Home

Automation of Testing of Polymer HVDC Cables using

image

Contents

1. amp S 0 225 amp 0 25 ANNANN N e eo E cbeiventerbae i 4 0 275 4 0 3 Electric field V m 0 01 0 02 0 03 0 04 0 05 0 06 0 07 radius of electrodes n Figure 10 Electric field versus radii of electrodes Similar behaviour is seen for the radius of the electrodes see figure 11 For all separation distances the maximum electric field decreases less as the radii of the electrodes increases A good choice of radius and separation distance would be in the area where the maximum electric field is satisfactory low and the dimensions are kept sensibly low For better visualisation of the resulting electric field for different values of radius and distance a contour plot was plotted for values between 16 kV cm and 36 kV cm see figure 12 An electrode radius of 0 03 m and a electrode distance of 0 2 m was chosen based on the availability in the workshop From the simulation this gives a maximum electric field of 22 kV cm at the surface of the HV side of the switch This configuration is also plotted in figure 12 The actual electric 16 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 2 Arm switch Electric field m om 05 0 1 0 15 0 2 0 25 D distance of electrodes m Figure 11 Electric field versus separation distance Figure 12 o o No ie a electrode distance m 5 n 0 1 01 00 0 04 radius m Contour of ele
2. A ol a Conductor Figure 3 ABC equvalent for measuring partial discharges for the current The required action of the program is to close this breaker before the surge and then open it after the surge R1 B2 0 Shunt B1 R2 Figure 4 Shunt for measuring partial discharges All these requirements for the program and control circuit was summarized into the follows e Perform the desired number of voltage surges until failure e The voltage surges shall be performed with a fixed intervall Regularly check for failure between the surges Protect the equipment measuring partial discharges Display the measurements Save the measured data to a file 2 1 General Program control 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 1 3 Programdesign In order to better structure the requirements and behaviour of the control program a flowchart was needed in order to perform the design A flowchart is a schematic representation of the process and helps creating the program code This is especially useful when programming in labview which is a visual programming language When applying the requirements listed earlier a flowchart was drawn as in figure 5 The flowchart summed up the main tasks to be performed by the program However due to the nature of the programming language in labview the program itself needed to be more complex From the flowchart the program was divided into three sections The first section took care of th
3. 0 05 2 3 Table 15 distance 0 15 m Electrode radius m Mazimum electric field MV m 0 01 5 0 0 02 3 2 0 03 2 6 0 04 2 3 0 05 2 1 Table 16 distance 0 175 m Electrode radius m Maximum electric field MV m 0 01 4 6 0 02 3 6 0 03 2 3 0 04 2 0 0 05 1 9 Table 17 distance 0 2 m Electrode radius m Maximum electric field MV m 0 01 4 4 0 02 2 6 0 03 2 2 0 04 1 9 0 05 1 7 Table 18 distance 0 225 m Electrode radius m Maximum electric field M V m 0 01 4 1 0 02 2 6 0 03 2 1 0 04 1 8 0 05 1 6 49 C VOLTAGES MEASURED WITH SPHERE SWITCH Table 19 distance 0 25 m Electrode radius m Maximum electric field MV m 0 01 4 1 0 02 2 9 0 03 1 95 0 04 1 7 0 05 1 5 C Voltages measured with sphere switch Table 20 Voltages measured with 3 69 cm gap distance U kV Um V UR2 V 0 0 014 0 10 0 022 0 20 0 046 0 30 0 064 0 001 40 0 082 0 001 50 0 098 0 001 60 0 113 0 0015 70 0 163 0 002 80 0 186 0 002 90 0 209 0 002 50 C VOLTAGES MEASURED WITH SPHERE SWITCH Table 21 Voltages measured with 4 97 cm gap distance U kV Um V UR2 V 0 0 015 0 10 0 022 0 20 0 044 0 001 30 0 065 0 001 40 0 083 0 001 50 0 099 0 001 60 0 113 0 0015 70 0 163 0 002 80 0 186 0 002 90 0 210 0 003 100 0 260 0 003 110 0 314 120 0 342
4. NTNU Innovation and Creativity Automation of Testing of Polymer HVDC Cables using Controlled Rapid Voltage Surges Thomas Karlsen Master of Science in Energy and Environment Submission date June 2007 Supervisor Erling Ildstad ELKRAFT Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Electrical Power Engineering Problem Description Due to and commercialization of the energy markets and environmental considerations there is an increasing interest in large scale exchange of power between different countries and continents For the highest rated voltages in DC today only oil impregnated paper is utilized as cable insulation Extruded polymer solutions are currently beeing developed but many questions are still unanswered This is connected to among others choice of testing methods for documentation of high production quality and good long term properties The test procedure chosen must be relevant regarding the service stress and sensitive for detection of production weaknesses In a NFR and industrially supported project it is at NTNU SINTEF beeing worked on developing a simplified voltage surge technique for detecting insulation weaknesses in high voltage DC insulation It has been shown that initiation of electrical trees in polymeric cable insulation can occur from contaminations when beeing subjected to abrupt surges at a voltage significantly lower than the breakdown voltage With basis in the developed expe
5. 130 0 392 140 0 430 Table 22 Voltages measured with 7 10 cm gap distance U kV Um V UR2 V 0 0 014 0 10 0 025 0 20 0 044 0 001 30 0 065 0 001 40 0 082 0 001 50 0 099 0 001 60 0 113 0 001 70 0 164 0 002 80 0 185 0 002 90 0 208 0 002 100 0 232 0 002 110 0 251 0 0025 120 0 327 130 0 362 140 0 372 F 150 0 422 E 160 0 492 170 0 560 5l C VOLTAGES MEASURED WITH SPHERE SWITCH Table 23 Voltages measured with shortcircuited gap U kV Um V UR2 V 0 0 016 0 0015 20 0 116 4 79 40 0 285 9 38 60 0 431 14 15 70 0 493 16 20 52
6. 230 VAC Figure 19 Control circuit for needle 24 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 3 Sphere gap switch Secondly the resistance had to be large enough so that the transformer did not deliver more than rated current if the relay was to be closed for a longer period than intended The capasitors had to be fully charged within shorter time than the ground ing interval of the cable objects usually 60 s When the relay is open the capacitors C are in series only with the resistance R and the belonging time constant is T R C Given that the capacitanse is 136 uF the largest resistance with respect to the first relation is 7 60s R e C 136 10 Farad 441176 52 5 The datasheet for the transformer states that the rated current for the sec ondary side of the transformer is 250 mA The rectifier has a rated current of 3 A so the transformer sets the current limit The rectified voltage over the capasitors was measured to be 177 1 V and the smallest resistance with respect to the second relation was 177 1V R The resistance therefore had to be between 710 Q and 440 kQ A 5 W resis tance of 56 kQ was selected In order to protect the circuit itself and connected equipment from incoming overvoltages five surge arresters were inserted at two places see figure 19 For protection of the Agilent unit the two wires connected to the 12 V relay were protected with S1 and 2 having the smallest available protection level
7. and resistance found in 28 I1b The deviation of Ilb from Ila was found using E mN deviation Tia 100 29 Table 9 Calculated currents through R1 UO kV Um V Ia microampere I1b microampere Deviation 20 0 044 4 4 4 26 3 18 40 0 083 8 3 8 51 2 53 60 0 113 11 3 12 77 13 00 80 0 186 18 6 17 02 8 49 100 0 231 23 1 21 28 7 88 120 0 273 27 3 25 53 6 48 42 4 DISCUSSION 4 Discussion The program was not set to handle the errors messages that may be gen erated from the instrument This means that if unexpected events and error messages occur the program will not be able to handle them Even though the output current and the current flowing in the circuit was found to be different the relation used to indicate failure will still be valid as the voltage applied to the circuit will be the same The voltages in figure 22 are quite equal for low voltages hence the uncer tainty of the difference between them is greater than for that measured by the multimerer Therefore the current measured by the multimeter was used by the regression tool i matlab to find a quadratic relation between the applied voltage and the voltage loss see equation 20 Leakage currents was measured and found to be insignificant in the sphere gap Although the spheres do not have smooth surfaces as required from 6 corona discharge may occur for higher voltages Additionally The largest measured leaka
