ダウンロード - 奈良先端科学技術大学院大学
Contents
1.2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24. 3 2
25. 5 5
26. MITRE Corp 2 3 3
27. 24
28. gt
29. Legislative Branch Judicial Branch
30. 4 1
31. 1 6 P260
32. DCF
33. 1 OD F 232 1 1 kk 232 2 2200 232 1 3
34. 2
35. 1
36. gt 2 3
37. public company 10 Q
38. Phase I
39. A BC a A B B B C a
40. 2 000 141 POSZ 1 000
41. 4 1 4 2
42. 5 2
43. 1 6 1 P270 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007
44. 4
45. lt preamble transition body
46. 95 95
47. 1 5 1 P230 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007
48. MPF MPF 112 6
49. DNA DNA DNA DNA
50. 5 5
51. 5 1 5 P228
52. 2 ee
53. C F 1 207 2 207 Eo 208 3 1
54. 3 1 1 1 P94
55. 5 3
56. 7 2 2 Q A
57. 2 3 2
58. 188 A 1 Poltorak and P J Lerner Essentials of Licensing intellectual Property Wiley 2004 Chapter 5 1 6 P257
59. 18 9 8 1 1 2
60. PC PC 1 1 1 P93 PC
61. 1 3 1 P175 1 II 176 176 1 2 kk 176 5 177 2 1 177 2 2 183 2 3
62. minimum royalty
63. 2 1 Offer and acceptance Competent parties Consideration Legal purpose
64. 1 1 5
65. 6 6 1
66. CD
67. 1995 2000 Ocean Tomo
68. 6 3
69. 189 http news branna com 2007 0113 enter_ 200701183 001_ html 190 2 6 US firms Q amp A 4 1 6 P259 5 4
70. 1 MPEP 2300 01 2 3 2
71. 3
72. 179 http www okinawa tlo com event Yoshida pdf 180 1 4 2 4 Marketing Tips in the US 1 6 P252
73. 108 DNA http www jpo go Jp torikumrkokusai kokusai3 thza13 htm 109 http wwwijpo go Jp torikumrkokusai kokusai37pdf 1812 027 b3b_reach pdf 10 http www jpo go jp torikumi kokusai kokusai3 pdf wm4_3d_re jp pdf 11 2008
74. 4
75. 1 6 P265 6 4
76. 5 http 7ywwnanstJp japanese kigyo_kenkyu sankangakupdfO1 pdf 16 http www somuka titech ac jp Kisoku contents8 16Y 135 pdf 1 http wwwripo osaka u acJp nmg7download img download_soce ttekizansanpolicypdf 18 http wwwkyoto u ac jp kenkyu02_tokky documents 03 pdf 1 1 P79
77. 191 utility patent design patent and registered design copyright trade secret trade dress9 192
78. 17 OJT AUTM Technology Transfer Practice Manual 2002 2nd ed Poltorak and P J Lerner Essentials of Licensing intellectual Property Wiley 2004 2006 2nd ed 2006
79. 3 2 2 2 3 Exclusive License Nonexclusive License
80. 1 2 1 P131 17 OJT 2005 H Furutani Patentability of Business Method Inventions in Japan Compared with the US and Europe USPTO November 3 2003 2006 8 1 2 1
81. 1 1 3 i
82. 99 2004 pages 124 128 100 pages 45 57 101 J L amp Econ vol 20 p 265 1977 IT 1 3 P
83. 64 James Gatto Patent Appeals Court Ruhng Highlights Potential Pitfalls of Over Reliance on Provisional Patent Applications Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP news letters vol 1400 No 1405 Feb 2 20060
84. 1 3 100
85. lt 1 2 3 122
86. 7 175 1 6 2 176 2006 2nd ed 2006 web page http co
87. 3 1 4
88. 6 5
89. 1 3 P144 2 kk 146 1 1 146 1 1 1 kk 146 1 1 2 kk 148 1 1 3 i 150 1 1 4 i 151 1 2
90. 202 526 208 594 616
91. 2 2 11 ARBITRATION
92. 2 6 Q1 A 1 PCT
93. 1 4 Common law equity
94. 2 3 2 biotechnological process 35 USC 130 b 1 X DNA 2 DNA X 1 DNA 2
95. 102 e 102 e PCT 102 e
96. 1 2 10 3 x 1
97. 1 1 1 P96 4
98. 1 5 P212 1998 9
99. 1 2
100. estoppel 1 5
101. 1 5 2 US Court of Appeals 11 circuit Washington D C 1 3
102. 2 4 1 1 1 siliding royalty rate
103. 4 A 5
104. 2 gt lt gt
105. 1 1 1 3 3 12 24 54 4 16
106. X 5 1 1 P71 X
107. 2 5 Japan
108. 1 2 1 P126 PCT PCT
109. 19 TP page 119 20 AUTM IAUTM 18 4 pages 1222 1229 21 Google distribution royalty policy sharing royalty pohcy 22 Binghamton 23
110. 24 3 25 2
111. 195 1 6 P264
112. 29 1 52 10 13 1 3 P166
113. 2 1 1
114. 1 5 1 P236 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 Range
115. 184 AUTM Technology Transfer Practice Manual 2002 2nd ed Part 8 185 A 1 Poltorak and P J Lerner Essentials of Licensing intellectual Property Wiley 2004 Chapter 9 1 6 P255
116. 1996 WTO
117. 7 78 2
118. 21 2 2 1 AUTM Association of University Technology Managers
119. 102 Colum L Rew vol 90 p 839 1990 103 Genentech Inc v The Wellcome Found 29 F 3d 1555 31 U S PQ 2d 1161 Fed Cir 1994 104 Scripps Chnic amp Research Tound v Genentech Inc 18 USPQ2d 1001 Fed Cir 1991 105 1999 No 205 pages 25 32 106 2004 pages 82 87 107
120. 3 2 x
121. gt gt gt
122. 4 2 36 4 2
123. X Vol 100 2008 11 18 7 19 6 15 8 26 14 5077 7 TP
124. 4 4
125. 1 6 P262 gt MTA Material Transfer Agreement
126. 2 1
127. lt 4 1 1
128. 1 2 1 4 P194 1 3
129. 3 3 1999
130. 1 5 P219 2 4
131. MPEP 2107 01 MPEP 2107 02 17 CTP Mr Barlow US FTRMS 4 3 1 3
132. 9 A
133. 128 1 2001 3 26 129 1
134. 2 2 12 NONWAIVER estoppel
135. 68 eBay Inc v MercExchange L L C No 05 130 126 S Ct 1837 2006 May 15 2006 69 E Alex Verbin Chachkes 2006 Vol 59 No 9 pages 41 44 70 42 http pc watch nmpress co Jp docs 2006 0502 high42 htm 7 Miku H Mehta RIM NTP BLACKBERRY AIPPI Japan Vol 51 No 7 pages 421 427 1 3 P147 4
136. 1 5 P215
137. US
138. 112 4 88 2006 Vol 59 No 2 pages 29 40 84 2 2003 pages 53 57 85 US FIRMS 4 1 DE 86 2004 Vol 57 No 8 pages 41 45 1 3
139. 1 5 P220 2 4 3 fixed sum royalty initial payment lump sum entry fee A paid up royalty B milestone payments 2 4 4
140. 2 AUTM
141. 4 5
142. 3 A 5 2 1 A win win
143. Q1 Q2 Q3
144. 4 2 x
145. 1 5 1 US Supreme Court 3 1 34 ul 1 2 P104 Washington D C 3
146. EDINET FindLaw stat com THOMSON 1 5 P210 1 212 2 kk 212 2 1 213 2 2 kk 215 2 215 2 8 215 2 3 2 kk 216 2 3 3 216 2 3 4 3 nn 217 Eo 217 2 3 6 kk 218 2 3 7 ee 219 2 4 220 2 4 1 5 Tie 220 2 4 2 220 2 4 3 fixed sum royalty pp 221 2 4 4 uuu 221 2 5
147. 1 5 3 US District Court 50 90 4 1
148. 239 available at http contracts onecle com inphonic noncomp shtml accessed Dec 2005 240 vs pages 22 28 1 6 2 P301 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 3 National Institutes of Health NIH MTA MTA Provider 1 Provider agrees to transfer to Recipient s Investigator named below the following Research Material Provider Recipient 2 This Research Material will only be used fo
149. authorship inventorship Q amp A
150. BlackBerry Research In Motion 6
151. Association of University Technology Managers AUTM gt
152. 3 1
153. 1 1 A 100
154. 35 3 35 3
155. 1 6 2 P303 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 TI Late L659 CCO VIN SHI PP papal 10 pepLsod st WOnPoUUUapI OU aAamo ELRILIN ITPasad ath Jo asn S SHd Wo BUSI ssBSbtIrep TO SUEEBTS AUE IO SHd ol adVTT aq QUE Ispfaord Jeth SHd TO Uonuejur StH ST iT SSIOid Woeasey SHD UOT Insert Ta 38th HOUsaAt alqelHUaled AU ol SISH ssa JOT AIdde Aeur id VLIN SEH SD SHEH Sadord fetGSsiTSJtHT ou SaHnpoe Japtord IatHaaIV st Jabrm Padofasap KUOttaATFE 10 SULAPE UF SIKEEtT asFtHQrd ol paZrtottUe jo st SHd UL 1SsIoid TSressa ah Jo SSmIOS th HT SaaXO dttts SNTAq apetE sONUSAU tm SITSE radord fetuSaTTSjUE Tao JO JHajed Ate ol Shih UPlar ITEYS SHd ALL SHd 3B SE uoTODSS SL S PLfaJeIN IPTIbasad ath Jo asodmd Xute IOT asn s JUatdI934 JO lno BUTSUB sassof DU sasuadxa SatUtVD sptretap saymiqe TI TOH sqarIrUUssoD sa ATHTKUSDtT
156. 1 0O 4 194 TD 194 1 2 194 1 3 0 195 1 4 195 1 5 196 1 6 ee 196 1 4 P193 137 oes 196 2 197 2 1 EE RR ei 197 2 2 197 2 3 197 3 IS 198 3 1
157. 42 Festo Corp v Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co Nos 95 1066 Fed Cir 2003 1 2 1 P129 2 gt 1 Dial52 2 1 2 1 3 1
158. 2 9 DO OS CO BC Ob 2 NAIST NAIST
159. 1 2 1 MTA Material Transfer Agreement 234 1 3
160. 49 pages 115 16 50 Janice M Mueller An Introduction to Patent Law ASPEN 2003 pages 69 90 51 50 page82 CAFC 52 pages 112
161. NAIST Web http www mitre org http homepage1 nifty com bicycletourscron priv htm http itpro nikkeibp coJp article USNEWS 20051007 222426 http intemet watch impress coJp www article 200271211 oval htm http cve mitre org about http www mitre org work tech_transfer pdf TTO_summary_report 2006 pdf 7 1 2 MITER Corp P312
