翻訳における「名詞化」という文法的比喩
Contents
1. context of situation register 22. 2 pq WARE product X 88 amp 4 0 EAH SN IE TOMREN process motivated choice Hatim and Mason 1990 3 4 2 2005
3. 2 20 4 7T ST 3 ON 1 1 ST
4. 6 2 2001 106 161
5. declarative goal mperative 25 1 E NM pork into bite sized pieces ideational Goal Circumstance Process Process Goal Circumstance material material interpersonal Comple Adjunct Predicator Predicator Comple Adjunct ment ment Mood Mood declarative imperative 29 AER As for pork you cut it into bite sized ZIN z OKZ OJ pieces 3
6. the addition of sugar SFL the addition of sugar unpacked
7. Kenny 1998 Baker 1992 2 for the sake of convenience because most translators are used to it rather than because it has any theoretical status 1992 5 6 textual equivalence pragmatic equivalence 16 SEL ST TT SEL
8. 3 SFL NAGANUMA Mikako M A BAR MRE KFM SFL mikakoQkatch ne jp 26 PRICI D it
9. CC Lails MAEL HATLO D FILL AEST ORLA E 5 1979 1991 1995 1999
10. 3 grammatical metaphor 3 SFL 4317 amp X iE B EE Tg 1 SFL congruent metaphorical In other words for any given semantic configuration there will be some realization in the lexicogrammar some wording that can be considered CONGRUENT 19 Interpretation Studies No 6 2006 there may also be various others that are in some respect transferred or METAPHORICAL Halliday 1994 342 AC UE BJ El Pie C L3 BUS C 2 22 32 5 RA BP E
11. SFL SFL SFL source NAGANUMA Mikako Grammatical Metaphor of Nominalization in Translation Interpretation Studies No 6 December 2006 Pages 15 28 c 2006 by the Japan Association for Interpretation Studies 15 Interpretation Studies No 6 2006 language text ST target language text TT SFL
12. x je UBI DX C9 amp Cut pork into bite sized pieces t m nli pork participant goal cut process material As for pork you cut it into bite sized pieces 18 PCR A
13. Tenor Mode kk 24 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 ST 1 2 21 Interpretatio
14. SFL 1999 30 36 E WR EO BEL LUTI Z 1995 25 66 1999 116 117 MM
15. participant 9 22 PCR A 2 TT For your safety Please Please dontrush notify switch process ST TT 4 B WD C3S S ID ye
16. For your safety don t rush for your train Please notify the train crew immediately if you find any suspicious items or unattended baggage Please switch your mobile phone to silent mode 364 Information TT 2 TT C3 EK back translation ST 5 ST texture PUMA DR
17. 2 SFL Munday 2001 4 17 Baker 1998b 277 280 46 Cicero 46 BCE 1960 CE D 2 literal translation free translation AATE IPER 20 equivalence Nida 1964 formal vs dynamic Newmark 1981 semantic vs communicative Bell 1991 semantic vs functional
18. 2 3 3 Matthiessen 2 Matthiessen 2001 96 97 Naganuma 2000 17 Interpretation Studies No 6 2006 CONTEXT OF CULTURE Context Genre CONTEXT OF SITUATION Register Field Tenor Mode realized in CONTENT LEVELS PEIE SY Semantics _Ideational Linguistic system Interpersonal Textual realized in Lexicogrammar TRANSITIVITY AX MOOD THEME realized in EXPRESSION LEVEL La YEH S Phonology Graphology 1 Stratification and Realization
19. 2005 5 pp 223 37 1999 ERORE 2001 LARR tma 28
20. As the doctor examined him carefully the patient recovered speedily 3 5 49 6 Hil 2 6 As the doctor examined him Congruent carefully the patient recovered speedily The fact that the doctor examined the patient carefully brought abou t his speedy recovery ACTES IE Sz Thedoctor s careful examination of the patient brought about his Metaphorical speedy recovery fg d b5755L E 6 S LIEB CERBER ce o rh RA o Fi L EIEE R P LOCOS TVLIERSRO LI TCO olii co 5o f1h c WATALULCHESUCBs iR A
21. 24 PRICI D 1979 129 130 X The doctor s careful examination of the patient brought about his speedy recovery examination FACT
22. SFL Malinowski Firth Halliday Halliday 1994 Halliday and Matthiessen 2004 Matthiessen 1995 context of culture context of situation meaning making Z ODAR HER SN how to mean Systemic theory is a theory of meaning as choice by which a language or any other semiotic system is interpreted as networks of interlocking options Halliday 1994 xiv functionalism Halliday 1994 xxix SEL Caffarel et al 2004 D SFL 1
