この報告書をダウンロードする
Contents
1.2.
3.
4. SICK
5. PLP PL PL
6. 21
7. OSHA
8. gt 2
9. 2
10. A 50
11. 1 7 3 3 1 7 4
12. 2 H 3
13. 4 1 10
14. A 4 1 2 60
15. 1
16. State of the Art State of the Art
17. EN71 EN ST ST
18. HSE EU 1998
19. OK UL NEC National Electronic Code UL
20. ll 8 149
21. EN 954 1 ISO EN Type C i EH 80
22. JTS 6
23. 950
24. 58
25. ANSI
26. 1 3 1 3 1 TS Technical Specification TR 1 TI TSO IEC New deliverables TS TS JIS JIS 1 3 2 CSB Competent Standadizarion Body
27. E 501
28. E trade union FE
29. ISO CEN 1994 6 7 CEN EA NN RS ISO CEN ISO CEN EN
30. 1980 EE 40 28
31. 2
32. 148 4
33. 51 47 0 GCT AV 4 E 2 4 Y L G TS O IOSI 9 4 4 TE
34. OSHA OSHA OSHA OSHA
35. 4 BG 4 5 2
36. dH D 100 5 125 1995 EC
37. D 1 RS 5
38. ITSO IEC
39. In your country is there a system which promotes No Our personal ressources are very strictly limited which does talent who can lead international standardization Is not allow us to put more manpower into standardisation A good there a system which utilizes an aged engineer who tool is the national mirror committee in which the content of has been related for standardization for many years lstandards can be discussed This helps to avoid travel time and expenses and beeing informed anyway F ISO IEC Suva Does the organization to which
40. 1 9
41. 111 10 11 12 yell 0 PL EU
42. BSI BG UL ANSI GE IBM B B
43. 0 CM
44. N H CSR CSR ul CSR 57
45. 4 U 1 U 1 E
46. There seem to be a lot of people who have been In Europe there is a long tradition of tripartite partnership in continuously participating in the development of an occupational health and safety with the following partners international standard for a long term in Europe What lauthorities employers and employees representatives Those are kind of organization do they belong to What frequently Iong term members in the Technical Committees Some advantage can they obtain by participating in the Multinational Companies are also interested in standardization standard development for a Iong term work The up dates of standardization work can become rather costly if the manufacturer has to make the ammendments in the aftermath Standardization can therefore grant the manufacturer cost reductions 87 E
47. T E PL E 110
48. 36 6 9 Nn
49. EU 3 TSO IEC
50. d
51. U 3 U 3 3 3 3 1 OSHA
52. e BG TUV CE UL UL E EU EU a
53. 60
54. 1
55. DTD HSE HSRE E 1 BSI E 2
56. KEIRIN NC 15 21 16 3 105 0011 5 8 03 3434 5384 100 8141 8 6 03 3277 0741
57. 3 5 2 E
58. 53 17 18 19 UO HSE 1988 BS EN 1050
59. 95 AD Annex4
60. ai MM CE
61. BE 2 2 2 3 2
62. 2 3 2 Directives EC Official Journal 3 2 3 3 Decisions
63. 8SDO NFPA 79 Bloodgood Bloodgood NEPA 79 ANSI OSHA
64. HRA 2 3 CAD
65. 1800 PL
66. 1995 1 1 1 1 3 EU 2 5 3 ESR ESR 1 TI
67. 3 2 3 1 EU EN EU
68. DN 2
69. CE 11 v 2 5 4 ESR 2 1
70. At which stage is the risk assessment executed in the Risk assessment is mandatory in accordance with the machinery development process of the machine Is the risk directive Generally the machinery directive is a law in Europe and assessment done in accordance with Machinery therefore it is mandatory under any circumstances safety standard Is the risk assessment effective to the safety level securing the machine Besides is there a method of the idea as better B BG s BIA Could you let us know the sample case that the risk For this question the BG s or BIA in Germany can give you a assessment was done better answer as they are doing risk
71. 9 JIS 108 Py 20 15 20 E
72. 62 6 8 EEG LY 2 9 lt ML ul bg 9 gt 47 3 lt Js p eR 9 a amp a CE Y 9 9 wer
73. BG BG TUV BG DIN CEN CENELEC 2003
74. 2 3 ul 5 4 1 3 2 3 2 JISC
75. 5000 CE EUCHNER BG EU EU f EC Treaty EU EC EU
76. ISO IEC ISO IEC ISO IEC 3 3 3 1 OSHA
77. OSHA OSHA OSHA OSHA MSDS
78. www asse org 86 Suva Alfred Sutter A RE RAs Do the people of the machine industrial world in your IIthink yes The major argument is that standardization simplifies country think that standardization leads to the process of market access Safety re
79. 62 12 e EN 954 1 ISO 13849 1 2 3 es 8 es 3 2
80. H 3 134 KUKA
81. CSR
82. 2 2 1988 3 1 1988 3 rR
83. ISO9000 ISO9000 C
84. EN E 119 7 5 3 C Nn
85. EU CREN TC BSI BSI ISO IEC CEN CENELEC ISO CEN CEN
86. GS CE
87. 4 h CE CE EU EN CE 4 CE EE
88. IEC IEC
89. ISO TC199 IEC TC44
90. 6 66 Safexpert 50 70 CE
91. EN 954 1 ISO 14121 EN 292 1 ISO 12100 1 2 E 65 2
92. PL CEN CEN 0
93. 5 4 3 1 EU 5 4 4 1 2
94. TUV BG 57 TUV 90 BG 80 1 TUV NN AM
95. i OSHA OSHA a ANSI B11 9 e
96. 2 ki 1 10 2 1 U 2 U 1 U 1 a AX
97. 20 RE ISO IEC IEC
98. 3
99. CE ISO
100. WTO TBT JIS ISO TEC 1SO IEC ISO IEC 33 3 a EC 10 EN
101. 8
102. 1 2 0 b c d e f 9 h CE 4 2 2 2 2 1
103. 138 SN S 9
104. 1837 TSO 12100 1 2 3 3
105. TSO E 12100 PL
106. What is the official position of the person who signs That s the decicion of the management They have toassign a for the self declaration of the CE mark When the CE Iperson or do it itself No but I think ist possible mark is signed has the person joined some insurance systems 92 IElan Schaltelemente GmbH amp Co KG A Do the people of the machine industrial world in your country think that standardization leads to strengthening international industrial power B ISO IEC TC We have heard f
107. A B C ISO 12100 EN292 ISO 12100 6 CRN TISO IRC EC
108. 76 10 e 2 e A 11 es iD e CMCS Certified Motion Control Specialist 77 3 2 2 JFB Enterprises IEC TC44
109. OSHA OSHA ANSI ANSI R15 06 U 1 OSHA 23 2 2 U 1
110. E 1 E 2 EC E 2 SD E 2 E 2
111. 5 8 H UL le RY YY 0 1 UL e UL 100 e UL Underwriters Laboratory e UL UL e 40 000
112. ISO 12100 E 1 H 0 E 2 E 2 E
113. OSHA 5 74 6 ANSIT Private Company 400 ISO EU ANSI 3 1 ISO 3 1 ISO
114. H
115. 2 HSE es e 5 CE e
116. FF E 1000 JTS A OHSAS18001 4 v
117. e 9 117 3 e USA ISO e JIS ISO IEC
118. CE
119. 1 1 f
120. 21 JISC 6 4 1 2 3 4 3 1
121. OSHA 80 e
122. HSE HSE Web DB 83 4 BG 16 H DD
123. Hy EN 7 7 30 40 E
124. 6 2 6 3 6 4 X1 I 1 1 1
125. 51
126. e PL 6 e RS es e ON 7 e 3 8
127. 3 3 2 1 18 2 32
128. HSE HSE 3 EU
129. v
130. Harmonised Standards Commission ESR E 2 5 2 6 1 89 392 EEC 1989
131. OSHA OSHA 1970 1990 kn gt 84 ANSI B11
132. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 4 1 d OM 35 MM
133. EU JIS JIS A 9 A1
134. 127 2 e e 5 6 _ F F 1 F e HMI es
135. Does the occupation called a safety consultant exist Yes usually self declared experts Several professional Is there a system which recognizes the qualification in organizations offer certification programs but they are voluntary case of being and not required to act as a consultant 107 5 5 1 A 1 A A 7 10 Fr 3 3
136. PL NPO ISO12100
137. e e EN ABC 75 e 1 2 Bloodgood ANSI B11 06 EN12415 12 es
138. 2 v gt 1 EU
139. U 2 U 2 24 v 95 3 OSHA
140. 1 i ISO IEC EU RU
141. 3 Oo NE 1 4 5 4 5 1
142. 122 OASHA FDI EU SREMT QC
143. Safexpert JTS PDF Safety Device List SICK
144. FL c
145. 150 10 1 5 14 ISO TC199 1
146. 2 BMW GM EUCHNER 5 10 ID 0 RA
147. TSM 6nW TITE 37 A 6 6 lt WN I gt TI 1n W amp 4 ai oP GA i EE Ea EE EE me 38 2 9 2 9 1
148. NV C C
149. 145 10 11 HH HH
150. 2 5 f 9 60 2 4 2
151. 1 2 16 2 13
152. C RR C C 10 50 19 59
153. UL A
154. A B C Ny 1 C E JIS ISO 9000 ISO 14000
155. 7 a Suva ISO TC199 Alfred Sutter b Durr Systems GmbH Elan Schaltelemente GmbH amp Co KG Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG TUVAutomotive Euchner c Robotic Industries Assocation 2 II k a
156. JIS 1
157. 19 20 gt MO EU 1985 CEN TC144 EN
158. I A 147
159. RBG E Dt BG E BH PL ES 0
160. JTS ISO 5 Yes No
161. 48 10 1990 3 4 1984 1873
162. 4 4 E 4 E 61 E
163. gL NECA NPO 2 vV 1 ln 50
164. RXR E 2 ISO 4 5 2 1 k 46 JIS B 9702 2000 ISO 14121 1999
165. ISO IEOJ 51 BG 0 BG BG TC CEN CENELEC 190 90 i MN e ISO IEC 40 du GS
166. 1 10
167. 21 s 2 22
168. A OD gO 2 4 3 a 3 b 3 d 3 c 3 e 3 h 3 f 3 h 3 9 53 5 5 1 5 1 2
169. 10 20 RXR 130 TS a e 5 200 e
170. CE 1961 1954 Al 2 5 9 Gesetz tber technishe Arbeitsmittle Statute on technical working equipment 1989 6 24 Bundesgesetzblatt BGBI I 1968 p 717 Geratesicherheitsgeset GSG Statute on the safety of equnpment 1992 10 23 BGBI T 1992 P1793 1992 9 2 1993 12 27
171. CE EU ANSI B11 xx CE CE CE E Appendix
172. HRA HRA HRA 50 500 500
173. What meaning does confirm Machinery safety standard In Europe and may be in US too there is a direct link to product have from the standpoint of Product Liability Law or insurance A How is new technological development in the machine field done The private company does originally It does as industry the academic organization and the government agency cooperate B Who invests the cost of development when jointly developing C To propose a new technology to an international standard can positive support is received from the government liability law