162. gt EU EU EU
163. 1 5 P213 TOSCA
164. Sole License OO x x x x x x
165. 3 3 1
166. 48 7 48 7 49 5 48 7
167. inventor contrbutor gt 1
168. utility patents design patents registered designs copyrights trade secrets and trade dress
169. 142 Right Now 2007 Vol1 22 pages 50 54 1 3 1 P186 A3 1 1 3 Q1 DNA iRNA
170. 2 Up Grade 213 TLO BKC 214
171. NAIST 60 2 2003 pages 33 35 61 page 71 62
172. 104 104 2
173. 207 1 605 99 1 612 94 208 2
174. 1 6 1 4 A 1 2 3
175. Webb Feinberg Mills ea
176. BS 151 152 3 1 2006 pages 78 83 153 2 page44
177. 36 4 2 1 2 P116
178. 4 4 1
179. IPDL 37CFR1 56 1 2 P112 Information Disclosure Statement IDS
180. 166 167 168 Technology Licensing Organization 169
181. EB on a
182. 2 5 A B 1 5 P221 C
183. 2 3 6 A NPV Net Present Value
184. 53 TDS TDS 54 http patentlaw typepad com patent 55 47 page 305 1 2 2 P136 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 Do
185. A3 A4 SEL IDS
186. CD 2 9
187. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 17 0JT pages 152 157 1 1 P68
188. 1 3 1 3 60 1 5 P225
189. 2 3
190. 2001 Philippe Signore The benefits of provisional applications Managing Intellectual Property 114 Nov 2001 Janice M Mueller An Introduction to Patent Law ASPEN 2003 2 2005 2 2004 2 2003 James G Gatto Patent Appeals Court Ruling Highlights Potential Pitfalls of Over 1 2 2 P142 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 Reliance on Provisional Patent Applications Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP news letters vol 1400 No 1405 Feb 2 2006 1 2 2 P143 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 me NAIST 2006 2007 1 3
191. 3 SNP Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Q3 A1
192. IDS 3 IDS IDS IDS
193. 10 4 25 3835 5 Mills Wyman
194. 1 2 2 2008 page 70 73 2006 Vol 59 No 9 pages 18 28
195. 2 1 5 1 P233 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 20 9
196. 112
197. 1 3 P171 2 3 4
198. 1 6 1 6 29 2 2000 11 29 earliest filing date 18 35USC122 b
199. 91 1 2 f 2004 pages 22 27 92 Scripps Chmic Research Foundation Genentech Inc 927 F 2d 1565 Fed Cir 1991 93 Atlantic Thermoplastics Co Inc v Faytex Corp 23 USPQ 2d 1801 Fed Cir 1992 1 3 P155
200. 2 1 2 2 New Railhead US5 899 283 US5 950 743 Vermeer Vermeer 63
201. Win Win Alex Verbin Chachkes 2006 Vol 59 No 9 pages 41 44 Miku H Mehta RIM NTP BLACKBERRY AIPPI Japan Vol 51 No 7 pages 421 427 2 2003 page 70 2006 Vol 59 No 9 pages 18 28
202. A PCR Q2
203. 2 3 A TPO Time Place Occasion Person 1 4 P204 2006
204. 96 6 36 01 Illustration of Prior Art Figure 1 should be designated by a legend such as Prior Art in order to clarify what is apphcant s invention See MPEP 608 02 g 1 3 P158 3
205. 1 2 1 P123 1 124 124 2 124 1 3 HE 2 124 ZS 125 EE 125 125 2 3 D nn 125 2 4 127 2 5 128 2 6 129 2 7 kk 130 2 8 DO 131 2 9 lt 131 1 1 1 1 1 NAIST 2 18 12 27 16 00 lt 18 00 3
206. 1 2 3
207. 1 1 1 48 7 36 4 2
208. 1 2 2 P138 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 2 New Railhead Mfg v Vermeer Mfg Co 298 F 3d 1290 63 USPQ2d 1843 Fed Cir 2002
209. 4 1 2 1 P130 60 60 2 8
210. A A 3 OO
211. 1998 1 2 P106 1 2 2 2 2 1 3 20
212. 80 patent attorney patent agent 2003 pages35 36 1 Right Now 2007 vol 22 pages 42 45 82 Right Now 2007 vol 22 pages 50 54 1 3 P151
213. 144 1997 E 1 3 1 P189
214. 5 8
215. 231 IL page 19 232 225 page 103 1 6 2 P296 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 2 6 3 3 1
216. 4 2 1 4 P200 4 3 TPO
217. Q4 producible by produced by Q5 IDS Q6
218. 1 1 1 P95 AID F 1
219. 17 3 29 OK 5 5 1
220. 4 1 x OK 1 6 1 P281 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007
221. PCT PCT PCT PCT PCT 30 PCT PCT 30
222. 29 296 10 10 100 100 204 2006 1 6 1 P276 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 2 4 2 90
223. 1 Q4 producible by produced by 133 CIP 17 pages 106 1 3 1 P181 A1 A Hole on the sheet sheet having a hole
224. 48 7 48 7 1 48 7
225. Q2 DNA 2001 3 26
226. 1 6 1 7 IDS
227. 2 4 pre existing duty rule pre existing duty rule Alaska Packers Alaska Packers Assn v Domenico 117 F 99 9th Cir 1902 1000
228. 2 2 2 116 2005 Vol 58 No 2 pages 71 81 1 3 P165
229. 1 3 1 P178 GM CSF 14 4 11 A3
230. implied license have made
231. 12 21
232. 1 kk 269 1 1 kk 269 1 2 kk 270 1 3 kk 270 2 kk 271 2 1 ee 271 2 2 273 2 3 kkk 274 2 DR 275 2 275 277 243 277 3 kk 278 3 1 kk 278 3 2 278 1 6 1 P268 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 4 O 280 441 D 280 4 1 1 kk 281 4 2 0O Li 283 S00 288 1
233. 4 x lt
234. 1 83 b Prior Art Related Art 1 3 P157 MPEP608 02 g Prior Art Prior Art
235. Q0 1 Q0 2 1 gt NAIST A B D E F G H Q1 Q2 Q3 ie Q4 GO
236. 13 5 17 TR X Y Z 18 In re Dene K fisher and Raghunath v Lalgudi 421 F 3d 1365 Fed Cir 2005 1 3 P168
237. 3 1 215 http www m w com home htm 216 Ron Tdra and James L Rogers Profit from Intellectual Property at page 147 SPHINX Publishing 1 6 1 P285 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 Web
238. 5 4 3 2 1 E 0 2 15 10 5 3 1 1 5 4 3 2 1 E 0 3 5 4 3 2 1 4 5 4 3 2 1 5 3 5
239. 44 2001 pages 110 121 110 45 Phihppe Signore The benefits of provisional apphcations Managing Intellectual Property 114 Nov 2001 pages 70 75 1 2 2 P133 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 1 kk 134 134 2 Ca OCR CN 134 eC 11S rp RUI A re ee 135 1 4 136 TO 20 74 2 2 CPXOLI7 0 136 6 138 1 7 138 2 2 139 2R0 139 3 RSE 139 2 3 kk 140 2 4 CAFC kk 141 2 5 RR RNR 142 1 1
240. 4
241. 1990 UC Merges
242. IDS 3 3 3
243. DO 4 5 36 4 2 1 2 P118 48 7 48 7 lt
244. 1 1 P78 Our concern is whether you have any practice to confirm all inventors correct in the case where claims are amended modified For example there are three co inventors and a claim has elements A B andC When B is eliminated the person who is only contrbuted to the element B should no longer be listed as the inventor ls this necessary 2 2 1
245. 1 1 7 United States Code USC 100 35USCS100 35 100 Code of Federal Regulations CFR 1 1 37CFR1 1 37 1 1 Manual of Patent Examining Procedure MPEP 1 2
246. 3 1 000
247. 2 gt
248. 3 2
249. 37 IDS 1 8 1 2 P114
250. Q1 2 AUTM Email Q1 3
251. 7 10 1 6 1 P278 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007
252. A cc 1 6 1 P287 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 5 3
253. DCF DCF 1 5 P218 DCF 2 3 7
254. DNA Mg A 143 Regents of the University of California v Eli Lilly and Co 119 F 3d 1559 43 U S PQ
255. equitable estoppel 2 3 Webb Webb Webb v McGowin 168 So 196 Ala 1935 gt Webb McGowin McGowin McGowin Webb 15 8 McGowin McGowin
256. A
257. 7 7 1 1 QUESTION ANSWER
258. net profit gross profit 1 4 1 2 259 169 496 1696 x 2596 186 AUTM Technology Transfer Practice Manual 2002 2nd ed Part 8 187 A 1 Poltorak and P J Lerner Essentials of Licensing intellectual Property Wiley 2004 Chapter 9 1 6 P256
259. Death Valley J 3
260. 65 LexisNexis US Law Lecture 1 http www In academic jp lexns 1ectures uslaw_source htm 66 State Street Bank amp Trust Co v Signature Hinancial Group Inc 149 F 3d 1368 1374 75 47 USPQ2d 1602 Fed Cir 1998 67 http www venus dti ne Jp 1moue m bm_020528Festo_Ball htm 1 3 P146 SO gt
261. 3 3 1 36 2 1 2 P108
262. 2 1 3 1 P185 A2 Remarks A3
263. a an at least one a plurality of 1 A B C A B C 2 A B C A B C 1 2 2 1 2006 11 producible by produced by Producible Produced
264. Licensed Patent as used in this Agreement shall mean inclusive definiton exclusive definiton open definiton closed definiton 2 2 3 GRANT OF LICENSE
265. http www jpo go jp torikumi ibento text pdf h18_houkaisei 02 pdf 131 MPF 17 f 1 pages 301 304 MPE 112 6 mm 132 NIST MTTRE NIST Q amp A MITRE Corp
266. 2 Goal 1 IPO 2 M amp A 2 M amp A IPO
267. 50 Uniform Commercial Code 1951 1954 1962 1 2 P103 1 3
268. IDS 4 4 1 2 j 1 1 2 P117 2 1