8. arrester with a protection level of 75 V Voltage over this resistance was measured and the actual current was found using Ohms law Voltages from 0 kV to 120 kV was applied and the belonging monitor voltage was measured from the glassman source see section 3 2 2 4 3 Testing of leakage currents in the sphere switch A set of measurements was performed in order to determine the leakage currents through the sphere gap The multimeter was connected to the lower side of the sphere and protected with a gas arrester in case of discharge The protection level of the arrester was 75 V The resistance was inserted into the circuit as R2 in figure 20 The currents was measured for three gap distances 3 69 cm 4 97 cm and 7 10 cm Three voltages was measured the voltage applied the monitor 27 2 4 Testing 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING Rl Figure 20 Circuit for measuring current through sphere gap voltage from the source and the voltage over the resistance R2 As the voltages measured over R2 were too small to be correctly measured by the multimeter the gap was short circuited in order to achieve larger currents These were compared to the monitor voltage in order to verify the currents See tables 20 23 appendix C 2 4 4 Testing of a cable object using the sphere switch A cable object was tested using the sphere switch and the program developed in LabView The applied voltage was 60 kV the sphere gap distance was set to the lowest i
9. channel in cable insulation 36 Breakdown channel in cable insulation 38 Measured current with no equipment connected 39 nner resistance of source es ye 4 a a a Rs 40 Relation between monitor voltage and output current 41 iv LIST OF TABLES LIST OF TABLES List of Tables 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Values of disruptive discharge voltages valid for direct voltages of either polarity From 6 oaa Measured current and deviation from calculated current Monitor voltages without any equipment and with arm switch 1 CINCUNber er aea Se el AA a A T a A ae we Se Measured Gap distance and withstand voltage Measured voltages from control circuit Voltages measured with shortcircuited gap and the currents theyandicate gr a et aoe a oth ee ote Be ot Be ee we OOK Deviation of measured currents from calculated current Calculated current and resistance in voltage divider Calculated currents through RI List of devices doe sO ewe Od ae Oe oe Se ee eS Measured monitor voltage and calculated current dist ncs O Cott Ss A ie tn A de Ue Gee we dis de de cod distance 0 Ly ao 2 5 2 tS a ete d at d a Se 2 distance 0125 tte be be ee ee be ee ed distances Ul bah 22 282 Ae ek be ho Se ook Se a A distances OITO Manaa ee ee a A distance 02 ae pha a es ak a Som a ae a e distance 0 225 M aaa
10. inner while loop and performs a grounding The perfor mance of a grounding is a realized with a sequence of closing and opening the two relays B1 and B2 see flowchart 5 At first the relay that protects the pd shunt B1 is closed Then the program waits a time shunt w time before closing the relay B2 that performes the actual grounding When the program then has waited the coil discharge time it opens the relay B2 and again waits the time shunt w time before opening the relay B1 See figure 8 for the realization of the sequence in labview E surge shunt wait b Delay Time s shunt surge wait gt Delay Time s measurement Em oil discharge time s 0i Figure 8 Sequence of closing and opening the breakers When grounding has been performed the for loop either continues or exits This is dependent on whether the desired number of groundings has been reached or not If not the for loop continues And if the desired number of groundings has been performed the program closes the breaker that is protecting the pd shunt opens the latch and stops When the Labview code of the program was fully created a front panel was designed The front panel is the graphical user interface used when running the program and synthesises the behaviour of a real instrument For this reason it is also called a virtual instrument 8 M
11. occurs It is the intention that when the cable breaks down the failure shall be detected by the program and the number of groundings displayed Each measurement as well as the number of grounding were to be displayed on a graph and later stored in a datafile As the current that flows through the point of failure will vary it is desired that the failure indicating interval is adjustable from the user panel of the program Additionally it is desired to measure any partial discharges that may occur in the initial growth of the electrical tree This measurement would done by using the abc equivalent of an initial electrical tree see figure 3 A rough calculation of the needed sensitivity can be done when using the eqution for stored energy in a capacitor Q C U and assuming the capac itance cable of the cable as 200 pF and the dissipated charge in a partial discharge as 1 pC The measurment equipment will be performed in another project but as the same control software will be used the implementation was done here now Q 1 10 2 1 pees Sy a aay 2 C 200 10 2F 200 a 2 As the equipment for measuring these partial discharges needs to be very sensitive the shunt needs to be protected during the relatively violent voltage surge This was done by inserting a breaker B1 that protects the shunt by connecting it to ground it as shown in figure 4 and creating a alternate path 6 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 1 General Program control
12. particles that may change the electric field For instance a strand of hair was found to cause breakdown in the gap when applying 95 kV to a gap distance of 35 mm This raises the need for clean electrodes and surroundings when voltage surges are to be applied 44 5 CONCLUSION 5 Conclusion A program was designed and created using Labview as a control system for instruments using the GPIB standard interface The program created was proven to correctly indicate a failure in a cable object An arm switch was constructed in order to improve the reliability of an already existing construction The constructed arm switch was found to have a leakage current proportional to the square of the applied voltage see equation 20 Due to this voltage loss the armbreaker was not suitable for use in the automation of the rapid voltages surges subjected to cable objects A sphere gap switch was constructed based on international standards for measuring high voltage The constructed sphere switch was found to have insignificant leakage currents and a test of a cable object was performed and found to be reasonibly coherent with previous experience Throughout the work undetermined output currents was indicated from the source As no apparent paths was found the source was closely examined and an internal voltage divider was found present in the Glassman high voltage source The current was found to flow internally in the source and not in the test c
13. potential V x10 M x10 M pry 14 625 15 p 13 875 p 13 125 p 12 375 p 11 625 p 10 975 p 10 125 10 p 375 8 625 7 875 7 125 6 375 p5 625 p 4 875 p 125 3 375 a 625 r 1 875 james 1 125 0 375 o Figure 16 Electric potential when needle strikes of the striker A maximum value of the field was found to be as much as 4 6 kV cm see figure 17 Finding this further work with the realization of the switch was performed 2 3 2 Arrangement An arrangement consisting of a sphere and a half sphere was set up The top sphere was connected to the HV side and subjected to the same voltage as the cable objects that were beeing tested The bottom half sphere was connected directly to ground The bottom sphere featured the striker that would be used to rapidly create a divergent eletric field see figure 18 A coil surrounding the striker and would be used to raise the needle into the gap between the spheres When the needle is extended into the gap the electric field around the tip is enhanced above the withstand voltage of the surrounding air This causes the air to break down and a discharge occurs in the gap between the two spheres 2 3 3 Control circuit The lower sphere contained a setup of a striker surrounded by a coil When a current is led through the coil the needle is forced up by the magnetic 22 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 3 Sphere gap switch Surface Electric field norm V m
14. source and the second with the arm switch connected to the circuit The monitor voltage was measured in both cases and when connected also the voltage over R 472 6 kQ see table 3 Considering the effect of the switch there was a significant change in current when applying more than 40 kV Also when increasing the applied voltage the difference between currents increased The currents were calculated using equation 18 plotted using matlab see figure 22 In order to determine the voltageloss over the current limiting resistance the difference between the currents in figure 22 was multiplied with the resis tance of 2 005 GQ In addition the voltage over R2 was measured by the multimeter was used to find a comparable voltageloss applying the relation 31 3 2 Arm Switch 3 RESULTS Table 3 Monitor voltages without any equipment and with arm switch in circuit Applied voltage Um nothing connected V Um breaker connected V Ur V 0 0 015 0 014 0 20 0 044 0 045 0 044 40 0 083 0 091 0 447 60 0 113 0 183 1 28 80 0 186 0 263 2 29 100 0 231 0 352 3 78 120 0 273 0 454 5 9 current A Applied voltage 7 Figure 22 Currents with and without armbreaker in circuit 32 3 RESULTS 3 3 Sphere switch U Troe 2 005 10 O 2 005 10 20 1 Uloss circuit 005 0 472 6 1030 005 0 9 The voltage loss indicated by these two measurements was plottet with mat la