174. PP 66 45 JNORTAL
175. 3 1 ICS Code 13 110 Safety of machinery GB 3 2 4 GB 3 1 GB T GB Z GB 8 1 GB Il Mandatory National Standards GB T Voluntary National Standards 3 GB Z National Standardization Guiding Technical Documents 29 3 2 No 1 GB11341 1989 2 GB12141 1989 3 GB12142 1989 GB 12265 1 1997 Safety of machinery safety distances to prevent danger zones being reached by the uppar limbs 5 GB 12265 2 2000 Safety of machinery safety distances to prevent danger zones being reached by the lower limbs S 6 GB 12265 3 1997 Safety of machinery Minimum gaps to avoid crushing of parts of the human body 7 GB12266 1990 8 GB12352 1990 9 GB12602 1990 Lifting appliancesjPSafety devices against
176. 60 70 BG BG NM BG
177. 10 e e e e 1 30
178. ES o WMD 5 2 2 E EE E CSR
179. s e ISO 12100 SO TC199 CEN 114 e ISO 14121 EN 1050 e es 1974 e 2 e e
180. 1 E I IN 1 RU BG
181. 100 20 30 i i MR NN BG
182. 2 3 123 se C e Mi 0 C e EU 9 CE 9
183. BG BG BIA D BIA TUV BG D IEC IEC TC44 4 1 1 2
184. CCC CSR 1
185. C D 2 RE D 2 2 3 2 3 1 EU
186. 152 5 EN EN EN
187. E 2 8 10 1 2 22 v E 44
188. the technical stand of the art Was Machinery Directive effective to decrease work Yes the figures regarding to accidents are getting better accidents related to the machine in your country Do II dontthink so because the technical stand of the art is not only you think the product at a still low safety level to be lgiven by the laws The innovation and progress in safety will make used if there is no Machinery Directive the customer more and more sensible B PL What meaning does confirm Machinery safety standard The conformity
189. 5 E a
190. D 14 5 6 6 2 1 2 3
191. EU JIS 49 5 H EU
192. e 1910 156 1910 157 e 1910 158 e 1910 159 e 1910 160 e 1910 161 e 1910 162 e 1910 163 e 1910 164 1910 165 L A L B L C L D 1910 156 O L 13 M 1910 166 1910 167 1910 168 1910 169 14 N 1910 176 1910 177 o 1910 177
193. trade union 1aborer inspector 50 y F ET 2 8 3
194. rr 43 10 11 12 Annex 4 Annex D A DTI
195. 1 2 3 3 BG BG BG 50 50 BG BG 100 2
196. 56 3 et f HH 49 5 9 2 8 11 SG SG Safety Goods
197. BG 2 3 139 E DNA e
198. es gt n N OSI RE 2 5 2 5 1 1995 RU Directive 4
199. ANSI H
200. PL 3 4 5 CE 95 BG TUV
201. SiIK E YES NO
202. 5 5 EE Eg 1 EE e e EU EC e se PL s es e es
203. BMW TUV BG BG 1 BG RU PL State of the Art Technology
204. 2 3 4 Recommendation EU 2 3 5 Opinion EU 2 4 1985 EU EC
205. US TAG Technical Advisory Group ISO TC199 2 ANSI ANSI ANSI Procedures SDO
206. 2 TUV E V TUV E V TUV Machinery Safety Functional Safety TUV Functional Safety TUV ISO 17025 BG v TUV BSI
207. 2 1 OK OK TUV
208. ISO IEC 144 2
209. e e
210. 109 4 A 1 5 E 500
211. 2 7 Sei E 2 E 9 D 1 D 2 CE Safexpert
212. O 1910 217 Mechanical power press ANSI B11 1 1971 Safety Standard for Construction Care and Use of Mechanical Power Press O 1910 219 Mechanical power transmission apparatus ANSI B15 1 Safety code for Mechanical Power Transmission Appratus Occupational Safety and Health Standards 9 29CFR 1 A 1910 1 1910 2 1910 8 1910 4 1910 5 1910 6 1910 7 o 1910 7 A OSHA 1910 8 2 B 1910 11 1910 12 1910 13 1910 14 1910 15 1910 16 _ 1910 17
213. f 10
214. OSHAct 3 8 OSHAct Federal Laws 29 Labor 651 678 The United States Code USC USC The Code of Federal Regulation CFR OHSHAct CFR CFR OHSHAct CER29 29CFR Part1910 29CFR 25 O ANSI NFPA
215. IT A TT PC lt 1
216. REU
217. 12 2 5 5 1997 CC 1993 e 1 897392 4 2 5 6 EC EC EC EU EC EU 2 5 7 1 1992 1
218. X 2 8 9 1 2 3 0 25
219. AGV DIN VB
220. E 1 CE DO CE E 1 19 CE IP CE D 3 CE 2 D 3 EUCHNER CE D 2 CE
221. vil A 1 B 2 4 3 a 3 b 3 d 3 c 3 e 3 h 3 f 3 h 3 g 9 9 mW RE EU
222. 1995 1 1 POPS POPS EU T CE
223. Was Machinery Directive effective to decrease work There was no significant change in number of accidents in accidents related to the machine in your country Do ISwitzerland due to the application of the machinery directive The you think the product at a still low safety level to be llevel of safety was rather higher before the intrduction of the used if there is no Machinery Directive machinery directive than after which may explain this effect 88 3 IA In your country is there an organization which certifies it concerning Machinery Safety Is it a private corporation or is it a public service corporation B Who is investing to establish the organization C Does the organization also have equipment which examines whether to conform the standard D Is there a system which recognizes the certific
224. 170cm 1980 4 E 1950 153 1 6 Il 2 3 4 5 6 7 al 9 10 11 21 15 17 E6 CE E 12 1998 E5 29 Paul Makin The Machinery Directive 98 37 EC And the
225. RIA 4 RIA GM a 10
226. 300 E 70 vV 5 11 K K 1 s
227. 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 2 ANSI ANSI ANSI SDO Standard Development Organization SDO RIA AMT
228. TUV e es e IEC 61508 DIN V VDE 0801 e
229. UL ANSI 2 3 E UL 4526 5980 UL SEMI Hy UL ISO IEC TSO IEC ISO IEBC
230. Was Machinery Directive effective to decrease work Forthis question the BG s or BIA in Germany can give you a accidents related to the machine in your country Do better answer as they are investigating in work accidents you think the product at a still low safety level to be used if there is no Machinery Directive B PL PL What meaning does confirm Machinery safety standard IThe supplier has to fulfill the safety standards in any case as the have from the standpoint of Product Liability Law or machinery directive is mandatory In the case of Product Liability insurance the standpoint of the supplier will not change if an accident happens A
231. s e 23 EU CE EU e CR
232. Germany Frauenhofer Institute How is new technological development in the machine Quite often academic organisations are doing technogical field done The private company does originally It development i e in Germany Frauenhofer Institute together with does as industry the academic organization and the Ithe industry government agency cooperate B Who invests the cost of development when jointly developing C To propose a new technology to an international Normally not standard can positive support is received from the government 100 5 IA
233. ISO UL CE 2 UL UL ISO 9000 1992 NASA ISO 9000 UKAS
234. f oo 0 9
235. E 1 15 4 E 1 E 2 EU 2 D 2 PL lt H 2
236. 11 b 5
237. e CCC 10 lt e 10 e
238. U 3 BS 8000 DIN V19250 EN 20 U 3 7 1 U 3 U 3 26 ANSI
239. 116 19 e CE e RN BN e e 5 2 B B
240. CEN EN EN EU EN EN EU EN 2 2 3 EU EU 2 2 2 4 EU EU EU EU 2 2 3 EU
241. 6 E 300 uk RSR
242. TSO IEC Guide51 Oo 4 a 1 59 5 3 5 1
243. j 2 3 ISO
244. VW BMW 3 14 113 15
245. CE
246. State of Art STN oo 46 3 1 2 Mak lt Saf Consultancy Mr Paul Makin
247. fC 2 KK 4 HE 16 2 13 16 2 16 p 1 3 1 3 1 1
248. 133 8 5 9 TIBM UL 9 I a H 1 1 Guardmaster SIPH
249. e 3 e e e 14 e A B C 3 A C s B B1 Particular Safety Aspect
250. 4 5 10 6 D 4 4 1
251. U 2 ANSI ANS8I U 2 TSO 3 3 2 U 2 ANSI American National Standard Institute ANSI SDO ANSI 21 Standard Development Organization SDO RIA Robotic I
252. 118 5 ISO9000 14000 2 3 8
253. ii ug Y 1 a 0 0 Ni A 840 2 A AN E 3
254. 2 8 5 EMC 1 2 MS
255. Standardization Administration of Chine http wwwr sac gov cm englhsh home asp Vol 41 No 1 2002 Vol 41 No 2 2002 21 P 12 1999 67 II 1 1 1 12 5 JISC 21 1 JISC 18 1 JIS 18 2
256. UL UL EU 82 3 2 3 Honda R amp D Honda R amp D Americas Inc HRA Assistant Senior Manager Chief Engineer Mr Hideyuki Akisawa Security Environmental Health amp Safety SRHS Manager Mr Joseph A Heater Semior Coordinator Group Leader Ms Sue Borawski Coordinator Mr Davd M Butchko 1 Mr Akisawa es Ms Borawski 11 s Mr Butchko 9 e Mr Heater 12 11 4
257. D 2 CE CE BG D 2 3 2 4 HVBG BIA D 4 HVBG BIA
258. ul HH 3 41 11 EU d EU 15 3 EU
259. PL ISO 51 CR Stewardship
260. Risk Evaluation 10 4 SR 1 19 10 BS 8000 DIN V19250 EN
261. ee 91 368 99 44 EEC
262. oo e 10 ISO IEC e EC ISO IEC e TSO IEC e
263. ISO 12100 ISO 9000 ISO 14000 PL PL 142 2 JIS f 3 35902
264. 1 e e 2 e BB s
265. 8 CE CE CE CE E 1 CE
266. OFF 5 10 5 10 8 10 le
267. 30 e e 20 2 es 11 e BSI
268. ANST ANSI American National S
269. 1 A C E 2 A D 3 A E 4 A B 5 D 6 D F 5 3 5 4 5 3 5 3 1
270. 18 e 1910 18 e 1910 19 3 C 4 D 1910 21 1910 22 1910 23 1910 24 1910 25 1910 26 1910 27 1910 28 1910 29 1910 30 5 E e 1910 35 e 1910 36 e 1910 37 e 1910 88 o E 6 F
271. 5 3 a EC EN NS EC EN ISO IEC i EN OSHA