269. 12 Rhicon v United States Surgical Corp 135 F 3d 1456 45 U S PQ 2d 1545 Fed Cir 1998 1 1 P75 1 2 4 AUTM
270. SED SED SED SED SED 1 2006 12 2007 1 SED
271. 2 234 225 Page 137 1 6 2 P298 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 5
272. 2 5 230 UP 1 6 2 P295 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 gt peppercom theory
273. 196 60 9 26 197 http 7wwwr pref miyag1 p se1bun syohi announce syo 20060203_4 pdf 1 6 1 P269 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 1 2 A 100 A
274. 1 1 Windows MacOS UNIX OS IT e Words http e words jp 2 2
275. exclusive nonexclusive 3 2 5 2 2 2 4 ROYALTY ROYALTY paid up royalty running royalty 4 1 6
276. paid up royalty running royalty 2 2 4 4 1
277. gt 1 1 P67 1
278. 3 1 2 1 2 1
279. IR 2004 http www toshiba cojp tech patip reportWindex j htm http Www ajinomoto co jp irintell html 4 1 1 1
280. A B A C A C C A
281. 3 2 550 549 233 231 page 15 1 6 2 P297 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 550
282. 1 1 1 P88 6 3
283. gt 2 gt gt 2
284. 1 2 3 1 3 1 2 100 7096 309 91 250 27 3 2
285. 1 2 P113
286. 1 1 P77 1 INVENTORSHIP Q1 1 Frequency of that an attorney decide the correct inventors According to AUTM Technology Transfer Manual the determination of inventorship involves a legal determination that must be carefully made by a patent attorney When the invention disclosure includes more than one inventor does an attomey USUALLY identify who are true inventors or OCCASIONALLY do that only when the attorney cannot believe that these listed inventors are correct We wonder that it would make the attomey busy very much and this work costly if the attomey did USUALLY Q1 2 Who is the correct inventor How do you determine who is the correct inventor S on a patent application Our concern is th
287. iD 1 3 Q1 1
288. 1951 6 300 10 8000 39 15 7 5000 3
289. 414 200 1 570
290. 4 2 2
291. DNA DNA
292. 7 601 622 7 601 85 3 10
293. 5 2 1 5 1 P235 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007
294. PCT 3 5 PCT PCT PCT PCT
295. IDS 1 2 P99 101 1 1 4 101 1 1 1 US Constitution 5 102 1 1 2 State Constitution 102 1 1 3 Federal Statute ki 102 1 1 4 State Statute 0 102 1 1 5 102 1 1 6 i 103 1 1 7
296. 1 2 2 P139 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 102 b New Railhead CAFC Bit housing asymmetric drill Housing110 A Bit Body106 US5 950 743 1 Claim 1 numeral and emphasis added An asymmetric drill bit for horizontal directional drilling in rock com
297. 2 1 3 1 P180 CIP Continued In Part Application
298. 2 59 IT 1 1 10 2 4 2
299. Inventorship Distribution of Royalties 1 2 20 20 20 3 112 4
300. 2 2 10 GOVERNING LAW 1 6 P250
301. 3 gt
302. 1 1 1 1 2 35 35USC 37 37CFR MPEP 2 1 EU
303. 4 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property 4 183 1 6 P254 CO en ee i na a
304. 59 404 5 9 399 696 Web Site http Www mujinkeiyaku com tokyo htm last visited March 2005 15 09 18 096 http www smbc card com memyloancash loancash_cashservice jsD last visited March 2005 27 896
305. A4 Q7 A1 A2
306. A2 Preamble A B C A B C B C Transition Words
307. All Elements rule 1 6 P261 5 8
308. 1 5 4 Supreme Court Supreme Court 55 1 2 P105 1
309. 22 100Q amp A page 28 222 Alexander 1 Poltorak Essentials of Licensmg Intellectual Property WILEY at pages 9 13 1 6 2 P291 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 Offer and Acceptance between Competent Parties Contract Consideration Legal Purpose Legal Purpose Offer and Acceptance Consideration Legal Purpose 90
310. 6
311. 162 37th Sheet 2006 12 16 SMIPS
312. TLO VC
313. Allowance Allowance
314. 89 A B C A B A B C A B A C B C A B C A B 90 Festo Corp v Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co 535 U S 722 2002 1 3 P154
315. 1 5 1 P237 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 7 3 3 Q A
316. have made have made in house have made gt 1 6 P258
317. 521 548 549 lt 554 555 lt 585 586 5 587 592 6 593 lt 600 201 1 6 1 P273 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 7 601 622 623 631 9 632 642 643 656 657 lt 666 12 667 lt 688 13 689 689 14 695
318. AUTM PC 3 3 3
319. lt gt 1 5 80
320. Web 4 4 x 2 1 10 2 2 1 10 3 x
321. 3
322. A 7 6 6 Q 1 5 1 P238 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007
323. 2005 12 7 1 6 6
324. Q qualiy C cost D delivery 3 60 70 145 2006 pages 1 20 146 PKK 1985 page 50 53 1 4 P195
325. 147 MBA MOT 2002 pages 134 155 148 W 2005 page31 1 4 P196 2 2 1 TI 3
326. 78 26 40 850 1 115 9 7750 250 NGB 12 9 CAD
327. Y Y 55 Ehicon US Surgical Ehicon US Surgical Y
328. 211 634 634 212
329. 7 4 4 Q A 7 5 5 Q
330. Q 1 1 P74 1 2 2 102 1 116 116 116 246 282
331. validity A 1
332. 2 2
333. 5 750 6596 Benford McLean 60 246 http7 tpro nikkeibp co jp article USNEWS 20051007 222426 247 http nternet watch impress co D www7 article 200271211 oval htm 248 CVE MITRE http cve mitre org about 7 1 2 MITER Corp P310 25 20 1 2
334. 1 1 4 State Statute 1 1 5 FDA Food and Drug Administration Federal Food and Drug Act
335. TY 9 http www ilc tsukuba ac jp rehp jp hp survey h18 nintei pdf 10 124 pages 1 6 http www chnzan yamaguchi u acJp katsudou nmages 060823 0823 pdf 1 Q amp A http home hiroshima u ac jp chizai dic q amp a21 30 html 1 1 P73 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1
336. 2 3 4 Contributors 13 AUTM AUTM pages 501 507 1 1 P76 1 2 5
337. 1 A4
338. 37 C F R 1 83 A B C A B C New Matter
339. 1998 TLO 1999
340. 4 5 x 2 1 10 2 2 1 10 3 1 6 1
341. 8 page 484 page 65 60 TLO BKC 17 OJT BP 2002
342. D F 3 4
343. pages 64 65 pages 62 63 17 OJT gt http ipw naist jp cast chizaoMnaistojt2005 1 pdf gt http ipw naistjp cast chizaolMnaistojt2005 3 shiryo2 pdf 2005 pages 72 78 gt http wwwr iip orjp Summary pdfdetail04j 16_12 pdf 1 Vol 52 No 6 2002 2003 pages 14 19 gt http wwwr iip orjp Summary pdfdetail02j 14_03 pdf 15 2 21 6 7 1 gt http wwwjpo 90 p Shiryou toushin Shingikaipdftokkyo_6 paper07 1 pdf
344. 708 90 708 obligation Consideration In consideration of 223 1 6 2 P292 Copyright Te
345. Inventor Information Web http www nist doV http patapsco nist gov ts 220 externalindex htm 7 1 1 NIST P308 7 FA 2006 2007 7 1 2 MITER Corp MITRE 1 kk 309 1 1 kk 309 1 2 i 311 2 kk 312 1 1
346. 227 228 pages182 229 225 P99 1 6 2 P294 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 3 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3
347. 193 2006 12 29 13 194 A I Poltorak and P J Lerner Essentials of Licensnng intellectual Property Wiley 2004 Chapter 10 AUTIM Technology Transfer Practice Manual 2002 2nd ed Part 8 Re 1 6 P263 lt
348. 1 2 C 1 2 D 1
349. 1 6 1 P284 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 Windows Mac OS UNIX Merrian Webster Dictionary2 5 3 Software something used or associated with and usually contrasted with hardware as a the entire set of programs procedures and related documentation associated with a system and especially a computer system specifically computer programs b materials for use with audiovisual equipment 1 related documentation 2 materials for
350. 10 20 10 100 15 100 10 29 29 5 2 29 29 20 29 29
351. 154 RDINET https info edinet go jp EdiHtml main htm 155 6 4 2006 pages 250 255 156 2006 pages 43 55 1 4 P201 4 6 win win 5 5 1
352. gt 1 6 1 P288 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 TLO BKC gt Ron Idra and James L Rogers Profit from Intellectual Property at page 147 SPHINX Publishing 1 6 1 P289 Copyright Tetsu Yo
353. 2 E 1 5 P223 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 1
354. 5 7 United State Patent and Trademark Office
355. 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 2000 2 4
356. 10 643 656 1 2 1 6 1 P279 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007