15. the program waits until beginning to chech for failure again Default is set to 4 s Coil discharge time This is the on time of the switch depending on its type type Default is set to 0 5 s Shunt w time This is the time before the surge that the shunt for mea suring partial discharges is protected This equals the At in figure 5 Default is set to 0 1 s Scanlist measure The scanlist indicating where the monitorvoltage is connected Default is set to channel 205 Scanlist switch This is the scanlist indicating where the 12 V is routed to the switch Default is set to channel 138 Scanlist shutdown This is the scanlist indicating where the latch of the HV source should be connected This is optional and default is set to channel 148 Scanlist shuntprotection This is the scanlist indicating where the breaker for protecting the pd equipment is connected Default is set to channel 137 Applied voltage V This is the applied voltage to the circuit and is used for determining the maximum current Default value is set to 60 kV Resistance Ohm This is the total value of the current limiting resistances and is used for determining the maximum current Default value is set to 2 005 GQ 13 2 1 General Program control 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING Fault interval This is the interval used for detecting a failure When a monitor voltage larger than the product of fault interval and the pre dicted monitor voltage is measured the p
16. the relay and labview program Hence a control circuit was created and tested Having designed the control circuit the circuit was created and tested for faults with a simple voltmeter When connected to the grid the circuit worked properly and the needle stroke as intended The input voltage was measured to 224 6 V On the secondary side the voltage was measured to 129 9 V This gives the transformer a more accurate ratio of 1 73 1 The rectified de voltage was also measured Table 5 Measured voltages from control circuit Point of measurement Measured voltage V input voltage 224 6 VAC transformed voltage 129 9 VAC rectified voltage 177 1 VDC The leakage currents of the sphere gap switch was measured using both the monitor voltage and the voltage that appeared over a resistance of 472 6 kQ see tables 20 22 The actual current measured through the sphere gap was found to be insignificant compared to the output current indicated by the glassman source This is illustrated in figure 25 where the graphs are at the bottom are the currents measured by the multimeter 39 3 3 Sphere switch 3 RESULTS Figure 25 Breakdown channel in cable insulation In table 21 and table 22 the voltage over the resistance R2 variated so much that the value was unable to be read This occured when about 110 kV and more was applied There was also audible corona at these voltages The largest voltage measure
17. values and equation 11 the corresponding breakdown values was found and is shown in equations 12 14 T 99 0 54 112 99 106 02 12 Ty 137 0 04 149 137 137 48 13 T 184 0 70 195 184 191 7 14 26 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 4 Testing The percentual deviation of the measured values from the interpolated values was found using equation 15 see alignment 21 23 measure B Tia e deviation G 15 Trable 2 4 2 Testing of leakage currents in the arm switch The only known electric property of the textile bakelite used for the arm switch plate was the breakdown voltage This was assumed to be a value that is valid for ac voltages only The de conductivity was unknown and a testing of any eventual leakage current between the electrodes was performed The monitor voltage from the voltage source indicated a current flowing even when no equipment was connected to the high voltage side of the source As this was a current not accounted by any apparent path it was believed to be discharges into air Therefore the currents where measured with and without the breaker in circuit and the difference between them assigned to leakage in the breaker In order to verify the measurements when inserting the breaker a resistance of 472 6 kQ was connected betweeen the low voltage electrode and the ground In order to protect the multimeter in case of discharges the resistance was protected with a surge
18. x10 0 39 Figure 17 Electric field strength when needle strikes field The power needed to actuate the striker was not available from the instrument and therefore a designated electric circuit was created for this purpose see figure 19 The Agilent instrument was to control the circuit routing a 12 V signal to a relay In order to provide a sufficient amount of energy for the coil to extend the needle capasitors were to be charged up and disharged over the coil To charge the capasitors ac voltage was taken from the grid and transformed down with a 2 1 transformer Using a fullbridge rectifier the capasitors was charged from both half waves of the voltage from the transformer The energy used when extending the needle would come from the charged capasitors But in the case of a relay fault a larger current than intended will flow from the transformer to the coil Therefore a current limiting resistance R was inserted in order to prevent the current from exceeding the maximum rated current of the transformer In addition fuses were inserted as a general mean of protection In order to find a suitable value for the resistance two relations were to be considered Firstly the time constant of the circuit had to be small enough so the capacitors would be fully charged before a grounding were performed 23 2 3 Sphere gap switch 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING U0 Ground Figure 18 Sphere gap arrangement 115 VAC a
19. 11 was found see table 2 The deviation was found to be small no more than 1 8 When implement ing the measurement of monitor voltage and using a interval from maximum 30 3 RESULTS 3 2 Arm Switch Table 2 Measured current and deviation from calculated current U kV Measured Voltage V Measured current microA Deviation 0 0 001 0 002 20 4 79 10 14 1 6 40 9 38 19 85 0 5 60 14 15 29 94 0 1 70 16 20 34 28 1 8 current in circuit the program correctly detected a failure 3 2 Arm Switch In order to improve a previously used armswitch a new design was created and tested Using Comsol Femlab software the electric field distribution around two electrodes was plottet for a set of different sizes and distances of the actual electrodes In all cases the highest values appeared at the surface of the top HV electrode facing the lower electrode A configuration of electrode radius equal to 0 03 cm and an electrode sepa ration equal to 0 2 m was chosen based on the availiability in the workshop and the mapping of results from the simulations Apart from the breakdown strength electrical properties for the material used making the armbreaker plate were unknown This caused great uncer tainty regarding the voltage loss over the current limiting resistances and actual voltage applied to the cable objects Two sets of measurements were performed The first with nothing connected to the
20. 5 Trondheim 2005 National Instruments LabVIEW GPIB and Serial Port VI reference manual august 1993 P Osmokrovic N Arsic and N Kartalovic Triggered Vacuum and Gas Spark Gaps IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 11 1996 P Osmokrovic N Arsic Z Lazarevic and D Kusic Numerical and Experimental Design of Three electrode Spark Gap IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 9 1994 Thomas Karlsen Testing of HVDC cables using rapid voltage surges Project thesis Norwegian University of Technology and Science 2006 47 B MAXIMUM E FIELD AT ELECTRODE SURFACE A Monitor voltage and output current Table 11 Measured monitor voltage and calculated current U kV Um V Calculated current microA 0 0 015 0 10 0 071 4 99 20 0 144 9 97 30 0 218 14 96 40 0 287 19 95 50 0 357 24 93 60 0 427 29 92 70 0 494 34 90 80 0 558 39 89 90 0 625 44 88 B Maximum E field at electrode surface Table 12 distance 0 075 m Electrode radius m Maximum electric field MV m 0 01 6 5 0 02 4 5 0 03 3 8 0 04 3 5 0 05 3 4 Table 13 distance 0 1 m Electrode radius m Maximum electric field MV m 0 01 5 7 0 02 3 9 0 03 3 3 0 04 2 9 0 05 2 7 48 B MAXIMUM E FIELD AT ELECTRODE SURFACE Table 14 distance 0 125 m Electrode radius m Mazimum electric field MV m 0 01 0 02 0 03 0 04 5 1 3 45 2 4 2 5