272. ISO TC199 ISO TC199 EU ISO 12100 IS j 1 IEC 61508
273. o 1910 1047 B o 1910 1047 C o 1910 1047 D 1910 1048 o 1910 1048 A o 1910 1048 B o 1910 1048 C O Et 1910 1048 D 1910 1048 E 1910 1050 o 1910 1050 A 4 4 o 1910 1050 B o 1910 1050 C o 1910 1050 D o 1910 1050 E
274. 1 2 4 3 a 3 b 3 d 3 c 3 6 3 f G 3 g 5 2 1 A C E 2 A D 3 A E 4 A B 5 D 6 D F 5 4
275. 240V 10 250V E JIS mn REU E 220V 20 220V 230V 200V 50V 220V 10 114 240 10 JIS
276. KAN Web KANMAIL KAN ISO 13564 KAN ISO TC U 8 KAN EU
277. es GM 50 e e es 73 GM GM
278. BSI TUV State of the Arts TEC 61508 1 NR IEC 61508 59 3 1 4 EUCHNER GmbH Co EUCHNER Managing Director Mr Stefan Euchner Export Director Mr Georges Hindi Technical Sales Manager Mr Thomas Rupp Product Manager Mr Jens Rothernburg Mr Euchner 3 1
279. CO Nt CSR CSR CSR 64 5 4 2 1
280. HVBG 370 230 BIA BIA 2000 70 7 BIA 1993 TC79 BIA SICK 1989
281. http www meti go p kohosys press 0004154 index htm1l WG JISC 2 ad 1 a JISC b o 2 a TS Technical Specification b CSB Competent Standadizarion Body ce TS CSB 3 8 b
282. gt 7 h gp hn IEB 6 YY 1 M G YHE G YYHW gt M 1 NZ 7 Tn gt 21 OSI Pg y IVHSO ISNV2 y VYHSO
283. 2 65 3 4
284. PL 2 2 1 1 1
285. AMT Association Manufacturing Technology RIA ANSI ISO IREC C RIA ANSI ISO TC 5
286. 52 TISO IEC TISO IEC TC 3 CEN CRNELEC ISO IEC RU
287. AE JIS 1 JIS 100V 2 ISO CEN 2 16 EE
288. D 2 13 CEN CENELEC
289. Oo E 2003 1 16 3 EU EU EU
290. U 3 4 U 1 U 1 5 UL
291. 1 IBM SICK ER 1 E 2 D 2 CE RA European Economic Area D 1 1
292. There seem to be a lot of people who have been Typically they belong to national standards groups and trade continuously participating in the development of an associations Advantage is they become recognized as experts international standard for a long term in Europe What land may be selected to lead programs and new development kind of organization do they belong to What advantage can they obtain by participating in the standard development for a long term E ANSI In your country is there a system which promotes Promote talent NO but ANSI does offer a short training course talent who can lead international standardization2 Is IThere is not a program or career path mostly dead end in the there a system which utilizes an aged engineer who USA has been related for standardization for many years F
293. 89 391 EEC 16 2 1 EU 89 391 EEC 89 654 EEC 90 270 EEC VDT EC EC 2062 94 EC 95 C246 03
294. gt ANSI R15 06 i
295. F 16 3 21
296. 4 66 6 hl 2 3 4 5 le 7 13 8 31 6 14 5 10 http wwwr sys cs me1 ac JD masao kouer021008 anzen mandara htm
297. BG 6 5 136 5 1 PL
298. 86 295 EBEC 86 296 EEC 86 663 EEC 1 1995 7 1 3 EC 4 EC 1994 1 1 k 2 5 8 The Supply of Machinery Safety Regulation 1992 No 3073 1992 The Supply of Machinery Safety Amendment Regulation 1994 No 2963 1994 5 No 8073 1992 1993 1 1 No 2963 1994 1994 9 1 No 3073
299. 25 5 121 C
300. NN e TSO 9000
301. CE EN EU ISO ISO EU 600 EN ISO ISO TC199 NWIP New Work Item Proposal WG6 1992 ISO
302. E PL 1 State of the Art CE
303. D 1 No BMW TU V BG 1 D 1 EUCHNER CE BG BG TUV D 2 6 CE
304. HH 5 3 6 1 2 mo HH
305. Has an economical impact of the machinery safety NO standard been analyzed 105 2 IA US How does machinery safety standard relate to Maybe it should but not a typical concern of industry in the US Corporate Social Responsibility of the private company B US Was Machinery safety standard effective to decrease Standards used to implement the Directive are useful but not yet work accidents related to the machine in your fully recognized in the USA country Do you think the product at a still low safety level to be used if there is no Machinery Directive C B11
306. 5 vl 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 a 4 b c d 1 e 2 f 3 4 21 9 h CE 4 4 EU 3 EU 4 2 4 5
307. B 2 4 C 3 a D 3 b 3 d E 3 c 3 e 3 h F 3 f 3 h G 3 9 5 EU
308. 5 SE 501 b
309. A B C D E F G H I J K ISO TC199 4 2 2 4 1 4 2 4 3 1 0 EU i
310. BG OK ABC A
311. EN 775 ISO 10218 ANST RIA R15 06 1999 ISO 10218 JIS
312. 2 JIS JIS ISO IEC
313. 5 4 6 1 2 3
314. A B C D E F G H J K ISO TC199 4 2 2 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 3 A
315. CSR CSR 2 2 2 5 3 2 1 oO L
316. BE 34 E gt 0 c
317. 132 H H UL UL UL UL CE TCE CCC UL
318. 2 2
319. AMT ANSI B11 RIA ANS1 R15 U 2 ANST 3 ANSI Procedures SDO 22 U 2 U 2 U 2 AMT 3 70 70 ANSI
320. RU ISO IEC ISO EC B
321. 85 10 HRA 1999 35 LA NY 3 2 TSO14001 1SO 9000 v 7 HRA
322. J RIA UL Underwriters Laboratories CSA Canadian Standards Association 20 GM 75 RIA
323. D 4 6 D 4 4 ISO 12100 E 1 CE A
324. GM ANSI RIA ASC Accredited Standard Commit ion
325. U 1 U 1 ANSI ANSI SDO Standard Development Organization RIA SDO U 2 U 2 GM U 2
326. 1 7 3 1 7 4 1 1 2 ESR ESR E 1 1 2
327. 1984 12 12 EU 93
328. 7 E 1 HSE Health amp Safety Executive 2 19 Corporate Scnence and Analytical Services Directorate Mr Richard Wilson E 2 Mak It Saf Consultancy 2 20 Mr PaulMakin ISO TC199 D 1 TUV Automotive 2 23 Mr Gunter Greil Mr Alfred Beer D 2 EUCHNER GmbH Co 2 24 Managing Director Mr Stefan Euchner Export Director Mr Georges Hindi Technical Sales Manager Mr Thomas Rupp Product Manager Mr Jens Rothernburg D 3 SICK AG 2 25 Division Industrial Safety Systems Ms Heike Haarmann D 4 KAN 2 26 KAN Deputy Head of Secretariat IMr Werner Sterk HBVG BIA Prof Dr Dietmar Reinert 3 1 2 U 1 RBI Robotic I
329. 1000 1990 NPO BG BG BIA 80 90 BG a i i BG 2000 Dr D EU
330. 2 EU EU EU 2 3 2 2 1 E A 12 1 i E 2 9
331. 3 4 CSR CSR CSR 1 5 CSR CSR 2
332. 600V 36 ITE Information Technology 1 NH ITE
333. U 2 U 2 U 2 2 U 8 7 NN 0 50 U 3 500 oo
334. 2 1 OK
335. i 5 1 1 A C E 2 A D 3 A E 4 A B 5 D 6 D F 5 3 5 4 1 1 1 JIS JIS ISO
336. OSHA OSHA ANSI 1 3
337. e 68 3 1 6 KAN KAN Commission for Occupational Health and Safety and Standardization 1 KAN Deputy Head of Secretariat Mr Werner Sterk HBVG BIA Prof Dr Dietmar Reinert s HVBG BG Berufsgenossenschaftilches s BIA Berfsgenossenschaften Institute fur Arbeitsschutz 35 HVGB e HVBG HV Haptverband der geverblichen
338. x lt ISO IEC IEC
339. 67 Safexpert 10 Safexpert s Safexpert e 3 4 e e 800 2 300 1 es 18
340. E TC199 TC199 0 0
341. AMT 70 70 ANSI JIS ISO IRC EN ISO IEKC AMT ISO IEC 70
342. Ls ISO 12100 143
343. U OSHA U 3 OSHA OSHA OSHA U 2 U 3 EE E OSHA U 3 3 1
344. e 1910 66 o 1910 66 A o 1910 66 B o 1910 66 C 1 II III o 1910 66 D 1910 67 e 1910 68 7 G e 1910 94 e 1910 95 o 1910 95 A o 1910 95 B o 1910 95 C o 1910 95 D o 1910 95 E o 1910 95 T o 1910 95 G o 1910 95 o 1910 95 1 e 1910 96 1910 1096 e 1910 97
345. i 8
346. 2 40 3 3 1 3 1 1 HSE HSE Health amp Safety Executive HSE Corporate Science and Analytical Services Directorate Mr Richard Wilson 1 HSE s HSE
347. E es E 100 es EE e e E e e E JIS ISO
348. e Dr Laurance ISO TC184 2 RIA e RIA ANSI ASD Accredited Standards Developer R15 R15 06 e RIA s ANS8I R15 06 RIA Web 3
349. 37 gt 0I OSI SIT 7 S 1 OSI IS SIP Y P 7 MH E Cm IEH 8 ISNV P12 VHSO Es JE gt 9 1 OSI
350. ANST RIA R15 06 1999 RIA Robotic Industries Association TSO ISO ANST RIA R15 06 ISO 10218 141 5 12 1 ANSI RIA R15 06 UL UL 1740
351. ILO ILO PL 2 0 50
352. 8 10 1960 H
353. Who is investing to establish the organization Private funding C Does the organization also have equipment which In some cases examines whether to conform the standard OSHA National Recognized Testing Laboratories NRTL ls there a system which recognizes the certification Yes OSHA has a program for National Recognized Testing organization Laboratories NRTL E Is there a system which gives the qualification of the person who certifies it What kind of system is it in case of being F Is there a system which promotes the person who certifies it G
354. We have heard for a lot of private companies in Europe to be participating in ISO IEC TC positively Does your company participate positively C What is the advantage that the private company which positively participates in ISO IEC TC obtains A In your company is there a post which takes charge speclializing in the standard B In your company is there a system which promotes talent who can lead international standardization Is there a system which utilizes an aged engineer who has been related for standardization for many years Might the cost of the product become high by standardization D PR Please let us know if the safety of the product is put out forward and
355. 3 2 1 2 2 2
356. IEC 61946 TC 126 e CE ASME CE Q amp A 5 e JIS IEC e
357. e Oo lt 80 g
358. es KAN Komiission Arbattsschutz und Normung HVBG HVBG 49 e s BG KAN NN BG e BG 100 e BG e DIN CEN CENELECj e DIN BG 300 700
