日本で望まれる機械安全に関する法規制及び社会制度の考察
Contents
1. ISO1212. 5 P
3. 5
4. et hi T 12
5. HA BNN 2 2 All 4 200
6. KELORO WER CE _ SAIR Ase
7. POC Ee eee ele oe a 4
8. A EJ eA DRR EN K A OREI RZ ko a HAVEL 50 1 1 3 1 6 6 B ee
9. zy 15
10. conformity assessment ISO IEC 17000 Validation ISO9000
11. cee No 4 2010 p 219 2 2 EN 2 R 1
12. T ILO 3
13. 3 4 3 4
14. REL Ree ne ee 9 2 Bo 3 H 4
15. EU 1 at 1 EU European Union EC 1993 ae 28 2 rc European Communities ai 1967 European Economic Community 3 EEC EC a SH RAKIY Comite Europeen EC salads EER 8 International Standardization Organization 1947 9 SY AE
16. dim Vol 8 No 1 pp 13 27 2015 22 gt P
17. 2 1 KDH LC ISO12100 1 2 q ee en GMR 3 eres EC eases 10
18. RAPEX Cee eigen a EU BETES Se AUL oe leer eat GAA Be BR oF BIS BGO TAB 2010 BG E ea ei WEET ORER GAA
19. A5 D
20. IMS IMS mene EN ISO 11161 IMS CE Zj ia EN BG
21. 5 3
22. 8 4 2006 oe oe Poe i BG Magee PRUE SES TRELAR l Eph A EU A state of the art
23. DF 1 CHS 1 4 PUWER The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations ILO 2011 Code of Practice on Safety and Health in the Use of Machinery ILO 118
24. 1 RM
25. 2 ISO12100 1 2 EDARAK hy at Zs ab Ss JERR E EL A ial E OISO12100 7
26. CE Zonat D
27. 10 3 28 2 IS012100 Vol 8 No 1 pp 13 27 2015 25
28. GAA BG BEELD eg 225 Oz SEER IHEMAR 7 gt L0 7 RAEN URBORMMAICR gt T ERE 50 OD 1 3 1 FE ee ae Sere eT
29. A DR N a B BRT OVE J STAGE Advanc 1 f 2014 08 22 2014 10 06 ia 3 e published date November 14 2014
30. HSL L ARAN 4 ZR KATH
31. 29 5 6 1 43 2 ADF
32. gt THE 2 2 1 8 4 1
33. A Aa EU B G 8 5 TS09001 EU EU ay EU a EC EU
34. HSL FEAT OBE LAL 14 EBS CHS 3 2 MOT Oe 6
35. Vol 8 No 1 pp 13 27 2015 17 gb RUD 5 18 R 2 Q 1
36. 8 2 A EU EU 4 Aa KEL Aa TEU gg 1 2 eer
37. on EU m E F EU 4 BR BS DS SE CE CE CE EU EU EU
38. me mz 18 Hic IT HLAO
39. 10 9 11 E Lv MEA RFA 9 Vol 8 No 1 pp 13 27 2015 20 5 gt Cee
40. SL SE RS ER CN RN ss CN TEA EE EAER LELE AE A S EVAR EI EU i H EU TS09001 mappo i i i i TARTS lt D E maon r HOR Cue eae eet wee CE D ee ee eee De FE eB CE 2 EU TS09001 ISO9001 CE
41. LT CE 1
42. 3 COMI CHDKHO tele 9 7 8 9
43. aul B E F CE 1994 R Bel fal iff H25 es EEO DR 1996 NIIS SD HOR 001
44. 8 5 2 2 3
45. E 2 Po a 2 3 4 BT h 3 C TF
46. ee ge San kl Eph ua eae H 1 2006 42 EC 98737 EC 2009 12 29 2 EMC aaah oe Att DIERE AC50 1000V DC75 1500V D NM 90 EU EMC a en EN Ena ina ete Coe pee CES 1 EN 1 A eee B C EN349 Bl
47. 5 11 12 5 6 7
48. eee OMA 9 gt Y PH a ant gO 2 5 2 m t Ie z F mm Uns mE
49. 2 2 FIC 15 O 5
50. ISO IEC EN 4 CE IM 23 6 EU
51. DL 2 2 4 TWH TISO IREC
52. ISO IEC 25 130 2 9 JIS
53. of Evidence Based Safety A REBS theory 3 a b c M zu FOJE DAT O g JIR uk ES lt K BRE ia DIE h
54. GAA GAA 1853 TUV g BG 1885 E 1900 TAB 39 40 1 EUFOR ae Fl GAA
55. 4 204 0024 1 4 6 AEK E E mail umezaki s jniosh go jp 4 Fe E 8 2 En FED AACE 1 4 BOS k
56. FEN Ny diaaa Safeguarding IE Fone sil Rs Information for use 14 Intended use of a 15 Reasonably foreseeable misuse 16 KADE Safeguard 17 Guard 18 Protective device KI EDU 15
57. T BF SOK 5 8 Ad TORT HOR LOL
58. 4 8 2012 9 IMS 2008 1 8 212 219 10 2009 11 12 PHBS 2013 13 68 12 10 14 14 2009 2013 HOLA 2013 1 16 gt EKR
59. 30 23 3 102 79 129 79 1 125 4 129 2 8 79 3 2 67
60. D4 IS012100 I I 1 I H 1 1 I I 1 l I 1 i l 1 g 1 l 1 g 1 l 1 1 1 1 2 3 lt lt lt NK v gt z EEDE J EEE 1 G8 7 45 34 9 67 51 9 87 67 4 31 24 0
61. m BE os CE Ov EU 3 1 EU 28 EU A RAY E KUR 3 Gy izt
62. E U EU TS09001 ISO9001 CE CE CE er BL CE M4 1 G b 1 2 3
63. 6 f Pe 7 Risk 8 Risk assessment mee we Adequate risk 9 reduction oo 2 i 8 AO 0 Protective measure HD AF ADR HIN Inherently safe design 1 measure Ad A
64. EN IL i wA e EI C lt i Pee ee C Tiai atia EN EU 1 EN EN 2 EN gt BETZEA EN292 ET
65. REE 4 2012 p 206 it Shy Sr 5 2 6
66. EL 2 mt ISO IEC CREB HS T
67. E Vo KORA E ILO 1942 S ARE DED ab AE PRED BEAR ICE 4 E BU dap agl eae caine
68. 5 1 n ER A t 26 2 3
69. EE A37 LAT TELETA OAS OAOE AN O IAEE TEATA 1 F eee lt L i 2012 p 112 f 2012 p 126 M5 7 19 K 4 6