21. 9 97 1 71 24 37 19 95 0 50 0 80 29 92 0 03 1 50 34 90 1 78 0 09 As the sphere gap was found to have insignificant leakage currents testing of a cable object was performed The program detected a failure after 70 groundings After slicing the cable object with a microtome it was found that the distance from the needle tip to the inner semiconductor was about 3 mm see figure 26 For this length fronttime and voltage the expected number of groundings was in the area of 60 100 groundings 3 4 Closer examination of the undetermined leakaged current Undeterminable leakage currents was indicated by the voltage source As no equipment was connected to the source the monitor voltage indicated an output of as much as 15 88 uA when applying 100 kV 25 45 uA when applying 160 kV and as much as 31 54 uA when applying the maximum voltage of 200 kV see figure 27 If this current was flowing through the circuit is would case great voltage losses and a reduced voltage applied to the cable objects Even though a current was indicated this was not the same as measured in the actual circuit The sphere gap was found to have insignificant leakage 37 3 4 Closer examination of the undetermined leakaged current8 RESULTS ___ Edge of needle tip eh inn S Figure 26 Breakdown channel in cable insulation 38 3 RESULTS3 4 Closer examination of the undetermined leakaged current l Output cur
22. A method of testing for such weaknesses has been proposed by Mildrid Sel sjord and Erling Ildstad 7 Testing of Rugowski objects with embedded defects had shown that electrical treeing and breakdown can occcur at an embedded defect as a result of rapid grounding after DC prestressing at a voltage much lower that the short term breakdown voltage Based on this the method for testing lengths of cable for weaknesses has been proposed 4 The method consists of inserting needles into the insulation of cable objects with XLPE insulation and poling the objects in order to provoke space charge injections around the needle tip The cable objects were then subjected to subsequent rapid voltage groundings It was found that electrical treeing and breakdown can occur as a result of abrupt grounding after DC pre stressing at a voltage much lower than the breakdown voltage of the cable The faster the grounding was done the more marked was this effect When repeated on several test lengths the procedure should give information about allowable working stress of a cable If the test procedure would turn out to be successful it may also be used as a routine test on long lengths of DC cables However this method involved that the surges are beeing performed manually introducing several variables as the surges never will be performed identically each time The purpose of the work presented is to create and 1 1 1 Sample and electrode arrangement 1 INTRODUCT
23. ION test an automated method of executing the experiments using controlled rapid voltages surges by developing and creating a control program and a high voltage switch 1 1 Sample and electrode arrangement The proposed experimental method is described in 4 Test objects are made using using 1 m long sections of a 12 kV XLPE cable equipped with terminations In each test object a sewing needle with a tip radius of 50 um and an overall diameter of 0 8 mm was at room temperature inserted through the insulation screen and into the XLPE insulation A mechanical tool was specially designed to make reproducibly selected distances between the needle tip and the conductor screen In addition a metallic mesh was clamped to the insulation screen to fascilitate high frequency grounding of the screen and needle DC Figure 1 Experimental circuit for use in testing Before grouding the cable objects the applied voltage was increased to the prestress level and held at this level for 24 hours When closing the grounding switch the voltage was rapidly reduced to zero at a rate determined by the capasitance of the test object and the impedance Z of the grounding circuit The high voltage resistance of R 2 005 GQ made it possible to operate this switch independent of the DC source and reduced the short circuit currents from the source 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 Spark gaps 1 2 Spark gaps Simple spark gaps insulated by atmospheric air c
24. a distance 0 25 M aooaa he ke 8 ee Voltages measured with 3 69 cm gap distance Voltages measured with 4 97 cm gap distance Voltages measured with 7 10 cm gap distance Voltages measured with shortcircuited gap 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction HVDC transmission has been in use for more than 50 years and has proved to be a reliable and valuable transmission media for electrical energy and has a number of technical advantages compared with HVAC transmission 2 Improvements in material technology and extrusion methods have made it possible to use polymeric insulation for both AC and DC power cables Currently accumulation of space charge limits the use of polymeric insulated HVDC cables to transmission systems that do not undergo polarity reversals and have a limited voltage range It is a common perception that one par ticle or irregularity in the insulation may be sufficient to cause breakdown This means that it is essential to be able to reveal such weaknesses before installation The use of polymeric cable insulation for HVDC cables is highly desirable from a commercial perspective and there is an incentive for use of polymeric insulation even for cables with the highest transmission capacity today the voltage level of HVDC cables is limited to 600 kV And so the there is a need for further research to gain a more complete understanding of processes involved in space charge accumulation
25. ainly the front panel consists of datafields for entering the parameters that are required in the inital while loop see figure 6 It also includes an 11 2 1 General Program control 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING area that shows the progress of the test and an area that displays the latest measurements of output current See figure 9 for the design of the front panel Soren z Number of surges Measure interval ms Surge interval s Surge wait period s sa f 150000 Af2000 Jeo 4 Reset scanlist Measure coil discharge time s Resolution 5 Default Don tReset 205 afo s oefault scaniist switch 2 shunt w time s Range 5 Auto birth ne 138 fjo 1 auto scaniist shutdown N fic o Average N last gs scanlist shunt protection Paces pes Ce 0 3 Sees 0 7 eee Aep N 0 2 10 8 0 9 60000 oar 0 9 Resistance Ohm o oe Af2 005E 9 Test started While oop iteration Pa 0 e Failure detected Cad am Fordoop iteration a Overall progress Figure 9 Front panel of the program The program controls four channels on the Agilent instrument One for measuring the monitor voltage the second for triggering the switch and the fourth for protecting the equipment for measuring partial discharges The third is optional and can be used for latching of the HV source when the program has detected a failure in order to stop the current flowing through the cable insulation All the da
26. an be used to measure the amplitude of a voltage above about 10 kV As the fast transitions from an either completely insulating or still highly insulating state of a gap to the high conducting arc state is used to determine a voltage level the disruptive discharges does not offer a direct reading of the voltage across the gap A complete short circuit is the result of a spark and therefore the voltage source must be capable to allow such a short circuit although the currents may and sometimes must be limited by resistors in series with the gap Osmokrovic et al 10 used a three electrode spark gap to create a method of testing high voltage circuit breakers with rated power values up to 25000 MVA under short circuit conditions As the maximum short cirtuit power obtainable from an actual grid was 6000 MVA they increased the power by building a synthetic circuit together with a direct test circuit These were synchronized using a three electrode spark gap Two different types of three electrode gas insulated spark gaps were used a spark gap with a third electrode beeing inside the main low voltage electrode And a spark gap with a separate third electrode on floating potential The spark gap triggering was realized by applying a negative triggering pulse to the triggering electrode setting up a greater voltage difference than the DC breakdown voltage and initiating a breakdown 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 Development and testing 2 1 Ge
27. arrangement 2 1 2 Spark gaps we Ne Sst ee ee eh oe Ge GB a 3 2 Development and testing 4 2 1 General Program control 4 a2 3 2 4 2h eo OE a eS 4 4 2 1 1 Measuring current fe De dog Pia dee Be dae 4 2 1 2 Program requirements 2 se ao ow Ss amp eS 6 2 1 3 Programdesign 2 auto aid ee ed Le ed eS 8 2 1 4 Testing of the program oa aa a dia ee ads SS sy 14 22 Amm swith goa ee SG Ra ee Pl we Be ce Pe 15 ORE DeeS Ena ce avid fo eh oe Ge ele oo hie amp oe 15 2 5 Sphere gap SWiteh se zoel Coe ae 2 ate a a ae SH 19 2 3 1 Design and simulation b 5 4 4 by de 4 by de amp 4 21 25 2 Arrangement nae rae ee ae A n a 22 2 3 3 Q ntrol CIVGIIE soe 3G ee A et ei ae A 22 2A TRS oiae a ie ki a te eae a eB ae ee ae Be a de 26 2 4 1 Testing of withstand values 26 2 4 2 Testing of leakage currents in the arm switch 27 2 4 3 Testing of leakage currents in the sphere switch 27 2 4 4 Testing of a cable object using the sphere switch 28 3 Results 30 Dil Program 2 6 8 EF SELEY DEL OLeer Ses er ses 30 J2 ATM WALES lane gt bug hone tag Behe ba hone be Poe be feared 31 3 3 Sphere sWwitCh se cc obo oh oe eS oe a ah OS we ee 33 3 4 Closer examination of the undetermined leakaged current 37 4 Discussion 43 5 Conclusion 45 6 List of devices 46 A Monitor voltage and output current 48 B Maximum E field at electrode surface 48 C Voltages measured with s