359. BG 1 KAN 72 3 2 3 2 1 RIA RIA Robotic Industries Association RIA Robotic Industries Association Director Standards Development Mr Jeff Fryman General Motors Corporation Regulatory Liaison Global Safety Mr Michael A Taubitz Laurance Assocates Consulting Neal Laurance Ph D 1 e Mr Jeff Fryman RIA Mr Taubitz GM 39
360. CREN CENELEC 7 EC EC gt Z WO 6 1a1 I OLM n NIQ i 4 1g1 N39 N OSI i CL a
361. 6 GSG EC CE 14 Neunte Verordnung zum Geratesicherheitsgesetz Maschinenverordnung Ninth Regulation to the GSG lt Regulation on Machinery gt GSG 9 lt gt 1993
362. 4 2002 38 1 9 1 EU 100 2 3 1 SICK STI
363. 4 TH 2 8 12 ST 1 ST 46 ST 14
364. Mr Paul Makin Mak It Saf Consultancy 1 Mr Paul Makin e 1974 Institute of Mechanical Engineering e 1974 HSE HSE es 1984 HSE Mr Richard Wilson s HSE e 983 es BSI CEN e 1991 ISO TC199 ISO IEC
365. RR BG E BG HSE HSE 2 HSE A B 100 lll ES C RM ISO 12100 1996
366. E 2 E 2 E 2 CFSE Certify Functional Safety Engineering CFSC 0 Functional Safety Company D 1 D 1
367. C EU 2 C C C V
368. C ul rr k 1 ME C SN 120
369. It 5
370. E KAN on 51 BG KAN BG 50 50 D 4 HVBG BG BG HVBG BIA 3 1 D 4 EN BG D D 4 BG KAN
371. 1800 1 4 3 24
372. 25 e 4 56 3 1 3 TUV Automotive TUV Automotive Mr Gunter Greil Mr Alfred Beer 1 TUV TUV Automotive TUV 2001 IQSE e TUV 4 TUV
373. 9 g 47 LZ VELIN EL 9 6 1 1 1 1 1 6 6 3 3 1 3 1 1
374. Safexpert Safexpert EU EN 1 2 Safexpert
375. 200 1985 12 19 JETTA 4 CIAJ JEIDA EIAJ ETAJ 0 11 _ VCCI 11 2 VCCI VCCI 3 Equipment ITE TTE 4 TFT
376. 21 JISC 21 ii 2 JISC
377. ANSI ISO EU U 1 U 1 U 1 RIA UL Underwriters Laboratories CSA Canadian Standards Association
378. 2 E
379. BSI 38 WG 1 ST 12 CE e CE CE s e es
380. E 100 1 51 PPMA Process Packaging Manufacture Association e e e
381. Mr John Bloodgood 1 JFB Enterprises Mr John F Bloodgood P E Mr John F Bloodgood Bloodgood 1983 AMT Association for Manufacturing Technology RIA Robotic Industries Association ANSI ISO IEC IEC TC44 ANSI ANSI SDO Standard Development Organization RIA SDO ANSI SDO
382. NPO CSR CSR 3 ISO TC199 TC199 NPO 51
383. 1910 1028 B 1910 1028 C O O O O 1910 1028 D o 1910 1028 E 1910 1029 o 1910 1029 A o 1910 1029 B 1910 1030 1 o 1910 10830 A BB 1910 1043 o 1910 1043 A 1910 1043 B I 1910 1043 B II 1910 1043 B III 1910 1043
384. 2 TSO13856 3 3 TSO14118 Ed1 2000 09 1SO14119 Ed1 1996 05 TSO14120 Ed1 2002 02 TSO14121 Ed1 1999 02 1SO14122 1 Ed1 2001 05 1 2 ISO14122 2 Ed1 2001 05 2 1S014122 8 Ed1 2001 05 3 1SO FDIS14122 4
385. CEO What is the official position of the person who signs It is signed by the CEO for the self declaration of the CE mark When the CE mark is signed has the person joined some insurance systems 104 Robotic Industries Association IDirector Standards Development Jeff Fryman A Do the people of the machine industrial world in your country think that standardization leads to strengthening international industrial power B ANSI ISO IEC US ISO Is there movement to advance the adjustment of ANSIIYes there is some movement Yes problem is the US committee and ISO IEC for the standardization of Ma
386. 1 4 1 4 1 JIS JISC JIS JIS 1 4 2 JIS 4 Q IEC 6100 4 2 4 2
387. 13 6 18 8 14 4 14 4 g JIS 14 14 6 JISC WG WG WG mp PP 14 7 16 1 15 6 17
388. G G 3 129 E G 2003 9 G 200 G
389. MTL UL UL IEC 61496 UL AMT ANSI B11 B11 24 TR Technical Report 78 RIA ANSI R15 NEPA NFPA 79 IEC 60204 1
390. i 2 e e gt TT Qr 124 1 12 5 4 D
391. 1 PL lt 50 E N
392. EU c d CE CE Managing director CEO CE 12 3 2 3 2 1
393. HSE SIAS 2003 3rd International Conference Safety of Industrial Automated System SIAS2003 INRS 2 BSI HSE 0 J J a mil 1 137
394. gt Y 6H GH O OSI Hf 1 BM 0 MY Y N 9 9 ER Ee 3 qw 0 1 N O N O Q g 1HY
395. NR GUIDE 51 1999 2 ISO 12100 EN292 Ni 3
396. U 1 10 1 4 E U 1 U 1 U 1 GM U 2 1
397. Y Y 7 gt 1 C A ENZ Y hg y 1 G SN 2 Y WM d NF gt WWY 2 A7 Y Td I 4 2 g 2 224 WE 4 N E
398. 5 15 3 115 17 18 JIS Oo JIS f AA
399. U 1 U 1 10 U 1 U 1 OSHA U 2
400. Yes that s why the industry has a lot of interest into the ISO and IEC activities Absolutely Clear and defined specifications help the manufacturer to develop efficient products for the world market Basically it is not a worked out systems The criteria are know how and experience That s a very important issue But I feel that I have to say yes and that s pity lega live Regarding to the lega live in practice safety is more a topic behind the stage 9001 14001 Tm not sure I guess the topics 9001 and 14001 are not so serious and for customer benefit as machinery safety 96 3 IA
401. 58 5 3 4 1 1 2
402. CNCA 01C004 2001 CNCA 01C005 2001 CNCA 01C006 2001 CNCA 01C007 2001 CNCA 01C008 2001 CNCA 01C009 2001 NCA 01C010 2001 NCA 01C011 2001 NCA 01C012 2001 NCA 01C013 2001 NCA 01C014 2001 NCA 01C015 2001 NCA 01C016 2001 A WCA 01C017 2001 CA 01C018 2001 CA 01C019 2001 CA 01C020 2001 CA 01C021 2001 CA 01C022 2001 CA 02C023 2001 CA 02C025 2001 CA 02C026 200
403. es 90 1 3 e 4 4 e e EP e SICK EUCHNER 13 e EN292 EN 292 2 e EN 292 RR
404. 1910 146 B 1910 146 C 1910 146 D 1910 146 1910 146 F Du E O O O OO O 20 e 1910 147 o 1910 147 A 11 K e 1910 151 o 1910 151 A e 1910 152 12 L 1910 155
405. WTO TBT JISC 1 ISO TC199 1EC TC44
406. REU DTI Department of Trade and Industry HSE DTIT HSE 42 3 HSE
407. U 2 AMT ISO IEC U 2 ISO IEC 2 U 2 2 ISO IEBC 2 U 2 1SO IEC
408. e e es 2 64 3 1 5 SICK AG SICK 1 Division Industrial Safety Systems Ms Heike Haarmann SICK SICK 3 600 40
409. Appendix IV CE CE 4 BIA
410. EN EU EU ISO WTO TBT ISO EU ISO JIS EU EC zs 2 3 1 Regulations EU
411. NORTAL U 2 25 UL E EU U 2 OSHA National Recognized Testing Laboratories NRTL 6 10
412. Q 1910 251 1910 252 1910 253 1910 254 1910 255 R 1910 261 1910 262 1910 263 1910 264 1910 265 1910 266 o 1910 266 A o 1910 266 o 1910 266 C TSO 1910 267 1910 268 1910 269 o 1910 269 A o 1910 269 B o 1910 269 C o 1910 269 D o 1910 269 E 1910 272 o 1910 272 A o 1910 272 B o 1910 272 C S 1910 301 1910 302 1910 803 1910 304 1910 805
413. 2 E 30 000 15 80 000 M EX I 3 4 2 30 000 ES E 1 MTTF R E E
414. EU EN ISO IEC CEN CENELEC ISO EC BSI ISO CEN ISO TC199 ISO
415. D 4 DIN CRN CRENELEC ISO IREBC BG D 4 D 4 KAN EN ISO IEC D 4 EN ISO IEC 14 D 4 1
416. 6 4 1 2 3 4 2 1 JISC 13 8 1 A B C
417. CE REA European Economic Area CE EUCHNER CRE CE CE CE BG
418. NA 60 10 1 7 3 5 PS 40 40 A 5000 112
419. 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 1 ESR ESR 2 ESR
420. 3 20
421. E SG Safety Goods ml SG 12 12 1 http www sg mark org
422. EU EU sl
423. BG GS GS GS CE GS EMC GS PL EUCHNER PL
424. EN EN CEN TC144 WG1 WG6 EN ISO EN TSO 12100 EN a Se ISO 12100 ISO 12100 EN EN ISO TC199 ISO TC199 ISO EN CEN TC199
425. EX 1 2 j ml TSO13855 Ed1 2002 02 ISO18856 1 Ed1 2001 08 1 ANY2DAUN20SA02H7 AKO 52 TSO183856 2
426. IEC 60204 1 NEPA ISO IEC OSHA ISO IEC ISO IEC 1
427. ISO 12100 CD ROM ISO ISO TC184 SC2 WG ANSI
428. 10 nm GS B GS 69 3000 BG GS GS GS 20 ee
429. 140 ANSI 2 ANSI ANSI GM CE
430. 1910 806 1910 307 1910 308 1910 309 1910 880 1910 331 1910 332 1910 333 1910 334 1910 885 1910 336 1910 398 1910 399 O 8S A 22 21 22 23 24 25 o 8 B O 8 C 20 T 1910 401 1910 402 1910 410 1910 420 1910 421 1910 422 1910 423 1910 424 1910 425 1910 426 1910 427 1910 430 1910 440 1910 441 O A O TT
431. EUCHNER EUCHNER 1953 8 Mr Rupp Mr Hindi Mr Rothernburg 50 1dentification MHI
432. MHI EUCHNER EUCHNER http www mazak co jp index j html ORM EUCHNER E v http www solton co p 60 40 EUCHNER
433. ee 13 86 1
434. ISO TC199 ANST IEEE 146 12 5 13 EU EU
435. OSHA 4 U 1 OSHA ANSI ANSI E E OSHA 1 U 2 EE Tederal Standards Regulation OSHA CER29 CFR Code of Federal Reguration CFR29 1800 1810 U 2
436. 17 E 1 E 1 95 E 1 TUV ISO 17025 D 1 BG D 1 TUV BSI DEMPCO T U V D 1 BG
437. 8 9 E HIH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH MEBBBB BMN 1 LN TA NR 1 1 1 TS 3 2 WMBMHHBUH 5 2 6 5 22 HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH onoeoeeeew 7 3 NOOOOOO ODDO 10 31 BMMID 10 32 OOOOOOOOOO DOOD OO 13 33 ODDO DOD 21 34 OOOOOOD ODODE 28 4 NOOO 32 B BMMEHHMIIMBMH 32 BIBBBI
438. IS ISO METI 100 18SO 4 TSO IEC EN
439. 2001 6 1 o b PL 1
440. 4 1 3 2 1000 E
441. SR CEC CEN CENELEC Harmonised European Standard CE IT V E IV
442. o 1910 1020 A o 1910 1020 B NIOSH RTECS 1910 1025 1910 1025 A 1910 1025 B O O O 1910 1025 C 1910 1027 1910 1025 D 1910 1027 1910 1027 B 1910 1027 C E 1910 1027 D 1910 1027 E O O O OO O 1910 1028 1910 1027 1910 1028
443. EN 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 ISO EN TSO EN ISO EN EN CEN EN EN ISO WTO TBT ISO ISO EN 2 2 2 EU BN CEN