357. 100 100
358. 1 1 1 P92 2 PC KOKUYO LB208S PD A5
359. AUTM
360. Written Description In re Deuel Written Description DNA 19 Regents of the University of Cahfornna v Eli Lilly and Co 119 F 3d 1559 43 U S PQ 2d 1398 Fed Cir 1997 120 Enzo Biochem V Gen Probe 63 USPQ 2d 1609 1610 1611 1613 1614 CAFC2002 x 121 Written Description Ttokugikonj 1 3 P169 2 3 2 3 1
361. Johnson amp Johnston CAFC
362. Claims 46 35 USC S111 b 47 2 2005 pages 80
363. Duty to Disclose 17 OJT 2005 2003 2004 2005 gt http www mofa go p mofaj area usa keizapdfs kisei2005 k pdf 1 2 P121 2 6 2 Z 1 2 1
364. 1995 2 3 3 2 4
365. National Labor Relations Board National Labor Relations Act 32 Marbury v Madison 1803 33 Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act 1 2 P102 1 1 6
366. 14 9 1 14 9 1 36 4 2 29
367. 48 7 48 7 1 48 7 1 2 P119
368. EDINET https info edinet go jp EdiHtmmain htm FindLaw http corporate findlaw com EDINET gt EDINET Electronic Disclosure for Inventor s NETwork FindLaw gt FindLaw
369. continuation in part application CIP MPEP S 201 08 37CFR 1 53 b 2 2 3 4 Request for Continued Examination RCE
370. Written Description Written Description Eli Lilly 19 Written Description DNA DNA EIi Lilly
371. Q1 Q2 LABORATORY NOTEBOOKS LN Q1 The usage of lab notebooks According to AUTM Manual LNs are used for determination of inventor S the evidence of interference law suit etc Our concern is another use of LN For example when you made a contract of Know How license with a company a LN of the researcher would be valuable to define what the know how is Do you know a good example with respect
372. Y 1 1 4
373. 1 4 4 a b c q 4
374. A2 How to use 7 lt 127
375. 135 Landis on Mechanics of Patent Claim Drafting 3 15 Practicing Law Institute 136 2 137 6 2006 Vol 59 No 11 pages27 44 H 12 9 29 1 3 1 P182 obtainable by obtained by
376. 5 4 3 2 1 3 5 4 3 2 1 4 5 4 3 2 1 5 5 4 3 2 1
377. a 570 570 566
378. 4 3 3 1 250 250
379. 1 6 1 7 2
380. 161 pages 10 11 1977 2005 28 2
381. 1990 cDNA expressed sequence tag EST USPTO EST USPTO 101 112 2005 1 28 No 236 pages 91 99 122 Diamond v Chakrabarty 206 USPQ 193 CCPA 1980 123 Amgen Inc v Chugai Pharmaceutial Co 13 USPQ 2d 1737 1759 1987 124 U S Patent 5 747 282 1998 1 3 P170
382. 4 2
383. 4 5
384. material
385. 220 page 170 48 3219 92 43 12506 Es
386. A3 EX A Ais something which is lig
387. 150 BP Awareness 2006 06 1 4 P198 3 3
388. 5 188 5 1 LICENSED PATENTS LICENSED PRODUCTS TERRITORY
389. 102b 1 Applicants Acknowledged Statement
390. 5 3 5 4 3 1 20 10 http Wwwtse orjp cash stock stliisting_a html http www tse orjjp cash stock stlisting_e html 1 4 1 MOT P209 Copyright 2006 2007 NAIST EE NAI ST 7 FA 2006 2007 1 5
391. assignable nonassignable ASSGINMENT
392. WHEREAS Whereas WHEREAS Licensor is the owner of and is willing to WHEREAS Licensee is in the business of and desires to Whereas WITNESSETH RECITALS Chapter 2 1 6 P247 Consideration NOW THERFORE in consideration of the parties agree hereto as follows 1 2 2 2 DEFINITIONS 1 ARTICLE 1
393. 1 1 4 3
394. 208 3 2 208 4 208 157 http ipw naist jp cast _chizai index html 1 4 1 MOT P206 Copyright 2006 2007 NAIST 5 IPO kkk 209 950 OD 209 5 2 kk 209 nt MNO 209 5 4 eeeeeee 209 1
395. 3 4 1 2 19 1 25 UFJ
396. NAIST 39 6 70
397. 2 3 5 300
398. ld Page 86 Mills Wyman Mills Wyman Mills 2 2 Feinberg Feinberg Feinberg v Pfeiffer Co 322 S W 2d 163 gt 200
399. 4 5 6 7 2 written contract
400. DNA DNA In re Deuel DNA 1 3 P164 DO Q CO gt 4
401. 1 2 3 4 1 5 P216 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 2
402. 3 3 NAIST 3 1 NAIST 3 2 3 2 1
403. 48 7 49 5 IDS 3 3
404. 5
405. 1 1 1 2
406. 1 4 P202 OP 3 A
407. 1 2 P115 4 3 36 4 2 29 1
408. 1 1 1 US Constitution 6 shall be the supreme law of the Land 1 1 2 State Constitution 1 1 3 Federal Statute 6 1 8 subject
409. 3 2 2005 1503 63 163 12 12 164 2006 8 MG 840 1500 165 18 5 1 5 1 P234 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007
410. 5 D 1 4 2 1 2 4 3 2 1 3 5 4 3 2 1 4 5 4 3 2 1 5 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 D 30x 100
411. 149 INEXTTINGJ 2003 03 Vol 4 pages 13 23 1 4 P197 3 3 1
412. 1 3 P149 CPA 3 4 3 6 9 12 9
413. 205 29 2 5 5 2 206 O O 3 1 6 1 P277 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 13 1256 35 3 4 35 4 2005 4 1 4
414. 16 4 18 5 1 1 1 P98 EE NAIST 2006 2007 1 2 lt gt
415. 5 6 2 2 5
416. UFJ UFJ 3 5 IR 1 5 P227 IR
417. RCE 4
418. 69 69 6 696 404 5 2 521 696 13 2 14 13
419. 1 1 1 2 Agreement Contract Agreement Contract
420. A3 126 Open End or Closed End 17 page 289 pages 294 296 1 3 1 P177 Transitlon Words OPEN END A4
421. 1 1 1 P86 1
422. 2 2 6 TERM AND TERMINATION TERM TERMINATION 2 2 7 ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER
423. 80 1 9 exoim romaor 1 3 Pe or Ooion m Venture Capital Angels The Valley Availability of Capital 2 2 2003 491
424. lt Example 1 Assignment of Invention gt ASSIGNMENT OF INVENTION ASSIGNOR insert name and agoress of inventor or creator of intellectual property hereby sells assigns and transfers to 237 AUTM pages 48 84 238 avalable at www odu edu ao research New 20TP_TTDocuments ASSIGNMENT OF INVENTION doc last sited Dec 2006 1 6 2 P300 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 lt Material 2 Employment gt FORM OF ASSIGNMENT OF INVENTION NONDISCLOSURE ANDNONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT This Agreement is made between InPhonic Inc a Delaware corporation hereinafter referred to collectively with its subsidiaries as the Company and tne Employee Company the Company and the Employee agree as folows 1 Proprietary Information ASCAP
425. 35USC122 b 2 B 18 35USC122 b 1 A 37CFR1 18 d 3 37CFR1 211 e
426. PCT 6
427. 1 6 1 P282 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 TLO
428. 139 2 Seientific and Technical Information Center USPTO tokugikon fF 2004 3 80 No 232 pages 98 111 140 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co Ltd v Samsung Electronncs Co Ltd 98 1377 99 1103 Fed Cir 2000 1 3 1 P184 Q6
429. 1 2 3 Ehicon Inc v United States Surgical Corp X Ehicon A exclusive license X Y Z Y Ehicon US Surgical 34 50 US Surgical Y A Y Y 33 47 Y US Surgical Ethicon Ehicon
430. gratuiies 224 pages 32 33 225 pages 82 108 226 1 6 2 P293 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 gt promissory estoppel
431. gt 241 1 6 2 P302 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 gt In consideration of
432. pages 23 http www sangaku titech ac Jp 08information file H16 ohokanri houkokusho pdf 25 AUTM 6 2 pages 536 539 26 27 2006 Vol 59 No 9 1 1 1 P87 AUTM
433. 5 1 5 P224 E 1 1 B 2 C 3 D 81 100 1 61 80 2 3 1 2 TLO 10
434. A1 Preamble One Sentence One Sentence A B C A A One Sentence
435. 2002 1 6 P267 EE NAITST 2006 2007 1 6 1 LA LA
436. 4 4 217 45 48 Ds 218 5 47 2 4 219 6 85 2 2
437. 2004 7 1 109 2 2 9 MOST FAVORED NATIONS
438. A2 producible by produced by 137 x X A obtainable by producible by 112 2 134 RIGHTNOWJ 2007 2 pages 46 49
439. 1 6 1 P274 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 2 4 91 91 2 4 1
440. Guide Mien al A Se Computer implemented Inventions Method 2 Nature of Inventions The United States Programs NN program product 1986 SS Fr Programs Computer readable media Claimable targets Apparatuse Methods 2 Computer readable media Apparatuses 2 Claimable targets 2 42220 2M 3 cmes0 Pure Business Computer implemented Inventions Methods Methods Nature of Inventions 41 H Furutani Patentability of Business Method Inventions in Japan Compared with the US and Europe USPTO November 3 2003 1 2 1 P128 Europe Programs iW
441. 1 5 1 P232 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 1 3 GAP 1 2 3
442. 1 A 2 2 A
443. 572 526 2 2 4 3 35 85 2