70. 3 1 OO SER IC ARE 1 3 O EU EN A 3 2 4 A HH 8 1 A 1
71. 6 X RR BP BA JAB No 14 1 14 TR 1 MM PAR 2014 5 25 2012 6 7 2000 190 193 E PHP 2007 122 126
72. ie 5 e a ieee ee ere er MOAN HOR OIE EO ROO 1985 EC D MED tie LALA SO ft ly r EV OR BRERERUR 9 Sn MEE ea ere OU eS D EU el EET EU OS 12 nares EU MC 13 Spee ines py 3 E EU ee ae px Vol 8 No 1 pp 13 27 2015 16
73. es step by step i BG P
74. INRS EN EU EN EU DARI Standardization and French Public Authorities H Vol 8 No 1 pp 13 27 2015 24 1 Ay
75. Hol itt Hr J Vol 8 No 1 pp 13 27 2015 k4 al m BOR Rt S amp B FE BA HET FR B H b E ZH
76. 14 EN OF CR 2 8 1 KUK 2
77. i e a EN292 TSO12100 7 Ee ao A BLN eB 3 2010 UCHR E re a 2 Fi N peta gt i at eg EMU LeOREUZIe 1 2 X2 18012100 B z 3 EEC
78. 1 EU EN 1957 EEC EEC 2 CEN CENEREC
79. yeaa 3 International Electrotechnical Commission 1908 SHEE BN Comite Europeen de Normalisation PEN NEES es ee she SES AS EY cA Comite Europeen de Normalisation Electro technique MA PAE eee 9 EN European Norms 2 ISO12100 JISB9700 E de int 9 i eo WS WIT FF i 2 Harm 3 Hazard 4 Hazardous situation 5 Harmful event
80. 00 18012100 1 1985 EN
81. 15 tad RK AR TF THK TRE 2010 86 4 217 225 1998 46 54 16 17 ISO OHS 18 ERIA ISO 1997 71 83 1990 55 530 2601 2609 19 YETI R 4 1 3 8 ISO12100 7 7 8 8 NIIS SRR 2005 33 53 67 LAL AAR 27 Discu
82. E J Ah 1 2 3 4 tte Lv ERE A 1 lk ISO12100
83. In addition to the aforementioned activities the basic principles of machine safety and accident prevention in Europe were considered particularly important for spreading and promotion among corporate executives and machine designers These principles are the 1 risk reduction strategies provided by the International Organization for Standardization ISO 12100 2 conformity assessments that use a modular approach and marking aimed at conveying information about declarations of conformity 3 validity confirmation when using a machine based on marking information and 4 feedback regarding disaster information for the design and manufacturing stages of a machine Key Words safety of machinery regulations social system ISO12100 validation 1 Mechanical and System Safety Research Group National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Japan 2 Nagaoka University of Technology 3 Electrical Safety Research Group National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Japan 4 Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare Vol 8 No 1 pp 13 27 2015
84. e Beet ea VH esse 5 BO PARIER Oa era ceed ee 6 ie BG 3 H HSL
85. ssion of the social system and regulations related to safety of machinery in Japan by Shigeo UMEZAKI Takabumi FUKUDA Tsuyoshi SAITO Shoken SHIMIZU Tetsuya KIMURA Kyoko HAMAJIMA Toshiro HOSHI Hiroyasu IKEDA Kohei OKABE Kenta YAMAGIWA Hajime TOMITA Yoshiki MIKAMI Yuji HIRAO Makiko OKAMOTO Satoshi KADOWAKI Masajiro ABE and Yuichi OTSUKA An advantage of Japan is that high quality safety management and production technologies have been implemented at worksites by workers managers and production engineers If European technologies and social systems for safety of machinery are appropriately implemented on the basis of these onsite capabilities a new technology and social system framework based on Japan s own onsite capabilities may be created This study examined the laws regulations and social systems that are favorable for safety of machinery in Japan In maximizing onsite capabilities for safety management the following four activities were presumed important 1 the positioning of safety as an investment for new value creation not a cost 2 the sharing of a strong sense of ownership and common values for building a safe workplace among involved individuals 3 the changes in strategies from prevention of recurrence to proactive prevention and from considering the number of accidents to considering the severity of accident and 4 the consideration of unexpected problems
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search