algorithms for the calculation of intercepts as well as slopes and their variances by orthogo nal regression are described in detail in annex B of 4 RSS is determined analogue to the calculation in module 5 4 10 With respect to b The value of the slope b may be used as a term to correct all input values y according to the following equation X Vicon b The resulting values of Yi cor may then be used to calculate the following new terms by linear regression Y cor Ct dx and UE haar Gen py UO f TF xut si E with u b uncertainty of the original slope b the value of which has been used to obtain Yi corr Algorithms for the calculation of intercepts as well as slopes and their variances by orthogo nal regression are described in detail in annex B of 4 RSS is determined analogue to the calculation in module 5 4 10 With respect to c The values of the slope b and of the intercept a may be used as correction terms to correct all input values y according to the following equation yi 7a Y izom b The resulting values of Yi cor may then be used to calculate the following new terms by linear regression Yicon C d
323. ure 79 Figure 80 Figure 81 Figure 82 Figure 83 Figure 84 Figure 85 Figure 86 Figure 87 Figure 88 Figure 89 Figure 90 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PMos Cologne SUMMEN cccccccceceeeeeeeeeeeeceeaaeeeceeeeeeeeeeaaaeaaeeeceeaaeeaeeeeeeeeeeeaaeaneees 176 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PMos Rodenkirchen SUMMED c ccccccecceeseeeseeeseueseuceeeceeuueeeeueaceeeueeaueueeeueseueueneaeaes 177 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PMos Rodenkirchen SUMMED ccccccecceecceseeeeeeeseueeeeueeuuseuueeeueeueeeueeaeeeueeeueeaaeenaes 177 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PMos values 2 18 MQM scsasdiscccedececcssaess tate checcviavacuasstenesceat saanssadtadsaccecboresaduistasScuiecs 178 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PMos valies gt 18 J M serrin rn enn ee ne ee ie ee ee eee ee RE E EE ENE 178 Reference device vs candidate SN3 measured component PMio AIIRESTSIMOS isc saicostccsicceeccaneecveetiecn tcc tanec oetnes cote 179 Reference device vs candidate SN4 measured component PM o AI TESE SITES curen E A 179 Referen
324. ure for type approval testing according to EN TS 16450 9 Performance criterion met no 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 111 of 300 Table 23 and Table 24 provide the obtained measured values for zero point as well as the calculated deviations in relation to the previous and the starting value in pg m Figure 32 to Figure 35 provide a graphic representation of zero point drift over the course of testing Table 23 Zero point drift SN3 amp SN4 PM 9 with zero filter SN3 SN4 Measured Deviation from Deviation from Measured Deviation from Deviation from Date Value previous value start value Date Value previous value start value g m g m pg m pg m ug m pg m 11 19 2012 11 19 2012 11 20 2012 0 0 11 20 2012 11 21 2012 0 8 0 8 11 21 2012 8 i 0 8 1 11 2013 1 12 2013 0 4 1 12 2013 0 0 1 13 2013 1 13 2013 2 5 2013 2 5 2013 2 6 2013 2 6 2013 2 27 2013 2 27 2013 2 28 2013 2 28 2013 3 30 2013 3 30 2013 3 31 2013 3 31 2013 4 1 2013 4 1 2013 4 26 2013 4 26 2013 4 27 2013 4 27 2013 4 28 2013 1 9 4 28
325. utlet Filter Parker Balston D100010 Bypass Filter WIX D100020 Pump Outlet Filter WIX D100020 Brushless Pump Nitto Kohki D100093 Pinch Valve Sirai D100833 Silicon Hose Espass D100823 42 APM 2 11 Error Messages COMDE DERENDA Warnings or error messages may be issued from time to time during operation Details on the individual reports will be found in the following table Even after a fault message has been issued the device will continue to function without any interruption After a power outage the device will automatically re start measurement operations The measured data recorded up until the power outage occurred will be retained in memory Error Description Error_EXTSENSOR Warning External temperature moisture sensor not connect ed or faulty Error_POWERLOSS Warning following power outage measurement was restarted after power restored Error_ENDOFLOG Warning Overrun at internal log memory SD card can no longer store all the malfunctions Error_RAMCLOCKOVERFLOW Warning Overrun at internal log memory only after restart ing if the internal memory is still in an overflow state Error_PUMPNOFLOW Malfunction Pump creating no measurable flow Check pump Seized or defective Error_ NOPHOTOMETER Malfunction Photometer values below limit value Check photometer Is it connected Error_HEATINGPHOTO Malfunction Photometer chamber