444. 1 8 8 1 5 1 P239 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 2003 2006 1 5 1 P240 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 AI ST 2006 2007 1 6 1980
445. 3 3 1 1 5 P226
446. Webb McGowin gt materal benefit McGowin Webb McGowin
447. 1 6 P243 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 paid up royalty running royally 2 cross license 3
448. 3 4 2 3 3 DCF discounted cash flow 2 3 1
449. 4 3 1 4 1 MOT P208 Copyright 2006 2007 NAIST
450. DNA gt cDNA SNPs cDNA SNPs 2 US EPC JP 2003 6 DNA
451. 2 2
452. 1 2 P109 37CFR1 63 a 4
453. 2006 MBA MOT 2002 NEXTING 2003 03 Vol 4 pages 13 23 2006 2 2001 TLO 2002 2002 PF 1985 W 2005 17 OJT Web
454. kk 187 2 4 i 188 2 5 kk 188 2 6 kk 188 So 189 1 1 1 NAIST 1 2 18 12 26 1 1 3 1 P176 2 2 1 Q1
455. PC NAIST NAIST Q1 a b c PC d Q2 Q1 al b c Q3 a b c d Q4 a b Q0
456. Whereas B X Consideration 1 WITNESSETH RECIATL THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between a company organized and existing under the laws of the state of having its principal office at
457. 1 36 1 2 P107 112 35USCS112 2 3 3 Continuing Application
458. A B C a AB C 1 1 2 509 1
459. LL 233 2 kk 233 3 kk 234 3 1 kik 234 3 2 uuuuuuiuiiiiiiiikii hb 234 4 235 5 i 235 5 1 gt YY 235 5 2 235 6 kk 236 7 kk 236 7 1 1 236 7 2 2 kk 237 7 3 3 uci 238 7 4 4 kk 238 7 5 5 kk 238 7 6 6 kk 238 8 ED 239 1 5 1 P231 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 1 GAP
460. 549 593 587 534 536 lt 1 gt 1 1 1 1 2 Continued Employment
461. http nexi go jp 2 1 5 P214 2 2
462. 1 2 4 94 Johnson amp Johnston Accocs v R E Serc Co No C97 04382 CRB N D Cal 1998 95 B J vol XI 5 1 3 P156 6 184
463. 38 49 1 2 123 1 2 26 4 3 36 1 2 38 126 1 134 2 1
464. 49 5 48 7 48 7
465. A
466. CIP In Vitro In Vivo CIP 1 3 1 P188 Q2 LA A gt MTA
467. EX 4 1500 60
468. P152 lt D gt 1 A B 2 C 1 3 D 1 2 4 E 1 3 1 1 A B 2 A B C 3 A B DLA B C D 4 A B ELA B C E A B D E A B C D E 1 4 3 4 4
469. 73 4 14 5 23 11 12699 1 1 P70 1 1 3 13 7196 X Y Y X 2 X A B X Y X X Y Y
470. Apple AOL AMD D SEC 1 3 3 1 3 1 1 12 8
471. MB 530A 5 10 20 7 11 28 A OB 17 10 19 Written Description Written Description 112 36
472. 1 6 P241 241 243 oe 244 2 7 245 2 I ep 245 2 1 2 _ i 245 2 1 3 kk 245 246 2 2 DO 246 2 247 2 2 2 DEFINITIONS kk 248 2 2 3 GRANT OF LICENSE kk 248 2 2 4 ROYALTY kk 248 2 2 5 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 249 2 2 6 TERM AND TERMINATION 249 2 2 7 ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER kk 249 2 2 8 TAX tt 250 2 2 9 MOST FAVORED NATIONS kk 250 2 2 10 GOVERNING LAW kk 250 2 2 11 ARBITRATION 251 1 6 P242 2 2 12 NONWAIVER 251 2 2 13 ee 251 2 EGODIKNSISSDMNRM GIEZ 251 3 1 ikki 252 3 2 253 3 254 45 OO Ooo OC 254 4 OS 255 4 2 kk 256 5
473. 5 1 1 Premises MTA Material Transfer Agreement 235 286 In c
474. MITRE MITRE s Technology Transfer Office TTO 1999 TTO MITRE TTO 2005 gt License and Patent Summary for 2005 Internal Patent Patent Disclosures Applications Patents MITRE Non Revenue Centers Licenses Received Submitted lssued Corporate 0 0 AFC 9 WC3 CAASD CEM CIIS 2005 Total Types of licenses executed U S patents granted to MITRE andthenew through the TTO program invention disclosures received by TTO 25 10 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Academic Government Open Source WPatents Granted BM Commercial Company Internal Invention Disclosures 249 http7 www mitre org work tech_transfer pdf7TTO_summary_report_2006 pdf 7 1 2 MITER Corp P311 2 MITRE Corp
475. pages 106 123 8 2 4 2004 9 14 http www jipa or jp katsudou project sangaku pdf syutokumanu pdf 1 1 P72
476. 1 1 P80 2 3 AUTM Q2 1 Q2 2 Q2 3 2 The contribution of each inventor The background of this question The Japanese patent law has strict rule regarding ermployee s invention That is an employer must pay for REASONABLE remuneration to an employee when the employee assigns to his employer in accordance with the contract
477. 152 1 2 1 kk 152 1 2 2 kkk 153 1 2 3 kk 155 2 156 N25 i i 158 eeetexee 159 2 1 uci 159 2 2 163 2 2 1 kk 164 2 2 2 Lk 165 2 2 3 kk 168 2 00 lt Of 170 2 3 1 kk 170 2 3 2 biotechnological process i 171 2 3 3 kk 171 2 3 4 RA a 172 1 3 P145 1 1 1 1 1
478. 2002 2002 Patent 2007 1 Vol 60 Web Awareness gt http chizai nikkeibp co jp chizaietc Shinagawa20050301 html http Www marelli co p jiten html gt http nexi go jp Super TLO gt http www kansaktlo co jp Supertlo internationallicense process02 html http www businesSs I D news for pade chizai 200612130009o nwc http www oceantomo com http www jpo go jp torikumi hiroba tokuiten htm http www kigyouka sakura ne jp contents ibuka htm 1 5 P229 2006 2007 1 5 1
479. NN 79 2 2005 page 69 1 3 P150 1 1 4
480. P167 MPEP 2107 02 lt Dane K Fisher gt ESTs 101 101
481. 14 8 27 18 7 19 2 page59 9 pages 141 142 1 1
482. 1 6 P245 2 1 4 2 2 Title LICENSE AGREEMENT
483. 101 116 1 2 1 2 Burroughs Wellcome Co v Baee Labs Inc 40 F 3d 1223 1228 Fed Cir 1994 Fiers v Revel 984 F 2d 1164 1168 25ISPQ2d 1601 1604 Fed Cir1993 Garrett Corp v United States 422 F 2d 874 Ct Cl 1970 Englehardt Minerals and Chemicals Corp v Anglo American Clays Corp 223 USPQ 755 M D Ga 1984
484. Q2 A1 1 A 2 A B A X A B X Y X Y A X A X Y
485. ee 221 3 kk 222 3 1 kk 222 3 1 1 kl 222 3 1 2 TLO ccc 225 3 1 3 225 3 2 226 3 3 kk 226 3 4 kk 227 3 5 kk 227 4 228 5 228 1 5 P211 1
486. 17 2 2005 page 69 2003 Right Nowl 2007 vol 22 pages 42 45 Right Now 2007 vol 22 pages 50 54 2006 Vol 59 No 2 pages 29 40 2004 Vol 57 No 3 pages 41 45 125 2003 pages 125 126 1 3 P172 Festo Corp v Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co 535 U S 722 2002 2 2004 pages 22 27 E
487. 1 6 1 P271 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 570 414
488. OO 1 GO 2 Q1 py 5231 8 Q2 Q3 1 1 1 P91 Q4 3 3 2 2 4 1 PC PC
489. ee 3 200 15 gt 2 2 29 1
490. 37 CFR 1 77 a Utility application transmittal form Fee transmittal form Application data sheet Specification Drawings Executed oath or declaration Power of Attomey for Patent Application Q O O Assignment 37CFR1 76 a Application Information Applicant Information Correspondence Information Representative Information Domestic Priority Information Foreign Priority Information Assignee Information 37CFR1 76 b 50 250
491. 5 IDS 1 2 P120
492. PCT PCT 30 30 PCT PCT PCT PCT 1 2 1 P122
493. BP Awareness 2006 06 http chizai nikkeibp coJp chizaietc oit20060607 html BP Awarenessj 2006 06 http chizai nikkeibp coJp chizaietc oIt20060605 html 1 4 P205 2006 2007 1 4 1 MOT
494. 37CFR1 219 1 2 P111 reasonable royalty Provisional Rights 35USC154 d 35USC154 d 1 B 35USC154 d 2 PCT 35USC102 6 3 3 36 4 2 14
495. 1 4
496. 2 2 13 Attorney in Fact Power of Attorney 3 178 1 6 P251
497. 9 28 2 6 29 1 1 15 1 16 HP http www meti go jp polhicy7anpo kanricatch allcatch all kisei htm 30
498. 112 1 2 2 P135 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 1 4 PCT IDS gt 12 12
499. 2 7 A4
500. NAIST David POSZ 243 http patapsco nist gov ts 2207externalindex htm 7 1 1 NIST P307 NAIST OTT Invention Disclosure Information
501. 1 2 Do 198 199 pages 120 151 200
502. 1985 1 2 1 P124 1988 2 2 1 2 2
503. P69 18 9 12 16 26283
504. Public Domain 3 1 Do 90
505. 1 2 2 87 http mihonir exblog Jp 88 http 7www shinohara eng com method 10 html 1 3 P153 all element rule
506. Y X A X A A X A C 69 A X X X A A B
507. kk 257 257 2 11H P CO 258 259 5 7 260 OO 260 5 261 5 RE 262 BON 262 6 263 6 1 1 263 6 2 kk 264 0600 265 6 4 266 GO 266 6 6 3 267 1 nonexclusive license exclusive license
508. 1I 1 6 1 P283 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 4 3 X
509. 6 A 5 3 1 A 2
510. 1 4 P199 gt gt 100 Se 9 996 10 5 j 9926 5 ne lt a 20000 a 3 3 2
511. 7 97 2006 Vol 59 No 2 pages 29 40 98 nature Jobs amp events 2005 3 1 3 P159