444. NH CE BG BG TUV BG TH 61 10 1 CE BG BG EUCHNER BG TUV BG TUV BG BG
445. kk 18 2 8 26 2 9 i 39 2 Ek MH 1 2 sk 41 3 SE NN NG i 41 3 2 000 SS NPDI2IADSS2SINSS2OC2SO Np 73 kk 87 Sl2 lt 1 1 108 BA 108 DAE 79 117 CE 120 BA DE A 125 ee 127 S56 EE NN I tS 128 BR CE NN Na nia ip 129 BO Ca pe KERSKERAZSSDH03AESRG 131 OE RE NN 2AR 134 5 0 NN AN Th 137 5 NNE SCREEN 140 5Al2 NR 142 5 8 EN EC ia OT Toss 147 4 ISOTCE199 REE h lk 2 1 2 151 6 LL Dn Da 154 IT 2 424 4 24 8 2 2 kk 38 83 1 I8SO kk 75 1 EU 17 A Uk 1 WTO TBT
446. EU BMC ISO TC ISO IEC TSO IS8S0O 49 EU
447. UL UL UL UL 8 UL
448. 3 2 3 8 4 2 4 5 5 5 2 5 3 5 4 54 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 a 4
449. 6 3 4 7 3 2 3 2 1 2 EU E
450. J fiZ A 2 7 M7 G n D gt 1 6 6 7 Y 8 0 9 MI N P
451. o 1910 1001 1 o 1910 1001 1910 1002 1910 1003 13 4 1910 1004 1910 1005 1910 1006 1910 1007 3 3 1910 1008 1910 1009 1910 1010 1910 1011 4 1910 1012 1910 1013 1910 1014 2 1910 1015 4 23 1910 1016 _N 1910 1017 o 1910 1017 A 1910 1018 o 1910 1018 A o 1910 1018 B o 1910 1018 C 1910 1020
452. o 1910 134 B 1 o 1910 134 B 2 o 1910 134 C OSHA o 1910 134 D 1910 135 1910 186 1910 1837 1910 188 1910 189 O 1 A O 1 B 10 J 1910 141 1910 142 1910 143 1910 144 1910 145 o 1910 145 A E o 1910 145 B E e 1910 146 1910 146 A
453. 0 EU
454. 1 3 3 1 4 1 4 2 4
455. EU EU 32
456. 128 4 5 7 G 1 F F 3 v F NEDO IEC TC44 IEC 500 METT 1 ISO 1000 13000
457. 2 e HRA es e HRA 2 960 270 1975 1990 e HRA e e 3
458. UM Op h CE CE 52 CE
459. 1 JIS JIS TSO IEC a b a JIS 56 2 3 4 2 2 2 fh
460. 1910 121 1910 122 1910 123 1910 124 1910 125 1910 126 9 1I 1910 132 e 1910 133 e 1910 134 O O O O DW O O OO O H o 1910 134 A
461. IEC 1 E CISPR 1979 FCC 2 E 4 JBMA E CISPR Publication 22 1981 1985 12 1 JEIDA
462. JIS JIS 1 1 4 4 JIS JTS JIS 2 2 1 2 1 1 WTO TBT WTO
463. PR Please let us know if the safety of the product is put Sorry but this question is not understood out forward and there is a case used for PR of the product or the enterprise E ISO9001 ISO14001 9 Do you have an idea of constructing the management system about Machinery safety as well as ISO9001 and ISO14001 93 3 A Was Machinery Directive effective to decrease work accidents related to the machine in your country Do you think the product at a still low safety level to be used if there is no Machinery Directive 1 2 Sub Question 1 Yes see statistics Sub Question 2 No because this would be in collision with German law B PL
464. C TSO9000 ISO14000 EU EU 8 S C C
465. 2 CNCA JIS
466. PL What meaning does confirm Machinery safety standardlIf the product is confrom to the mchinery guidline the lawers state have from the standpoint of Product Liability Law or Ithat done yourjob as manufacturer well The insurance companies insurance do the same A How is new technological development in the machine field done The private company does originally It does as industry the academic organization and the government agency cooperate B Who invests the cost of development when jointly developing C To propose a new technology to an international Sometimes standa
467. ZTE E Y 031 OSI SI VdN 1n ISNV Y 3 3 0 Z 2Z gt OS al N P Z 1 0SIPI N O 31 OSI N RR gt 9 CG EIC 1 N N39 2 lt E E 6 1USUUBIJBdJ UBSdOJn eonSnF JO no ug
468. re CE 95 5 BG TUV UL EU CE 5 EU
469. 135 5 A PSDI LCR 3 Br NN NE
470. Z Tn IANL 0 gt 1 gt M 7 V 9 NZ W G6PJ gt 0 C 2 e 7 P 3 9 1 19 6 BYH gt 4 gt C1 ND l Y n Y
471. 1 OK RUCHNER 2 EUCHNER 1 4 4 EUCHNER 1 po TUV TUV BG
472. ANSI RIA UL i UL A RIA RIA ANST RIA R15 06
473. ST 1 1 2 30 34 MR 1 112 b 3
474. UL NN CE EC UL EU 1 EN60950 IEC60590 UL60950 UL TC UL JETITA UL UL EC DEMKO 1997 UK st OY UL UL ON
475. 4 5 SG a 1 21 30 56 39 8 14
476. E 10 1000 H 3 4
477. bB GT G dTS 2 I OSI 2 46 Y gt GET 6 Y L 666L LCL LOSI 000ZZ0Z6d SIF 48 4 5 4 5 1 1 5 EU i
478. 12 HSE DTI HSE DTIT 1992 1995 3 CE Soft Implementation Type Test
479. 5 10 KAN KAN D KAN KAN EN k BG KAN ISO IEC EN EU
480. EU HSE HSE EU 1 2
481. GM ANSI ANSI
482. ISO 12100 EU EU 10 BU
483. TBT TBT Ce 2 1 2 ISO CEN IEC CENELEC 2 EN ISO TEC
484. http www vcci or jp N
485. 52 13 14 15 RC
486. 8 CE CE CE CE U 2 CE AMT RIB U 2 3 3 4 27 3 4 2001 8 1
487. HVBG BG BG 1 BG KAN KAN KAN 1994 18 71 1 5 FE 5 DIN 1 VEA HVBG 1 17
488. b d 1 8 2 f 3 2 4 21 h CE 4 4 EU 3 EU 4 2 4 5 A 1 B 2 4 C 3 a D 3 b 3 d E 3 c 3 e F 3 D G
489. 800 4200 oo BG 35 25 BIA BIA BG
490. E 1 Me ISO 12100 3 DO E 2 5 CE 95 BG TUV CE UKAS DTI E 1 TUV
491. 10 1 1 6 8 E 7 IEC 3 4 4 1
492. 3 10 H ISO 9000 TSO 9000 JQA ISO 9000 E S JQA JET H gt
493. 56 HH EE 5
494. 10 1 In atest house as TUV there are many different groups involved in standard committees Maybe one out of ten of our employees is a commitee member Tchnical Certifiers We have no certain system to promote talents This is based on experience and skill of the employees Generally members of committess are group managers or technical certifiers Depends on the product PR Yes every certificate will be used for PR IEC61508 There are certain requirements for management systems in IEC 61508 and similar standards 99 3 A BG s BIA
495. 63 5 4 5 4 1 1 JIS 8 2 2 2 3 2 2 4 2 5 2 JIS 2 EU 1H
496. 100 E 2 E 2 2 E 2 A B E 2 E 2
497. BG D 4 BIA D 4 KAN D 4 D 2 20 3 3 3 3 1
498. EN397 1972 EN 149 1SO TOC94 1989 BG WG WG1 EN 1995 BIA ee 8 CEN TC158 2001 EN12415 FE BG
499. Fx NT a 4 4 7 EP i 1 ri M 7 9 2 Wer WM EH 44 4 3 1 5lle A ISO 12100 B C a 2 2 2 2 2 TSO IEC 2001 6 1
500. HSE CE CE CE 1 Re i CE
501. ISO12100 EU UL NEPA Loss Prevention Counc
502. 1 2 3 12 a
503. CE 6 CE 7 8 CE CE CE 2 1 3 2 4
504. e 1910 98 8 H 1910 101 1910 102 1910 103 1910 104 1910 105 1910 106 1910 107 1910 108 1910 109 19 1910 110 1910 111 1910 112 1910 113 1910 119 1910 119 A 1910 119 B 1910 119 C 1910 119 D E e 1910 120 1910 120 A 1910 120 B 1910 120 C 1910 120 D 1910 120
505. 8 SS 2 gt 1 i A
506. E 1 DD E h 16 RR E 1 E 1 EN 1050 E 2 E 2 0 BG D 1 BG 100
507. Oo 2 2 M 35 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 14 VCCI 1 HH 1985 9
508. 2003 2000 1 EU METCON Confederation of British Industry Engineering Employers Federation REF MECON British 45 17 18 19 Fluid Power Association A B IEC TC44
509. B2 Safety Related Device s C EN 12417 e CEN 600 A B 150 C 470 63 15 e e C Mr Rothenburg EC
510. 3 CEN EN EU Oounail of Minister Council of Minister WG 2 8 WG dn RE i ti 13 Annex EN 292 1ISO 12100
511. 50 G G FE
512. AC50V AC1000V DC75V 1500V 2 3 EN 26 EN60065 EN60742 EN60950
513. e ISO Guide 51 ISO TAG Technical Advisory Group e 1991 EU e EU 2002 2002 ISO TC199 es HSE 1995 2 es e 1985 3
514. 1 NECA IEC WG NWTI New Work Item IEC TC44 TC65 IRC IEC IEC
515. 3 2 8 4 1 2 TVD AIMD
516. JIS 2 CSB JIS 1 3 3 TS CSB TS CSB TS CSB JIS JISC a b c d e
517. TC 1 1 WG E 1 WG 151 CEN TC199 TC199 30 5 1 NN VDMA
518. Web wwmwr osha gov BMW v HRA 3 8 OSHA
519. b c 3 1 3 2 1 1 8 0 2 5 h oo mo a 39
520. 1 4 4 E E EE 4 F 2 2 4 v 2 A 30 000 1 8 104 4 lt HH
521. 44 13 14 15 16 EU HSE 2
522. 1 Uaborer inspector WG BSI HSE WG IBM 2 HH
523. EU OSHA e 81 1 12 13 TISO 12100 ISO 14121 TSO 13849 IEC 60204 1 ISO IEC 10 TSO IEC
524. RU 24 EC E e EU Supply of Machinery Regulation EU 55 e e EU
525. e 30 e No 1 58 2 es NECA http www neca or jp e F B ee NECA 70 e CCC
526. 0 10 EU
527. 15 17 15 GO 16 3 AH a
528. DH EC E 1993 Sl 86 296 EEC 86 663 EEC 12 31 1 1 12 31 IV 13 13 1995 7
529. EU EU 0 2 j EU EU HH 10 BU
530. 3 e 4 8 13 EC 1 2 1992 1994 86 295 EEC 86 296 EEC i 1995 12 31 CENELEC FEM 4 CEN ORGALIME E TUTB lt EU 3
531. 1 es e ISO TC e es ERHS OK e e C O
532. 1 3 Y Ek EE SS 2 P gt a 30 Xy gt 0 y gt Y rifiAZ 9 3 7 gt yy lt 4 2 9 gt ND y gt 1 C 5 1 2 Y
533. 6 1 3 73 F 9 a amp 2 2 gt Y 0 Y IMAH Y EE EE Y fi
534. B U V W X Y Z 1910 1000 1910 1000 Z 1 Z1 1910 1000 ZZ 2 1910 1000 Z3 Z 3 1910 1001 o 1910 1001 A OSHA o 1910 1001 B o 1910 1001 C o 1910 1001 D o 1910 1001 E o 1910 1001 o 1910 1001 o 1910 1001 HH
535. 45 Er I Em 74 2 EU 3 a 2 a a a H 1 E rm E
536. H e UL e 1000 e 4 131
537. A o 1910 177 B NHTSA e 1910 178 o 1910 178 A 1910 179 1910 180 1910 181 1910 183 1910 184 15 O 1910 211 1910 212 1910 213 1910 214 1910 215 1910 216 1910 217 o 1910 217 A o 1910 217 B o 1910 217 C OSHA O O O O
538. C B 1910 1043 D oO O O oO oO Oo o 1910 1043 E 1910 1044 1 2 E 3 o 1910 1044 A DBCP o 1910 1044 B DBCP o 1910 1044 C 1910 1045 DBCP 1910 1045 1910 1045 B 1910 1045 C O O O 1910 1045 D 1910 1047 o 1910 1047 A 24
539. CAD s e INSTRON STRUCTURE TESTING SYSTREMS s HRA 83 HRA