28. b see figure 23 4 Voltage loss indicated by glassman Voltage loss indicated by multimeter Quadratic curve fitting Applied voltage W x 10 Figure 23 Calculated voltage loss with armbreaker in circuit Using the arm switch in the circuit the voltage loss was quite significant When applying a voltage of 50 kV the voltage loss was about 3 kV and when applying 100 kV the voltage loss was about 16 kV A relation between the applied voltage and the voltage loss was found see equation 20 Utoss Uo V 2 04 107 U3 0 04 Uo 133 V 20 3 3 Sphere switch Due to the uncertainty of the arm switch a more reliable alternative was needed With basis in the IEEE publication Standard Techniques for High 33 3 3 Sphere switch 3 RESULTS Voltage Testing a switch based on a sphere gap was created The sphere gap used air as insulation material and a more homogenous field distribution was provided than for the arm switch As a mechanism of applying the rapid voltage surges a striker with a small tip radius was extended from the lower sphere into the gap The electric field at the tip of the striker became so enhanced that the air broke down and an arc formed between the upper sphere and the striker tip As the impedance in figure 1 originally was connected between the lower sphere and ground a voltage was set up over this as the grounding were performed It was found that this voltage trav
29. ct proportion to output current from the source For determining the actual relation between monitor voltage and the output current of the source a circuit consisting of only two resistances was set up These resistances was the same as the current limiting resistances for testing cable objects and had a value of 2 GQ plus 5 MQ The applied voltage was read from the display at the front panel of the source and the monitor voltage was measured with the Agilent unit As the power needed to operate the circuit breakers will exceed the rated switching values of the instrument the matrix switch will route a 12 V signal to relays capable of switching this power 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 1 General Program control For some of the applied voltages the voltage over the resistance of 472 6 kQ was measured and the belonging current was found Also the deviation from the calculated current in table 11 was found See table 2 The total resistance would then be 2 005472600 GQ and the calculated cur rent was found simply using ohms law _ Applied voltage V calculated current A 2 0054726 1090 1 The applied voltage the measured monitor voltage and the calculated current can be seen in table 11 in appendix A A relation between the monitor voltage and the current in the circuit was derived As seen in figure 21 the approximation is fairly accurate And this relation was further used in the labview software as a method of
30. ctric field for radius and separation distance 17 2 2 Arm switch 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING field strength along the axis between the centers of the two electrodes can be seen in figure 13 The maximum field strength appears at the surface of the top electrode and is significantly less at the lower electrode This gives greater tolerances for edges at the arm when the switch is open x10 Electric field norm V m 25r ssreesssssosseos Aia E SAREA sessnsessasssosss pee dhe DEn LEA os ecensnnnnensese Di EEE sagertartacsegsacadsngediatos E N E Z we Sb E a T 2 5 a MOD fil E EE PEEL E cau namauaa de yous DB EE ERES TENN T ep snn Dawah e bests o A 0 0 05 0 1 0 15 0 2 0 25 Arc length n Figure 13 Electric field between electrodes A supportplate for the electrodes was designed as in figure 14 The available material for the plate was textile bakelite This material is often used as insulation for high voltage equipment as it can endure temperatures up to 120 C The only obtainable material spesification from the supplier was that the electrical breakdown strength is 5 kV for 3mm The conductivity of the material was unknown In the model see figure 14 the shortest distance between the high voltage and the ground electrode is about 16cm The withstand voltage the plate should then be 5kV Ubakelite 160mm 266kV 4 3mm 18 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 3 Sphere gap swi
31. d over the resistance was 0 003 V when applying 100 kV over a sphere gap of 4 97 cm This indicated that a current of 0 003V So 1 OA 24 472 6 1080 Paok 24 was flowing through the gap Assuming that the same current flows through the current limiting resis tances the voltage loss would be Utoss 6 35 107 A 2 005 10 12 73V 25 This value was considerably less than the voltage loss of 16 kV that occured when applying 100 kV to the arm switch The values read from the multimeter were very small and in order to get comparative data the sphere gap was short circuited and measurements per formed Using the short circuit measurements in table 23 the indicated currents were compared to the calculated currents see table 6 In table 7 the deviation of the measured currents from the calculated current is shown after applying equation 26 Tea culated ere Iculated 4 100 26 deviation E calculate 36 3 RESULTS3 4 Closer examination of the undetermined leakaged current Table 6 Voltages measured with shortcircuited gap and the currents they indicate calculated current uA current through R2 uA current indicated by source LA 0 0 00317 0 29 9 97 10 14 7 35 19 95 19 85 19 79 29 92 29 94 30 38 34 90 34 27 34 87 Table 7 Deviation of measured currents from calculated current Calculated current uA Deviation R2 Deviation Glassman source 0 z
32. determining the output current from the source A cable with a known failure was inserted into the circuit and tested The resistance of the faulty cable was very low compared to the total resistance Following the current through the cable was very similar to the current measured when the circuit consisted only of the resistances In figure 2 the current through a faulty cable is plotted together with the current measured when short circuiting the cable object ent A Measured curr Figure 2 Currents measured in a cable with failure 2 1 General Program control 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING As seen in figure 2 a cable with a failure in the circuit represented a con nection from conductor to shield with no significant increase in the total resistance about 50 MQ 11 This meant that no significant decrease from the short circuit current When introducing a interval from the maximum current this was used as a parameter for detecting a cable failure 2 1 2 Program requirements Testing of a cable object consists of poling a cable object with needle implants for 24 hours so that the slow polarisation mechanisms have decayed When this is done the cable object is subjected to repeated negative rapid voltage surges by bringing the conductor voltage to ground This is done with a fixed time interval This performing of rapid voltage surges takes place until the cable object grow electrical trees and an electrical breakdown
33. e start test part in the flowchart In this section all the necessary input parameters are collected before continuing The realiza tion of this was to use a while loop that runs continuously until a start button is pressed This loop collects the parameters and initiates the main part of the program when the button Start test is pressed see figure 6 It would be convinient only to enter the applied voltage as a parameter for determining the maximum current But as the current limiting resistances can be replaced this is entered in addition to the applied voltage Further the relation in equation 18 was implemented for finding the belonging monitor voltage see figure 7 When the start button is pressed the parameters are collected and a VISA 2 connection to the instrument is created When this is done the program exits the inital loop and the second part of the program is started The second and main section of the program took care of the two loops that can be seen in the flowchart figure 5 In this section groundings and failure checks are performed Groundings are performed by routing a 12 V signal to a relay using the 4x8 matrix switch The realization of the second section and main part of the program was done using two nested loops The outermost is a for loop that is governed by the execution of surges and runs for the number of times set in number of surges at the start of the program The innermost is a while l