512. IMD 1991 1 2000 2 17 MD 1 4
513. A 3 1 4 P203
514. EU PCT 38 39 4 2 40 2005 lt 17 OJT 1 2 1 P125
515. 96 NPV B DCF DCF DCF DCF
516. 2006 2 2 12 2002 pages 70 79 18 NRDO ht
517. X NIST 1901 1300 Standard Reference Material SRM NIST 3 1997 2001 2005 2006 9 3000 1 120 1116
518. 3 370 C
519. 1 3 P161 1998 DNA SNPs Haplotype DNA
520. 102 e 56 35 USC 154 3 57 35 USC 184 58 MPEP 706 02 59 2 2004 pages 72 73 ul 1 2 2 P137 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 Patent Pending Patent Pending Patent Pending
521. JO D 198 3 2 pp 198 3 3 199 3 3 1 199 3 3 2 200 4 200 oe ee 200 2 MT nn 200 4 DTP Oe 201 4 4 201 4 5 kk 201 4 6 V 202 5 202 5 1 uttii 202 5 2 es 202 5 3 kk 204 1 1 1 IMD 2002 30 80 90 1
522. 1 3 1 P190 Q7 Q1 DNA iRNA
523. 59 6 2
524. Executive Branch 1 1 31 1 2 P101
525. P132 FDS3L 2006 2007 1 2 2 Claims lt gt
526. 158 159 2003 pages 56 59 160
527. 4 1 612 1 209 77 78 30 31 63 79
528. P110 3 13 9 30 7
529. 2 2 3 DNA X cDNA DNA DNA
530. MOT DCF 2000 http wwwJjpo qo p torikumi hiroba tokuiten htm 1 5 P222 5 A If B C D E A B
531. x GO X O x x O O x 181 182 4 4 1 6 P253
532. 1 3 1 P179 or 18 MPF
533. 91 91 gt 1
534. J amp vol XI 5 nature Jobs amp events 2005 3 2004 pages 124 128 pages 45 57 1999 No 205 pages 25 32 2004 pages 82 87 2002 pages 70 79 tokugikon 2006 5 8 No 241 pages
535. http Www smbc co jp kojin campaign3 index html2banner_id 76 last visited March 2005 1 309 2 3596 10096 1 6 1 P275 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 2006 12 59 6
536. 3 1 4 4 1 259 4 2596 284 259 Gary M Ropski and Marc Cooperman Damages in USA Intellectual Property Litigation JPOS March 1990 p 181
537. P248 2 2 5 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES REPRESENTATION misrepresentation material WARRNANTY
538. PCT 2 4 Assignment 1 2 1 P127
539. MPEP 2173 05 h Il OR TEMINOLOG A2 my invention A3 OO 130
540. 4 2 404 59 x x 2 1 555
541. 1 ASCAP 5 2 MTA MTA MTA MTA
542. 1 6 P266 6 6
543. A X A B Y 2 1 1 1 2
544. A1 10 S A B
545. 10 Home fiom Pi Date to tsuane Pending Data 40 50 gona DMsionan CB A Provisiorals Gi web Patently O 1 1 5 102 b
546. 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 173 A I Poltorak and P J Lerner Essentials of Licensing intellectual Property Wiley 2004 Chapter 2 174
547. 200 800 200 800 200 200 200 200 1000 800
548. 210 1 8 30 570 1 6 1 P280 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 49
549. 48 7 36 4 2 48 7 49 5
550. 1 36 4 2 36 4 2 36 4 2
551. 7 2 gt http wwwJjpo 9oJp Shiryoutoushin Shingikaipdftokkyo_6 paper07 2 pdf 2576927 Vol 100 2003 11 gt http www hanketsu j Oorjp hanketsujjsp hatumeisihyou 200311hyou html gt http www ilc tsukuba ac jp rehp jp hp survey h18 nintei pdf 124 gt http wwwr chiZai yamaduchi u ac p katsudou images 060823 0823 pdf Daniel A Scola Jr The Art of Inventorship New Joursey Law Jourmal July21 1997 gt http www hoffmannbaron com press inventorship cfm Diana Sheiness et al The importance of gettng inventorship right Nature Biotechnology 24 153 154 2006 gt ht
552. 1 6 P249 2 2 8 TAX
553. 26 LT 1 1 1 P89
554. Gaithersburg Md 234ha Boulder Colo 84ha 2 900 1800 350 1400 242 http www nist gov 7 1 1 NIST P306 1 2 NIST Office of Technology Partnerships OTP Web Liceses and Patents OTP NIST NIST the Small Business Innovation Research Program SBIR NIST Technology Serviees Technologqy Parfnerships How to Work With NIST NIST Patent Policy Working with NIST brochure NIST 2005 Annual Report on T
555. Kimbaly Clark v Procter amp Gamble 973 F 2d 911 Fed Cir 19921 Ethcon Inc v United States Surgical Corp 135 F 3d 1456 1460 Fed Cir 1998 10 1 6 7 9 10 10
556. P286 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 4 4 4 5 2 1 10 3 7 2 1 4 2 2 JIS JIS
557. ki 103 25 9 0 103 3 i 104 4 104 5 104 1 5 1 US Supreme Court kk 104 1 5 2 US Court of Appeals 105 1 5 3 US District Court es 105 1 5 4 105 EE 106 2 106 2 1 1 106 2 2 i 107 2 2 1 kk 107 2 3 i 107 2 31 1 0 ER 107 2 R SBRRSRSBeeaSBRSHERel 107 2 3 3 i 108 2 3 4 i 108 3 Li 108 1 2 P100 3 0 108 3 2 110 3 3 NI NIE I 2 112 4 113 114 2 cece 115 4 3 kk 116 2 117 57 KM 118 Gi 120 1 50
558. 1 80 BD BD 18 7 BD 2 6 8 2 11 6 CPA 1 CPA 1 CPA 1 1 CPA 1 75 http www bekkoame ne Jp yab2 76 CPA 2000 5 29 CPA 1999 17 RCE pages 106 145 146 US Patent Related Information E RCE
559. 18 18 ID 19 3 NAIST 2006 2007 1 gt NIST 2 lt gt Inventorship Distribution of Royalties Laboratory Notebooks IDS US FIRMS N N ok NN ODO OO OO PR 0 WO NM J N N N NM NM P66 P85 P99 P122 P133 P144 P175 P193 P206 P210 P230 P241 P268 P290 P306 P309 P313 P330 P339 P355 P64 Marketing Tips in the US 2 4 P371 NIST Q amp A 2 4 1 P390 MITRE Corp
560. verbal contract 170 17 OJT 1 1 171 A I Poltorak and P J Lerner Essentials of Licensing intellec
561. 0 DCF discounted cash flow DCF 1 5 P217 100 5 1 105 1 105 100 DCF 1 2 2 1
562. 17 RIGHT NOWJ 2007 2 pages 46 49 1 3 1 P191 2006 Vol 59 No 11 pages27 44 USPTO tokugikon 2004 3 30 No 232 pages 98 111 Right Now 2007 Vol 22 pages 50 54 1997 Web http www jpo go jp torikumi ibento text pdf h18_houkaisei 02 pdf 1 3 1 P192 AIS FFA 2006 2007 1 4
563. 1 2 5 IDS IDS 10096 IDS lt IDS
564. 75 1 2 3 Ehicon Inc v United States Surgical Corp 75 1 2 4 kk 76 1 3 77 2 000 79 2 0 79 2 2 80 2 3 81 1 1 P66 i
565. 2 5 P405 US Firms Q amp A 2 6 P416 P65 AIS 7 A 2006 2007 1 1 1 0 68 68 1 1 1 68 1 1 2 70 1 1 3 13 7196 71 1 1 4 72 1 1 5 72 1 2 74 1 2 1 74 1 2 2
566. 3 1 2 2 36 4 2
567. 64 1 6 1 2
568. Compuler HHHHHHHUHHHH i readable 8 media 48 Apparatuses 1986 AMG Methods EA eo echmies Pure Business Computer implemented Inventions Methods Nature of Inventions 2 6 MPF 112 6 Festo 1 gt
569. Housing Vermeer Drill Bit Angled Features 2 5 Key unitary bit body 706 being an9 e9
570. Q0 1 a b c Q0 2 a b c d Q1 a b c PC d Q2 Q1 a b c Q3 a b c d Q4 Q3 a b 1 1 1 P90 3 2 2 5 30
571. 1 4 1 MOT P207 Copyright 2006 2007 NAIST 3 2 3 1 3 2
572. 1999 2 1904 244 http www mitre org 245 http7 homepage1 nifty com bicycletour sci ron priv htm IT 7 1 2 MITER Corp P309 lt MITRE gt MITRE CME ID Common Malware Enumeration CME 2005 10 ID 1 2 3 US CERT Open Vulnerability Assessment Language OVAL M
573. 4 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 2
574. 696 3 10 9 565 565 2 3
575. 74 USPTO Annual Reports http www uspto gov web offices com annualindex html 1 3 P148 2003 2004 2005 2006 USPTO 6 723 6 816 7 363 8 189 3 579 3 681 4 177 4 779 308 443 978 1 218 gt 2000 Assistant Examiner 300 350 Primary Examiner 550 650 1 2 2 1BD Balance Disposal
576. Further the REASONABLE remuneration must be defined calculated by the real contribution of the inventor and jointinventors However it is impossible to estimate the value of the invention when it is fled The value will usually become apparent a couple of years or decades from the filling Japanese Patent Law Our question is Q2 1 Do you have any guideline in order to define a proportion of the contribution of each inventor Q2 2 When do you decide the proportion 1 Invention disclosure 2 at the filing of the application 3 at the receiving of allowance 4 other Q2 3 When inventors disagree on the proportionate how do you setlle such disputes Example procedures have included Referenced by AUTM having the Provost serve as the adjudicator having Iinventors themselves establish a procedure for resolution having third party determine the relative contribution to the invention 9 1 1 P81 AUTM AUTM 6 1 13 4
577. M amp A C F Cash Flow C F 5 IPO 5 1 5 2
578. NAIST 1 87 2 NAIST kk 88 3 NAIST 89 3 1 kk 89 3 2 kk 89 8 21 os 89 3 2 2 1 91 Go 91 91 3 3 2 92 3 3 3 ee 92 III ii 96 1 1 1 P85 4 Muu 97 gt 1
579. P163 EST Expressed sequence tag 4 29 1 29 2 29 1 36 4 102 103 101 112 2 2 1 DNA cDNA