540. Was Machinery Directive effective to decrease work Yes the machinery directive influences the safety safety is accidents related to the machine in your country Do lincreasing NOt all but some companies would have lower safety you think the product at a still low safety level to be without machinery directive used if there is no Machinery Directive B PL What meaning does confirm Machinery safety standard INo influence have from the standpoint of Product Liability Law or insurance A How is new technological development in the machine We dont understand this question field done The private company does originally It does as industry the academic organization and the government agency cooperate B Who invests the cost of development when jointly Every partner developing
541. 1910 1051 1 3 1910 1051 A 1 3 1910 1051 B 1 83 1910 1051 C 1 8 1910 1051 D 1 83 1910 1051 1910 1051 1910 1052 o 1910 1052 A o 1910 1052 B o 1910 1052 C 1910 1096 1910 1200 O O O OO O o 1910 1200 A o 1910 1200
542. 4 ISO14123 1 Rd1 1998 04 1 1SO14123 2 Ed1 1998 04 2 TSO14159 Ed1 2002 04 TSO WD TR18569 TSO11161Ed1 1994 2 IEC TC144 IEC 60204 1 Ed 4 1997 10 1 IEC 60204 11 Ed 1 2000 07 11 1000Va c 1500Vd c 36kV IEC 60204 31 Ed 3 2001 11 31 2
543. ANSI OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Admin Federal Standards Regulations OSHA CFR29 CFR Code of Federal Regulation CFR29 1800 1810 MTL
544. CEN ISO 12100 State of Art State of Art Technology
545. DEMPCO TUV BG TUV CFSE Certify Functional Safety Engineering CFSC Certify Functional Safety Company NE
546. JIS C 1000 4 2 JIS C 61000 4 2 3 JTS 14 7 JIS 250 DD 1 4 3 JIS
547. UKAS UKAS DTIT tl ISO 9000 EIN 4500 Re TUV A EE
548. 5 3 5 4 6 6 1
549. ANSI UL ISO IEC What is the standard of Machinery safety mainly Machine tools covered by the B11 series of national standards applied to the industry in the United States D OSHA Does the standard have substantial binding authority INO standards are strictly voluntary OSHA is the binding What are grounds of the binding authority authority and they have their own regulations 106 UL a private company 100 CSA In your country is there an organization which Although not required UL a private company has been doing this certifies it concerning Machinery Safety Is it a for over 100 years The CSA and now some European notified private corporation or is it a public service bodies have entered the marketplace corporation 2
550. es 1984 EU EU Single Market e CEN CENELEC IEC BSI se 1988 BS 5304 Safety of Machinery 1974 s 1984 EU 47 1984 EU 1 EU
551. 4 5 6 21
552. B o 1910 1200 C o 1910 1200 D o 1910 1200 E 1910 1201 1910 1450 o 1910 1450 A 1910 1450 B 25 2 8 2 8 1 EC 1 EC 73 23 EEC 89 392 EEC EMC 89 336 EEC 93 42 EEC 907885 EEC 91 263 EEC E 87 404 EEC 88 378 EEC 90 396 EEC 92 42 EBEC 89 686 EEC 89 106 EEC 90 384 EEC 2 8 2 1 1997 1 1 1995 1 1 1996 1 1 1996 6 14 1995 1 1 1992 7 1 1990 1 1 1996 1 1 1998 1 1 1995 7 11 1991 7 1 2003 1 1
553. C To propose a new technology to an international No there is no influence from the government standard can positive support is received from the government 103 5 IA At which stage is the risk assessment executed in the We are no machine builders development process of the machine Is the risk assessment done in accordance with Machinery safety standard Is the risk assessment effective to the safety level securing the machine Besides is there a method of the idea as better B Could you let us know the sample case that the risk assessment was done A CE
554. EN EU E 1 E
555. IEC 61496 1 Ed 1 1997 08 1 IEC 61496 2 Ed 1 1997 11 2 TIEC 61496 3 Ed 1 2001 02 3 TEC 61496 4 4 IEC 62046 IEC 62061 2 8 7 UL UL Machine EE EE EE 22 541 551 561 664 751 763 982 Vending Machines Amusement and Gaming Machines Refrigerated Vending Machines Transformer Type Arc Welding Machines Floor Hinishing Machines Commercial Dry Cleaning Machines Type IV Motor Operated Commercial Food Preparing Machines Moto
556. ISO9001 ISO14001 Do you have an idea of constructing the management system about Machinery safety as well as ISO9001 and ISO14001 Yes they do Normally these people are working in the committees for the so named C standards in Europe To have influence on the standards No it is not No there is no system Sometimes yes mostly no We dont understand this question Yes we do 102 3 IA
557. Safexpert EU JTS PDF
558. UL UL e 5 e UL e 2 2 UL e UL 863 es H
559. 1 VII 2 3 EC VI EC VII 9 8 CEC EC
560. 145 TUV s TEC 61508 1IQSE 33 28 4 1 TUV 2
561. 3 e e e GUI SUI Solid User Interface 1996 SUI s
562. 3 9 5 2 1 A C E 2 A D 3 A E 4 A B 5 D 6 D F 5 3 5 4 5 1 5 2 EU MO 6
563. ANSI OSHA 79 OSHA EC EC ANSI OSHA ANSI R15 06 RIA ISO 10218 EU EU Asia European Committee ISO IEC
564. ITE ERN60335 1 EN60835 2 EN60357 2 8 3 1 1 2
565. Normally by private companies sometimes in co operation with academic organisations very seldom sponsored by government Depending to the project This is a private matter 94 5 A 1SO12100 IEC61508 At which stage is the risk assessment executed in the Starting with the concept See ISO 12100 1 2 or IEC 61508 development process of the machine Is the risk assessment done in accordance with Machinery safety standard Is the risk assessment effective to the safety level securing the machine Besides is there a method of the idea as better B Could you let us know the sample case that the risk assessment was done
566. 5 12 BGBI 1993 ILp 704 1993 5 20 2 5 10 1991 Law n 91 1414 Code du Travail Labour Code Public Health Code Decree n 92 765 Decree n 92 766 Decree n 92 767 1992 8 11 1992 12 18 Arrete NB EC 7 15 2 6 EU 2 6 1 EC 2 1 3 1957 EU e
567. 86 655 EEC EEA COM 95 282 95 0155 CNS 89 655 ECC 95 EC EC No 18 95 95 C296 01 EU 89 655 EEC 89 655 EEC 89 656 EEC 95 C262 09 95 C281 04 95 C332 06 95 63 EC 17 2 7 2 7 1 Department of Labor DOL Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act OSHAct 1970
568. BIBBB BBB 32 43 HEE 45 A NN 46 5 49 WBMBRNMBMIMBHIBM BBB 54 Sra 54 52 ODDO 56 5 56 5 NN SO 64 EE CT EE EE EN EE Em 0 EE RO Em PN ME re FE I OO 2 8 NA RT MA OE NIT NNN DOAN ON 0 0 9 SO 29 441HHHHHHHHHHHHHHUHHHHHHHHHH 35 42 ODDO OO 42 43 OO 43 44 DOO 44 5 48 51 ODDO 55 2 63 M RGB 29 2 30 41 ODDOOOOD ODD ODDO 38 42HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH LEH wws 39 4310OOOOOO ODO 40 44 DD 41 1 2 A II kk 1 N21 lt Ne A f 1 li 1 1 2 kk 2 1 3 1 2 0 SS 2 1 4 ki 3 kk 5 bi E h l lt 1 5 85 ON 5 9 EU Is SS NE 6 2 RR RN Rlih hk 7 2 0 2 AH 9 2 6 BU kk 16 2 7
569. CEN 1ISO EU Annex4 54 20 Use Directive e EE Ns EU e 6
570. D 3 18 E 1 E 2 E 9 HVBG BIA D 4 D 4
571. a a y 2 P32 M 7 9 E 7 gt O J NZ 47 E 9 IS 9 v W Y 2 1 CP 7 fi 01 7 Y Y a 4
572. e e e 2 e e
573. e JIS 9 JIS 1 2 1 2 1 JISC ey 1 2 2 JIS i FDIS 1 2 3 JTSC
574. s ISO s SEMI e es SEMI EHS Rnvironmental Health and Safety e SEMI
575. 0 2 8 6 ISO IEC 1 ISO TC199 ISO12100 1 ISO12100 2 ISO NP13848 ISO13849 1 Ed1 1999 11 ISO DIS13849 2 ISO TR13849 100 Ed1 2000 09 100 ISO13849 1 ISO18850 ISO13851 Ed1 2002 03 ISO13852 Ed1 1996 12 E B ISO13853 Ed1 1998 09 ISO13854 Ed1 1996 12 1 28 CB
576. BS LPC LPC NEPA 6 National Fire Protection Association 1896 1930 SG 2
577. EC a i Health Administration v OA NI WO6 OSHA Occupational Safety and OSHA OSHA The Code of Federal Regulation CFR CFR29 29CFR Part1910 29CFR 25 O E
578. LU lt 21 16 17 18 19 o 1910 217 D 1910 218 1910 219 P 1910 241 1910 242 1910 243 1910 244
579. e e lt E BG 2 e e CEN EU CEN Web as Rs Qr 3 16 CE EUCHNER
580. overloadingi Safety technology code 10 GB 13308 1998 11 IGB 13567 1998 Testing method and judging rule of safety to friction spark of metallic material for coal mine 13 GB 15052 1994 Lifting appliances Dangerous positions and signs 14 GB T 15706 1 1995 Safety of machinery Basic concept general principles for design Part 1 Basic terminology methodology 15 IGB T 15706 2 1995 Safety of machinery Basic concepts general principles for design Part 2 Technical principles and specifications 16855 1 1997 ISafety of machinery Safety related parts of control systems Part 1 General principles for design 17 GB T 16856 1997 Safety of machinery Principles for risk assessment 18 GB T 16906 1997 Standard test methods for electrical resistivity of antistatic coating in petroleum tanks 19 GB T 17045 1997 Protection against electric shock Common aspects for installation and equipment Safety of machinery Pressure sensitive protective device Part 1 General principles for the design and testing of pressure sensing mats and pressure sensing floors 21 GB17584 1998 22 IGB17585 1998 23 GB 17586 1998 GB 24 Safety of machinery Permanent means of access to machines and industrial plants Part 1 Choice of a fixed means of access between two levels Safety of machinery Permanent means of access to machines and industrial plants Part 2 Working platforms and gangways B 17888 3 1999 Safety