34. e electrodes In order to achieve lesser leakage currents three main goals were defined for the new design e larger radii of the electrodes and edges of the conductive materials e larger separation of electrodes in air e larger creep distance in the plate between electrodes To obtain an initial but absolutely not final value of the distance between the electrodes for use in the simulation software the breakdown strength of air was set to 3 2 10 V m This gives the distance U 200 10 V Emar 3 2 106V m d 0 0625m 3 15 2 2 Arm switch 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING A model of two round electrodes were modeled in Femlab The electrodes were aligned vertically and for fixed separation distances S between 0 075 m to 0 3m the radius was varied from 0 01 m to 0 05 m and the maximum electric field was noted down The electric field strength was typically highest at the surface of the high voltage electrode The values are shown in tables 12 19 in appendix B The results from the simulation were plotted and visualized in matlab In figure 10 one sees that for all radii the maximum electric field decreases less as the separation disctance between the electrodes increases x 10 7 T T T T T 85 0 075 4 4 0 1 JAO aeaaee tE es einne Siet Hoef amp S 0 125 4 0 15 i sS 0 175 Bes Ness E ET P PE EST i amp S 0 2
35. elled back through the wires and discarged in the surge arresters rendering the effect of the impedance useless This was solved with placing the impedance between the HV part of the switch and the cable object Additionally on one occasion unexpected disharges occured at a sphere gap with sufficient distance and without the striker extended This was later found to be caused by a strand of hair that was situated on top of the lower sphere The IEEE publication supplied known withstand values for different setups of sphere diameter and sphere separation And the measured withstand voltages of the sphere gap switch deviated no more than 3 58 from the table values in 6 see table 4 Table 4 Measured Gap distance and withstand voltage Arch gap cm Withstand voltage kV 3 77 110 5 02 140 7 35 190 110 106 02 i 106 02 Oe 21 140 137 48 D 100 1 83 22 2 137 48 22 190 191 70 D a U 1 U 2 3 at 00 0 89 23 In order to visualize the measured withstand values was plotted and com pared to the table values using matlab see 24 34 3 RESULTS 3 3 Sphere switch E Withstand values from table Measured withstand values Voltage kV 3 35 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 Gap distance m Figure 24 Measured withstand values and table values The striker mounted in the lower sphere needed a more elaborate control system than provided by
36. ge current was calculated to cause a voltage loss of 12 73 V when applying 100 kV A voltage loss considerably smaller than the 16 kV of voltage loss caused by the armbreaker When the sphere switch was found not to cause any voltage loss a breakdown test was performed on a cable object A needle was inserted leaving 3 mm of healthy insulation between then needle tip and the innermost semiconductor The expected number of voltage surges needed to cause a breakdown was between 60 and 100 The program detected a failure after 70 surges which was a bit lower than expected The low number of surges that was needed is believed to be caused the different setup of the circuit when connecting the sphere switch The up per sphere is connected to the front time resistance with a copper wire of broader cross section and lesser transition resistance than previously used This is believed to provide a more rapid discharge in the insulation around the inserted needle and faster initiation of electrical treeing This may also mean that reproducing old results may be difficult as the setup of the circuit has been changed The circuit was designed from concept and only tested with series of no more than 226 groundings Hence it should be reconstructed in case of extended use in order to remove eventual flaws and secure better long term stability 43 4 DISCUSSION The sphere gap was also found to be sensitive to pollution e g dust and small conductive
37. he experimental circuit 19 2 3 Sphere gap switch 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING has a current limiting resitance and the voltage source is therefore capable to allow such spark This would be a good method for performing rapid voltage surges to the cable objects The IEEE standard for High Voltage Testing 6 defines the standard sphere gap as a peak voltage measuring device constructed and arranged in accor dance with the standards spesifications It consists of two metal spheres of the same diameter D with their shanks operating gear insulating supports supporting frame and leads for connections to the point at which the voltage is to be measured Standard values of sphere diameter D vary from 62 5 mm to 2000 mm The spacing between the spheres is designated as S and varies from 5 mm to 2000 mm The voltages to be measured with these configurations vary from 69 5 kV to 2490 kV see table 8 in 6 Spheres with a diameter of 250 mm were available at the Elkraft engineering workshop The Glassman HV source provides a dc voltage of up to 200 kV For the given sphere diameter within this voltage range the gap distances varies from 25 mm to 80 mm see table 1 Table 1 Values of disruptive discharge voltages valid for direct voltages of either polarity From 6 Sphere gap spacing mm Voltage kV peak 25 72 5 30 86 0 35 40 112 45 50 137 55 60 161 62 5 70 184 80 206 The point on the t
38. ircuit causing voltage losses 45 6 LIST OF DEVICES 6 List of devices The following devices where used in the project Table 10 List of devices Device number Device B02 0313 B2 321 G04 0026 G05 0101 503 0356 B01 0491 SEFAS 104 0402 H01 0094 K3 083 K3 68 Mascot 0 30V voltage source Glassman high voltage source Yokogawa Oscilloscope HP Agilent Datalogger Fluke Multimeter Skilletrafo Voltagedivider Megger 100 pF capasitor 100 pF capasitor 46 REFERENCES REFERENCES References 11 Agilent Technoligies Agilent 34970A Data Acquisition Switch Unit Users Guide third edition 1999 Dr B R Andersen editor HVDC transmission Opportunities and challenges Andersen Power Electronic Solutions Ltd UK 2006 J Kuffel E Kuffel W S Zaengl High Voltage Engineering Fundamen tals Newnes second edition 2000 Erling Ilstand and Mildrid Selsjord DC Treeing and Breakdown of XLPE Insulation during Rapid Voltage Grounding Technical report Norwegian University of Science and Technology 2005 Glassman high voltage inc Instruction manual PG series third edition The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IEEE Standard Techniques for High Voltage Testing 1995 Mildrid Selsjord and Erling Ildstad Electrical Treeing Caused by Rapid DC Voltage Grounding of XLPE Cable Insulation Technical report SINTEF Energy Research Sem S landsvei 11 746
39. n table 1 and the maximum current at failure would then be 60 10 V baec Be 16 300 100 Su 16 The belonging monitor voltage the failure parameter was found applying the relation in equation 18 Um 13787 29 92uA 0 01 0 4226V 17 This value was used as the monitor voltage indicating failure and entered into the program The rest of the default values was not altered 28 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 4 Testing A needle was inserted into the insulation of the cable object The cable object was then connected to the sphere switch in series with a resistance of 93 3 Q This resistance was placed in the circuit in order to control the front time of the grounding pulse After poling the cable object was subjected to rapid voltage surges using the sphere switch and the program created in labview 29 3 RESULTS 3 Results 3 1 Program The measured monitor voltage was plottet against the calculated current in the circuit using Matlab see figure 21 The regression tool in Matlab yielded a linear relation between monitor voltage and output current found in equation 18 Monitor voltage V 0 0 5 1 1 5 2 2 5 3 35 4 45 Current A 5 Figure 21 Monitor voltage versus output current Um I 13787 I 0 01 V 18 For some of the applied voltages the voltage over the resistance of 472 6 kQ was measured and the belonging current was found Also the deviation from the calculated current in table