326. valency of the sampling system Particulate measuring systems for PM25 shall be tested according to performance criterion 5 4 10 Calculation of expanded uncertainty between systems under test Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Refer to modules 5 4 2 PM10 and 5 4 10 PMz25 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 96 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 3 5 Sensitivity coefficient of sample gas pressure The sensitivity coefficient of sample gas pressure at reference point shall not exceed the requirements of Table 2 in VDI Standard 4202 Sheet 1 September 2010 A value c at 70 to 80 of the upper limit of the certification range shall be used as reference point Note This test item is irrelevant to particulate measuring systems 6 2 Equipment Not applicable 6 3 Method Not applicable 6 4 Evaluation Not applicable 6 5 Assessment Not applicable Performance criterion met 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Not applicable 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of
327. very 3 months 7 According to the manufacturer the internal filters in the device zero air filter outlet fil ter for photometer bypass filter and pump outlet filter shall be exchanged latest every 6 months 8 The photometer should be sent to the manufacturer for re calibration at least once a year According to the manufacturer the photometer has to be completely replaced if the completely collected PM mass exceeds 50 mg correspond to approx 200 days with an average concentration of 50 g m the photometer offset exceeds 2500 mV After the annual maintenance of the photometer the measuring system is to be calibrated at the measurement site with the gravimetric PM reference method according to EN 12341 respectively with the gravimetric PM s reference method according to EN 14907 Preferably a seasonal calibration rhythm is to follow 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 67 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PM2z5 Report no 936 21219977 A 9 During the annual basic maintenance the cleaning of the sampling tube has also to be considered 10 The vacuum pump has a life time of approx 2 years after reaching the lifetime the pump must be completely replaced Failure
328. view of the most important meteorological parameters that have been obtained during the measurements at the 4 field test sites vali dation campaign Cologne winter 2014 as well as an overview of the concentrations of sus pended particulate matter during the test period All single values are provided in annexes 5 and 6 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc A TUVRheinland Precisely Right Page 60 of 300 TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A Table 7 Ambient conditions at the field test sites daily mean values Cologne Bonn Cologne Rodenkirchen Cologne winter winter summer summer winter 2014 Number of value pairs Reference PM10 e 21 ar 45 ae Number of value pairs Reference PM25 e a ae ao PMz 5 ratio in PM10 Range 41 6 97 2 42 2 96 5 42 5 84 1 38 8 73 6 32 0 90 9 Mean value 73 8 70 5 62 2 54 0 68 5 Ambient temperature C Range 3 3 11 9 3 4 20 0 6 3 28 2 9 9 27 8 2 5 13 1 Mean value 4 6 7 9 16 7 17 2 6 5 Ambient pressure hPa Range 988 1027 985 1021 993 1021 988 1016 984 1022 Mean value 1004 1004 1008 1005 1000 Rel humidity Range 70 0 91 2 42 8 85 8 51 4 89 5 48 6 96 4 46 8 8
329. x 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 187 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A and 2 RSS Us_s Vicor u x e d 1 x P x2u2 b u a 7 n 2 with u b uncertainty of the original slope b the value of which has been used to obtain Yicor and with u a uncertainty of the original intercept a the value of which has been used to obtain Yi corr Algorithms for the calculation of intercepts as well as slopes and their variances by orthogo nal regression are described in detail in Annex B of 5 RSS is determined analogue to the calculation in module 5 4 10 The values for Uc sor are used for the calculation of the combined relative uncertainty of the candidate systems after correction according to the following equation us neo Yi W omeorr y Ty For the corrected dataset uncertainty We cmcorr iS calculated at the daily limit value by taking yi as the concentration at the limit value The expanded relative uncertainty Wemcorr is calculated according to the following equation Wewr corr k W cmcor In practice k 2 for large number of available experimental results The highest resulting uncertainty Wemcor is compar
330. xpanded uncertainties are below 25 with the exception of Rodenkirchen summer For SN3 and SN4 together the expanded uncertainty for the data set 230 yg m is above 25 Criterion 5 For SN3 the slope as well as the intercept of the evaluation of the full dataset are significantly greater than the permissible values For SN4 the intercept of the evaluation of the full dataset is significantly great er than the permissible values Other For both candidates the total slope is 0 977 and the intercept is 3 758 at an expanded overall uncertainty of 23 25 for the full dataset The January 2010 version of the Guide is ambiguous with respect to which slope and which intercept should be used to correct a candidate should it fail the test of equivalence After consultation with the convenor Mr Theo Hafkenscheid of the EC working group responsible for setting up the Guide it was decided that the requirements of the November 2005 version of the Guide are still valid and that the slope and intercept from the orthogonal regression of all the paired data be used These are stated additionally under Other in the above The 2006 UK Equivalence Report 10 has highlighted this was a flaw in the mathematics required for equivalence as per the November 2005 version of the Guide as it penalized in struments that were more accurate Annex E Section 4 2 therein This same flaw is copied in the January 2010 version It is proposed that the same
