第100号記念号第2分冊
Contents
1.2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. 3
13. 48
14. R 2
15. E
16. ES 40
17. 3
18. 2 Tmmonen S 2006 Translation as a writing process o Pauses in translation versus monolingual text production Target 18 2 313 335 Krings H 2001 Repairing texts Empirical 1 https www tausdata org investigations of machine translation post editing 2 Immonen 2006 processes G S Koby e
19. gt mi ul 2 RDNS NT Data Driven MT 1950 IBM
20. 4 5 V E 800
21. GL f
22. 9
23. 3 32 Time flies like an arrow gt na 4 Ri I am a cat
24. 3 et 0 NO
25. 4 5 8 14
26. 3300
27. 12 a 0 2
28. 1 3 H 3
29. hh 3
30. 5 2 GM A
31. Ni
32. 5 2 L L IC L X
33. 50 H 100 100 ee Jamming DDwin PDIC
34. 7IT K 3 ul
35. 3 300 400
36. 28 3 E P L ee
37. 1
38. UQ 60 i 906 0 8 0
39. 5 4 IV ES 30 3
40. D tel
41. transmission Baker 2006 pp 1 2
42. 1
43. fm NSR gt 8 Iam a cat
44. 2 1000 8000 800 2 3 eo O
45. 0 le or i i
46. 64 RS Da P 2 Se SS 8 9 ERE AS gt 1 BE ee 1
47. 5 3 M M 10
48. Goog1e Garcia 1 2 1 5 10 1 3 100 1 1 32 3 2 67 7 3 7
49. O 2
50. 2 Traductore traditore Traduttore traditore untranslatability 45 NN Rt
51. 5 5 V G G
52. 1
53. 2 0 Brien Krings Im
54. 9 00 9 30 9 30 12 00 TEL 20 13 00 16 00 2 16 00 18 00 3 TEL1200 120 12 600 1 50 1 5 I A 5000
55. MGL
56. 65 LU hy
57. RR ON A 2007 Rei8 amp Vermeer 1984 1991 p 66 Bielsa amp Bassnett 2009 p 63 es
58. 1 400KB 58 9 10 39 1 i NE 0 10 En 2 gt SN oe
59. 8 decentering deEuropeanization WO
60. A a co o
61. vv 10 Jsabelle KALINOWSKI La vocation au travail de traduction Actes de la recherche en sciences socials 2002 2 144 Le Seuil 9 2 PAC
62. Rg B 3 NN
63. 1 1500 120 2000 2 1
64. gt 30 O 30 15 3 5
65. 2 1 2 DM SR SS TE 35
66. RE A A 0 CR HE 1995 Karl R Popper falsifiability Popper 1959
67. 2 1 a 8 A Nk 67 9 AAA 10 9
68. Nord 1988 2005 2009 Newmark 1981 p 39 2009 Toury 1995 p 13 2009
69. A 6 00 o A 8 50 A 5000
70. 1970
71. OBrien 2006b Eye tracking and translation memory matches O Brien 2006b 53 fuzzy Match 70 100
72. 100 2 D O
73. 1Google
74. There I was tiny Connie surrounded by bulking horses NN
75. The Eyes Trump the Bars 9 TOEIC 600 TOEPL GBT 34 PBT 480
76. 2 51 SMT L Google 2006 IST 2006
77. Benjamin 196972004 p 81 2009 LT 2008 p 1
78. 3 3 1 3 1 gt 2 gt 3 lt TB HH Garcia 2010 NAATI 3 uh nu A
79. 1 14 1 Let s sit in a chair 0 ASIA 2 oo 2
80. 279 translate A as B A B translate A as B as equivalence
81. 3 5X7 agess 6 P si RH 650KB 69
82. 800 68 3 x
83. OK 4 300 9 E
84. ev KWIC
85. E oS NS EE EN NR
86. 4 6 VI F 3500 DM 2 FE
87. 4 7 VI G 8000 1
88. post edit SH NT RS i post editing Full post editing Allen 2003
89. 1 3 Bowker Rapid post editing Ful1 post editing Garcia 2010 Is machine translation ready yet Google
90. TMS TM TAUS Ww pre edit post edit oost editor
91. 10 10 12 1 3 1
92. KWIC Finder ParaConc
93. 2 Guerberof 2009 Productivity and quality in the post editing of outputs from translation memories and machine translation Guerberof 2009 SMT SMT 1
94. i 3 5 7 HE gt Oie NPB i 6 Er 4 7
95. A M 3 N 2
96. NN Re WE
97. Ss
98. te D 3 SN
99. em NR EEEEEEEEEEEE EE 63
100. L 3 J 3
101. OBrien amp
102. OK 3 4 30
103. E 40 6
104. 11 AAA 12 2 13 AAA 14 5
105. 3 1 4 8 V H 4000 JC H H H H H H
106. 4 3 3 DM C DM 80 O H 1000 1000 8 1 HH
107. 8 2 H H 2 H H
108. fi6 Baker M 2006 Translation and conflict A narrative account London New York Routledge 197 A 2008 Berman A 1984 7eve de UI tranger Culture et traduction dans PAllemagne romantique Paris Editions Gallimard Bielsa E and Bassnett S 2009 Translation in global news London New York Routledge 2007 Jakobson R 195972004 On linguistic aspects of transla
109. E 61 1
110. a
111. G O G
112. 3 117 3 3 E 4 800 78
113. No Match 85 90 85 1 2
114. ul input
115. IN 2 RE NR Re 6 NY Se Se 90 Se Phy 2 9 OO gt J OD CE
116. 250 6 2000 ALPAC 1966 i SYSTRAN 2 Eg RE 1980 1984 E ATLAS 1
117. SA CD ROM 1000 D 38 IBM D
118. CSN 2 nbn TT i exact English equivalent
119. L xx
120. O L NM RN a 1
121. E 52 Krings 2001 Reparing Texts Krings 2001
122. es SR i 2 gt SS 62
123. 37 1 1 1 10000 8
124. 9 Q 2
125. A4 3 NR 0 eS C 3 A 3 a
126. 2 F 3 3 0
127. G 5 6 3 6