580. 1 MITRE MITRE s Mission As a public interest company MITRE works in partnership with the government applying systems engineering and advanced technology to address iSsues Of critical national importance MITRE 3 FFRDCs Federally Funded Research and Development Centers 3 MITRE
581. DNA DNA DNA Chakrabarty 101 Inventions patentable manufacture composition of matter isolated purified DNA EST Cell line virus EST
582. specific substantial credible CIP 1
583. 6 10 12 http7wwwjjpo go jp torikumrkokusai kokusai3 3kyoku_tokkyo_h15 htm 1 3 P162 NEDO 2006 20
584. known to him on the application filing date of carrying out the invention Description Requirement The traditional view of this legal reduirement was that the language of patent claims presented or amended after the fling date of the application must find adequate support in the written description portion of the patent document the same invention
585. provisional divorced from any discussion whatsoever of the bit housing combination do not convey to one of ordinary skill that Cox was in possession of the bit housing angle that is a limitation of the invention claimed in the 283 patent Angled Drill Bit 2 Vas Cath Inc v Mahurkar 935 F 2d 1555 19 USPQ 2d 1111 Fed Cir 1991 At 1117 The purpose of the written description reduirement is broader than to merely explain how to make and use the application must also convey with reasonable clarity to those skilled in the art that as of the filling date sought he or she was in possession of the invention Martin v Maryer 823 F 2d 500 3 USPQ2d 1333 Fed Cir 1987 Jepson v Coleman 314 F 2d 533 136 USPQ 647 CCPA 1963 1 2 2 P141 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 3 US patent 5 899 283 col 3 1 49 col 4 5 4 at page 1846 section 1 of right column COX Heel toe Heel toe Angle New Railhead Joseph Steele Drill Bit Heel and Toe
586. use with audiovisual eqduipment AV MATERIALS MATE RIALS CD DVD
587. 01 9 30 7 2 3 2 3 1 same patentable invention 35USC135 a 37CFR1 601 conception reasonable diligence reduction to practice
588. 160 PA tPA 2 240U mg VIII C gt The Prospect Theory 1977 Kitch The Reward Theory
589. 2d 1398 Fed Cir 1997 1 3 1 P187 2 4 Q A D C 2 5 Q A RCE CIP
590. 4 3 2 1 E 0 6 5 3 1 7 5 4 3 2 1 35x 100 5 C 1 5 4 3 2 1 2
591. 69 77 2005 Vol 58 No 2 pages 71 81 Written Description tokugikon 2005 1 28 No 236 pages 91 99 2003 pages125 126 Web LexisNexis US Law Lecture 1 gt http www In academic p lexis lectures uslaw_source htm gt http www venus dti ne Jp inoue Im bm_020528Festo_Ball htm 42 gt http pc watch impress co jp docs 200670502 high42 htm USPTO Annual Reports gt http www uspto 9oVweb offices com annual index html US Patent Related Information gt http www bekkoame ne jp yabz 1 3 P173 gt http nihonir exblogJp gt http www shinohara eng commethod 10 html DNA gt http www j
592. 8 309 308 4 page 112 1 2 2 P134 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 1 3 112 1 3 Enablement Requirement The enablement provision specifies that an inventor must disclose both how to make the invention as well as how to use it Best Mode Requirement Under U S patent law it is not enough that an applicant has merely disclosed one way of making and using the invention he bears a further obligation to disclose the best way
593. Agreement 1 Consideration es 291 291 1 2 Agreement CONGaGNO EE uu 291 2 FA 293 2 1 0 Mils seein 293 2 2 Feinberg 293 2 3 Webb LULL 294 2 4 pre existing duty rule es 295 1 6 2 P290 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 25S lt 295 2 6 NIS NNIAI NNNG NN NN AR NNA INN MR nA AA 297 3 297 1 3 297 32 297 4 9 2 298 5 odie 299 5 RR lt NR SR 299 5 2 MTA kk 301 5 3 i 302 6 302 1 Consideratlon
594. ITRE 2002 12 Open Vulnerability Assessment Language OVAL OVAL OVAL Query MITRE Common VulInerabilities and Exposures CVE OVAL
595. T O1 PUB SSSTUULIBT juattmias on SelBIS Past at PIOY ol saaIse tfatdia OS Burop Wo MeT Aq pearqrload sssfum S lonpord IBTQJSUTTOS BUNBINSaL AUB 10 lsford WILasay Ah arms gt nptoo IstrHosisd ro tontunnStr st oafozrd UoIbesey a Jo IUatitasIoptte Ue so AdUT 10 IAF TL al JOU saarie itarditaad Oslord Dieasad 3 JO as mas am UE aaAQfGUie ST AG apet SHOIMNTSAUT UF SHUSU fadond fetuSsifsUL Jaqlo IO aed Xute ol atU Ubial eys JHatdros SHT SD TIPO Hada saled pI JO SIUSL Alartdozrd ro Uajed Aue a3uryu IOU TIM EURILLN WorkseA st TO as ae SHOTBIUasaldal ou soyLIU Ispliold ISOTA IdT HY TAIILAYI Y A01 SSINIII HO ALITIAVINVHDIYINK IO ALNVAEVAY ANV DNICT 1TINI ITdINT O SSITAIXI SIIINVAAVAL ON HILW INIIdIIFH OL Tdd 1S 9NI39 ST LI Ammo treasal at OF SSEAESS 6 St pspLMoId st UAILIN IUDIeasad SHEL 9 Ueidioay Pie Iepiaord Aq pearie ATTEIURGT Se JO basodsTp esaIalo 10 JUatdiaaxd Aq pakonssp aq TH TeUBIPIN Hieasaxd a0 SIT srnooo IaxAatpHEA pasdefa 2Aby seas c aar ID Palafdruos stloaford Moleasa a UAL sasodmd tLwO SITIOF HT asn ol PUB SHetRO oj TPTESIPIN areasa SUH SOILTNSID ol USU at sarasal IepIAO0Id epLerdJo esordde TLL aotBApb Mo HUOISLAIsdns 12anp ST TO JST Iapun Jot aldoad Testie 0 LTaietI Loleass am I2ISULD 0 JOU ssal5b TSUHRT PU TPLISIEIN Tolesey STH IaAo Iontroo ULjar O1 SaaI5P arIojafatll IOILBUSSAU ttatdros TSPINOId ol ATe1aLtdOTH palspIsHUoo st Pltv TsDIAOTH TO Hed ath UO NISUNSSAUT ULIIMSIS 6 SiUesaIda
596. ak Essentials of Licensing Intellectual Property WILEY AUTM vs 1 6 2 P305 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 NAIST ID 3A 2006 2007 7 1 1 NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST 1 kkk 306 1 1 D 306 1 2 DU TO 307 2 307 1 1 1 NIST
597. e procedure for determining inventors and the cnteria also Q1 2 1 Do you have any guideline to decide inventors Q1 2 3 What kinds of materials without a laboratory notebook are useful to decide the DrOper inventors For exarmple meeting memo emall etc Have you ever had an interview with the people who are listed as inventors to verify Q1 3 When do you determine the jointinventors According to the Ehicon Inc v U S Surgical case we know that all inventors must be named in a patent application even if they worked only for tny dependent claims or their contributions are small It is said that all inventors are listed correctly when the application is fled However claims are generally Supposed to change through the examination Because an examiner usually provides prior art which is against patentability of the invention When a new element is added in a claim to go around prior art there are possible that another person might be included as an inventor 4 Right Now 2007 2
598. e they Ssubject matter of the claims are accurately 1 2 2 P140 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 scaled drawings of the actual tool one of ordinary skill could actually construct the tool itself from these drawings and if that were done the heel and toe portions would be present comments added 2 4 CAFC CAFC CAFC 2 Written Requirement Written Requirement the angled drill bit the toe or the heel heel toe ratio a high angle of attack the offset drill points At page 1848 The passing references to a high angle of attak and high included angle offsets in the
599. echnology ransfer Federal Technology ranSfer Act of 1986 ml U S_ Patent and Trademark Office Licenses and Patents s Licensinq NIST Inventions a How to Apply for a License s Search NIST Patents Licensable Technologies Inventions fice of Technology Partnerships 100 Bureau Drive Stop 2200 Gaithersburg MD 20899 2200 Website Comments OTP royalty exclusive license non exclusive license 2