40. neral Program control Labview software was used to control and monitor the applying of rapid voltage surges The name is short for Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Engineering Workbench and is widely used for data acquisition instrument control and industrial automation It also features a platform for a visual dataflow programming language similar to Matlab s simulink The instrument chosen for controlling the test was a HP Agilent 34970A data acquisition switch unit The intrument can communicate with a computer using either a GPIB or RS 232 interface 1 In addition the instrument is extensible with up to three plugin modules The two modules that were chosen was a 20 channel armature multiplexer and a 4x8 two wire matrix switch This enabled the control system to both measure voltages from up to 20 inputs and perform any possible connection at 32 crosspoints in the matrix switch 2 1 1 Measuring current As surges are applied an eletrical tree will form from contaminations in the cable insulation Such contaminations will enhance the electric field causing partial discharges and a failure will occur When this failure occurs a conductive breakdown channel will appear and a significantly larger current will flow through the circuit In order to detect these failures a spesific voltage given from the glassman HV source was used the monitor voltage The user manual 5 claims that this monitor voltage is a 0 10 V signal in dire
41. ng a imitated value instead of the real measurement of the monitor voltage When the program itself worked according to the specitications the communication with the instrument was tested 14 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 2 Arm switch In order to test the voltage measured from the Agilent instrument a variable low voltage source that could deliver up to 30 V was used to imitate the monitor voltage The part of the program that checked for failure was finally tested against the glassman voltage source and a cable with a failure 2 2 Arm switch A previously used circuit breaker was found to have leakage currents when applying higher voltages These leakage currents set up a significant voltage over the current limiting resistances As the applied voltage over the switch increased the leakage current and hence the voltage over the resistances increased The voltage over the cable object never reached more than about 40 kV see 11 In order to remove this effect of voltage loss the arm switch was to be modified into a switch with lesser leakage currents 2 2 1 Design The initial design was performed with FEMLAB MATLAB software The original switch consisted of a fibreglass plate that held the two electrodes in place An arm was moved between the electrodes using an actuating coil The electrodes themselves had a radius of about 0 5cm This caused a divergent electric field and a region with high electric stress at the surface of th
42. of 75 V The multiplexer can withstand voltages up to 300V and it is therefore assumed able to handle transients up to 75 V The output of the circuit was also protected with surge arresters The pro tection level of 3 S4 and S5 was set to 225 V enough to allow the voltage over the charged capacitors to operate the coil surrounding the striker but also protecting the circuit from incoming overvoltages 25 2 4 Testing 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 4 Testing 2 4 1 Testing of withstand values A simple test of the withstand values for the sphere gap was performed According to table 1 the gap distance varies between 2 5 cm and 8 0 cm for the voltages available from the HV source The sphere gap were adjusted to three different distances within this range 3 77 cm 5 02 cm and 7 35 cm The voltage was then raised until a spark occured in the gap and noted down see table 4 Using the values in 6 the breakdown values corresponding to the distances was found using linear interpolation for a point x y at a straight line between to points o yo and x1 y1 the linear relation yields Y Yo T Xo Y Yo _ T To is 7 For each gap distance the a from the table was calculated 3 77 3 5 _ _ 0 54 8 oe hie 5 8 5 02 5 0 Qs 0 04 9 5 5 5 0 7 35 7 0 __ 0 70 10 aa e As o Equation 7 was rewritten into Yy yo a y Yo 11 Using these
43. oop that is governed by the measurements performed between the surges When in the while loop the program will measure the monitorvoltage using the 20 channel multiplexer and use this to check for cable failure This will Virtual Instrument Software Architecture 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 1 General Program control Figure 5 Flowchart for the control program 9 2 1 General Program control 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING While Loop waiting for start button fosied tae MIE fp gt 1 gt esistance Ohm 050 0 01 Reset rE Serial Port Configuration Resolution S Defaulp ILO co B Range S Auto Lo anu Bcanlist Measure ab lt 1 Ecanlist switch ia a os Eo Ecanlist shutdown Gta Ecanlist shunt protection ia Figure 6 Start loop of the program Figure 7 Labview implementation of equation 18 10 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 1 General Program control be done with a fixed interval until it is time to perform the next grounding The time between each measurement is set from measure interval at the front panel of the program The currents indicated by the measured monitor voltage is displayed as a graph in the rigth section of the frontpanel If a failure is detected the program will close the breaker protecting the pd shunt open the latch show a message dialog and stop When the surge interval has elapsed and no failure has been detected the program exits the
44. phere switch 50 ill LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF FIGURES List of Figures CON DOK WHF Experimental circuit for use in testing 2 Currents measured in a cable with failure ooa 5 ABC equvalent for measuring partial discharges 7 Shunt for measuring partial discharges f Flowchart for the control program 9 Start loop of the program aoao dow w amp dfolw 2 10 Labview implementation of equation 18 10 Sequence of closing and opening the breakers 11 Front panel of the program aooaa aa a 12 Electric field versus radii of electrodes 16 Electric field versus separation distance 17 Contour of electric field for radius and separation distance 17 Electric field between electrodes 004 18 Supportplate for switch electrodes 19 IEEE standard for vertical sphere gap 21 Electric potential when needle strikes 22 Electric field strength when needle strikes 23 Sphere gap arrangement 0000 eae 24 Control circuit tor needle dia ace he a He dae Gok 24 Circuit for measuring current through sphere gap 28 Monitor voltage versus output current 30 Currents with and without armbreaker in circuit 32 Calculated voltage loss with armbreaker in circuit 33 Measured withstand values and table values 35 Breakdown
45. rent without any equipment connected current A 0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2 applied voltage W x 10 Figure 27 Measured current with no equipment connected 39 3 4 Closer examination of the undetermined leakaged current8 RESULTS currents when subjected to voltage The armswitch had significant leakage currents that corresponded only to the increase in monitor voltage but not the total current indicated by the monitor voltage After a more thorough inspection of the circuit schematics of the voltage source a voltage divider was found to be present inside the source as in figure 28 The purpose of this voltage divider was to derive a feedback signal for monitoring the real output voltage Figure 28 Inner resistance of source The actual value of the resistance in the divider was not described in the manual However the manual stated that a signal varying from 0 V to 10 V is in direct proportion to the output current Assuming that a monitor voltage of 0 V indicates no current and a moni tor voltage of 10 V indicates the rated current of 1 mA as in figure 29 the assumed relation between monitor voltage and output current was described as in equation 27 Um I 0 001 2f 10 0 00 27 In order to determine the value of R1 figure 28 the values in table 23 was used except the measurement for zero applied voltage These measurements were done with the known R2 equal to 2 0054726 GQ and the cont
46. rimental circuit the student shall develop an automated system that will replace the manual performing of subsequent rapid voltage surges and detecting cable failures Assignment given 15 January 2007 Supervisor Erling Ildstad ELKRAFT Summary This report aims to describe the work done in order to develop and create a solution for automation of failure detection and performance of rapid voltage surges The automated system was developed with basis in the experimental circuit developed at NINU SINTEF The circuit relied on manually perform ing rapid voltage surges and detecting cable failure Meaning that inequality in the performance of each grounding may introduce unknow variables The realized automation system consisted of two parts The first part was a switch that was able to withstand the voltage applied and able to perform the rapid voltage surges The second part was a program that controlled the switch and regularly monitored the condition of the cable object indicating failure when electrical treeing had caused breakdown in the cable insulation Two solutions for switches were examined One switch utilized an arm mov ing between two electrodes for grounding the objects using textile bakelite as insulation and support frame for the electrodes The other switch utilized a sphere gap with air as insulation and an electric field strength close to the breakdown strengt of the air Groundings in the sphere gap switch were per fo