23. SFL multiple theme ni HJ dE Halliday 1994 Halliday and Matthiessen 2004 Caffarel A et al 2004 Language Typology Amsterdam John Benjamins Baker M 1992 In Other Words A Coursebook on Translation London and New York Routledge ed 1998a The Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies London and New York Routledge 1998b Translation studies in Baker 19982 pp 277 80 Bell R 1991 Translation and Translating Theory and Practice London and New York Longman Butt D et al 2000 Using Functional Grammar An Explorer 5 Guide 2nd edition Sydney Macquarie University Cicero M T 46 BCE 1960 CE De optimo genere oratorum in Cicero De inventione De optimo genere oratorum topica translated by H M Hubbell Cambridge MA Harvard University Press London Heinemann pp 347 73 Halliday M A K 1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar 2nd edition London Melbourne and Auckland Edward Arnold Halliday M A K and J R Martin 1993 Writing Science Literacy and Discursive Power London and Washington DC Falmer Press 27 Interpretation Studies No 6 2006 Halliday M A K and C M I M Matthiessen 2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar 3rd edition London Edward Arnold H
24. Butt et al 2000 7 3 CE stratification realization h FMO Ne field tenor Fn mode register ideational Ginterpersonal textual 3 TRANSITIVITY MOOD THEME 9 imd network instance
25. 1 And I did not translate them as an interpreter but as an orator keeping the same ideas and forms or as one might say the figures of thought but in language which conforms to our usage And in so doing I did not hold it necessary to render word for word but I preserved the general style and force of the language Cicero 46 BCE 1960 CE 364 2 ISFC 32 International Systemic Functional Congress 23 Discourses of hope 200 7 Naganuma 2005 XO Ca 3 TRANSITIVITY MOOD THEME Theme Rheme 4 topical theme
26. ST TT For your safety don t rush for your train Please notify the train crew immediately if you find any suspicious items or unattended AP baggage Please switch your mobile phone to silent mode 3 Information ST 3
27. tum ST 3 2 23 Interpretation Studies No 6 2006 ar OWE e OHR
28. LEEA congruent unpacked 25 Interpretation Studies No 6 2006 1995 256 e COD
29. Tt E i ETE Foo C 2 27 30 2 4802588 a BS EE T Could you open the window nominalization they add sugar the addition of sugar 1994 352 SFL Halliday and Martin 1993 Simon Vandenbergen et al eds 2003 Lassen 2003
30. atim B and I Mason 1990 Discourse and the Translator London and New York Longman Kenny D 1998 Equivalence in Baker ed 1998a pp 77 80 Lassen I 2003 Accessibility and Acceptability in Technical Manuals Amsterdam John Benjamins Matthiessen C M I M 1995 Lexicogrammatical Cartography English Systems Tokyo International Language Sciences Publishers 2001 The environments of translation in Steiner and Yallop 2001 pp 41 124 Munday J 2001 Introducing Translation Studies Theory and Applications London and New York Routledge Naganuma M 2000 Thematic Challenges in Translation between Japanese and English Macquarie University M A dissertation 2005 Nominalization in translation between Japanese and English A paper presented in ISFC32 Sydney University Newmark P 1981 Approaches to Translation Oxford and New York Pergamon Nida E 1964 Toward a Science of Translating Leiden E J Brill Simon Vandenbergen A et al eds 2003 Grammatical Metaphor Amsterdam John Benjamins Steiner E and C Yallop ed 2001 Exploring Translation and Multilingual Text Production Beyond Content Berlin and New York Mouton de Gruyter 1995 ELARI D lt EFS ih Ex amp E 1995 gt 1979 1991
31. n JAIS Emi T his paper explores the possibility of bridging the gap between theory and practice in translation from the view point of Systemic Functional Linguistics SFL focusing specifically on nominalization SFL regards language as a meaning making resource which simultaneously has three metafunctions ideational interpersonal and textual It is one of the most useful and powerful tools to analyze both source and target language texts ideationally interpersonally and textually SFL text analysis contributes to the understanding and the evaluation of texts for which the translator constantly makes motivated decisions to make meaning In this paper I will firstly outline some relevant theories of translation studies and then move on to practical text analysis based on SFL to show how the grammatical metaphor of nominalization brings to the surface some challenges in translation between Japanese and English 1 Systemic Functional Linguistics SFL
32. n Studies No 6 2006 2 1 3 TT For your safety don t rush for your train context of culture SAA 1 1 1 3
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search