600. esey at0 0 elqeorndde suouelnsar pue saltu ieTaDe TY DEN AIdttoS ol saarBb Beltdios Pannpal aq Aeur eStTsSHT TOHNeZ1TeToTatTTCtfOS UNL IOF SIBS 10 Tomonboxd UAISS SU TS sasodnad jorlatthttoo 10 DaSt sq 10U HLM TOKtSiCIN SCaSs StTT SUQTItDtOS InettrmtejttOo PIQDIINS Tapim AO S PaqUasap iaaford Woeasey a 10J IOJO1OQT JSTL STTL UE iQje3TsaAUT SUHaidfosxl Aq sasodmd tf reasan IOr pasn aq ATUO TA BteiGTN Usressan SRIL STO HP 1S NXVIVIH NT G3Sn 38 TON XYIN TYTHIIVI HIXVSSSXN SIHL TCUaJ6TN ToyeasaT BULMOTIOT st ofsq PStttetr JO1eSGSeAuT sardroa ol IaJsUPH ol SaarSE faptaord 1 Juardioad apIAOIG Uaidiaay 10 iepRard SH Sb ofaq PagnuspI St SHd IsqaUA TIsJBTN Uorbpasad leUalbtHr ETDaSat Ja SISTSHIGH IP UL SHd SQLMISS eaH HING at se Usred ol parsJal AlasDaalloo OHitfaAard PUe IONUO ssbssIG JoJ SIsilla St DU UonensTIMOPY BN pUe pood at HICH TO SalBHSIT TRUONEN srB Aq sstt 10 paldope Ueeq se YLA TetUtaai JaTSUBIT TIIeJeTN SFEL INIIVNAIHOF JSNVHITVII3SLIVEIV 3SLLTSS HIe3H SIG lt HIN lt q pedsHqnd VLN 8 sldurexd gt P304 NY CN G gt gt ro MK NN 100Q amp A Alexander Poltor
601. hter than water something A is lighter than water A4 producible by 2 2 Q5 IDS 188 Atlantic Thermoplastics Co Inc v Faytex Cor
602. ntracts corporate fimndlaw comy Intellectual Property Agreements 177 A I Poltorak and P J Lerner Essentials of Licensing intellectual Property Wiley 2004 1 6 P246 2 2 1 Agreement Parties Witnesseth Whereas Consideration LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made by and between Aand B WITNESSETH WHERAS A owns x WHERAS B wishes to practice x NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein the parties agree as follows Parties A B Agreement Witnesseth Whereas A X
603. onsideration of give and take page 52 1 6 2 P299 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 MTA Material Transfer Agreement
604. p USPQ 2d 1481 Fed Cir 1992 1 3 1 P183 A1 109 A2
605. pages 109 122 1 6 1 P272 Copyright Tetsu Yoshida 2006 2007 2 2 404 59 6 59
606. pdfO1 pdf gt http www kyoto u ac p kenkyu 02 tokky documents 03 pdf http www somuka titech ac jp Kisoku contents8 16Y135 pdf gt http www ipo osaka u ac jp img download_img download_socel titekizaisanpolicy pdf http www policycomell edu cm_images uploads polPatent html http www techtransferharvard edu fles SupplementRSPpdf Binghamton http research binghamton edu TT pdfBinghamton7 20University7 20Royalty 20Dis tribution 20Plan pdf gt http Wwwwr uvapf orgresources index cfrmfuseaction viewpadepage_id 42 CFID 786 7 amp CFTOKEN 67147635 amp http Wwww research buffalo edu policies royalty_distnbution_policy cf 1 1 P83 gt http gra sdsu edu research Dhp 7areaid 2 amp sectionid 12 amp subsectionid 72 http research ulowa edu techtransferdownloads INVENTOR 20REVENUE 20DIS TRIBUTION 20AGREEMENT doc 1 1 P84 2006 2007 1 1 1
607. po go jp torikumi kokusai kokusai3 tizai3 htm gt http www jpo go jp torikumi kokusai kokusai3 pdf 1312 027_b3b_reach pdf gt http www jpo go jp torikumi kokusai kokusai3 pdffwm4 3d_ re jp pdf 2003 6 10 12 gt http Www jpO 9oJDp torikumkokusaikokusai3 3kyoku_tokkyo_h15 htm NEDO gt http www nedo goJDp roadmap index html 1 3 P174 MII NAIST FD 34 2006 2007 1 3 1
608. prisind 8 a bit body 706 attached to an end of a VE sonde housing 110 the unitary bit body 106 being angled with respect to the sonde housing 110 the bit body being nonmovable with respect to the sonde housing in drilling operation and the bit body being mounted with a plurality of substantially forward facing end studs 112 extending Figure of U S patent 5 899 238 from a front face of the bit body Centerlines Aand B are added 2 3 Sonde Housing Drill Bit At page 1847 In its view one of ordinary skill would readily understand from the totality of the disclosure i e the drawings together with the provisional written description that the drill bit was angled with respect to the sonde housing Drill Bit Sonde Housing Drill Bit COX At page 1847 I inventor COX believe that becaus
609. r Tetta CTN TTPaSS SEL SUIEHSd jSY UONBULOFHT Jo WopesiJ 3 10 TSDIO 1m109 JSDU botrad saUIH DeUeJTOHS Ul SSNs amsOISIP pasodord sth sia Oi SAD GS AifHT Pe ST TAPIAOIG TIJP AIHO apEU aq Apr TSOISSiP 2Hqnd tons ardroay ol HoDeUUOTLF TILNS3GHNOD Ua Set spliorg JF Ng ioalord HHasad at Jo slInsal st SSO SSTD A asTavretO Jo Usnqnd XetU uaidioey Honeatdqo ATTenHapQHeo be NOL jgardr gt s el PasafastP SE UIA TO slqeITBAB ATIqnd stroseg 1O st 38th TO nsitdosd ol HAoUY ATsnolaazd se ip uonerLHoptt ToT JHeaYs TYILNIGIINOD padttreys st yeth TELRIRIN YoressarT LNSE po ST Haoqe HOTIETTETOTKTT STLW SSDFAOTH TO AUE arnsolosrp S3T JO ajep am Uo STPSA sanp TO Poliad e 10 attSDHUOO TH Jean 0 saatie jmardhaa Mel AG Patttrrad jtalxa ai OL astwrstio palsanbal sssjuUn IPLJa3CTN Idpased SH Jo HONRqEIUOD S JSDEAO1LH 33DeINOtRTSE HL luatdryay nalotg STeaSaYH 3 ZUR HoUB gt Tqnd UNL jo stoneussard Tero He TH CessaoaU 35pd JtfattRISB1NG UP astD SWOIOF Se ATSHIosds LA PaqtISSsD esfoad Taeasar loaford Trpasar jgrwaolfof at WIN ttOOaUttOS HI AISIOS JOiPSTiSaNHT SUstdioad Ad Pest aq ILW TELaILIN HoTEasa SULL TSqHHIIIN aoUeINSSV sDtAord aseald ou ss osIGUS UEUMH Jo Uonaalord 9t St ol arTPIDoob De13S IOS sjeUslbJN UATEasaH Sa CB tH SeA FI or sa CUTtfO UEUNY JO SITS3CIN Hoteassd TV COT IEIIaIGIN ATGeSe SH JO Supuey sh pue josford yore
610. r research purposes by Recipient s investigator in his her laboratory 4 To the extent permitted by law Recipient agrees to treat in confidence for a period of three 3 years 3 5 When the Research Project is completed or three 3 years have elapsed whichever occurs first the Research Material will be destroyed by Recipient or otherwise disposed of as mutually agreed by Provider and Recipient MTA 5 3 MTA In consideration of 6
611. shida 2006 2007 NAI ST 2006 2007 1 6 2 consideration Consideration MTA Material Transfer
612. to a unique usage of LN especially technology transfer Another example to use LN in a presentation of the invention Q2 The management system of lab notebooks We are trying to retain lab notebooks of all facility S to prepare for the future trouble Please let us have your comments Q2 1 Custody What kind of person is in charge of the system 1 IP division technology transfer office 2 head of laboratory 3 other Q2 2 Length of term to retain the notebook How long lab notebooks should be kept in the system 1 1 1 P97 ex Several years post publication several years from the date the study Was completed terminated or discontinued 30years etc Q2 3 What a guideline regulation do you have with respect to the system Do you know a good policy on ownership and retention of research data AUTM 6 2 pages 536 539 gt http www sangaku titech ac jp 08information file H16 johokanri houkokusho pdf 2006 Vol 59 No 9 pages 29 40
613. tp www nedo go jp roadmap index html 14 2010 2025 15 tokugikon 2006 5 8 No 241 pages 69 77 ED 1 3
614. tp www nature com nbtjournaly24 n2 pdfnbt0206 153 pdf 1 1 P82 Jeff Rothermberg Determining inventorship not easy The Business Review Albany August8 2005 gt http albanybizjoumals com albany stories 2005708 08 smallb3 html United States Patent and Trademark Office MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE 2137 01 Inventorship gt http www uspto 9oVweb offices pacmpep documents 2100_2137 _01 htm 5 4 3 gt http www meti dojpkohosys press 0003591707 030128tokkyo1234 pdf Right Nowl 2007 2 IP 2006 gt http www iip or jp summary pdf detail05j 17_24 pdf gt http www naist p japanese kigyo_kenkyu sankangaku
615. tsu Yoshida 2006 2007 As consideration for In consideration of A A As consideration for B B 2 2 7 2 1 Mils Mills Mills v Wyman 20 Mass 207 1825 gt Wyman Mills Wyman Wyman gt
616. tual Property Wiley 2004 Chapter 1 172 500 550 17 OJT 1 5 2 1 3 1 6 P244
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search