331. y Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 41 of 300 pended particulate matter PM1o and PM25 Report no 936 21219977 A Besides the direct communication via Jog Dial and instrument display there is also the pos sibility to communicate with the measuring system via RS232 serial interface Bayern Hessen Protocol Measured data can e g be recorded on a PC in a simple way via RS232 and a terminal software During the type approval test the measured data have been ac cessed by download the measured data stored on the SD card For external check of the zero point of the measuring system a zero filter is installed at the instrument inlet The use of this filter allows the supply of particulate free air Figure 12 Zero filter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 42 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A For external check of the sensitivity of the photometer the instrument s manufacturer has developed the following optional test method By offering propane to the photometer a scattered light signal in the range of 300 400 mV corresponds to an aerosol concentration of approx 70 g m is induced The stability of that signal is taken as a measur
332. y between Candidates 0 96 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 162 160 Slope b 0 921 1 025 Uncertainty of b 0 037 0 043 Ordinate intercept a 3 223 4 000 Uncertainty of a 0 698 0 807 Expanded measured uncertainty Wem 16 42 All comparisons Uncertainty between Reference 0 58 g m Uncertainty between Candidates 1 27 g m SN3 SN 4 Number of data pairs 195 193 Slope b 0 935 signifikant 1 020 nicht signifikant Uncertainty of b 0 019 0 022 Ordinate intercept a 3 552 signifikant 3 981 Uncertainty of a 0 474 0 531 Expanded measured uncertainty Wom 17 80 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH A TUVRheinland Air Pollution Control Precisely Right Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Page 170 of 300 ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components suspended particulate matter PM1o and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A The results of the check of the five criteria given in chapter 6 1 Methodology of the equiva lence check modules 5 4 9 5 4 11 are as follows Criterion 1 More than 20 of the data are greater than 28 yg m Criterion 2 The uncertainty between the candidates is less than 2 5 ug m Criterion 3 The uncertainty between the reference devices is less than 2 0 ug m Criterion 4 For SN3 all of the expanded uncertainties are above 25 with the exception of Cologne winter For SN4 all of the e
333. z5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 5 Assessment The availability was 100 for SN3 and 98 9 for SN4 without test related downtimes In cluding test related downtimes it was 91 6 for SN3 and 90 5 for SN4 Performance criterion met yes 6 6 Detailed presentation of test results Table 13 Determination of availability without test related downtimes Se a Bomme Je o0 mamerne a o Table 14 Determination of availability incl test related downtimes o T T m e Downtime fa oo Maintenance incl 22 zero filter 3195669_2014_936_21219977A_EN doc TUV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH Air Pollution Control A TUVRheinland Report on performance testing of the Air Pollution Monitor 2 APM 2 measur Precisely Right ing system manufactured by Comde Derenda GmbH for the components sus Page 87 of 300 pended particulate matter PMio and PMz5 Report no 936 21219977 A 6 1 5 2 9 Instrument software The version of the instrument software to be tested shall be displayed during switch on of the measuring system The test institute shall be informed on changes in the instrument software which have influence on the performance of the measuring system 6 2 Equipment Not required here 6 3 Method It was checked whether the measuring system has a means of displaying the instrument software The manufacturer was advised to inform the test institute on any changes in the in strument software 6 4 Evaluation The

Download Pdf Manuals

Related Search

21219977A

Related Contents

DOL 21R SENSOR 230 V  fichier 1 - CRDP de Montpellier  Philips Ecomoods Spot light 57952/31/16  CyberHome Entertainment TV DVD Combo CH-DVD 300 User's Manual  NB4L16MMNEVB Evaluation Board User`s Manual for NB4L16M  Presse Studio Auto Clam  AD-5643 - エー・アンド・デイ  KALORIK TO 39085 SS  here - dfir.com.br  Sony VAIO VGN-FW21ZR User Guide Manual  

Copyright © All rights reserved. Failed to retrieve file