581. supporting programme of European Standards Ek f 2000 4 620 x f http www jicosh gr jp Japanese countr 1999 8 VCCI 154 y7usa 7index html 2003 CCC
582. with the law is one of the basic requirements in a have from the standpoint of Product Liability Law or court case to show that the manufacturer meets his insurance responsibilities A How is new technological development in the machine The start up is in the most cases through government agencies field done The private company does originally It and insurance bodies The realisation and the real goal comes does as industry the academic organization and the more from the industry government agency cooperate B Who invests the cost of development when jointly There is no clear practice developing C To propose a new technology to an international standard can positive su
583. you relate try to Suva is a nationally operating enterprise diffuse the ISO IEC standard excluding Europe Asian nations especially China and South Korea G Has an economical impact of the machinery safety The European Commission has made an estimation of cost and standard been analyzed benefit when introducing the machinery directive I ignore later research work on this issue A EU Annex A We know that to secure the safety of the machine The machinery safety directive has been transposed into national which circulat
584. your company is there a post which takes charge speclializing in the standard B In your company is there a system which promotes talent who can lead international standardization Is there a system which utilizes an aged engineer who has been related for standardization for many years C Might the cost of the product become high by standardization D PR Please let us know if the safety of the product is put out forward and there is a case used for PR of the product or the enterprise E ISO9001 ISO14001 9 Do you have an idea of constructing the management system about Machinery safety as well as ISO9001 and ISO14001 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG Michael Rehberg ISO IEC
585. 1 CA 02C027 2001 CA 03C028 2001 CA 04C029 2001 NCA 05C030 2001 NCA 06C031 2001 NCA 07C032 2001 2 AV AV AV EMC hml uH EMO EMC ul 31 EEE EE EE EE C CD RG oR Er GD PK EB CP RL CD NCA 08C033 2001 NCA 08C034 2001 CA 08C035 2001 NCA 08C036 2001 CA 08C037 2001 CA 08C038 2001 CA 08C039 2001 CA 08C040 2001 CA 08C041 2001 CA 08C042 2001 CA 08C043 2001 NCA 08C044 2001 NCA 09C045 2001 NCA 09C046 2001 NCA 09C047 2001 2 Il
586. 2 PL State ot the Art Technology D 1 D 1 D 1 3 2
587. 3 ISO IEC 4 4 5 5 1 5 2
588. 9 RMC IEC 60204 32 Ed 1 1998 08 3 32 IEC 61310 1 Ed 1 1995 01 1 IEC 61310 2 Ed 1 1995 01 2 IEC 61810 3 Ed 1 1999 02 8 IEC 61491 Ed 2 2002 11
589. A 5 SCHEMERSAL ln SICK Safexpert 1
590. A CE What is the official position of the person who signs Managing director for the self declaration of the CE mark When the CE mark is signed has the person joined some insurance systems 95 A Do the people of the machine industrial world in your country think that standardization leads to strengthening international industrial power B ISO IEC TC We have heard for a lot of private companies in Europe to be participating in ISO IEC TC positively Does your company participate positively C ISO IEC TC What is the advantage that the private company which positively participates in ISO IEC TC obtains A In
591. HSAS18000 10 e es e ISO IRC e e e
592. IEC a b a JIS vi b 501 1 2
593. SO IEC TC positively Does your company participate positively C ISO IEC TC What is the advantage that the private company which positively participates in ISO IEC TC obtains A In your company is there a post which takes charge speclializing in the standard B In your company is there a system which promotes talent who can lead international standardization Is there a system which utilizes an aged engineer who has been related for standardization for many years Might the cost of the product become high by standardization PR Please let us know if the safety of the product is put out forward and there is a case used for PR of the product or the enterprise D E
594. U EU 3 2 2 CEN CENELEC
595. assessment for machines A CE What is the official position of the person who signs The person takes over the responsibility for the conformity with for the self declaration of the CE mark When the CE the relevant standards It is not related to any insurance system mark is signed has the person joined some insurance systems 101 IEuchner IProduct Manager Bus Systems Jens Rothenburg A Do the people of the machine industrial world in your country think that standardization leads to strengthening international industrial power B ISO IEC TC We have heard for a lot of private companies in Europe to be participating in I
596. ation organization E Is there a system which gives the qualification of the person who certifies it What kind of system is it in F ls there a system which promotes the person who certifies it G Does the occupation called a safety consultant exist Is there a system which recognizes the qualification in case of being Suva Suva provides this service More information can be obtained from http www suva ch en home suvapro zertifizierung zertifizierung sstelle_sces008 htm Suva Suvas own capital Suva For those machinery suva is issuing certificates yes Suva Switzerland has an accreditation system for certification bodies S
597. chinery structure does not mirror the ISO structure safety ls there a factor to obstruct the adjustment when advancing it C ISO IEC TC We have heard for a lot of private companies in Advantage is ability to influence specifications and have an early Europe to be participating in ISO IEC TC positively knowledge of trends and developments in fields of interest What is the advantage that the private company which positively participates in ISO IEC TC obtains D
598. e e 4 e 8 SEMI Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International ISO es SEMI
599. edon uolun UBS9dOJn NN UOISSIUUUUOO 7 OH ugedoJn 0 42 H 4 6 YH I 1d 1 7 Gvw AE 4 G a 0 CE TE TE 4 2 4 LM 43 47 LE lt M PS 6 ISNV 1n 0 VHSO es 12YAISNV Le 3 MM 7 TV ti 1 ISNV nn 9 72 ILLLLLLLLLLT 4 7 ss P gt PL ee 5 NN k ou 1 LT TT TL 0 YH
600. es in EU Machinery Directive has law by each member state That s why the essential safety binding authority What influence does Machinery requirements became binding Annex A states that each Directive give to the risk assessment in the manufacturer has to carry out a risk assessment manufacturing of the machine 2 National laws based on the machinery safety directive also discribe the conformity assessment procedures required to be followed when selling machinery in Europe B How does machinery safety standard relate to Indirectly Safety standards can support the manufacturer to Corporate Social Responsibility of the private comply with legal requirements and grant free circulation of their company machinery within Europe C
601. follow the technical progress closely to recognise technical development at an early stage allowing to act rapidly to market requirements Surprises necessitating subsequent adjustments which might cause considerable cost can be avoided C CEN CENELEC Is there the part assignment between CEN CENELEC IEuropean law refers to harmonised standards as possible means to the government agency the economic group and the comply with the essential safety and health requirements private company to promote the standardization of Europe D
602. gulations may cause strengthening international industrial power serious technical barriers to trade The Safety standards help also to protect users against harm It will also be a significant exoneration in liability court cases All this helps the manufacturer to reduce cost when avoiding to have different models of his machinery for different countries B ISO IEC TC ISO IEC TC We have heard for a lot of private companies in The reasons for investing in standardization work is Europe to be participating in ISO IEC TC positively to influence the content of the standards in order to avoid as far What is the advantage that the private company which las possible specifications increasing the cost of his machinery positively participates in ISO IEC TC obtains to