47. rmed using a striker to greatly enhance the electric field and cause a spark between the spheres causing a transition from a highly insulating state to a highly conductive state As the experimental circuit had a large current limiting resistance the ex perimental circuit was sensitive to leakage currents as they set up a voltage over the resistance instead of the cable objects Leakage currents in the switches were examined and it was found that the arm switch had leakage current unacceptable for use in the experiment Similarly leakage currents in the sphere gap switch were examined and found to be acceptable for use in the experiment The behaviour of cable objects that due to electrical treeing had developed insulation failure was examined and measurement parameters for detecting cable failure were found These parameters were implemented using LabView as a platform for creating a a control program and interface to the instruments connected to the switch Having fully created the automated system the system was used in testing cable objects and was found able to inflict and detect a cable failure due to electrical treeing However compared to previous results a lower number of groundings was needed which may indicate that the introduction of the sphere gap switch has altered the circuit in a manner such that new results will differ from former results CONTENTS CONTENTS Contents 1 Introduction 1 1 1 Sample and electrode
48. rogram states that a failure has occured Default is set to 0 9 Resolution This is the instrument resolution for voltage measurements De fault is set to the default setting of the instrument Range This is the instrument range for voltage measurements Default is set to Auto N averaging To avoid beeing mislead by misreadings one can average over the last measurements in order to better determine a failure When averaging is used the average value has to be larger than the product of the fault interval and the predicted monitor voltage By default the five last measurements are averaged While loop iteration This is the counter for the while loop and displays the current iteration For loop iteration This is the counter for the for loop and displays the current iteration Overall progress This is a progress bar that displays the progress of the test Stop test This is a button that stops the test It is recommended to use this in order to perform the exiting routines Test started This is an indicator that shows whether the test has started Failure detected This is an indicator that shows whether a failure has been detected Test stopped This is an indicator that show whether the test has stopped Plot area This is a graph that displays the measurements of the monitor voltage The same values are saved to the xmI file 2 1 4 Testing of the program During the design process the program was continuously tested by usi
49. rol mea surement using the multimeter Knowing the current I2 that flows through R2 the current I1 can be determined subtracting I2 from the assumed total current 4 Ip I2 And further the resistance of the voltage divider can be found using Ohms law on I1 and the applied voltage see table 8 40 RESULTS3 4 Closer examination of the undetermined leakaged current I A Um V Figure 29 Relation between monitor voltage and output current Table 8 Calculated current and resistance in voltage divider UO kV I0 microampere T2 microampere T1 microampere R GOhm 20 11 6 9 97 1 63 12 27 40 28 5 19 95 8 55 4 68 60 43 1 29 92 13 18 4 55 70 49 3 34 90 14 4 4 86 Al 3 4 Closer examination of the undetermined leakaged current8 RESULTS When disregarding the first calculated resistance the average resistance of R1 was calculated to be 4 68 4 55 4 86 10 Raverage l 2 Q 4 6966 10 Q x 4 70 10 Q 28 This value of R1 was found using measurements when equipement was con nected to the source These values was further tested using the values from table 3 when no equipment was connected rendering R2 as a open circuit It was then assumed that all the current indicated by the source was flowing through the calculated resistance R1 In table 9 the assumed current found using equation 27 Ila was compared to the current calculated using Ohms law with the applied voltage
50. tafields in figure 9 is explained as follows VISA resource name This is the field for specifying the GPIB adress for the instrument This value must be the same as the value set at the instrument as there can be several instruments connected to the same cable Default GPIB channel is set to 9 Reset This is an option whether to reset the instrument when connecting to it Default is Don t reset Note that this may cause problems if the latch is connected Serial Port Configuration This is the configuration when using a RS232 connection instead of a GPIB connection Default values are set Last error out This is a message box that displays the last error message generated By default no errors have occured and the box is empty 12 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 1 General Program control In case a error has occured the program should be restarted in order to clear errors and measurement data Number of surges This is the desired number of surges that is to be per formed Default is set to a high number 150000 surges Measure interval This is the interval between each check for failure De fault is set to 2000 ms Surge interval This is the interval between each voltage surge Default is set to 60 s Surge wait period When the cable has been subjected to a grounding a higher current will flow in order for the cable to recharge Measuring the current in this period may falsely indicate a failure The wait period is the time
51. tch Arm attachment lco2 and ground connection Figure 14 Supportplate for switch electrodes 2 3 Sphere gap switch As the arm switch had several divergent fields that were hard to control a so lution with a more homogenous field distribution was needed Kuffel et al 3 discusses several arrangements for reliably measuring high voltages Mainly the rod rod gap and the sphere gap are recommended as their reliabilities are best confirmed Rod gaps have earlier been used for for the measurement of impulse volt ages but because of the large scatter of the disruptive discharge voltage and the uncertainties of the strong influence of the humidity they are no longer allowed to be used as standard measuring devices A sphere gap was therefore preferred as limitation in the gap distance pro vides a homogenous field distribution between the spheres so that no predis charge or corona appears before breakdown The measuring capability of the sphere gap was not to be used but the ability to apply maximum voltage before breakdown Two methods of modifying a sphere gap into a three electrode spark gap has been described by Osmokrovic et al 9 but required a relatively complex arrangement A a simpler mechanism of extending the trigger electrode into the sphere gap would provide similar effect as the electric field is rapidly increased above withstand level A complete short circuit is the result of a spark T
52. wo spheres that are closest to each other are called spark ing points and is where the breakdown occurs In practice the disruptive discharge may occur between other neighbouring points But in the realizede switch a spark will be initiated by rapidly increasing the electric field by moving a striker with a relatively small radius into the electric field between the spheres 20 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING 2 3 Sphere gap switch An arrangement which is typical of sphere gaps with a vertical axis is shown in figure 15 One sphere shall preferably be connected directly to ground but it may be connected through a resistance for special purposes such as measuring the current when sparks occur In the interests of personnel and equipment safety such resistances should be of very low values Figure 15 IEEE standard for vertical sphere gap 2 3 1 Design and simulation The sphere gap arrangement was drawn and simulated with Comsol Femlab software The model was drawn with the striker pin extended from the lower sphere into the sphere gap The model was solved and the electric field distribution and the electric potential distribution was found for a case where 86 kV were subjected to a sphere gap distance of 30 mm according to table 1 see figure 16 It was found that the electric field strength was greatly enhanced at the tip 21 2 3 Sphere gap switch 2 DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING im Surface Electric potential V Contour Electric

Download Pdf Manuals

image

Related Search

Related Contents

DESIGN OF AN AUTOPILOT FOR SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL  Linksys 7920 IP Phone User Manual  Metrologic MS9540 VoyagerCG  Heartland Refrigerator HCFDR20 User's Manual    Toshiba 200L Copier User Manual  Les poux sont parmi nous !  Samsung MW82W Bruksanvisning  

Copyright © All rights reserved.
Failed to retrieve file