128. i Kikuko TANABE A Personal Attitude Construct Analysis from the Experiences of Japanese Translators Kobe College Studies Vol 56 No 2 2009 Kobe College
129. Giddeon Toury Toury 1995 p 65 lt
130. Guerberof Guerberof 0 Brien 2006b 90 4 1 amp Ehgoetz 2007 acceptance of machine translation output A Bowker Exploring user reci
131. art crafD FT Lefevere 1992 p 9 2009 rewriting
132. Wolf 2000 p 142 2009 Cronin 1996 p 49 2009 Levine 1991 p 3 2009 Steiner 1998 p 413 2009
133. DY 4 4 IV D 12000 80 1000 AID 12 A D D D
134. be BE A be XA X 3 2000
135. 68
136. 1 0 v
137. 8 100 Jakobson 1959 2000 p 139 Vinay amp Darbelnet 1995 p 16 2009 1 mtersemiotic Translation
138. 41 5 1 I 2
139. 8 2 8 1 O trans literation adaptation appropriation 2 O 3 4 CAT 5 D D 6
140. 2 pre edit H contro11ed language SN Simplified Technica1 English 2 CC
141. CBT 157 j RN EE NE NN 8 NO 66
142. E p 100 6 p 275
143. 4 2 TI B 10000 8 B B 2 1
144. 40 ANAN 2 3 50
145. A B 10 y C CD ROM
146. E RH
147. 1603 2008 p 382 2000 A B 15 30 Toury G 1995 Descriptive translation studies and beyond Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins Tymoczko M amp Gentzler E Eds 2002 Translation and power Amherst amp Boston University of L Massachusetts Press 2001
148. A B 1 Lv equal value OO DOLc O 2008 translation as X translate A as B as equivalence dike A as ike X A A be XA X
149. 2010 9 2 100 2 ss 100 100 216 4 7 2 502 GFCO1200 nifty ne jp http homepage3 nifty com hon yaku tsushin index html http homepage3 nifty com hon yaku tsus
150. 8 E 7
151. Gauvin 1989 p 9 Simon 1996 p 15 2009 2005 p 10 p 34 Niranjana 1992 p 2 2009
152. 4 E 3
153. 2 Interlingual Translation 3 Intralingual Translation Gutt 1991 2000 2009 Ginferencing Tymoczko amp Gentzler 2002 p xxi Holz Manttari 1984 2009
154. 2 G
155. Think Aloud Protocol Systran Metal1 20 similarity level 4 6 10 2 2 OBrien 2006a Controlled Language and Post Editing 0 Brien 2006
156. H IE 1990 80 2000
157. 3 pp 15 16 p 379 p 380 p 382
158. 300 X 1 4 10 X J 800
159. ER a WP 2 0 NSR 6 2 5 0 0 ss NN 9 Se PS 8 0 EO 9 ww SN IP E lt SS 1
160. a CL tempora1 echiieaD cognitive IBM Websphere 0 Brien segment
161. d Ohio Kent State University 2 Press NIST 2006 NIST 2006 Machine translation evaluation results 2006 11 1 2010 8 19 http www itl nist gov iad mig tests mt 2006 doc mt06eval_official_results html Allen J 2003 Post editing in H Somers Ed Computers and translation A 77g7s7g7o7 guide Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins 297 317 OBrien S 2006a Controlled language and post editing Multilingual 0ctober November 17 19 https 216 18 156 115 multiligual downloads screenSupp83 pdf Bowker L and Ehgoetz M 2007 Exploring user acceptance of machine translation output A recipient evaluation In D Kenny and K Ryou Eds 4czoss Bound aries 777e77877o7g7 Perspectives _on Translation Newcastle upon Tyne Cambridge Scholars Publishing 209 OBrien S 2006b Bye tracking and translation memory 224 matches Perspectives Studies in translatology 14 3 185 205 Chesterman A and E Wagner 2002 Can Theory Help Translators A Dialogue Between the Ivory Tower and the Wordface Manchester St Jerome Publishing Trujillo A 1999 Translation Engines Techniques for Machine Translation London Springer Garcia I 2010 Is machine translation ready yet Vermeer H J 1989 2000 Skopos and commission in Target 22 1 7 21 translational action In L Venuti Ed 7Translation stud
162. hin index html 35 45 50 51 57 60 0 I IV 14 150
163. ies reader pp 227 38 London Routledge Guerberof A 2009 Productivity and quality in the post editing of outputs from translation memories and machine translation Localisation Focus 7 1 11 21 2000 EXPLORING TRANSLATION THIEORIES Anthany Pyr 56 100
164. pient evaluation Bowker amp Ehgoetz 2007 Skopos Vermeer 1989 2000 Chesterman amp Wagner 2002 80 1 recipient 54 evaluation Trujillo 1999 Bowker amp Ehgoetz 3 CQD
165. tion In Venuti L Bd 2004 The translation studies reader 2nd edition London amp New York Routledge 2008 as 2005 J 2009 Munday J 2008 Introducing Translation Studies London Routledge 1973 Popper K R 1959 The logic of scientific discovery London New York Hutchinson 1995 3 lt v
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search