603. he products we sell assessment was done A CE What is the official position of the person who signs The person s is are responsible for the product product for the self declaration of the CE mark When the CE development mark is signed has the person joined some insurance sure no signing without checking systems 98 TUEV Automotive TUEV Sueddeutschland Group Automation Software and Electronics IQSE Manager Safety A Do the people of the machine industrial world in your country think that standardization leads to strengthening international industrial power B ISO IEC TC We have heard for a lot of private co
604. il 2 1985 LPC Loss Prevention Council LPC 1 LPC LPC BS
605. mpanies in Europe to be participating in ISO IEC TC positively Does your company participate positively C ISO IEC TC What is the advantage that the private company which positively participates in ISO IEC TC obtains A In your company is there a post which takes charge speclializing in the standard B In your company is there a system which promotes talent who can lead international standardization Is there a system which utilizes an aged engineer who has been related for standardization for many years C Might the cost of the product become high by standardization D PR Please let us know if the safety of the product is put out forward and there is a case used for PR of the product or the enter
606. ndustries Association 3 8 Director Standards Development Mr Jeff Fryman General Motors Corporation Regulatory Liaison Global Safety Mr Michael A Taubitz Laurance Assocates Consulting Dr Neal Laurance U 2 JFB Enterprises 3 9 10 Mr John F Bloodgood U 3 Honda R amp D 8 11 Assistant Senior Manager Chief Engineer Mr Hideyuki Akisawa Security Environmental Health amp Safety SEHS Manager Mr Joseph A Heater Senior Coordnnator Group Leader Ms Sue Borawski Coordinator Mr David M Butchko 3 1 3 1 4
607. ndustries Association and provides information AMT Association for Manufactureing Technology ISO IEC ISO IEC ISO IEC 2
608. ng devices associated with guards Principles for design and selection 41 GB 40531 1993 42 GB 40532 1993 43 GB 40533 1993 44 GB 4053 4 1983 46 GB 4674 1984 47 GB T 8176 1997 48 GB 8196 1987 49 GB 8197 1987 30 2 ISO 12100 GB 2 GB T 15706 1 1995 Safety of machinery Basic concept general principles for desngn Part 1 Basic terminology methodology GB T 15706 2 1995 Safety of machinery Basic concepts general principles for desngn Part 2 Technical principles and specifications GB T TISO TR 12100 1 1992 TSO TR 12100 2 1992 ISO 12100 1992 1995 31 4 4 1
609. of machinery Permanent means of access to machines and industrial plants Part 3 Stairways stepladders and guard rail B 17888 4 1999 Safety of machinery Permanent means of access to machines and industrial plants Part 4 Fixed ladders Ladders part 1 terms types functional sizes Ladders Part 2 Requirements Testing marking 30 GB17957 2000 Safety of machinery Temperatures of touchable surfaces Ergonomics data to establish temperature limit values for hot surfaces 32 GB 18209 1 2000 Safety of machinery indication marking and actuation Part 1 Requirements for visuallauditory and tactile signals 33 GB 18209 2 2000 34 IGB 18209 3 2002 Safety of machinery Indication marking and actuation Part 3 Requirements for the location and operation of actuators Safety of machinery Reduction of risks to health from hazardous substances emitted by machinery Part 1 Principles and specifications for machinery manufacturers Safety of machinery Reduction of risks to health from hazardous substances emitted by machinery Part 2 Methodology leading to verification procedures Ergonomic design for the safety of machinery Part 1 Principles for determining the dimensions required for openings for whole body access into machinery Ergonomic design for the safety of machinery Part 2 Principles for determining the dimensions required for openings for access of parts of the body into machinery 40 IGB T 18831 2002 Safety of machinery Interlocki
610. or a lot of private companies in Indirectly via German mirror comities Europe to be participating in ISO IEC TC positively Does your company participate positively C ISO IEC TC What is the advantage that the private company which Prior knowledge and option of co creation positively participates in ISO IEC TC obtains A In your company is there a post which takes charge speclializing in the standard B In your company is there a system which promotes talent who can lead international standardization Is there a system which utilizes an aged engineer who has been related for standardization for many years Might the cost of the product become high by standardization D
611. pport is received from the government 97 5 IA At which stage is the risk assessment executed in the during the whole process development process of the machine Is the risk yes and the standards help to do the job assessment done in accordance with Machinery sure It s a good method safety standard Is the risk assessment effective to perhaps not better but as good as but mostly not standardized the safety level securing the machine Besides is there a method of the idea as better B Could you let us know the sample case that the risk Iits done on t
612. prise E ISO9001 ISO14001 Do you have an idea of constructing the management system about Machinery safety as well as ISO9001 and ISO14001 Components Ridlerstrasse 65 Guenter Greil Machinery industry is highly interested in standardisation as this is a advantage in marketing ISO IEC TC44 We as a notified body and test house according to the machinery directive are involved in many ISO IEC activities especially in TC44 develpoment To have influence into the develpoment of new standards and to have knowledge of certain back ground informations TUV
613. r Operated Household Food Preparing Machines 1017 Vacuum Cleaners Blower Cleaners and Household Floor Hinishing Machines 1063 Machine Tool Wires and Cables 1594 Sewing and Cutting Machines 1647 Motor Operated Massage and Exercise Machines 1776 High Pressure Cleaning Machines 2157 Electric Clothes Washing Machines and Extractors 30 2 8 8 CCC 1 47 CNCA FE CCC 101 CNCA 01C001 2001 CNCA 01C002 2001 CNCA 01C 002 2001 A1 CNCA 01C003 2001
614. rd can positive support is received from the government 91 5 A EN1050 98 37 EG At which stage is the risk assessment executed in the After the first ideas You have to update it during the development development process of the machine Is the risk process Yes EN1050 98 37 EG Yes Yes assessment done in accordance with Machinery safety standard Is the risk assessment effective to the safety level securing the machine Besides is there a method of the idea as better B Could you let us know the sample case that the risk For every product It s law in europe assessment was done A CE
615. tandard Institute UL Underwriters Laboratories NFPA National Fire Protection Association NEC National Electrical Code ANSI ANSI SDO Standard Development Organization ANSI SDO AMT Association for Manufacturing Technology RIA Robotic Industries Association UL ANSI ISO IEC AMT ISO IEC ISO IEC
616. there is a case used for PR of the product or the enterprise E ISO9001 ISO14001 0 Do you have an idea of constructing the management system about Machinery safety as well as ISO9001 and ISO14001 ISO IEC TC Yes and no depenting to their job That s no big question because it s law Standards which fit together with the industrial reality No not if you take care of this during the development 90 3 A Was Machinery Directive effective to decrease work accidents related to the machine in your country Do you think the product at a still low safety level to be used if there is no Machinery Directive B
617. uva is accredited During the accreditation process all required qualifications to run a certification body are veryfied not at my knowledge CEN CEN OK CEN central secretariat employs a number of consultants Their task is to ensure that standards comply with the essential safety and health requirements of the machinery directive Their OK is required for the CEN approval of a standard 89 IDurr Systems GmbH Paint Systems Application Marcus Frey A Do the people of the machine industrial world in your country think that standardization leads to strengthening international industrial power B ISO IEC TC
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search